Prosecution Insights
Last updated: October 02, 2026
Application No. 18/867,640

METHOD AND APPARATUS FOR TRANSMITTING/RECEIVING WIRELESS SIGNAL IN WIRELESS COMMUNICATION SYSTEM

Non-Final OA §103
Filed
Nov 20, 2024
Priority
Jul 05, 2022 — RE 10-2022-0082183 +1 more
Examiner
MEJIA, ANTHONY
Art Unit
Tech Center
Assignee
LG Electronics Inc.
OA Round
1 (Non-Final)
84%
Grant Probability
Favorable
1-2
OA Rounds
1y 0m
Est. Remaining
99%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 84% — above average
84%
Career Allowance Rate
615 granted / 735 resolved
+23.7% vs TC avg
Strong +18% interview lift
Without
With
+18.2%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
2y 11m
Avg Prosecution
15 currently pending
Career history
742
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
15.1%
-24.9% vs TC avg
§103
48.7%
+8.7% vs TC avg
§102
17.1%
-22.9% vs TC avg
§112
10.3%
-29.7% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 735 resolved cases

Office Action

§103
DETAILED ACTION Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . Priority Acknowledgment is made of applicant’s claim for foreign priority under 35 U.S.C. 119 (a)-(d). The certified copy has been filed in parent Application No. KR10-2022-0082183, filed on 05 July 2022. Allowable Subject Matter Claim 4 is objected to as being dependent upon a rejected base claim but would be allowable if rewritten in independent form including all of the limitations of the base claim and any intervening claims. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 103 In the event the determination of the status of the application as subject to AIA 35 U.S.C. 102 and 103 (or as subject to pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 102 and 103) is incorrect, any correction of the statutory basis (i.e., changing from AIA to pre-AIA ) for the rejection will not be considered a new ground of rejection if the prior art relied upon, and the rationale supporting the rejection, would be the same under either status. The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 103 which forms the basis for all obviousness rejections set forth in this Office action: A patent for a claimed invention may not be obtained, notwithstanding that the claimed invention is not identically disclosed as set forth in section 102, if the differences between the claimed invention and the prior art are such that the claimed invention as a whole would have been obvious before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to a person having ordinary skill in the art to which the claimed invention pertains. Patentability shall not be negated by the manner in which the invention was made. Claims 1-3 and 5-15 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over Xu et al. (EP 3 562 182 A1) (hereinafter as Xu) and in further view of Pan et al. (US 11,601,997 B1) (hereinafter as Pan). Regarding Claim 1, Xu teaches a method of configuring multiple wireless communication paths performed by a first user equipment (UE) in a wireless communication system, the method comprising: performing a procedure for configuring a direct path connected to a network (UE establishes a direct connection to a relay UE, pars [0089-0100]); receiving, in a radio resource control (RRC) connected state in which the direct path is configured, configuration information regarding an indirect path between the first UE and the network (the relay UE performs configutation based on content in the RRC. pars [0089-0100]); and receiving a sidelink message from a second UE configured as a relay UE for the indirect path (the Remote UE and the Relay UE may connect to each other by using a sidelink, pars [0089-0100]). Xu does not explicitly teach wherein, based on failure information being included in the sidelink message from the second UE, the first UE performs bearer suspension for a first bearer related to the indirect path. However, Pan in a similar field of endeavor discloses a method and apparatus for a remote UE to support direct and indirect communication path switching in a wireless communication system including teach wherein, based on failure information being included in the sidelink message from the second UE, the first UE performs bearer suspension for a first bearer related to the indirect path (col.15, step 8, lines 36-46, UE suspends data transmission via relay link in data path switching after RRC, and reporting that a sidelink radio link failure or sidelink RRC reconfiguration has been detected, col.18, lines 7-9, switching from a direct path to in,direct path, 4.5.4.2, col.18, lines 47-52, and RRC setup includes establishing a radio bearer, col. 18, lines 15-21). It would have been obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to utilize the teachings of Pan in Xu to support direct and indirect communication path switching. One of ordinary skill in the art before the effective filing date of the claimed invention would have been motivated to combine the teachings of Xu/Pan to improve multipath services. Regarding Claim 2. Xu/Pan teach the method of claim 1, wherein the failure information is related to configuration failure for the indirect path (Pan: reporting that a sidelink radio link failure or sidelink RRC reconfiguration has been detected, col.18, lines 7-9, switching from a direct path to indirect path, 4.5.4.2, col.18, lines 47-52). It would have been obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to utilize the teachings of Pan in Xu to support direct and indirect communication path switching. One of ordinary skill in the art before the effective filing date of the claimed invention would have been motivated to combine the teachings of Xu/Pan to improve multipath services. Regarding Claim 3. Xu/Pan teach the method of claim 1, wherein the first bearer is an indirect bearer (Xu: discusses connecting directly and indirectly connecting the UE to a path, pars [0080-0081] and par [0011] discussed mapping a first bearer configuration to a second bearer configuration). Regarding Claim 5. Xu/Pan teach the method of claim 1, further comprising: performing an RRC re-establishment procedure based on the failure information being included in the sidelink message (Pan: a local ID to identify the remote UE can be included in a header and including in