Prosecution Insights
Last updated: July 15, 2026
Application No. 18/868,216

DC SHORT CIRCUIT PROTECTION DEVICE

Non-Final OA §102
Filed
Nov 22, 2024
Priority
Jun 07, 2022 — JP 2022-092472 +1 more
Examiner
AL-TAWEEL, MUAAMAR QAHTAN
Art Unit
Tech Center
Assignee
Panasonic Holdings Corporation
OA Round
1 (Non-Final)
82%
Grant Probability
Favorable
1-2
OA Rounds
10m
Est. Remaining
99%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 82% — above average
82%
Career Allowance Rate
51 granted / 62 resolved
+22.3% vs TC avg
Strong +25% interview lift
Without
With
+24.6%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
2y 5m
Avg Prosecution
59 currently pending
Career history
111
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§103
78.6%
+38.6% vs TC avg
§102
21.4%
-18.6% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 62 resolved cases

Office Action

§102
DETAILED ACTION Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 102 In the event the determination of the status of the application as subject to AIA 35 U.S.C. 102 and 103 (or as subject to pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 102 and 103) is incorrect, any correction of the statutory basis (i.e., changing from AIA to pre-AIA ) for the rejection will not be considered a new ground of rejection if the prior art relied upon, and the rationale supporting the rejection, would be the same under either status. The following is a quotation of the appropriate paragraphs of 35 U.S.C. 102 that form the basis for the rejections under this section made in this Office action: A person shall be entitled to a patent unless – (a)(1) the claimed invention was patented, described in a printed publication, or in public use, on sale, or otherwise available to the public before the effective filing date of the claimed invention. Claim 1 is rejected under 35 U.S.C. 102 (a)(1) as being anticipated by Browning, Jr. (US Patent No. 3604356). Regarding claim 1, Browning discloses a direct current short circuit protection device (i.e., such as direct current short circuit protection device fig. 2; see for example fig. 2, Col. 2 lines 5+) comprising: a fuse (i.e., such as fuse 34; see for example fig. 2, Col. 2 lines 5+) that includes a bus bar (i.e., such as bus bar of power lines fed by terminal 11; see for example fig. 2, Col. 2 lines 5+) and cuts off (i.e., such as cuts off via trembler switches 33a/33b and detonator 32; see for example fig. 2, Col. 2 lines 5+) the bus bar (i.e., such as bus bar of power lines fed by terminal 11; see for example fig. 2, Col. 2 lines 5+) in response (i.e., such as in response to; for instance, arming bellows 35 closes switch 31 and opens shorting switch 34 to allow the discharge of energy storage capacitor 38 through trembler switch 33a, closed on impact, to detonator 32 to explode the device. Similarly, if a negative pulse were applied to terminal 11, capacitor 40 will discharge through trembler switch 33b, closed switch 31, and detonator 32 to explode the ordnance device on impact; arming bellows 35 having closed switch 31 and opened switch 34 after the arming time delay caused by magnitude polarity circuit 20; see for example fig. 2, Col. 2 lines 5+) to an ignition signal (i.e., such as ignition signal to be fired via gas diode 30 when sensing CKT 21 is activated to trigger CKT 35, likewise, the ignition signal to be fired via gas diode 25 when sensing CKT 20 is activated to trigger CKT 35; see for example fig. 2, Col. 2 lines 5+); a first current detector (i.e., such as first current detector sensing CKT 21; see for example fig. 2, Col. 2 lines 5+) that includes a first resistor (i.e., such as first resistor 26; see for example fig. 2, Col. 2 lines 5+) and detects (i.e., such as resistor 26 detects the current flowing in network 15 at the sensing CKT 21; see for example fig. 2, Col. 2 lines 5+) a current (i.e., such as current flowing in network 15 at sensing CKT 21 and sensing CKT 20; see for example fig. 2, Col. 2 lines 5+) flowing through (i.e., such as current flowing through network 15 in sensing CKT 21 and sensing CKT 20; see for example fig. 2, Col. 2 lines 5+) the bus bar (i.e., such as bus bar of power lines fed by terminal 11; see for example fig. 2, Col. 2 lines 5+); a second current detector (i.e., such as second current detector sensing CKT 20; see for example fig. 2, Col. 2 lines 5+) that includes a second resistor (i.e., such as second resistor 22; see for example fig. 2, Col. 2 lines 5+) and detects (i.e., such as resistor 22 detects the current flowing in network 15 at the sensing CKT 20; see for example fig. 2, Col. 2 lines 5+) the current (i.e., such as current flowing in network 15 at sensing CKT 21 and sensing CKT 20; see for example fig. 2, Col. 2 lines 5+) flowing through (i.e., such as current flowing through network 15 in sensing CKT 21 and sensing CKT 20; see for example fig. 2, Col. 2 lines 5+) the bus bar (i.e., such as bus bar of power lines fed by terminal 11; see for example fig. 2, Col. 2 lines 5+); and a disconnection control circuit (i.e., such as disconnection control circuit of capacitors 28, 26 and gas diodes 30, 25; see for example fig. 2, Col. 2 lines 