Prosecution Insights
Last updated: October 02, 2026
Application No. 18/868,854

MEDICAL VEHICLE AND METHOD FOR OPERATING A MEDICAL VEHICLE

Non-Final OA §102§112
Filed
Nov 25, 2024
Priority
May 27, 2022 — EU 22175706.5 +1 more
Examiner
TRAN, DALENA
Art Unit
3657
Tech Center
3600 — Transportation & Electronic Commerce
Assignee
Koninklijke Philips N.V.
OA Round
1 (Non-Final)
88%
Grant Probability
Favorable
1-2
OA Rounds
9m
Est. Remaining
98%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 88% — above average
88%
Career Allowance Rate
960 granted / 1095 resolved
+35.7% vs TC avg
Moderate +10% lift
Without
With
+9.8%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
2y 8m
Avg Prosecution
12 currently pending
Career history
1115
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
8.0%
-32.0% vs TC avg
§103
37.6%
-2.4% vs TC avg
§102
31.5%
-8.5% vs TC avg
§112
14.3%
-25.7% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 1095 resolved cases

Office Action

§102 §112
DETAILED ACTION Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . This application has been examined. Claims 1-13 are pending. The prior art submitted on 11/25/24 and 7/17/26 has been considered. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 112 The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 112(b): (b) CONCLUSION.—The specification shall conclude with one or more claims particularly pointing out and distinctly claiming the subject matter which the inventor or a joint inventor regards as the invention. The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 112 (pre-AIA ), second paragraph: The specification shall conclude with one or more claims particularly pointing out and distinctly claiming the subject matter which the applicant regards as his invention. Claim 9 recites the limitation "the vehicle settings" in line 2. There is insufficient antecedent basis for this limitation in the claim. Correction is required. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 102 The following is a quotation of the appropriate paragraphs of 35 U.S.C. 102 that form the basis for the rejections under this section made in this Office action: A person shall be entitled to a patent unless – (a)(2) the claimed invention was described in a patent issued under section 151, or in an application for patent published or deemed published under section 122(b), in which the patent or application, as the case may be, names another inventor and was effectively filed before the effective filing date of the claimed invention. Claims 1-13, are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 102(a)(2) as being anticipated by Lin et al. (US 2022/0054330 A1). As per claim 1, Lin et al. disclose a medical vehicle comprising; a base vehicle; and a compartment with a medical imaging system (see at least [0058-0059] disclose a base vehicle 310, and a compartment 320 with a medical imaging system 322), wherein the compartment is a part of the base vehicle or the compartment is attached to the base vehicle (see at least [0058-0059] and figure 3), wherein the base vehicle comprises at least one base vehicle sensor (see at least [0058-0059] disclose vibration detector 334 and 534, speed detector 335 and 535), and wherein the medical vehicle is configured to obtain sensor readings from the at least one base vehicle sensor during operation of the medical vehicle (see at least [0065-0071] disclose monitoring result related to at least one of an operation state of at least one of components of the movable medical device); analyze the sensor readings with regard to adverse conditions for the medical imaging system, comprising detecting the adverse conditions for the medical imaging system; and provide feedback based on the analyzed sensor readings (see at least [0064] and [0077], all para. disclose the one or more monitoring device of the monitoring system 330 may acquire the monitoring result related to at least one of an operation state of at least one of components of the movable medical device or an environment parameter where the medical cabin is located. The control device 360 of the monitoring system 330 may be configured to provide the feedback based on the monitoring result); wherein if the detected adverse conditions exceed a predetermined first adverse condition threshold, the feedback is an alert and/or a control command for re-calibration and/or maintenance of the medical imaging system (see at least [0080-0084] disclose determining whether the monitoring result satisfies one or more abnormal conditions, and the control device 560 may generate a prompt instruction to remind a user to adjust an operation of one or more components related to the monitoring result). As per claim 2, Lin et al. disclose the base vehicle comprises at least one of a truck, a train, a plane, a helicopter, an autonomous flight object and/or a ship (see at least [0051]). As per claim 3, Lin et al. disclose the medical imaging system comprises at least one of a magnetic resonance imaging, a computed tomography, a digital X-ray radiography, a single-photon emission computed tomography, a positron emission tomography, a dark field X- ray imaging, a small dedicated medical imaging and an ultrasound system (see at least [0041], and [0052]). As per claim 4, Lin et al. disclose wherein the at least one base vehicle sensor comprises at least one of a vehicle navigation system, a compass, a camera, a radar, a lidar, a speedometer, a wind sensor, a wave sensor, an acceleration sensor, an inertial measurement unit, a motion control sensor, an engine control sensor, a vibration sensor, an electrical sensor, a temperature sensor, a humidity sensor and an electromagnetic