Prosecution Insights
Last updated: August 18, 2026
Application No. 18/871,066

DYNAMIC FILM COATING DEVICE AND DYNAMIC FILM COATING METHOD USING SAME

Non-Final OA §112
Filed
Dec 02, 2024
Priority
Dec 19, 2022 — CN 202211632285.1 +1 more
Examiner
RODRIGUEZ, MICHAEL P
Art Unit
1712
Tech Center
1700 — Chemical & Materials Engineering
Assignee
Suzhou Maxwell Technologies Co. Ltd.
OA Round
1 (Non-Final)
73%
Grant Probability
Favorable
1-2
OA Rounds
12m
Est. Remaining
99%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 73% — above average
73%
Career Allowance Rate
493 granted / 674 resolved
+8.1% vs TC avg
Strong +29% interview lift
Without
With
+29.4%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
2y 8m
Avg Prosecution
23 currently pending
Career history
699
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
0.8%
-39.2% vs TC avg
§103
48.0%
+8.0% vs TC avg
§102
17.9%
-22.1% vs TC avg
§112
23.8%
-16.2% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 674 resolved cases

Office Action

§112
DETAILED ACTION Election/Restrictions Applicant’s election without traverse of Claims 1-9 in the reply filed on 06 May 2026 is acknowledged. Non-elected Claim 10 is noted as having been cancelled via the amendment filed therewith. Information Disclosure Statement The information disclosure statements (IDS) submitted on 02 December 2024 and 14 January 2026 have been considered by the examiner. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 112 The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 112(b): (b) CONCLUSION.—The specification shall conclude with one or more claims particularly pointing out and distinctly claiming the subject matter which the inventor or a joint inventor regards as the invention. The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 112 (pre-AIA ), second paragraph: The specification shall conclude with one or more claims particularly pointing out and distinctly claiming the subject matter which the applicant regards as his invention. 1. Claims 5-8 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 112(b) or 35 U.S.C. 112 (pre-AIA ), second paragraph, as being indefinite for failing to particularly point out and distinctly claim the subject matter which the inventor or a joint inventor (or for applications subject to pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 112, the applicant), regards as the invention. With regard to Claims 5-8, each depend from a cancelled claim (Claim 4), and are thus ambiguous. For purposes of examination, each of Claims 5-8 are presumed to depend from Claim 1. Allowable Subject Matter Claims 1-3 and 9 are allowed. Claims 5-8 would similarly be allowable to the extent they are amended to depend from Claim 1 as noted above. The following is an examiner’s statement of reasons for allowance: The closest prior art is deemed to be CN 108611620 to Yang et al. (“Yang”) and DE 102013100767 to Krause et al. (“Krause”), translations of which are provided herewith and referred-to herein. Yang teaches a continuous vacuum coating apparatus comprising a controller, buffer chamber, pump (transition) chamber, and target (coating) chamber arranged in sequence (see Abstract; FIG. 1; ¶¶ [0008]-[0015], [0031]-[0033], [0036]-[0037]). Position sensors (detection elements) communicate substrate presence to a controller which adjusts the speed of conveyor belts on which the substrates reside, thereby controlling distances therebetween (Id.). Krause teaches a continuous vacuum treatment process and system comprising a gate region (buffer), passing region (transition), and processing region (coating) (see Abstract; FIGs. 3-4). The passing region of Krause comprises position detectors (see FIG. 4 elements 10; ¶¶ [0045]-[0046]). Conveyor speed is adjusted based on substrate detection (see ¶ [0036]). Yang and Krause do not teach or suggest a configuration wherein the transition chamber comprises first and second chambers integrally connected and arranged such that the first chamber is adjacent the buffer chamber, the second chamber is adjacent the coating chamber, and wherein the first and second chambers are provided with detection elements as claimed. Any comments considered necessary by applicant must be submitted no later than the payment of the issue fee and, to avoid processing delays, should preferably accompany the issue fee. Such submissions should be clearly labeled “Comments on Statement of Reasons for Allowance.” Conclusion Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to Michael P Rodriguez whose telephone number is (571)270-3736. The examiner can normally be reached 9:00 - 6:00 Eastern M-F. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Michael Cleveland can be reached at 571-272-1418. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /Michael P. Rodriguez/Primary Examiner, Art Unit 1712
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Dec 02, 2024
Application Filed
Jul 28, 2026
Non-Final Rejection mailed — §112 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12686030
STRUCTURAL MEMBER AND METHOD FOR PRODUCING THE SAME
2y 4m to grant Granted Jul 21, 2026
Patent 12668603
FUNCTIONALIZED ORGANOTIN PRECURSORS AND RELATED METHODS
2y 7m to grant Granted Jun 30, 2026
Patent 12661688
ACOUSTIC PANEL EDGE
3y 1m to grant Granted Jun 23, 2026
Patent 12661689
METHOD FOR FORMING MULTILAYER FILM AND MULTILAYER FILM
1y 6m to grant Granted Jun 23, 2026
Patent 12654382
PROCESS FOR MAKING A NON-FIBROUS WATER SOLUBLE PRODUCT
2y 6m to grant Granted Jun 16, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

Strategy Recommendation AI-generated — please review before filing

Get a prosecution strategy drawn from examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Typically takes 5-10 seconds — AI-generated, attorney review required before filing

Prosecution Projections

1-2
Expected OA Rounds
73%
Grant Probability
99%
With Interview (+29.4%)
2y 8m (~12m remaining)
Median Time to Grant
Low
PTA Risk
Based on 674 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allowance rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month