the reconfiguration message, col. 24, lines 26-40). It would have been obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to utilize the teachings of Pan in Xu to support direct and indirect communication path switching. One of ordinary skill in the art before the effective filing date of the claimed invention would have been motivated to combine the teachings of Xu/Pan to improve multipath services. Regarding Claim 6. Xu/Pan teach the method of claim 1, wherein the sidelink message is directly received from the second UE through a sidelink interface between the first UE and the second UE (relay UE), (Xu: par [0077] discloses direct path and par [0089] discloses sidelink communication). Regarding Claim 7. Xu/Pan teach the method of claim 1, wherein the sidelink interface between the first UE and the second UE, is released based on the failure information being included in the sidelink message (Pan: reporting that a sidelink radio link failure or sidelink RRC reconfiguration has been detected, col.18, lines 7-9, switching from a direct path to indirect path, 4.5.4.2, col.18, lines 47-52). It would have been obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to utilize the teachings of Pan in Xu to support direct and indirect communication path switching. One of ordinary skill in the art before the effective filing date of the claimed invention would have been motivated to combine the teachings of Xu/Pan to improve multipath services. Regarding Claim 8. Xu/Pan teach the method of claim 1, wherein the sidelink message includes information indicating that the sidelink message is related to multi-path configuration of the first UE (Pan: report includes information for path switching from direct to indirect communication. The remote UE could receive a RRCReconfiguration message indicating the target relay UE for path switch, col.26, lines 24-67, a UE may establish multiple PC5 unicast links with a peer UE, col.6, lines 56-60). It would have been obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to utilize the teachings of Pan in Xu to support direct and indirect communication path switching. One of ordinary skill in the art before the effective filing date of the claimed invention would have been motivated to combine the teachings of Xu/Pan to improve multipath services. Regarding Claim 9. Xu/Pan teach the method of claim 1, further comprising: reporting, to the network through the direct path, configuration failure for the indirect path based on the failure information being included in the sidelink message (Pan: reporting that a sidelink radio link failure or sidelink RRC reconfiguration has been detected, col.18, lines 7-9, switching from a direct path to indirect path, 4.5.4.2, col.18, lines 47-52). It would have been obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to utilize the teachings of Pan in Xu to support direct and indirect communication path switching. One of ordinary skill in the art before the effective filing date of the claimed invention would have been motivated to combine the teachings of Xu/Pan to improve multipath services. Regarding Claim 10. Xu/Pan teach the method of claim 1, wherein the first UE operates as a remote UE in the indirect path (Xu: par [0077] discloses remote UE communication in indirect path). Regarding Claim 11, this non-transitory computer-readable medium claim comprises limitations substantially the same, as those discussed in claim 1 above, same rationale of rejection is applicable (Xu: pars [0391-0397]) further disclose a storage medium). Regarding Claim 12, this apparatus (device) claim comprises limitations substantially the same, as those discussed in claim 1 above, same rationale of rejection is applicable (Xu: pars [0391-0397] further disclose processor and memory). Regarding 13. Xu/Pan teach the device of claim 12, further comprising: a transceiver configured to transmit or receive a signal under control of the processor (Xu: par [0356]). Regarding 14. Xu/Pan teach the device of claim 12, wherein the device is an application-specific integrated circuit (ASIC) or a digital signal processor (Xu: par [0355]). Regarding 15. Xu/Pan teach the device of claim 12, wherein the device is a user equipment (UE) operating in a 3rd generation partnership project (3GPP) based wireless communication system (Xu: par [0126]). Conclusion Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to ANTHONY MEJIA whose telephone number is (571)270-3630. The examiner can normally be reached Monday-Friday 10:30 AM-6:30 PM EST. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, CHRISTOPHER PARRY can be reached at (571)272-8328. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /ANTHONY MEJIA/Primary Examiner, Art Unit 2451
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Nov 20, 2024
Application Filed
Sep 15, 2026
Non-Final Rejection mailed — §103 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12750911
METHOD AND APPARATUS FOR PERFORMING UPLINK TRANSMISSION BASED ON CONFIGURED GRANT IN WIRELESS COMMUNICATION SYSTEM
3y 0m to grant Granted Sep 29, 2026
Patent 12739164
HIGH AVAILABILITY OF HOST DATA PATH WITH TUNNELING IN SOFTWARE DEFINED NETWORKS
2y 11m to grant Granted Sep 15, 2026
Patent 12739928
Wireless Device, Network Node and Methods Performed Thereby for Handling Transmission of Data
2y 2m to grant Granted Sep 15, 2026
Patent 12737157
INTERCONNECTION PLATFORM FOR REAL-TIME CONFIGURATION AND MANAGEMENT OF A CLOUD-BASED SERVICES EXCHANGE
1y 8m to grant Granted Sep 15, 2026
Patent 12732255
CONFIGURATION FOR TIMING OF BEAM MANAGEMENT WITH MECHANICAL DISPLACEMENT OF ANTENNA PANELS IN A CUSTOMER PREMISES EQUIPMENT
2y 7m to grant Granted Sep 08, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

Strategy Recommendation AI-generated — please review before filing

Get a prosecution strategy drawn from examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Typically takes 5-10 seconds — AI-generated, attorney review required before filing

Prosecution Projections

1-2
Expected OA Rounds
84%
Grant Probability
99%
With Interview (+18.2%)
2y 11m (~1y 0m remaining)
Median Time to Grant
Low
PTA Risk
Based on 735 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allowance rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month