Prosecution Insights
Last updated: August 16, 2026
Application No. 18/871,973

PRINTING SYSTEM AND PRINTING METHOD

Non-Final OA §102§103
Filed
Dec 05, 2024
Priority
Jun 13, 2022 — JP 2022-095142 +1 more
Examiner
MCMILLION, TRACEY M
Art Unit
2853
Tech Center
2800 — Semiconductors & Electrical Systems
Assignee
Suntory Holdings Limited
OA Round
1 (Non-Final)
88%
Grant Probability
Favorable
1-2
OA Rounds
3m
Est. Remaining
90%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 88% — above average
88%
Career Allowance Rate
560 granted / 638 resolved
+19.8% vs TC avg
Minimal +2% lift
Without
With
+2.3%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Fast prosecutor
1y 12m
Avg Prosecution
21 currently pending
Career history
669
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
0.9%
-39.1% vs TC avg
§103
59.0%
+19.0% vs TC avg
§102
23.8%
-16.2% vs TC avg
§112
13.6%
-26.4% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 638 resolved cases

Office Action

§102 §103
DETAILED ACTION Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . Priority Receipt is acknowledged of certified copies of papers required by 37 CFR 1.55. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 102 The following is a quotation of the appropriate paragraphs of 35 U.S.C. 102 that form the basis for the rejections under this section made in this Office action: A person shall be entitled to a patent unless – (a)(1) the claimed invention was patented, described in a printed publication, or in public use, on sale, or otherwise available to the public before the effective filing date of the claimed invention. Claim(s) 1-4 and 7 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 102(a)(1) as being anticipated by Attias (DE 4237577). With regard to claim 1, Attias discloses a printing system [Fig.1A] comprising: a conveyance device (16) [Para. 0047] configured to convey a container (12) [reusable bottles; Para. 047]; and a printing device (112) [Para. 0059] configured to perform laser printing on the container, wherein the conveyance device is configured to hold top and bottom of the container [Fig. 6] and convey the container being held along a predetermined path [Fig. 1, 5A-6 and 16], and the printing device is provided at a position adjacent to the predetermined path where laser printing can be performed on the container being conveyed [Fig. 1B]. With regard to claim 2, Attias discloses wherein the conveyance device includes a rotary table (31) being rotatable and a locator pair (52, 36) [Figs 4 and 6] configured to hold the top and bottom of the container, the locator pair is mounted to a periphery of the rotary table, and the predetermined path is a path along a rotation track of the rotary table [Fig. 1B]. With regard to claim 3, Attias discloses wherein the locator pair is rotatably mounted to the rotary table [connected to central axis (34) of carousel; See Fig. 16]. With regard to claim 4, Attias discloses further comprising a control device (104) [Para. 0034, 0065; Fig. 8] configured to independently control rotation of the rotary table and the locator pair. With regard to claim 7, Attias discloses a printing method comprising: performing printing on a container (12) held and conveyed by a conveying device (16) by irradiating the container with a laser beam [See Fig. 10], the conveying device holding top and bottom of the container and conveying the held container along a predetermined path [See Fig. 1, 5A-6 and 16] . Hi Kristal, regarding application 18/871,973, allowable subject matter is indicated as follows Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 103 The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 103 which forms the basis for all obviousness rejections set forth in this Office action: A patent for a claimed invention may not be obtained, notwithstanding that the claimed invention is not identically disclosed as set forth in section 102, if the differences between the claimed invention and the prior art are such that the claimed invention as a whole would have been obvious before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to a person having ordinary skill in the art to which the claimed invention pertains. Patentability shall not be negated by the manner in which the invention was made. Claim(s) 6 is rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over Attias (DE 4237577) as applied to claim 1 above, and further in view of Nishimura (JP 2019189282). With regard to claim 6, Attias does not disclose wherein the conveyance device is a roll labeler. Nishimura teaches a conveyance device (11) is a roll labeler (2) [Para. 0010]. It would have been obvious to one having ordinary skill in the art before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to utilize a conveyance device as a roll labeler as taught by Nishimura for the purpose of affixing labels to the sides of the containers Allowable Subject Matter Claim 5 objected to as being dependent upon a rejected base claim, but would be allowable if rewritten in independent form including all of the limitations of the base claim and any intervening claims. The primary reason for indicating allowable subject matter of claim 5 is the inclusion of the limitations of wherein in the control device function, the rotation speed of the locator pair is determined so as to suppress a relative speed with respect to the printing device of a surface, facing the printing device, of the container being conveyed in a state of being held by the locator pair. It is this limitation(s) found in the claims, as it is claimed in the combination of that has not been found, taught or suggested by the prior art of record, which makes these claims allowable over the prior art. Conclusion Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to TRACEY M MCMILLION whose telephone number is (571)270-5193. The examiner can normally be reached Monday-Friday 6AM-2:30PM EST. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Ricardo Magallanes can be reached at 571-272-5960. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /TRACEY M MCMILLION/Examiner, Art Unit 2853 /RICARDO I MAGALLANES/Supervisor Patent Examiner, Art Unit 2853
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Dec 05, 2024
Application Filed
Jul 29, 2026
Non-Final Rejection mailed — §102, §103 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12703189
PRINTER ASSEMBLY WITH COMMON MODULE
2y 6m to grant Granted Aug 11, 2026
Patent 12691676
HEAD UNIT AND LIQUID DISPENSING APPARATUS
2y 3m to grant Granted Jul 28, 2026
Patent 12686219
DEVICE, RECORDING DEVICE
3y 1m to grant Granted Jul 21, 2026
Patent 12649329
METHOD AND APPARATUS FOR HIGH CONTRAST PRINTING
3y 0m to grant Granted Jun 09, 2026
Patent 12643336
PRINTING APPARATUS, METHOD FOR CONTROLLING PRINTING APPARATUS, AND STORAGE MEDIUM
2y 7m to grant Granted Jun 02, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

Strategy Recommendation AI-generated — please review before filing

Get a prosecution strategy drawn from examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Typically takes 5-10 seconds — AI-generated, attorney review required before filing

Prosecution Projections

1-2
Expected OA Rounds
88%
Grant Probability
90%
With Interview (+2.3%)
1y 12m (~3m remaining)
Median Time to Grant
Low
PTA Risk
Based on 638 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allowance rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month