Prosecution Insights
Last updated: August 17, 2026
Application No. 18/871,182

Underbody Protection Device, Housing Lower Part, Vehicle Floor Device, and Motor Vehicle

Non-Final OA §102§103§112
Filed
Dec 03, 2024
Priority
Jul 20, 2022 — DE 10 2022 118 134.0 +1 more
Examiner
SHELTON, IAN BRYCE
Art Unit
Tech Center
Assignee
Bayerische Motoren Werke Aktiengesellschaft
OA Round
1 (Non-Final)
78%
Grant Probability
Favorable
1-2
OA Rounds
5m
Est. Remaining
93%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 78% — above average
78%
Career Allowance Rate
205 granted / 264 resolved
+17.7% vs TC avg
Moderate +15% lift
Without
With
+14.9%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Fast prosecutor
2y 2m
Avg Prosecution
30 currently pending
Career history
280
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
0.3%
-39.7% vs TC avg
§103
49.8%
+9.8% vs TC avg
§102
23.8%
-16.2% vs TC avg
§112
21.7%
-18.3% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 264 resolved cases

Office Action

§102 §103 §112
DETAILED ACTION Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . Claim Objections Claim 22 is objected to because of the following informalities: Claim 22, line 1, “a vehicle floor” should say “the vehicle floor” Appropriate correction is required. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 112 The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 112(d): (d) REFERENCE IN DEPENDENT FORMS.—Subject to subsection (e), a claim in dependent form shall contain a reference to a claim previously set forth and then specify a further limitation of the subject matter claimed. A claim in dependent form shall be construed to incorporate by reference all the limitations of the claim to which it refers. The following is a quotation of pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 112, fourth paragraph: Subject to the following paragraph [i.e., the fifth paragraph of pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 112], a claim in dependent form shall contain a reference to a claim previously set forth and then specify a further limitation of the subject matter claimed. A claim in dependent form shall be construed to incorporate by reference all the limitations of the claim to which it refers. Claim 17 is rejected under 35 U.S.C. 112(d) or pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 112, 4th paragraph, as being of improper dependent form for failing to further limit the subject matter of the claim upon which it depends, or for failing to include all the limitations of the claim upon which it depends. Claim 17 depends upon claim 16 and claim 16 has the limitation of “an underbody protection device … that covers at least some regions of the battery housing toward a bottom of a vehicle vertical direction (z) in an installed position”. Claim 17 just recites this same limitation and does not further limit. Applicant may cancel the claim(s), amend the claim(s) to place the claim(s) in proper dependent form, rewrite the claim(s) in independent form, or present a sufficient showing that the dependent claim(s) complies with the statutory requirements. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 102 The following is a quotation of the appropriate paragraphs of 35 U.S.C. 102 that form the basis for the rejections under this section made in this Office action: A person shall be entitled to a patent unless – (a)(1) the claimed invention was patented, described in a printed publication, or in public use, on sale, or otherwise available to the public before the effective filing date of the claimed invention. (a)(2) the claimed invention was described in a patent issued under section 151, or in an application for patent published or deemed published under section 122(b), in which the patent or application, as the case may be, names another inventor and was effectively filed before the effective filing date of the claimed invention. Claim(s) 11-12 is/are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 102(a)(1) as being anticipated by Dietz (DE 102012015919 A1). Regarding claim 11, Dietz discloses an apparatus (figs.1-9) for an electrically drivable motor vehicle, comprising: an underbody protection device (housing bottom 18) that is configured to be reversibly secured to a battery housing (battery case 12) of a traction battery of the electrically drivable motor vehicle and that covers at least some regions of the battery housing toward a bottom of a vehicle vertical direction (z) in an installed position, wherein the underbody protection device has a first underbody element and a second underbody element, between which a spacer is arranged, such that the underbody elements form a sandwich structure with the spacer (fiber-reinforced plastic layers 44, core 48, core 46 form the underbody elements and spacer in a sandwich structure, figs.6-7). Regarding claim 12, Dietz discloses wherein the underbody elements comprise a fiber-reinforced plastic (fiber-reinforced plastic layers 44). Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 103 The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 103 which forms the basis for all obviousness rejections set forth in this Office action: A patent for a claimed invention may not be obtained, notwithstanding that the claimed invention is not identically disclosed as set forth in section 102, if the differences between the claimed invention and the prior art are such that the claimed invention as a whole would have been obvious before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to a person having ordinary skill in the art to which the claimed invention pertains. Patentability shall not be negated by the manner in which the invention was made. Claim(s) 13-22 is/are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over Rausch (DE 102019206646 A1) in view of Franke (US 20220271359 A1 / DE 102021103378 B3). Regarding claim 13, Rausch discloses a housing apparatus (housing assembly 2, figs.1-2) comprising: a housing lower part (side walls 21, case back 6, and underrun protection 5, figs.1-2) associated with a battery housing (energy storage housing 3, figs.1-2) of a traction battery (energy storage 4, figs.1-2) of an electrically drivable motor vehicle (motor vehicle 1, fig.1), which is designed to delimit a storage volume (volume for the batteries 4, figs.1-2) for a number of battery cells (energy storage 4, figs.1-2) of the traction battery, wherein the housing lower part has a storage area (storage area for batteries 4, figs.1-2), on which the number of battery cells are accommodatable, and in the storage area (figs.1-2). Rausch discloses case back (6) and cooling device (18), cooling plates (17), and air cushion (19) to cool batteries (4), but fails to disclose the housing lower part has at least one predetermined break point which, upon failure, forms an opening in the housing lower part, via which gas emerging from the number of battery cells is