Prosecution Insights
Last updated: August 17, 2026
Application No. 18/869,334

NEW LOW-VISCOSITY FUNCTIONAL LIQUIDS

Non-Final OA §103
Filed
Nov 26, 2024
Priority
May 31, 2022 — EU 22176522.5 +1 more
Examiner
VASISTH, VISHAL V
Art Unit
1771
Tech Center
1700 — Chemical & Materials Engineering
Assignee
BASF SE
OA Round
1 (Non-Final)
72%
Grant Probability
Favorable
1-2
OA Rounds
7m
Est. Remaining
99%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 72% — above average
72%
Career Allowance Rate
992 granted / 1372 resolved
+7.3% vs TC avg
Strong +34% interview lift
Without
With
+33.7%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
2y 4m
Avg Prosecution
52 currently pending
Career history
1408
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
1.1%
-38.9% vs TC avg
§103
52.2%
+12.2% vs TC avg
§102
15.0%
-25.0% vs TC avg
§112
10.3%
-29.7% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 1372 resolved cases

Office Action

§103
DETAILED ACTION Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 103 The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 103 which forms the basis for all obviousness rejections set forth in this Office action: A patent for a claimed invention may not be obtained, notwithstanding that the claimed invention is not identically disclosed as set forth in section 102, if the differences between the claimed invention and the prior art are such that the claimed invention as a whole would have been obvious before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to a person having ordinary skill in the art to which the claimed invention pertains. Patentability shall not be negated by the manner in which the invention was made. The factual inquiries for establishing a background for determining obviousness under 35 U.S.C. 103 are summarized as follows: 1. Determining the scope and contents of the prior art. 2. Ascertaining the differences between the prior art and the claims at issue. 3. Resolving the level of ordinary skill in the pertinent art. 4. Considering objective evidence present in the application indicating obviousness or nonobviousness. Claims 1-15 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over NPL document entitled New Functional Fluids (cited in the IDS filed 1/9/2025 – hereinafter referred to as NFF). Regarding claims 1-15, NFF discloses functional fluids. The requirements for brake fluids in order to meet the DOT 4 and DOT 5.1 standards are low viscosity (max. 750 cSt at -40°C) and high dry and wet boiling points (Page 3-4/L. 3-4, see Table 1). In Example 3 of NFF, it is disclosed a composition that contains 50% by weight of methoxy triethylene glycol silicon dimethyl ester (MTGSE) (component E of the present application), 24% by weight of methoxy triethylene glycol (MTG) (component A of the present application), 24% by weight of butoxy tricthylene glycol (BTG) (component B of the present application) and 2% by weight of diisopropylamine (component D of the present application) (Page 4-5/L. 10-22 and see Tables 2 and 4 and Examples 3 and 8). Example 3 differs from the present application in that the composition contains too much of component (B) butoxy triethylene glycol and in that the viscosity at -40°C is not disclosed. It is the position of the examiner that concentration is a result effective variable and as such can be optimized without undue experimentation. Discovery of optimum value of result effective variable in known process is ordinarily within the skill in the art and would have been obvious, consult In re Boesch and Slaney (205 USPQ 215 (CCPA 1980)). It is further the position of the examiner that the viscosity recited in claim 1 would be inherent to the composition recited in NFF as it discloses the same components as the instant claims in nearly the same concentration ranges. Conclusion Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to VISHAL V VASISTH whose telephone number is (571)270-3716. The examiner can normally be reached M-F 9:00-4:30 and 7:00-10:00p. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Prem Singh can be reached at 5712726381. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /VISHAL V VASISTH/Primary Examiner, Art Unit 1771
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Nov 26, 2024
Application Filed
Jul 13, 2026
Non-Final Rejection mailed — §103
Aug 04, 2026
Applicant Interview (Telephonic)
Aug 04, 2026
Examiner Interview Summary

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12703834
ANTI-STICTION IONIC LUBRICANTS IN MEMS DEVICES
2y 2m to grant Granted Aug 11, 2026
Patent 12686833
REFRIGERATOR OIL COMPOSITION AND REFRIGERATOR MIXTURE COMPOSITION
3y 11m to grant Granted Jul 21, 2026
Patent 12686655
Method and System for Light Olefin Generation with High Yields and Selectivity
2y 6m to grant Granted Jul 21, 2026
Patent 12679736
Methods, Systems and Apparatus for Carbon Capture, Utilization and Storage
3y 5m to grant Granted Jul 14, 2026
Patent 12678906
MACHINE TOOL SYSTEM, AND HYDRAULIC LIQUID AND PROCESSING LIQUID FOR MACHINE TOOLS
1y 10m to grant Granted Jul 14, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

Strategy Recommendation AI-generated — please review before filing

Get a prosecution strategy drawn from examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Typically takes 5-10 seconds — AI-generated, attorney review required before filing

Prosecution Projections

1-2
Expected OA Rounds
72%
Grant Probability
99%
With Interview (+33.7%)
2y 4m (~7m remaining)
Median Time to Grant
Low
PTA Risk
Based on 1372 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allowance rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month