Prosecution Insights
Last updated: July 17, 2026
Application No. 18/867,799

SYSTEM FOR PROVIDING PUTTING INFORMATION, METHOD FOR PROVIDING PUTTING INFORMATION AND METHOD FOR CONTROLLING USER TERMINAL

Non-Final OA §102§103
Filed
Nov 20, 2024
Priority
May 25, 2022 — RE 10-2022-0064150 +1 more
Examiner
BOYD, ALEXANDER L
Art Unit
2424
Tech Center
2400 — Computer Networks
Assignee
Golfzon Co. Ltd.
OA Round
1 (Non-Final)
74%
Grant Probability
Favorable
1-2
OA Rounds
7m
Est. Remaining
98%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 74% — above average
74%
Career Allowance Rate
230 granted / 309 resolved
+16.4% vs TC avg
Strong +23% interview lift
Without
With
+23.3%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
2y 3m
Avg Prosecution
29 currently pending
Career history
340
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
0.5%
-39.5% vs TC avg
§103
94.1%
+54.1% vs TC avg
§102
0.9%
-39.1% vs TC avg
§112
2.4%
-37.6% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 309 resolved cases

Office Action

§102 §103
DETAILED ACTION Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . Information Disclosure Statement The information disclosure statement (IDS) submitted on 11/20/2024 is in compliance with the provisions of 37 CFR 1.97. Accordingly, the information disclosure statement is being considered by the examiner. Preliminary Amendment The preliminary amendment of 11/20/2024 has been entered. Claim Status Claims 1-5, 7-12, and 14 are pending in this Office Action. Claims 6 and 13 are cancelled. Claim Objections Claims 1, 7, and 14 are objected to because of the following informalities: In each of claims 1, 7, and 14, at line 1, “a user who play golf” should be replaced with “a user who plays golf” to correct grammar. Appropriate correction is required. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 102 The following is a quotation of the appropriate paragraphs of 35 U.S.C. 102 that form the basis for the rejections under this section made in this Office action: A person shall be entitled to a patent unless – (a)(1) the claimed invention was patented, described in a printed publication, or in public use, on sale, or otherwise available to the public before the effective filing date of the claimed invention. Claims 1-3, 7-10, and 14 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 102(a)(1) as being anticipated by Lee et al. (KR 2021-0016195). Regarding claim 1, Lee teaches: A method for providing putting information to a user who play golf on a golf course to guide putting play through a user terminal by a server [providing putting guide information to the user who plays golf (page 1 and 7)], the method comprising: transmitting green terrain information about a real green where the user plays putting to the user terminal connected to the server [a central server provides information to the mobile device including putting terrain for the golf course the user is currently playing (page 7-8, Fig. 10-16)] determining a ball position on a virtual green which is generated based on the green terrain information corresponding to a position of a golf ball on the real green [determining a current position of the golf ball and displaying the current position on the augmented reality or virtual image (page 6-7 and 9, Fig. 11-12)], and generating putting information including a distance between the golf ball and a hole-cup on the real green and a green lie using the determined ball position and a cup position on the virtual green corresponding to a position of the hole-cup on the real green by the user's manipulation through a putting interface of the user terminal for processing to generate the putting information [the user manipulates the region display image on the mobile device to specify a region to be displayed or adjust the position or size of an area display image (page 4-5). Providing putting information including a current position of a golf ball and a distance to a hole cup determined based on actual location of the cup from a database (page 9, Fig. 17) and topography or slope of the terrain between the ball and the cup (page 6-7, Fig. 11-15)] and generating putting guide information including at least one of a putting expected path and a putting direction from the ball position to the cup position on the virtual green using the generated putting information so that the putting guide information is provided through the putting interface [providing information for user convenience, such as a putting direction or a putting strength based on the terrain, such as an incline on the terrain (page 7-9, Fig. 14-15 and 18)]. Regarding claim 2, Lee teaches the method of claim 1; Lee further teaches: the generating putting information includes: receiving a position of the user terminal by a GPS module of the user terminal as the user manipulates through the putting interface at a location adjacent to the golf ball placed on the real green; determining the received position of the user terminal as the ball position on the virtual green [determining location of the mobile device 10 using GPS as the mobile device is held by the user in proximity to the golf ball, the location of the golf ball can be determined from the location of the mobile device 10 (page 8-9)] and generating information on the distance and slope from the ball position to the cup position as the putting information [determining distance information or putting information on a golf course based on the GPS location of the golf ball and course information from the database (page 9, Fig. 17) and information such as elevation or slope of the corresponding terrain on the terrain on which the golf ball is placed may be provided in addition (page 6-8, Fig. 11-15)]. Regarding claim 3, Lee teaches the method of claim 1; Lee further teaches: the putting interface is configured to capture and display the golf ball and the hole-cup on the real green by a camera of the user terminal [the camera captures the golf ball and cup on the green (page 3-5, Fig. 17-18)], and to display a ball position alignment portion so that the captured golf ball can be aligned at a predetermined position on the putting interface [the user can manipulate the display area to change the viewing perspective or angle, thus aligning the ball to a desired position (page 5, Fig. 17-18)], and wherein the generating putting information includes: determining the ball position on the virtual green using a position of the user terminal by a GPS module of the user terminal, a cup position on the virtual green, and a positional relationship between the golf ball and the hole-cup aligned through the putting interface as the user aligns the golf ball with the hole-cup on the putting interface [determining location of the mobile device 10 using GPS as the mobile device is held by the user in proximity to the golf ball, the location of the golf ball can be determined from the location of the mobile device 10. Providing putting information including a current position of a golf ball and a distance to a hole cup determined based on actual location of the cup from a database (page 8-9, Fig. 17)] and generating information on the distance and slope from the ball position to the cup position as the putting information [determining distance information or putting information on a golf course based on the GPS location of the golf ball and course information from the database (page 9, Fig. 17) and information such as elevation or slope of the corresponding terrain on the terrain on which the golf ball is placed may be provided in addition (page 6-8, Fig. 11-15)]. Regarding claim 7, claim 7 is rejected for the same reasons given in the above rejection of claim 1. Regarding claim 8, claim 8 is rejected for the same reasons given in the above rejection of claim 2. Regarding claim 9, claim 9 is rejected for the same reasons given in the above rejection of claim 3. Regarding claim 10, Lee teaches the method of claim 7; Lee further teaches: the displaying putting guide information includes: when a putting direction starting from the ball position based on the green lie between the ball position and the cup position on the virtual green is determined, displaying a line of the putting direction, which is a straight line from the ball position to a putting aiming point in the putting direction, on the putting interface as the putting guide [providing information for user convenience, such as a putting direction or a putting strength based on the terrain, such as an incline on the terrain, which may be displaying as a straight line with an arrow to a point (page 7-9, Fig. 14-15 and 18)]. Regarding claim 14, Lee teaches: A system for providing putting information to a user who play golf on a golf course to guide putting play through a user terminal [a system for providing putting guide information to a user playing golf (page 8-9, Fig. 16)], the system comprising: a database that stores green terrain information about a green of each hole in the golf course [database stores all of the golf course information (page 8-9)] and a server that communicates with the user terminal through network connection [central server 500 communicates with mobile device 100 through a network (page 8, Fig. 16)], wherein the server extracts green terrain information about the green of the hole in which the user is playing from the database and transmits the extracted information to the user terminal [providing information from the database to the mobile device including putting terrain for the golf course the user is currently playing (page 7-8, Fig. 10-16)], and wherein the server generates putting information for guiding the user's putting play based on a virtual green generated by the extracted green terrain information and provides the generated information to the user through the user terminal, wherein the server is configured to process: determining a ball position on a virtual green which is generated based on the green terrain information corresponding to a position of a golf ball on the green