Prosecution Insights
Last updated: October 01, 2026
Application No. 18/871,103

CONTROL METHOD, ELECTRONIC DEVICE, AND STORAGE MEDIUM

Non-Final OA §102
Filed
Dec 02, 2024
Priority
Jun 15, 2021 — CN 202110661501.4 +1 more
Examiner
LEE, JOHN J
Art Unit
Tech Center
Assignee
Guangdong OPPO Mobile Telecommunications Corp., Ltd.
OA Round
1 (Non-Final)
93%
Grant Probability
Favorable
1-2
OA Rounds
4m
Est. Remaining
99%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 93% — above average
93%
Career Allowance Rate
1218 granted / 1312 resolved
+32.8% vs TC avg
Moderate +6% lift
Without
With
+6.4%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
2y 2m
Avg Prosecution
24 currently pending
Career history
1324
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
8.6%
-31.4% vs TC avg
§103
26.2%
-13.8% vs TC avg
§102
40.2%
+0.2% vs TC avg
§112
6.3%
-33.7% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 1312 resolved cases

Office Action

§102
DETAILED ACTION Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 102 1. In the event the determination of the status of the application as subject to AIA 35 U.S.C. 102 and 103 (or as subject to pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 102 and 103) is incorrect, any correction of the statutory basis (i.e., changing from AIA to pre-AIA ) for the rejection will not be considered a new ground of rejection if the prior art relied upon, and the rationale supporting the rejection, would be the same under either status. The following is a quotation of the appropriate paragraphs of 35 U.S.C. 102 that form the basis for the rejections under this section made in this Office action: A person shall be entitled to a patent unless – (a)(1) the claimed invention was patented, described in a printed publication, or in public use, on sale, or otherwise available to the public before the effective filing date of the claimed invention. 2. Claims 1-9 and 11-21 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 102(a)(1) as being anticipated by CHENG et al. (CN 106707735). Regarding claim 1, CHENG teaches that a control method performed by a wearable device, the wearable device comprising a first system and a second system (Fig. 1 and pages 6, paragraphs 28 – pages 10, paragraphs 41). CHENG teaches that in response to a Bluetooth activation instruction, in a first state, activating, by the first system, a first Bluetooth application, the first Bluetooth application being configured to support a first service, activating, by the second system, a second Bluetooth application, the second Bluetooth application being configured to support a second service (Fig. 1 and pages 6, paragraphs 28 – pages 10, paragraphs 41, where teaches a low power consumption smart Bluetooth watch comprising a chip A100 (Fig. 1) and a chip B200 (Fig. 1), and the chip A100 is a processor (a second processor) having high performance and high power consumption, wherein android and/or windowsst and/or linux multitasking operating system (a second system) is run, and a classic Bluetooth module is integrated, and the chip B200 is relatively low in performance, extremely low in power consumption, and internally integrated with a BLE (Bluetooth low energy) module, and the BLE module is a processor (a first processor) having a low power consumption Bluetooth function, the internal hardware core of the BLE module is a 51 core or an arm core (a first system), and the chip A100 is used for interacting with an interface of a user, and needs to calculate or process a large amount of other tasks (a second service), and the chip B200 not only controls, but is not limited to, the operation of the BLE module, but also controls mobile phone data interaction, various sensor data acquisition and motion detection (a first service), and also the chip A100 and the chip B200 dynamically switch for running or parallel communication according to the change of a usage scenario and a mode of the user, and the running condition of the system is controlled and divided into three levels, level 1: when executing a complex or interface interaction task (in a first state), the chip A100 and the chip B200 normally run, and this corresponds to a situation where the user directly uses the watch (in the first state, the first system starts a first Bluetooth application; the first Bluetooth application supports the first service, the second system starts a second Bluetooth application; and the second Bluetooth application supports the second service), and level 2: when some of background tasks are executed or a processing sensor is interrupted (in a second state), the chip A100 enters a standby node, and the chip B200 normally works, and this corresponds to a situation in which the watch is generally on a wrist (in the