Prosecution Insights
Last updated: August 17, 2026
Application No. 18/872,284

POWER CONTROL ACTUATOR

Non-Final OA §102§103§112
Filed
Dec 06, 2024
Priority
Jun 17, 2022 — JP 2022-098068 +1 more
Examiner
STEFANON, JUSTIN
Art Unit
Tech Center
Assignee
Sony Group Corporation
OA Round
1 (Non-Final)
51%
Grant Probability
Moderate
1-2
OA Rounds
1y 6m
Est. Remaining
99%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 51% of resolved cases
51%
Career Allowance Rate
95 granted / 187 resolved
-9.2% vs TC avg
Strong +48% interview lift
Without
With
+48.3%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
3y 2m
Avg Prosecution
45 currently pending
Career history
242
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
1.3%
-38.7% vs TC avg
§103
39.0%
-1.0% vs TC avg
§102
32.8%
-7.2% vs TC avg
§112
26.1%
-13.9% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 187 resolved cases

Office Action

§102 §103 §112
DETAILED ACTION Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . Priority Receipt is acknowledged of certified copies of papers required by 37 CFR 1.55. Information Disclosure Statement The information disclosure statement (IDS) submitted on 12/06/2024 is being considered by the examiner. Claim Objections Claim 2 is objected to because of the following informalities: claim 2 recites “an output frame 261 attached to the output-side bearing and has a space”. This should read ““an output frame 261 attached to the output-side bearing and having a space” or similar. Appropriate correction is required. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 112 The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 112(b): (b) CONCLUSION.—The specification shall conclude with one or more claims particularly pointing out and distinctly claiming the subject matter which the inventor or a joint inventor regards as the invention. The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 112 (pre-AIA ), second paragraph: The specification shall conclude with one or more claims particularly pointing out and distinctly claiming the subject matter which the applicant regards as his invention. Claims 2-5 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 112(b) or 35 U.S.C. 112 (pre-AIA ), second paragraph, as being indefinite for failing to particularly point out and distinctly claim the subject matter which the inventor or a joint inventor (or for applications subject to pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 112, the applicant), regards as the invention. Claim 2 recites the limitation “relative to” in line 2. This limitation renders the claim indefinite as it is not clear in what manner the claimed space is ‘relative to’ the claimed outer peripheral surface; does the space define an exterior of the surface, lie parallel to the surface, merely enclose the surface, or some other relationship? Claim 3 recites the limitation "the space a size larger than at least a cumulative tolerance" in line 2. This limitation renders the claim indefinite as it is not clear either what dimension, direction, or part of the space the claimed size refers, nor what dimension, direction, or part of the frame and bearing are being measured for tolerance. Claims 4-5 depend from rejected claims 2-3. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 102 The following is a quotation of the appropriate paragraphs of 35 U.S.C. 102 that form the basis for the rejections under this section made in this Office action: A person shall be entitled to a patent unless – (a)(1) the claimed invention was patented, described in a printed publication, or in public use, on sale, or otherwise available to the public before the effective filing date of the claimed invention. (a)(2) the claimed invention was described in a patent issued under section 151, or in an application for patent published or deemed published under section 122(b), in which the patent or application, as the case may be, names another inventor and was effectively filed before the effective filing date of the claimed invention. Claims 1-5 and 8-9 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 102(a)(1) as being anticipated by PARK (US 20130257230). Regarding claim 1, PARK discloses a power control actuator 80 comprising: an output-side bearing 271 provided on a side on which a torque is to be outputted; a speed reducer 220 including an output shaft 237; and a torque sensor 230 that detects a torque associated with rotation of the output shaft 237, wherein an outer peripheral surface of the torque sensor 230 and an inner peripheral surface of the output- side bearing 271 constitute a spigot joint structure, an inner peripheral surface of the torque sensor 230 and an outer peripheral surface of the output shaft 237 of the speed reducer 220 constitute a spigot joint structure (see annotated Fig. 7, below), and PNG media_image1.png 182 253 media_image1.png Greyscale the output-side bearing 271, the output shaft 237 of the speed reducer 220, and the torque sensor 230 have a coaxial structure (Fig. 7). PNG media_image2.png 522 425 media_image2.png Greyscale Regarding claim 2, PARK discloses the power control actuator according to claim 1, further comprising: an output frame 261 attached to the output-side bearing 271 and has a space relative to an outer peripheral surface of the output-side bearing 271 (see annotated Fig. 7, below). PNG media_image3.png 425 521 media_image3.png Greyscale Regarding