Prosecution Insights
Last updated: October 02, 2026
Application No. 18/868,867

IMAGE PROCESSING DEVICE AND IMAGE PROCESSING METHOD

Non-Final OA §112
Filed
Nov 25, 2024
Priority
May 31, 2022 — JP 2022-088585 +1 more
Examiner
HUYNH, VAN D
Art Unit
2665
Tech Center
2600 — Communications
Assignee
Hamamatsu Photonics K.K.
OA Round
1 (Non-Final)
87%
Grant Probability
Favorable
1-2
OA Rounds
6m
Est. Remaining
99%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 87% — above average
87%
Career Allowance Rate
643 granted / 739 resolved
+25.0% vs TC avg
Moderate +13% lift
Without
With
+13.4%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
2y 4m
Avg Prosecution
30 currently pending
Career history
763
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
9.7%
-30.3% vs TC avg
§103
35.5%
-4.5% vs TC avg
§102
30.0%
-10.0% vs TC avg
§112
11.5%
-28.5% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 739 resolved cases

Office Action

§112
DETAILED ACTION Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 112 The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 112(b): (b) CONCLUSION.—The specification shall conclude with one or more claims particularly pointing out and distinctly claiming the subject matter which the inventor or a joint inventor regards as the invention. The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 112 (pre-AIA ), second paragraph: The specification shall conclude with one or more claims particularly pointing out and distinctly claiming the subject matter which the applicant regards as his invention. Claims 1-6 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 112(b) or 35 U.S.C. 112 (pre-AIA ), second paragraph, as being indefinite for failing to particularly point out and distinctly claim the subject matter which the inventor or a joint inventor (or for applications subject to pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 112, the applicant), regards as the invention. Independent claim 1 recites the limitation “the train image” in line 7. There is insufficient antecedent basis for this limitation in the claim. The Examiner suggests replacing “the train image” with –the training image--. Dependent claims 2-6 are also rejected based on their dependency of the defected parent claim 1 above. The prior art does not appear to teach or make obvious the subject matter of the claims. However, the 35 U.S.C. 112(b) rejection for claim 1-6 must be overcome. Allowable Subject Matter The following is a statement of reasons for the indication of allowable subject matter: The prior art made of record and considered pertinent to the applicant's disclosure, taken individually or in combination, does not teach the claimed invention having the following limitations, in combination with the remaining claimed limitations. Regarding independent claims 1 and 7, the closest prior art does not teach or suggest the claimed invention having “a first CNN processing step of inputting a first input image, in which pixel values in a partial region are changed based on a training image, to a convolutional neural network, and creating a first output image by the convolutional neural network; a first CNN training step of evaluating an error between the first output image and the training image, and training the convolutional neural network based on an error evaluation result; a second CNN processing step of inputting a second input image to the convolutional neural network, and creating a second output image by the convolutional neural network; and a second CNN training step of evaluating an error between the second output image and the target image, and training the convolutional neural network based on an error evaluation result, wherein after respective processes of the first CNN processing step and the first CNN training step are repeatedly performed a plurality of times for each of a plurality of sets of the training image and the first input image, respective processes of the second CNN processing step and the second CNN training step are repeatedly performed a plurality of times, and the second output image is set as the noise reduced image”, and a combination of other limitations thereof as recited in the claims. Regarding dependent claims 2-6 and 8-12, the claims have been found allowable due to its dependencies to claims 1 and 7 above. Conclusion Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to VAN D HUYNH whose telephone number is (571)270-1937. The examiner can normally be reached 8AM-6PM. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Stephen R Koziol can be reached at (408) 918-7630. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /VAN D HUYNH/Primary Examiner, Art Unit 2665
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Nov 25, 2024
Application Filed
Aug 10, 2026
Non-Final Rejection mailed — §112 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12738020
IMAGE PROCESSING DEVICE, CORRECT ANSWER DATA GENERATION DEVICE, SIMILAR IMAGE SEARCH DEVICE, IMAGE PROCESSING METHOD, AND PROGRAM
2y 8m to grant Granted Sep 15, 2026
Patent 12737951
IMAGE PROCESSING DEVICE AND IMAGE PROCESSING METHOD
2y 1m to grant Granted Sep 15, 2026
Patent 12727799
METHOD AND APPARATUS FOR QUANTITATIVE AND DEPTH RESOLVED HYPERSPECTRAL FLUORESCENCE AND REFLECTANCE IMAGING FOR SURGICAL GUIDANCE
2y 8m to grant Granted Sep 08, 2026
Patent 12725242
Method for Evaluating the Surface of a Body Component, and Method for Training an Artificial Neural Network
2y 8m to grant Granted Sep 01, 2026
Patent 12718529
MEDICAL IMAGE LEARNING METHOD, MEDICAL IMAGE LEARNING APPARATUS, AND STORAGE MEDIUM
3y 6m to grant Granted Aug 25, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

Strategy Recommendation AI-generated — please review before filing

Get a prosecution strategy drawn from examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Typically takes 5-10 seconds — AI-generated, attorney review required before filing

Prosecution Projections

1-2
Expected OA Rounds
87%
Grant Probability
99%
With Interview (+13.4%)
2y 4m (~6m remaining)
Median Time to Grant
Low
PTA Risk
Based on 739 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allowance rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month