second state, the first system starts the first Bluetooth application; and the first Bluetooth application supports the first service), and/or in a second state, activating, by the first system, the first Bluetooth application, the first Bluetooth application being configured to support the first service, or, in the second state, activating, by the second system, a third Bluetooth application, the third Bluetooth application being configured to support the first service and the second service (Fig. 1 and pages 6, paragraphs 28 – pages 10, paragraphs 41, where teaches a low power consumption smart Bluetooth watch comprising a chip A100 (Fig. 1) and a chip B200 (Fig. 1), and the chip A100 is a processor (a second processor) having high performance and high power consumption, wherein android and/or windowsst and/or linux multitasking operating system (a second system) is run, and a classic Bluetooth module is integrated, and the chip B200 is relatively low in performance, extremely low in power consumption, and internally integrated with a BLE (Bluetooth low energy) module, and the BLE module is a processor (a first processor) having a low power consumption Bluetooth function, the internal hardware core of the BLE module is a 51 core or an arm core (a first system), and the chip A100 is used for interacting with an interface of a user, and needs to calculate or process a large amount of other tasks (a second service), and the chip B200 not only controls, but is not limited to, the operation of the BLE module, but also controls mobile phone data interaction, various sensor data acquisition and motion detection (a first service), and also the chip A100 and the chip B200 dynamically switch for running or parallel communication according to the change of a usage scenario and a mode of the user, and the running condition of the system is controlled and divided into three levels, level 1: when executing a complex or interface interaction task (in a first state), the chip A100 and the chip B200 normally run, and this corresponds to a situation where the user directly uses the watch (in the first state, the first system starts a first Bluetooth application; the first Bluetooth application supports the first service, the second system starts a second Bluetooth application; and the second Bluetooth application supports the second service), and level 2: when some of background tasks are executed or a processing sensor is interrupted (in a second state), the chip A100 enters a standby node, and the chip B200 normally works, and this corresponds to a situation in which the watch is generally on a wrist (in the second state, the first system starts the first Bluetooth application; and the first Bluetooth application supports the first service). Regarding claim 2, CHENG teaches that the in response to the Bluetooth activation instruction comprises: receiving, by the second system, the Bluetooth activation instruction, and sending the Bluetooth activation instruction (messages, notifications) to the first system (Fig. 1 and pages 6, paragraphs 28 – pages 10, paragraphs 41), and receiving, by the first system, the Bluetooth activation instruction, initializing, by the first system, a Bluetooth protocol stack (Fig. 1 and pages 6, paragraphs 28 – pages 10, paragraphs 41). Regarding claim 3, CHENG teaches that receiving, by the first system, Bluetooth data, and processing the Bluetooth data based on a current state (Fig. 1 and pages 6, paragraphs 28 – pages 10, paragraphs 41). Regarding claim 4, CHENG teaches that the processing the Bluetooth data based on the current state comprises: in case the wearable device is in the second state, processing, by the first system, the Bluetooth data, or in case the wearable device is in the second state, forwarding, by the first system, the Bluetooth data to the second system, processing, by the second system, the Bluetooth data, or in case the wearable device is in the first state, forwarding, by the first system, the Bluetooth data to a routing module on a first processor of the wearable device, determining, by the routing module, which system to process the Bluetooth data (Fig. 1 and pages 6, paragraphs 28 – pages 10, paragraphs 41), wherein the first processor is configured to run the first system (Fig. 1 and pages 6, paragraphs 28 – pages 10, paragraphs 41). Regarding claim 5, CHENG teaches that the determining, by the routing module, which system to process the Bluetooth data comprises: in case the Bluetooth data is data related to the first service, sending the Bluetooth data to the first system, and in case the Bluetooth data is data related to the second service, sending the Bluetooth data to the second system (Fig. 1 and pages 6, paragraphs 28 – pages 10, paragraphs 