claim 3, PARK discloses the power control actuator according to claim 2, wherein the space has a size larger than at least a cumulative tolerance of the output frame 261 and the output-side bearing 271 (see annotated Fig. 7, above). Regarding claim 4, PARK discloses the power control actuator according to claim 2, wherein the output frame 261 has a fastening hole through which a fastening member penetrates (see annotated Fig. 7, below), and PNG media_image4.png 240 131 media_image4.png Greyscale the output frame 261 and the output-side bearing 271 are fastened by the fastening member through the fastening hole and the space. Regarding claim 5, PARK discloses the power control actuator according to claim 2, wherein the output-side bearing 271 includes a cross roller bearing including an inner ring and an outer ring (para [0091]), and the space is provided between an outer peripheral surface, in an axial direction of the output- side cross roller bearing 271, of the outer ring and an inner peripheral surface of the output frame 261 and between an outer peripheral surface, in a radial direction of the output-side cross roller bearing 271, of the outer ring and an inner peripheral surface of the output frame 261. PNG media_image5.png 425 521 media_image5.png Greyscale Regarding claim 8, PARK discloses the power control actuator according to claim 1, further comprising: a correction unit that corrects a sensor value of the torque sensor 230 after attachment to a target of attachment, on a basis of a difference between a sensor value of the torque sensor 230 before the attachment to the target of attachment and a sensor value of the torque sensor 230 after the attachment to the target of attachment (the apparatus of PARK performs this function as broadly claimed, see para [0106]). Regarding claim 9, PARK discloses the power control actuator according to claim 1, wherein the speed reducer 220 includes a strain wave gearing including a flexspline (122/222), and the flexspline (122/222) constitutes the output shaft 237 of the speed reducer 220 (para [0066]). Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 103 The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 103 which forms the basis for all obviousness rejections set forth in this Office action: A patent for a claimed invention may not be obtained, notwithstanding that the claimed invention is not identically disclosed as set forth in section 102, if the differences between the claimed invention and the prior art are such that the claimed invention as a whole would have been obvious before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to a person having ordinary skill in the art to which the claimed invention pertains. Patentability shall not be negated by the manner in which the invention was made. Claims 6 and 7 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over PARK in view of MIYAZAWA (US 20190064018). Regarding claim 6, PARK discloses the power control actuator according to claim 1, wherein the torque sensor 230 includes: a first rotating body 231; a second rotating body 232 provided on an outer side of the first rotating body 231; a first bar section 233 including a front surface and a rear surface each including a plurality of strain gauges 234, the first bar section 233 coupling the first rotating body 231 and the second rotating body 232 to each other; and a second bar section 233 including a front surface and a rear surface each including a plurality of strain gauges 234, the second bar section 233 coupling the first rotating body 231 and the second rotating body 232 to each other, the second bar section 233 being opposed to the first bar section 233 with the first rotating body 231 being interposed between the second bar section 233 and the first bar section 233, and However, PARK does not disclose the plurality of strain gauges provided in the first bar section and the plurality of strain gauges provided in the second bar section constitute a Wheatstone bridge. MIYAZAWA discloses a power control actuator with a torque sensor 100 of similar construction with eight strain gauges constituting a Wheatstone bridge (para [0066]). It would have been obvious before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to a person having ordinary skill in the art to which the claimed invention pertains to provide the power control actuator of PARK with a torque sensor having the strain gauges constituting a Wheatstone bridge, similar to MIYAZAWA. A person having ordinary skill in the art to which the claimed invention pertains would have been motivated to make such modification in order to enable two-line torque outputs to be detected with one strain generation part, and allow a noise component to be removed by the resultant force, and improve detection accuracy, as taught by MIYAZAWA (para [0070] and [0082]). Regarding claim 7, PARK discloses the power control actuator according to claim 1, wherein the torque sensor 230 includes: a first rotating body 231; a second rotating body 232 provided on an outer side of the first rotating body 231; first and second bar sections 233 each including a plurality of strain gauges 234, the first and the second bar sections 233 coupling the first rotating body 231 and the second rotating body 232 to each other to allow the first and the second bar sections 233 to be opposed to each other with the first rotating body 231 being interposed