on which the user is playing by the user's manipulation through a putting interface of the user terminal for processing to generate the putting information including a distance between the golf ball and a hole-cup on the real green and a green lie, generating the putting information using the determined ball position and a cup position on the virtual green corresponding to a position of a hole-cup on the green [providing putting information including determining a current position of the golf ball and displaying the current position on the augmented reality or virtual image (page 6-7 and 9, Fig. 11-12). the user manipulates the region display image on the mobile device to specify a region to be displayed or adjust the position or size of an area display image (page 4-5). Providing putting information including a current position of a golf ball and a distance to a hole cup determined based on actual location of the cup from a database (page 9, Fig. 17) and topography or slope of the terrain between the ball and the cup (page 6-7, Fig. 11-15)] and generating putting guide information including at least one of a putting expected path and a putting direction from the ball position to the cup position on the virtual green using the generated putting information so that the putting guide information is provided through the putting interface [providing information for user convenience, such as a putting direction or a putting strength based on the terrain, such as an incline on the terrain (page 7-9, Fig. 14-15 and 18)]. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 103 The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 103 which forms the basis for all obviousness rejections set forth in this Office action: A patent for a claimed invention may not be obtained, notwithstanding that the claimed invention is not identically disclosed as set forth in section 102, if the differences between the claimed invention and the prior art are such that the claimed invention as a whole would have been obvious before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to a person having ordinary skill in the art to which the claimed invention pertains. Patentability shall not be negated by the manner in which the invention was made. Claims 4 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over Lee et al. (KR 2021-0016195) in view of Kim et al. (KR 10-2202594). Regarding claim 4, Lee teaches the method of claim 1; Lee further teaches: the generating putting guide information so that the putting guide information is provided through the putting interface includes: determining a putting direction starting from the ball position based on the green lie between the ball position and the cup position on the virtual green [providing information for user convenience, such as a putting direction or a putting strength based on the terrain, such as an incline on the terrain (page 7-9, Fig. 14-15 and 18)]. While Lee discloses the direction and strength to hit the ball for it to go in the cup, Lee does not explicitly disclose: determining a path from the ball position to the cup position formed by the green lie if the golf ball is putted from the ball position to the putting direction as a putting expected path. Kim teaches: determining a path from the ball position to the cup position formed by the green lie if the golf ball is putted from the ball position to the putting direction as a putting expected path [determining a putting path in the direction between the ball and the hole according to the green conditions, such as slope or degree of inclination (page 6-8, Fig. 4-8)]. It would have been obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art, having the teachings of Lee and Kim before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to modify the method of Lee by incorporating determining a path from the ball position to the cup position formed by the green lie if the golf ball is putted from the ball position to the putting direction as a putting expected path as disclosed by Kim. The motivation for doing so would have been to show the golfer a trajectory of putting the ball so they can accurately aim for the cup (Kim – page 2-3 and Fig. 5-8). Therefore, it would have been obvious to combine the teachings of Lee and Kim to obtain the invention as specified in the instant claim. Regarding claim 5, Lee and Kim teach the method of claim 4; Kim further teaches: determining a putting aiming point in the determined putting direction [aiming point (page 4 and 6-8, Fig. 4-8)] and determining a directional distance, which is a distance from the cup position to the putting aiming point [aiming point distance (page 4, 6, and 8, Fig. 6-8)]. Regarding claim 11, Lee teaches the method of claim 7; Lee further teaches: the displaying putting guide information includes: when a putting direction starting from the ball position based on the green lie between the ball position and the cup position on the virtual green is determined [providing information for user