41, where teaches level 1: when executing a complex or interface interaction task (in a first state), the chip A100 and the chip B200 normally run, and this corresponds to a situation where the user directly uses the watch (in the first state, the first system starts a first Bluetooth application; the first Bluetooth application supports the first service, the second system starts a second Bluetooth application; and the second Bluetooth application supports the second service), and level 2: when some of background tasks are executed or a processing sensor is interrupted (in a second state), the chip A100 enters a standby node, and the chip B200 normally works, and this corresponds to a situation in which the watch is generally on a wrist (in the second state, the first system starts the first Bluetooth application; and the first Bluetooth application supports the first service). Regarding claim 6, CHENG teaches that in case the first system is in an active state and the second system is in a hibernate state (sleep standby), in response to determining, by the routing module, that the Bluetooth data is the data related to the second service, waking up, by the first system, the second system, and processing, by the second system, the Bluetooth data (Fig. 1 and pages 6, paragraphs 28 – pages 10, paragraphs 41). Regarding claim 7, CHENG teaches that the wearable device comprises one or more selected from the group consisting a standard mode, a high-performance mode and a low power consumption mode, in the first state, the wearable device operates in the standard mode, and/or in the second state, the wearable device operates in the high-performance mode or the low power consumption mode (Fig. 1 and pages 6, paragraphs 28 – pages 10, paragraphs 41). Regarding claim 8, CHENG teaches that the in the first state, the wearable device operates in the standard mode comprises: in the second state, receiving, by the wearable device, a first instruction, the first instruction being configured to indicate switching to the standard mode, the wearable device switching to the standard mode in response to the first instruction, and/or the in the second state, the wearable device operates in the high-performance mode or the low power consumption mode comprises: in the first state, receiving, by the wearable device, a second instruction, the second instruction being configured to indicate switching to the high-performance mode, the wearable device switching to the high-performance mode in response to the second instruction, or in the first state, receiving, by the wearable device, a third instruction, the third instruction being configured to indicate switching to the low power consumption mode, the wearable device switching to the low power consumption mode in response to the third instruction (Fig. 1 and pages 6, paragraphs 28 – pages 10, paragraphs 41, where teaches fast processing, fast sleep, and more energy-saving, and through the weight sensor and magnetic sensor analyze the data, and control the operating status of the system and divide it into three levels: level 1, when performing complex or interface interaction tasks, chip A100 and chip B200 operate normally, corresponding to the situation when the user directly uses the watch; level 2 when performing some background tasks or processing sensor interrupts, the chip A100 enters standby mode, and the chip B200 works normally, which corresponds to the situation of the general watch on the wrist, level 3, no tasks or performing some background tasks but no BLE module data and sensor interrupts , Chip A100 and Chip B200 both enter sleep mode, corresponding to the user's sleep situation). Regarding claim 9, CHENG teaches that the wearable device comprises a first processor and a second processor, the first processor is configured to run the first system, the second processor is configured to run the second system (Fig. 1 and pages 6, paragraphs 28 – pages 10, paragraphs 41), a performance level requirement of the second processor is higher than that of the first processor, a power consumption level requirement of the first processor is higher than that of the second processor (Fig. 1 and pages 6, paragraphs 28 – pages 10, paragraphs 41, where teaches a chip A100 (Fig. 1) and a chip B200 (Fig. 1), and the chip A100 is a processor (a second processor) having high performance and high power consumption, wherein android and/or windowsst and/or linux multitasking operating system (a second system) is run, and a classic Bluetooth module is integrated, and the chip B200 is relatively low in performance, extremely low in power consumption, and internally integrated with a BLE (Bluetooth low energy) module, and the BLE module is a processor (a first processor) having