Prosecution Insights
Last updated: July 17, 2026
Application No. 18/869,717

LIQUID FLOW STABILIZING STOPPER

Non-Final OA §102§103
Filed
Nov 26, 2024
Priority
May 27, 2022 — BR 2020220104331 +1 more
Examiner
MELARAGNO, MICHAEL
Art Unit
Tech Center
Assignee
Pmi South America Consumer Goods Ltda
OA Round
1 (Non-Final)
67%
Grant Probability
Favorable
1-2
OA Rounds
7m
Est. Remaining
79%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 67% — above average
67%
Career Allowance Rate
483 granted / 719 resolved
+7.2% vs TC avg
Moderate +12% lift
Without
With
+11.7%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
2y 2m
Avg Prosecution
25 currently pending
Career history
740
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
0.1%
-39.9% vs TC avg
§103
82.1%
+42.1% vs TC avg
§102
5.4%
-34.6% vs TC avg
§112
5.6%
-34.4% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 719 resolved cases

Office Action

§102 §103
DETAILED ACTION Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 102 The following is a quotation of the appropriate paragraphs of 35 U.S.C. 102 that form the basis for the rejections under this section made in this Office action: A person shall be entitled to a patent unless – (a)(1) the claimed invention was patented, described in a printed publication, or in public use, on sale, or otherwise available to the public before the effective filing date of the claimed invention. Claim(s) 1, 2, 5 and 6 is/are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 102(a)(1) as being anticipated by Appla (U.S. Pat. 5,139,182). Regarding claim 1, Appla discloses liquid flow stabilizer stopper (11) arranged to be associated to openings of bottles, thermos flasks and similar containers, comprising: a stopper body (seen in Fig. 2) comprising a closed lower end (15a) and an open upper end (18a) for the outflow of liquid, wherein the stopper body is endowed circumferentially with openings (between 24 and 25), through which liquid can flow to an inside of the stopper, wherein the stopper is partially hollow and endowed internally with a flow stabilizer (col. 4, lines 59-64: “the edge of the circular valve disc 23 for passage of fluid, that is to say two-way flow of air ingress and liquid egress. The effect which is created by this design is air-liquid mixing or deflecting baffles for a more regulated fluid flow therethrough“) bulge (22) originating at the closed lower end and projecting longitudinally through the inside of the stopper (via ribs 24, 25), whereby configuring an annular internal space for the passage of liquid to the open upper end. Regarding claim 2, Appla discloses that the stopper body has an external thread (17) which corresponds to the internal thread (14) of a mouth of an adapter secured to a container. Regarding claim 5, Appla discloses that the openings of the stopper boedy are oblong in shape. (seen in Fig. 2, right side of the cross-section, opening is wider than taller) Regarding claim 6, Appla discloses that the stopper has an external gasket (28). Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 103 The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 103 which forms the basis for all obviousness rejections set forth in this Office action: A patent for a claimed invention may not be obtained, notwithstanding that the claimed invention is not identically disclosed as set forth in section 102, if the differences between the claimed invention and the prior art are such that the claimed invention as a whole would have been obvious before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to a person having ordinary skill in the art to which the claimed invention pertains. Patentability shall not be negated by the manner in which the invention was made. Claim(s) 3 is/are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over Appla as applied to claim 1 above, and further in view of Tajima, et al. (“Tajima”) (U.S. Pub. 2014/0312077). Regarding claim 3, Appla discloses the stabilizer bulge from claim 1, but does not disclose that the bulge comprises, internally, a thermally-insulating material. Tajima discloses a stopper (13) with a bulge (23) that has an internal thermally-insulating material (36). Therefore, it would have been obvious to one with ordinary skill in the art, prior to the effective filing date of the claimed invention, to borrow the teaching of Tajima to include a thermally-insulating material to Appla’s bulge to “allow the beverage inside the container body to be kept hot or cold.” (Tajima: ¶ [0061]) Claim(s) 4 is/are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over Appla and Tajima as applied to claim 3 above, and further in view of Choltco-Devlin, et al. (“Choltco-Devlin”) (U.S. Pub. 2017/0362012). Regarding claim 4, the combination discloses an internal thermally-insulating material but does not mention the materials of manufacture of the insulating material. Choltco-Devlin discloses a beverage container with insulated cover and teaches that styrofoam, polyurethane, polyethylene, fiberglass or other insulation material are known in the art. Therefore, it would have been obvious to one with ordinary skill in the art, prior to the effective filing date of the claimed invention, to borrow the teaching of Choltco-Devlin to select a block of styrofoam or polyurethane as the insulating material since it reduces the exchange of heat with the external environment. (Choltco-Devlin: ¶ [0014]) Conclusion The prior art made of record and not relied upon is considered pertinent to applicant's disclosure. See form PTO-892, attached. Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to MICHAEL J MELARAGNO whose telephone number is (571)270-7735. The examiner can normally be reached Mon - Fri: 8 am - 5 pm +/- flex. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Paul Durand can be reached at (571) 272-4459. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /MICHAEL J. MELARAGNO/ Examiner, Art Unit 3754
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Nov 26, 2024
Application Filed
Jun 03, 2026
Non-Final Rejection mailed — §102, §103 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12679606
FITMENT ASSEMBLY FOR A FLEXIBLE CONTAINER, FLEXIBLE CONTAINER HAVING A FITMENT ASSEMBLY AND PROBE USED FOR DISPENSING FROM A FLEXIBLE CONTAINER
2y 8m to grant Granted Jul 14, 2026
Patent 12662295
ATTACHMENT FOR A BEVERAGE CONTAINER
2y 6m to grant Granted Jun 23, 2026
Patent 12643786
Method To Control A Dispensing Machine Of Fluid Products
4y 5m to grant Granted Jun 02, 2026
Patent 12643731
DISPENSERS FOR SPRAYING CHEMICAL IRRITANTS AND METHODS OF USING
2y 0m to grant Granted Jun 02, 2026
Patent 12628990
DISPENSER ASSEMBLY
2y 9m to grant Granted May 19, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

Strategy Recommendation AI-generated — please review before filing

Get a prosecution strategy drawn from examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Typically takes 5-10 seconds — AI-generated, attorney review required before filing

Prosecution Projections

1-2
Expected OA Rounds
67%
Grant Probability
79%
With Interview (+11.7%)
2y 2m (~7m remaining)
Median Time to Grant
Low
PTA Risk
Based on 719 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allowance rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month