field sensor (see at least [0072] disclose a camera, a video recorder, an image sensor, etc.). As per claim 5, Lin et al. disclose the adverse conditions for the medical imaging system comprise at least one of impact forces on the compartment, adverse environmental conditions in the compartment, power outages affecting the medical imaging system and high intensity electromagnetic fields affecting the medical vehicle (see at least [0073-0076] disclose the energy detector 537 may be configured to determine a remain energy (or capacity) of an energy storage component of the movable medical device). As per claim 6, Lin et al. disclose wherein the medical vehicle is configured such that analyzing the sensor readings comprises predicting the adverse conditions for the medical imaging system, and if the predicted adverse conditions exceed a predetermined adverse condition prediction threshold, the feedback is provided to a vehicle management system of the medical vehicle and/or compartment management system and comprises control commands to adapt vehicle settings and/or compartment settings (see at least [0064] and [0077], all para. disclose the one or more monitoring device of the monitoring system 330 may acquire the monitoring result related to at least one of an operation state of at least one of components of the movable medical device or an environment parameter where the medical cabin is located. The control device 360 of the monitoring system 330 may be configured to provide the feedback based on the monitoring result; and para. [0080-0084] disclose determining whether the monitoring result satisfies one or more abnormal conditions, and the control device 560 may generate a prompt instruction to remind a user to adjust an operation of one or more components related to the monitoring result). As per claims 7-8, Lin et al. disclose if the detected adverse conditions exceed a predetermined second adverse condition threshold, and if the detected adverse conditions exceed a predetermined third adverse condition threshold (see at least [0080-0083] disclose different predetermined adverse condition threshold), the feedback is provided to the vehicle management system of the medical vehicle and/or compartment management system and comprises control commands to adapt vehicle settings and/or compartment settings, and the feedback is an alert for inspection and/or repair of the medical imaging system (see at least [0084] disclose different adjustment feedback condition). As per claim 9, Lin et al. disclose the vehicle settings to be adapted comprise at least one of vehicle speed, vehicle route, vehicle suspension settings, and environmental conditioning settings (see at least [0094]). Claims 10 and 11, are method claims corresponding to medical vehicle claims 1 and 6 above. Therefore, they are rejected for the same rationales set forth as above. Claim 12 is a method claim corresponding to medical vehicle claims 7-8 above. Therefore, it is rejected for the same rationales set forth as above. As per claim 13, Lin et al. disclose if the feedback is 1) an alert for re-calibration, maintenance, inspection and/or repair and/or 2) a control command for re-calibration and/or maintenance, then the re-calibration, maintenance, inspection and/or repair of the medical imaging system is performed at a destination of the medical vehicle and/or when the detected adverse conditions fall below a predetermined fourth adverse condition threshold (see at least [0051] disclose the desired location may refer to a destination location). Conclusion The prior art made of record and not relied upon is considered pertinent to applicant’s disclosure: . Bailey et al. (US 2019/0357862 A1) . Delise et al. (US 2018/0133074 A1) . Nishino et al. (US 2011/0317817 A1) . Cella et al. (US 2022/0197306 A1) Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to DALENA TRAN whose telephone number is (571)272-6968. The examiner can normally be reached M-F 7AM-5PM. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, ADAM MOTT can be reached at 571-270-5376. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /DALENA TRAN/Primary Examiner, Art Unit 3657
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Nov 25, 2024
Application Filed
Jul 28, 2026
Non-Final Rejection mailed — §102, §112 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12741371
DETERMINING AND UTILIZING CORRECTIONS TO ROBOT ACTIONS
2y 2m to grant Granted Sep 22, 2026
Patent 12728877
METHOD AND SYSTEM FOR RECOMMENDING VEHICLE CONTROL MODE BASED ON VEHICLE SITUATION
2y 0m to grant Granted Sep 08, 2026
Patent 12730458
MOBILE OBJECT CONTROL DEVICE, MOBILE OBJECT CONTROL METHOD, AND STORAGE MEDIUM
1y 11m to grant Granted Sep 08, 2026
Patent 12715130
CONTROL ROBOT FOR GROUND OPERATION BASED ON 3D MODEL
2y 5m to grant Granted Aug 25, 2026
Patent 12708997
INFORMATION PROCESSING APPARATUS FOR ROBOT TEACHING, ROBOT SYSTEM FOR ROBOT TEACHING, METHOD FOR GENERATING TRAJECTORY OF SPECIFIC PART OF ROBOT, METHOD FOR CONTROLLING ROBOT IN ROBOT TEACHING, RECORDING MEDIUM, AND MOVABLE OBJECT
2y 3m to grant Granted Aug 18, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

Strategy Recommendation AI-generated — please review before filing

Get a prosecution strategy drawn from examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Typically takes 5-10 seconds — AI-generated, attorney review required before filing

Prosecution Projections

1-2
Expected OA Rounds
88%
Grant Probability
98%
With Interview (+9.8%)
2y 8m (~9m remaining)
Median Time to Grant
Low
PTA Risk
Based on 1095 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allowance rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month