transported away from the storage volume. However, Franke discloses housing lower part has at least one predetermined break point (degassing unit 8 with degassing elements 9 designed as a bursting element, figs.1-2) which, upon failure, forms an opening in the housing lower part, via which gas emerging from the number of battery cells is transported away from the storage volume (degassing elements 9 open to discharge hot gas from the battery cells 3 via degassing chamber 12 and outlet 14 with openings 15, figs.1-2, paragraph [0028]). Rausch and Franke are both considered to be analogous to the claimed invention because they are in the same field of housing apparatus. Therefore, it would have been obvious to someone of ordinary skill in the art before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to have modified Rausch with the degassing unit of Franke with a reasonable expectation of success because it would have combined prior art elements yielding predictable results of removing unwanted gasses from the battery cells for cell integrity, performance and safety. Regarding claim 14, Rausch in combination with Franke discloses wherein the housing lower part has a separate predetermined break point for each of the number of battery cells (Rausch, cooling device 18, cooling plates 17, and air cushion 19 to cool each battery 4; Franke, degassing unit 8 with a plurality of degassing elements 9 to discharge hot gas from the battery cells 3 via degassing chamber 12 and outlet 14 with openings 15, figs.1-2, paragraph [0028]), and each predetermined break point is arranged underneath a respectively associated battery cell in the vehicle vertical direction (z) in the installed position (figs.1-2 of both Rausch and Franke). Regarding claim 15, Rausch in combination with Franke, Rausch discloses a vehicle floor (floor of vehicle 1, fig.1) device for an electrically drivable motor vehicle, comprising: a battery housing (battery housing 3, figs.1-2) for a traction battery, wherein the battery housing has the housing lower part according to claim 13. Regarding claim 16, Rausch in combination with Franke, Rausch discloses further comprising an underbody protection device (underrun protection 5, figs.1-2) that is configured to be reversibly secured to a battery housing (housing 3, figs.1-2) of a traction battery of the electrically drivable motor vehicle (motor vehicle 1, fig.1) and that covers at least some regions of the battery housing toward a bottom of a vehicle vertical direction (z) in an installed position (figs.1-2), wherein the underbody protection device has a first underbody element and a second underbody element, between which a spacer is arranged, such that the underbody elements form a sandwich structure with the spacer (upper cover plate 11, lower cover plate 12, and filler 13 form the 1st element, 2nd element, and spacer in a sandwich structure, fig.2). Regarding claim 17 as best understood based on the 35 U.S.C 112(d) issue discussed above, Rausch in combination with Franke discloses, Rausch discloses wherein the underbody protection device covers at least some regions of the battery housing toward the bottom in the vehicle vertical direction (z) in the installed position (underrun protection 5, battery housing 3, figs.1-2). Regarding claim 18, Rausch in combination with Franke discloses wherein the housing lower part and the underbody protection device together delimit a degassing chamber (Rausch, cooling device 18, cooling plates 17, and air cushion 19; Franke, degassing unit 8 with degassing elements 9 designed as a bursting element, degassing elements 9 open to discharge hot gas from the battery cells 3 via degassing chamber 12 and outlet 14 with openings 15, figs.1-2, paragraph [0028]), into which the gas flows via the opening and via which the gas is be transported away from the storage volume. Regarding claim 19, Rausch in combination with Franke discloses further comprising: an impact absorption structure that is arranged in the degassing chamber (Rausch, underrun protection device 5 has filler foam 13 and cooling system, figs.1-2; Franke, degassing unit 8 with degassing elements 9, figs.1-2, paragraph [0028]). Regarding claim 20, Rausch in combination with Franke discloses wherein the impact absorption structure has at least one gas conduction duct, which is configured to lead the gas away from the battery cells (Rausch, underrun protection device 5 has filler foam 13 and cooling system, figs.1-2; Franke, degassing unit 8 with degassing elements 9, figs.1-2, paragraph [0028]). Regarding claim 21, Rausch in combination with Franke, Rausch discloses wherein the underbody protection device is secured to the housing lower part via at least one screw connection (screwing points 16, fig.2). Regarding claim 22, Rausch in combination with Franke, Rausch discloses a motor vehicle (motor vehicle 1, fig.1) having a vehicle floor device according to claim 15. Conclusion The prior art made of record and not relied upon is considered pertinent to applicant's disclosure. The prior art not relied upon but considered pertinent to the applicant’s disclosure is included in the 892 form. The art included has features related to claim limitations, the general structural of the invention, teachings, and other analogous art to the invention. Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to IAN BRYCE SHELTON whose telephone number is (571)272-6501. The examiner can normally be reached Monday-Friday 8:00-5:00. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Allen Shriver can be reached at (303)-297-4337. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /IAN BRYCE SHELTON/Examiner, Art Unit 3613
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Dec 03, 2024
Application Filed
Jul 20, 2026
Non-Final Rejection mailed — §102, §103, §112 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12703305
VEHICLE REAR STEP AND DIFFUSER SYSTEM
2y 7m to grant Granted Aug 11, 2026
Patent 12691828
ROTARY TELESCOPIC BOOM LIFT
2y 7m to grant Granted Jul 28, 2026
Patent 12673713
LEG FOLDING MECHANISM AND A PUSH CHAIR
3y 1m to grant Granted Jul 07, 2026
Patent 12673709
Retractable and extendable hand truck base plate assembly with a securing and releasing mechanism
2y 10m to grant Granted Jul 07, 2026
Patent 12668291
Wheel tackle
2y 4m to grant Granted Jun 30, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

Strategy Recommendation AI-generated — please review before filing

Get a prosecution strategy drawn from examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Typically takes 5-10 seconds — AI-generated, attorney review required before filing

Prosecution Projections

1-2
Expected OA Rounds
78%
Grant Probability
93%
With Interview (+14.9%)
2y 2m (~5m remaining)
Median Time to Grant
Low
PTA Risk
Based on 264 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allowance rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month