5+) that outputs (i.e., such as outputs as activating the arming bellows 35; see for example fig. 2, Col. 2 lines 5+) the ignition signal (i.e., such as ignition signal to be fired via gas diode 30 when sensing CKT 21 is activated to trigger CKT 35, likewise, the ignition signal to be fired via gas diode 25 when sensing CKT 20 is activated to trigger CKT 35; see for example fig. 2, Col. 2 lines 5+) to the fuse (i.e., such as fuse 34; see for example fig. 2, Col. 2 lines 5+) based on a first detection signal output (i.e., first detection signal output via diode 27 to capacitor 28; see for example fig. 2, Col. 2 lines 5+) from the first current detector (i.e., such as first current detector sensing CKT 21; see for example fig. 2, Col. 2 lines 5+) and a second detection signal output (i.e., such as second detection signal output via diode 23 to capacitor 24; see for example fig. 2, Col. 2 lines 5+) from the second current detector (i.e., such as second current detector sensing CKT 20; see for example fig. 2, Col. 2 lines 5+), wherein the first resistor (i.e., such as first resistor 26; see for example fig. 2, Col. 2 lines 5+) and the second resistor (i.e., such as second resistor 22; see for example fig. 2, Col. 2 lines 5+) are integrated (i.e., such as resistors 26 and 22 are integrated/built-in/connected as desired in the ordnance fuze device of fig. 2; see for example fig. 2, Col. 2 lines 5+) with the bus bar (i.e., such as bus bar of power lines fed by terminal 11; see for example fig. 2, Col. 2 lines 5+), and a current (i.e., such as current flowing in network 15 at sensing CKT 21 and sensing CKT 20; see for example fig. 2, Col. 2 lines 5+) having a same magnitude (i.e., such as the current flowing in network 15 at sensing CKT 21 and sensing CKT 20 has the same magnitude; see for example fig. 2, Col. 2 lines 5+) as the current (i.e., such as current flowing in network 15 at sensing CKT 21 and sensing CKT 20; see for example fig. 2, Col. 2 lines 5+) flowing through (i.e., such as current flowing through network 15 in sensing CKT 21 and sensing CKT 20; see for example fig. 2, Col. 2 lines 5+) the bus bar (i.e., such as bus bar of power lines fed by terminal 11; see for example fig. 2, Col. 2 lines 5+) flows (i.e., such as current flowing through network 15 in sensing CKT 21 and sensing CKT 20; see for example fig. 2, Col. 2 lines 5+) in the first resistor (i.e., such as first resistor 26; see for example fig. 2, Col. 2 lines 5+) and the second resistor (i.e., such as second resistor 22; see for example fig. 2, Col. 2 lines 5+), and the first resistor (i.e., such as first resistor 26; see for example fig. 2, Col. 2 lines 5+) and second resistor (i.e., such as second resistor 22; see for example fig. 2, Col. 2 lines 5+) have resistance values different (i.e., such as resistance values of resistor 26 and resistor 22 are different; for instance, for reasons that will hereinafter be apparent the resistance of resistor 26 is preferably of a different value than that of resistor 22. In most ordnance devices, the values of capacitors 16 and 17 are equal and predetermined as are the values of capacitors 24 and 28. By selecting, therefore, unequal values for resistors 22 and 26, the arming time delay utilizing +V.sub.1 will be different than the arming time utilizing -V.sub.1 since the time constants of circuits 20 and 21 will differ. Similarly, since the time delay in fuze arming is also dependent on the magnitude of the stored charge, and therefore dependent on the magnitude of the voltage impulse, as well as the time constants of circuits 20 and 21, two additional delay times can be obtained utilizing impulses of +V.sub.2 and -V.sub.2 volts. It is readily apparent that each magnitude-polarity combination applied at terminal 11 yields a different arming time delay. Thus, it is clearly apparent that more than four diverse arming time delays may be obtained if additional impulse voltages are available at terminal 11; see for example fig. 2, Col. 2 lines 5+) from each other (i.e., such as the value of resistor 26 is different from the value of resistor 22; for instance, for reasons that will hereinafter be apparent the resistance of resistor 26 is preferably of a different value than that of resistor 22. In most ordnance devices, the values of capacitors 16 and 17 are equal and predetermined as are the values of capacitors 24 and 28. By selecting, therefore, unequal values for resistors 22 and 26, the arming time delay utilizing +V.sub.1 will be different than the arming time utilizing -V.sub.1 since the time constants of circuits 20 and 21 will differ. Similarly, since the time delay in fuze arming is also dependent on the magnitude of the stored charge, and therefore dependent on the magnitude of the voltage impulse, as well as the time constants of circuits 20 and 21, two additional delay times can be obtained utilizing impulses of +V.sub.2 and -V.sub.2 volts. It is readily apparent that each magnitude-polarity combination applied at terminal 11 yields a different arming time delay. Thus, it is clearly apparent that more than four diverse arming time delays may be obtained if additional