a low power consumption Bluetooth function). Regarding claim 11, CHENG teaches all the limitations as discussed in claim 1. Furthermore, CHENG further teaches that a processor and a memory, the memory being configured to store a computer program that is capable of running on the processor (Fig. 1 and pages 6, paragraphs 28 – pages 10, paragraphs 41) Regarding claim 12, CHENG teaches all the limitations as discussed in claims 1 and 11. Regarding claim 13, CHENG teaches all the limitations as discussed in claims 1 and 2. Regarding claim 14, CHENG teaches all the limitations as discussed in claims 3 and 4. Regarding claim 15, CHENG teaches all the limitations as discussed in claims 1 and 5. Regarding claim 16, CHENG teaches all the limitations as discussed in claims 1 and 6. Regarding claim 17, CHENG teaches all the limitations as discussed in claims 1 and 7. Regarding claim 18, CHENG teaches all the limitations as discussed in claims 1 and 2. Furthermore, CHENG further teaches that the in response to the Bluetooth activation instruction (messages, notifications) comprises receiving, by the second system, the Bluetooth activation instruction, and sending the Bluetooth activation instruction to the first system, the Bluetooth activation instruction being configured to indicate an activation of a Bluetooth chip (Fig. 1 and pages 6, paragraphs 28 – pages 10, paragraphs 41), and/or receiving, by the first system, the Bluetooth activation instruction, activating, in response to the Bluetooth activation instruction, the Bluetooth chip (Fig. 1 and pages 6, paragraphs 28 – pages 10, paragraphs 41). Regarding claim 19, CHENG teaches all the limitations as discussed in claims 3 and 4. Regarding claim 20, CHENG teaches all the limitations as discussed in claims 1 and 5. Regarding claim 21, CHENG teaches all the limitations as discussed in claims 1 and 6. Conclusion The prior art made of record and not relied upon is considered pertinent to applicant's disclosure. LAI (US 2020/0076234) discloses Bluetooth Headset, Charging Cabin and Charging System Thereof. CHEN et al. (US 2021/0105200) discloses Multi-Member Bluetooth Device Capable of Dynamically Switching Operations Mode. Information regarding...Patent Application Information Retrieval (PAIR) system... at 866-217-9197 (toll-free)." Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to JOHN J LEE whose telephone number is (571)272-7880. The examiner can normally be reached on Mon-Fri (8:00am-5:00pm). Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Yuwen Pan can be reached on 571-272-7855. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of an application may be obtained from the Patent Application Information Retrieval (PAIR) system. Status information for published applications may be obtained from either Private PAIR or Public PAIR. Status information for unpublished applications is available through Private PAIR only. For more information about the PAIR system, see http://pair-direct.uspto.gov. Should you have questions on access to the Private PAIR system, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative or access to the automated information system, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. J.L August 21, 2026 John J Lee /JOHN J LEE/ Primary Examiner, Art Unit 2649
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Dec 02, 2024
Application Filed
Aug 25, 2026
Non-Final Rejection mailed — §102 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12738077
METHODS, SYSTEMS, AND COMPUTER PROGRAM PRODUCT FOR REMOVING EXTRANEOUS CONTENT FROM DRUG PRODUCT PACKAGING TO FACILITATE VALIDATION OF THE CONTENTS THEREIN
4y 7m to grant Granted Sep 15, 2026
Patent 12739024
INTELLIGENT TRANSPORTATION SYSTEM USING MULTI-LAYER SATELLITE AND COMMUNICATION METHOD USING THE SAME
2y 7m to grant Granted Sep 15, 2026
Patent 12732773
SYSTEMS, METHODS, AND MANUFACTURES FOR PROVIDING NETWORK SERVICES INCLUDING MOBILE SERVICES TO A LOCATION
2y 9m to grant Granted Sep 08, 2026
Patent 12726918
TRANSMIT POWER CONTROL ACCUMULATION CORRECTION
3y 4m to grant Granted Sep 01, 2026
Patent 12726221
Active Power Splitter and Combiner Circuitry
2y 11m to grant Granted Sep 01, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

Strategy Recommendation AI-generated — please review before filing

Get a prosecution strategy drawn from examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Typically takes 5-10 seconds — AI-generated, attorney review required before filing

Prosecution Projections

1-2
Expected OA Rounds
93%
Grant Probability
99%
With Interview (+6.4%)
2y 2m (~4m remaining)
Median Time to Grant
Low
PTA Risk
Based on 1312 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allowance rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month