Prosecution Insights
Last updated: August 17, 2026
Application No. 18/868,180

INFORMATION PROCESSING DEVICE, INFORMATION PROCESSING METHOD, AND PROGRAM

Non-Final OA §102
Filed
Nov 22, 2024
Priority
Jun 02, 2022 — nonprovisional of PCTJP2022022493
Examiner
LIDDLE, JAY TRENT
Art Unit
3715
Tech Center
3700 — Mechanical Engineering & Manufacturing
Assignee
Sony Group Corporation
OA Round
1 (Non-Final)
58%
Grant Probability
Moderate
1-2
OA Rounds
1y 10m
Est. Remaining
81%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 58% of resolved cases
58%
Career Allowance Rate
353 granted / 611 resolved
-12.2% vs TC avg
Strong +23% interview lift
Without
With
+22.9%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
3y 7m
Avg Prosecution
26 currently pending
Career history
648
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
19.0%
-21.0% vs TC avg
§103
35.0%
-5.0% vs TC avg
§102
17.6%
-22.4% vs TC avg
§112
21.1%
-18.9% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 611 resolved cases

Office Action

§102
DETAILED ACTION Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . Preliminary Amendment A preliminary amendment was received on 02/25/0226. Presently, claims 13-32 are pending. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 102 In the event the determination of the status of the application as subject to AIA 35 U.S.C. 102 and 103 (or as subject to pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 102 and 103) is incorrect, any correction of the statutory basis (i.e., changing from AIA to pre-AIA ) for the rejection will not be considered a new ground of rejection if the prior art relied upon, and the rationale supporting the rejection, would be the same under either status. The following is a quotation of the appropriate paragraphs of 35 U.S.C. 102 that form the basis for the rejections under this section made in this Office action: A person shall be entitled to a patent unless – (a)(1) the claimed invention was patented, described in a printed publication, or in public use, on sale, or otherwise available to the public before the effective filing date of the claimed invention. Claims 13-32 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 102(a)(1) as being anticipated by US Patent Application Publication No. 2020/0276499 to Black. With regard to claim 13, Black discloses an information processing device comprising: one or more processors (0047); one or more storage devices storing instructions that when executed by the one or more processors, causes the one or more processors to (0047): receive, from an operation device, comprising a driving unit and an operation member configured to be tilted, operation information including at least one of a tilt direction and a title angle of the operation member (0004-0007; 0048-0060); set a scene including at least one operation target object based on the operation information (0004-0007; 0048-0060); issue a driving instruction to the driving unit to drive the operation member according to a state of the operation target object in the set scene (0004-0007; 0048-0060). With regard to claim 14, Black discloses wherein the instructions cause the one or more processors to issue the driving instruction to the driving unit to drive the operation member in a direction corresponding to a direction of a force received by the operation target object in the scene (0004-0007; 0048-0060). With regard to claim 15, Black discloses wherein the instructions cause the one or more processors to update contents of the scene according to a state of the operation member as driven by the driving instruction (figs. 7-10; 0004-0007; 0048-0060). With regard to claim 16, Black discloses wherein, in response to the operation target object exerting a force on another object in the scene based on the operation information, the instructions cause the one or more processors to issue the driving instruction to present a resistance force against a tilting operation on the operation member (0004-0007; 0048-0060). With regard to claim 17, Black discloses wherein the instructions cause the one or more processors to issue the driving instruction to limit at least one of the tilt direction or the tilt angle of the operation member according to the state of the operation target object in the scene (0004-0007; 0048-0060). With regard to claim 18, Black discloses wherein the instructions cause the one or more processors to issue the driving instruction to change contents of limitation to the operation member according to a state of the operation member (0004-0007; 0048-0060). With regard to claim 19, Black discloses, wherein, in response to the state of the operation target object being changed independently of the operation information, the instructions cause the one or more processors to issue the driving instruction to drive the operation member according to operation contents required to cause the change in the state of the operation target object (0004-0007; 0048-0060). With regard to claim 20, Black discloses wherein the instructions cause the one or more processors to: issue the driving instruction to drive the operation member according to pre-recorded operation contents; and update contents of the scene according to the pre-recorded operation contents (0004-0007; 0048-0060). With regard to claim 21, Black discloses, wherein the instructions cause the one or more processors to: issue the driving instruction to drive the operation member according to operation contents performed on a different operation member provided in a separate operation device; and update contents of the scene according to the operation contents performed on the separate operation device (0004-0007; 0048-0060). With regard to claim 22, Black discloses, wherein the instructions cause the one or more processors to change values of parameters included in the driving instruction according to a profile of a user who uses the operation device (0004-0007; 0048-0060). Claims 23-32 are mirrored claims to claims 13-22 and are rejected in like manner. Conclusion Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to Jay Liddle whose telephone number is (571)270-1226. The examiner can normally be reached M-F 9-5. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Dmitry Suhol can be reached at (571)272-4430. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /Jay Trent Liddle/Primary Examiner, Art Unit 3715
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Nov 22, 2024
Application Filed
Jul 21, 2026
Non-Final Rejection mailed — §102 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12691379
REMOTE REAL-TIME GAME INPUT AGGREGATION
3y 2m to grant Granted Jul 28, 2026
Patent 12685933
LIVE VIDEO-BASED INTERACTION METHOD AND APPARATUS, DEVICE AND STORAGE MEDIUM
3y 2m to grant Granted Jul 21, 2026
Patent 12685930
Systems and Methods for Efficient Content Management and Distribution for Video Game Development
2y 10m to grant Granted Jul 21, 2026
Patent 12654107
GAME DATA VERIFICATION METHOD AND APPARATUS, DEVICE, COMPUTER-READABLE STORAGE MEDIUM, AND COMPUTER PROGRAM PRODUCT
2y 8m to grant Granted Jun 16, 2026
Patent 12650867
TRANSPOSING VIRTUAL CONTENT BETWEEN COMPUTING ENVIRONMENTS
2y 7m to grant Granted Jun 09, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

Strategy Recommendation AI-generated — please review before filing

Get a prosecution strategy drawn from examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Typically takes 5-10 seconds — AI-generated, attorney review required before filing

Prosecution Projections

1-2
Expected OA Rounds
58%
Grant Probability
81%
With Interview (+22.9%)
3y 7m (~1y 10m remaining)
Median Time to Grant
Low
PTA Risk
Based on 611 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allowance rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month