impulse voltages are available at terminal 11; see for example fig. 2, Col. 2 lines 5+). Allowable Subject Matter Claims 2-8 are objected to as being dependent upon a rejected base claim, but would be allowable if rewritten in independent form including all of the limitations of the base claim and any intervening claims. The following is a statement of reasons for the indication of allowable subject matter: Regarding claim 2, Browning teaches the invention set forth above. However, Browning does not particularly teach wherein the disconnection control circuit determines whether to cut off the bus bar by performing a predetermined calculation based on the first detection signal output from the first current detector and the second detection signal output from the second current detector, and the disconnection control circuit outputs the ignition signal to the fuse when the disconnection control circuit has determined to cut off the bus bar. Hence claim 2 will be deemed allowable if rewritten in an independent form. Claim 3 depends on objected claim 2, consequently claim 3 will also be deemed allowable. Regarding claim 4, Browning teaches the invention set forth above. However, Browning does not particularly teach wherein the first resistor and the second resistor are parts of the bus bar, a direction in which the current flowing through the first resistor, the second resistor, and the bus bar is defined as a first direction, and an area of a section of the first resistor orthogonal to the first direction and an area of a section of the second resistor orthogonal to the first direction are smaller than an area of a section in a portion other than the first resistor and the second resistor in the bus bar orthogonal to the first direction. Hence claim 4 will be deemed allowable if rewritten in an independent form. Claim 5 depends on objected claim 4, consequently claim 5 will also be deemed allowable. Regarding claim 6, Browning teaches the invention set forth above. However, Browning does not particularly teach wherein the first current detector includes a current monitoring terminal for monitoring a current flowing through the first resistor, and the second current detector includes a current monitoring terminal for monitoring a current flowing through the second resistor. Hence claim 6 will be deemed allowable if rewritten in an independent form. Regarding claim 7, Browning teaches the invention set forth above. However, Browning does not particularly teach further comprising a temperature monitoring terminal that is provided on the bus bar and monitors a temperature of the bus bar. Hence claim 7 will be deemed allowable if rewritten in an independent form. Regarding claim 8, Browning teaches the invention set forth above. However, Browning does not particularly teach further comprising a comparator that compares a first current value calculated based on the first detection signal output from the first current detector with a second current value calculated based on the second detection signal output from the second current detector, wherein the comparator detects that any one of the first current detector and the second current detector has failed based on a comparison result between the first current value and the second current value. Hence claim 8 will be deemed allowable if rewritten in an independent form. Conclusion Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to MUAAMAR Q AL-TAWEEL whose telephone number is (571)270-0339. The examiner can normally be reached 0730-1700. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Thienvu V Tran can be reached at (571) 270- 1276. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /MUAAMAR QAHTAN AL-TAWEEL/Examiner, Art Unit 2838 /THIENVU V TRAN/ Supervisory Patent Examiner, Art Unit 2838
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Nov 22, 2024
Application Filed
Jun 10, 2026
Non-Final Rejection mailed — §102 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12676606
TRANSISTOR OVER-VOLTAGE PROTECTION
3y 7m to grant Granted Jul 07, 2026
Patent 12665406
TEMPERATURE SENSING TAPE HAVING A TEMPERATURE SENSOR ELEMENT WITH MULTIPLE CRYSTALLIZATION POINTS
2y 7m to grant Granted Jun 23, 2026
Patent 12651891
SPARK PLUG HAVING A SMALL INTER-ELECTRODE DISTANCE AND AN AT LEAST PARTLY NEGATIVE SPARK POSITION
2y 5m to grant Granted Jun 09, 2026
Patent 12635465
SUBSTRATE SUPPORT AND SUBSTRATE PROCESSING DEVICE
2y 3m to grant Granted May 19, 2026
Patent 12620802
SEMICONDUCTOR DEVICE STRUCTURE AND METHOD OF MANUFACTURING THE SAME
2y 4m to grant Granted May 05, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

Strategy Recommendation AI-generated — please review before filing

Get a prosecution strategy drawn from examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Typically takes 5-10 seconds — AI-generated, attorney review required before filing

Prosecution Projections

1-2
Expected OA Rounds
82%
Grant Probability
99%
With Interview (+24.6%)
2y 5m (~10m remaining)
Median Time to Grant
Low
PTA Risk
Based on 62 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allowance rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month