Prosecution Insights
Last updated: August 06, 2026
Application No. 18/871,210

METHOD AND COMPUTER SYSTEM FOR ANALYZING GASTRIC ENDOSCOPIC IMAGE UTILIZING IMAGE SEGMENTATION TECHNOLOGY

Non-Final OA §102
Filed
Dec 03, 2024
Priority
Jul 01, 2024 — nonprovisional of PCTCN2024102836
Examiner
CHEN, XUEMEI G
Art Unit
2661
Tech Center
2600 — Communications
Assignee
Ton-Yen General Hospital
OA Round
1 (Non-Final)
77%
Grant Probability
Favorable
1-2
OA Rounds
11m
Est. Remaining
99%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 77% — above average
77%
Career Allowance Rate
448 granted / 582 resolved
+15.0% vs TC avg
Strong +26% interview lift
Without
With
+25.5%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
2y 7m
Avg Prosecution
20 currently pending
Career history
601
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
11.8%
-28.2% vs TC avg
§103
61.4%
+21.4% vs TC avg
§102
13.1%
-26.9% vs TC avg
§112
10.5%
-29.5% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 582 resolved cases

Office Action

§102
DETAILED ACTION Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . Claims 1-10 are pending in the application. Claim Objections Claim 5 recites two “decoder”. For the purpose of prior art rejection, Examiner considers the first decoder an “encoder”. Claim 10 has similar issue. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 102 In the event the determination of the status of the application as subject to AIA 35 U.S.C. 102 and 103 (or as subject to pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 102 and 103) is incorrect, any correction of the statutory basis (i.e., changing from AIA to pre-AIA ) for the rejection will not be considered a new ground of rejection if the prior art relied upon, and the rationale supporting the rejection, would be the same under either status. The following is a quotation of the appropriate paragraphs of 35 U.S.C. 102 that form the basis for the rejections under this section made in this Office action: A person shall be entitled to a patent unless – (a)(1) the claimed invention was patented, described in a printed publication, or in public use, on sale, or otherwise available to the public before the effective filing date of the claimed invention. Claim(s) 1-10 is/are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 102(a)(1) as being anticipated by Chen et al. (Chen YT, Yang EH, Chang WL, Lin J, Cheng HC, Huang CR. Mask focal modulation network for gastric intestinal metaplasia segmentation. In 2024 International Joint Conference on Neural Networks (IJCNN) 2024 Jun 30 (pp. 1-8). IEEE. Hereafter Chen). As per claim 1, Chen teaches an analyzing method for gastric endoscopic image utilizing image segmentation technology (Abstract), the analyzing method adapted to a computer system (page 5 right column 4th line “a GTX 3080 GPU”) and comprising: obtaining a gastric endoscopic image and cutting the gastric endoscopic image into a plurality of patches (Fig. 1 “Image” with dimension HXWX3 being input image; Abstract “gastric IM segmentation from endoscopic images”; Fig. 1 “patch partition”); inputting one of the patches into an encoder to obtain an encoded feature map (Fig. 1 “Encoder”; page 3 right col. B. Encoder Module “The encoder has four stages. The width and height of the feature maps are divided by 2 and the number of channels is doubled in each stage as shown in Fig. 1”); inputting the encoded feature map into a decoder to obtain a decoded feature map (Fig. 1 “Pixel Decoder”; page 3 right col. C. Pixel Decoder Module “The output f4 of the pixel decoder is the feature embedding of size 1/4 of the original resolution”); inputting the decoded feature map into a mask focal modulation decoder, wherein the mask focal modulation decoder comprises a plurality of mask focal modulation stages (Fig. 1 showing 3 mask focal modulation stages; See below attached para. from page 3 right col. section D), and wherein one of the mask focal modulation stages is utilized to receive the decoded feature map and a first prototype feature (Fig. 1 the first stage receiving the decoded feature map and a first prototype feature “Prototypes NXC”); PNG media_image1.png 295 687 media_image1.png Greyscale inputting the first prototype feature into a focal modulation function to obtain a focal modulation feature (Fig. 2; page 4 eqn. (2) PNG media_image2.png 57 73 media_image2.png Greyscale is a focal modulation function applied to the first prototype feature); inputting the decoded feature map into a scaling function then into a projection function to obtain a scaled feature (See below attached eqn. (2) and description from page 4 left col.; PNG media_image3.png 56 108 media_image3.png Greyscale representing applying a scaling function R(.) to decoded feature map fs, then applying projection function F(.)); PNG media_image4.png 218 705 media_image4.png Greyscale ; generating a second prototype feature based on a mask, the scaled feature, and the focal modulation feature (See above attached para. from page 4 left col., in which MFM(pb,fs,mb) representing a second prototype feature, mb a binary mask, PNG media_image3.png 56 108 media_image3.png Greyscale the scaled function and PNG media_image2.png 57 73 media_image2.png Greyscale the focal modulation feature. See description in page 4 left col.); and generating a prediction mask based on the second prototype feature, wherein the prediction mask comprises a plurality of pixels for segmenting a gastric intestinal metaplasia area (Fig. 1 “Predict Mask” with dimension HXWXK; Abstract “Gastric intestinal metaplasia (IM)”). As per claim 2, dependent upon claim 1, Chen