convenience, such as a putting direction or a putting strength based on the terrain, such as an incline on the terrain (page 7-9, Fig. 14-15 and 18)]. Lee does not explicitly disclose: displaying a putting line of a path from the ball position to the cup position formed by the green lie if the golf ball is putted from the ball position to the putting direction, on the putting interface as the putting guide. Kim teaches: displaying a putting line of a path from the ball position to the cup position formed by the green lie if the golf ball is putted from the ball position to the putting direction, on the putting interface as the putting guide [determining a putting path in the direction between the ball and the hole according to the green conditions, such as slope or degree of inclination (page 6-8, Fig. 4-8)]. It would have been obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art, having the teachings of Lee and Kim before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to modify the method of Lee by incorporating displaying a putting line of a path from the ball position to the cup position formed by the green lie if the golf ball is putted from the ball position to the putting direction, on the putting interface as the putting guide as disclosed by Kim. The motivation for doing so would have been to show the golfer a trajectory of putting the ball so they can accurately aim for the cup (Kim – page 2-3 and Fig. 5-8). Therefore, it would have been obvious to combine the teachings of Lee and Kim to obtain the invention as specified in the instant claim. Regarding claim 12, Lee teaches the method of claim 7; Lee further teaches: the displaying putting guide information further includes: when a putting direction starting from the ball position based on the green lie between the ball position and the cup position on the virtual green is determined, and a putting aiming point on the putting direction from the ball position is determined [providing information for user convenience, such as a putting direction or a putting strength based on the terrain, such as an incline on the terrain, which may be displaying as a straight line with an arrow to a point (page 7-9, Fig. 14-15 and 18)]. Lee does not explicitly disclose: displaying a directional distance, which is a distance from the cup position to the putting aiming point, on the putting interface. Kim teaches: displaying a directional distance, which is a distance from the cup position to the putting aiming point, on the putting interface [aiming point distance (page 4, 6, and 8, Fig. 6-8)]. It would have been obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art, having the teachings of Lee and Kim before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to modify the method of Lee by incorporating displaying a directional distance, which is a distance from the cup position to the putting aiming point, on the putting interface as disclosed by Kim. The motivation for doing so would have been to show the golfer how far they need to hit the ball so they can accurately determine the speed at which to hit the ball (Kim – page 3-4 and Fig. 5-8). Therefore, it would have been obvious to combine the teachings of Lee and Kim to obtain the invention as specified in the instant claim. Conclusion Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to Alexander Boyd whose telephone number is (571)270-0676. The examiner can normally be reached Monday - Friday 9am-5pm PST. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Benjamin Bruckart can be reached at 571-272-3982. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /ALEXANDER BOYD/ Examiner, Art Unit 2424
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Nov 20, 2024
Application Filed
Jun 17, 2026
Non-Final Rejection mailed — §102, §103 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12641319
SYSTEMS AND METHODS FOR VALIDATING LIVE PROGRAMMING CONTENT BASED ON THIRD-PARTY DATA
2y 4m to grant Granted May 26, 2026
Patent 12641306
METHODS, APPARATUS, AND ARTICLES OF MANUFACTURE TO DETERMINE WHETHER AUDIENCE MEASUREMENT METERS ARE CO-LOCATED
2y 2m to grant Granted May 26, 2026
Patent 12615417
DECISION-BASED MODEL GENERATION FOR VIDEO DELIVERY
2y 6m to grant Granted Apr 28, 2026
Patent 12587698
OPTIMIZATION OF ENCODING PROFILES FOR MEDIA STREAMING
1y 12m to grant Granted Mar 24, 2026
Patent 12581167
DYNAMIC CONTENT SELECTION MENU
1y 8m to grant Granted Mar 17, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

Strategy Recommendation AI-generated — please review before filing

Get a prosecution strategy drawn from examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Typically takes 5-10 seconds — AI-generated, attorney review required before filing

Prosecution Projections

1-2
Expected OA Rounds
74%
Grant Probability
98%
With Interview (+23.3%)
2y 3m (~7m remaining)
Median Time to Grant
Low
PTA Risk
Based on 309 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allowance rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month