teaches wherein generating the prediction mask based on the second prototype feature comprises: inputting the second prototype feature corresponding to a last stage among the mask focal modulation stages into a plurality of neural networks to obtain a mask feature and a category feature (See below Chen partial Fig. 1 (annotation added), in which second prototype feature from last stage with dimension NXC is input to neural networks MLP, generating a mask feature (“Mask Embeddings”) and a category feature (“Class Embeddings”)); performing element-wise multiplication on the mask feature and the decoded feature map to obtain a binarization mask (See below partial Fig. 1 first multiplication representing element-wise multiplication on the mask feature and the decoded feature map to obtain a binarization mask (“Binary Masks”)); and performing element-wise multiplication on the binarization mask and the category feature to obtain the prediction mask (See below partial Fig. 1 second multiplication representing element-wise multiplication on the binarization mask and the category feature to obtain the prediction mask). PNG media_image5.png 312 785 media_image5.png Greyscale As per claim 3, dependent upon claim 1, Chen teaches wherein generating the second prototype feature based on the mask, the scaled feature, and the focal modulation feature comprises: performing element-wise multiplication on the mask, the scaled feature, and the focal modulation feature to obtain the second prototype feature (page 4 eqn. (2), see below attached para.). PNG media_image6.png 221 689 media_image6.png Greyscale As per claim 4, dependent upon claim 1, Chen teaches wherein the mask comprises a plurality of values, and the analyzing method further comprises: determining whether each of the values of the mask ​​is less than a threshold to generate a next stage mask (See below attached para. from page 4 left col.). PNG media_image7.png 347 680 media_image7.png Greyscale . As per claim 5, dependent upon claim 1, Chen teaches wherein the Claim 6, an independent system claim, recites steps corresponding to method claim 1. Therefore the recited steps of 6 are mapped to Chen in the same manner as corresponding steps in claim 1. Chen additionally teaches system elements, such as a memory and a processor (page 5 right column 4th line “a GTX 3080 GPU”). Claim 7, dependent upon claim 6, recites similar steps corresponding to method claim 2. Therefore the recited steps of 7 are mapped to Chen in the same manner as corresponding steps in claim 2. Claim 8, dependent upon claim 6, recites similar step corresponding to method claim 3. Therefore the recited step of 8 is mapped to Chen in the same manner as corresponding step in claim 3. Claim 9, dependent upon claim 6, recites similar step corresponding to method claim 4. Therefore the recited step of 9 is mapped to Chen in the same manner as corresponding step in claim 4. Claim 10, dependent upon claim 6, recites similar elements corresponding to method claim 5. Therefore the recited elements of 10 are mapped to Chen in the same manner as corresponding elements in claim 5. Conclusion Additional prior art Öztürk et al. (Öztürk Ş, Cukur T. Focal modulation network for lung segmentation in chest X-ray images. Turkish Journal of Electrical Engineering and Computer Sciences. 2023;31(6):1006-20) discloses a method for segmentation of lung regions using a focal modulation UNet model (FMN-UNet). The method includes receiving a high-resolution CXR image, projecting the input through a convolutional encoder stage to extract a relatively compact latent representation, processing encoded feature maps at the lowest and highest resolutions to capture both global and local contextual relationships between image features, and projecting feature maps through a convolutional decoder stage to produce segmentation masks. See Fig. 1, page 1008 2nd para., page 1009-1011 section 2.2. FMN-UNet. Contact Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to XUEMEI G CHEN whose telephone number is (571)270-3480. The examiner can normally be reached Monday-Friday 9am-6pm. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, John M Villecco can be reached at (571) 272-7319. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /XUEMEI G CHEN/Primary Examiner, Art Unit 2661
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Dec 03, 2024
Application Filed
Jul 09, 2026
Non-Final Rejection mailed — §102 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12694654
MODEL TRAINING METHOD AND RELATED DEVICE
2y 11m to grant Granted Jul 28, 2026
Patent 12694468
RANGE AWARE SPATIAL UPSCALING
2y 8m to grant Granted Jul 28, 2026
Patent 12676016
IMAGE BURST EDITING BASED ON NATURAL LANGUAGE PROCESSING (NLP) INPUT
2y 7m to grant Granted Jul 07, 2026
Patent 12670575
PATTERNING PARAMETER DETERMINATION USING A CHARGED PARTICLE INSPECTION SYSTEM
2y 3m to grant Granted Jun 30, 2026
Patent 12664709
IMAGE RECONSTRUCTION METHOD AND IMAGE RECONSTRUCTION PROCESSING SYSTEM
2y 6m to grant Granted Jun 23, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

Strategy Recommendation AI-generated — please review before filing

Get a prosecution strategy drawn from examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Typically takes 5-10 seconds — AI-generated, attorney review required before filing

Prosecution Projections

1-2
Expected OA Rounds
77%
Grant Probability
99%
With Interview (+25.5%)
2y 7m (~11m remaining)
Median Time to Grant
Low
PTA Risk
Based on 582 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allowance rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month