between the first and the second bar sections 233; and a third bar section 233 including a plurality of strain gauges 234, the plurality of strain gauges 234 provided in the first bar section 233 and the plurality of strain gauges 234 provided in the second bar section 233 constitute a first sensor. However, PARK does not disclose a fourth bar section including a plurality of strain gauges, the third and fourth bar sections coupling the first rotating body and the second rotating body to each other to allow the third and fourth bar sections to be opposed to each other with the first rotating body being interposed between the third and fourth bar sections in a direction differing from the first and the second bar sections, the plurality of strain gauges provided in the third bar section and the plurality of strain gauges provided in the fourth bar section constitute a second sensor, and a sum of a first sensor value by the first sensor and a second sensor value by the second sensor is outputted as a sensor value of the torque sensor. MIYAZAWA discloses a power control actuator with a torque sensor 100 of similar construction with a fourth bar section 121d including a plurality of strain gauges G4,G8, third and fourth bar sections coupling a first rotating body 112 and a second rotating body 114 to each other to allow the third and fourth bar sections to be opposed to each other with the first rotating body being interposed between the third and fourth bar sections in a direction differing from the first and the second bar sections (Fig. 5), the plurality of strain gauges provided in the third bar section and the plurality of strain gauges provided in the fourth bar section constitute a second sensor, and a sum of a first sensor value by the first sensor and a second sensor value by the second sensor is outputted as a sensor value of the torque sensor (Para [0071]). PNG media_image6.png 510 502 media_image6.png Greyscale It would have been obvious before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to a person having ordinary skill in the art to which the claimed invention pertains to provide the power control actuator of PARK with a torque sensor having a fourth bar section including a plurality of strain gauges, the third and fourth bar sections coupling the first rotating body and the second rotating body to each other to allow the third and fourth bar sections to be opposed to each other with the first rotating body being interposed between the third and fourth bar sections in a direction differing from the first and the second bar sections, the plurality of strain gauges provided in the third bar section and the plurality of strain gauges provided in the fourth bar section constitute a second sensor, and a sum of a first sensor value by the first sensor and a second sensor value by the second sensor is outputted as a sensor value of the torque sensor, similar to MIYAZAWA. A person having ordinary skill in the art to which the claimed invention pertains would have been motivated to make such modification in order to enable two-line torque outputs to be detected with one strain generation part, and allow a noise component to be removed by the resultant force, and improve detection accuracy, as taught by MIYAZAWA (para [0070] and [0082]). Conclusion The prior art made of record and not relied upon is considered pertinent to applicant's disclosure. US-20150100159-A1 PARK discloses a cross-roller bearing, harmonic decelerator, and four-bar torque sensor; US-20200003256-A1 KOROYASU discloses a cross-roller bearing, wave gear mechanism, and torque sensor; US-20240083041-A1 ZHAO discloses a cross-roller bearing, wave gear mechanism, and four-bar torque sensor; US-20240255054-A1 MORITANI discloses a cross-roller bearing, wave gear mechanism, and eight-bar torque sensor; WO-2021219200-A BACHMAIER discloses a cross-roller bearing, stress wave transmission, and torque sensor. Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to JUSTIN STEFANON whose telephone number is (703)756-4648. The examiner can normally be reached Monday - Thursday and alternate Fridays 8AM - 5PM EDT. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Oluseye Iwarere can be reached at (571) 270-5112. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /JUSTIN STEFANON/Examiner, Art Unit 2834 /OLUSEYE IWARERE/Supervisory Patent Examiner, Art Unit 2834
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Dec 06, 2024
Application Filed
Jul 13, 2026
Non-Final Rejection mailed — §102, §103, §112 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12494684
ROTOR OF AN ELECTRIC MACHINE
2y 3m to grant Granted Dec 09, 2025
Patent 12451742
METHOD AND APPARATUS FOR COOLING A ROTOR ASSEMBLY
3y 2m to grant Granted Oct 21, 2025
Patent 12316190
CASE STRUCTURE OF IN-WHEEL MOTOR
2y 10m to grant Granted May 27, 2025
Patent 9650015
BELT RETRACTOR FOR A VEHICLE SAFETY BELT
2y 8m to grant Granted May 16, 2017
Patent 9635986
SPINDLE AND ADAPTER FOR ROLL PAPER PRODUCT DISPENSERS
5y 6m to grant Granted May 02, 2017
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

Strategy Recommendation AI-generated — please review before filing

Get a prosecution strategy drawn from examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Typically takes 5-10 seconds — AI-generated, attorney review required before filing

Prosecution Projections

1-2
Expected OA Rounds
51%
Grant Probability
99%
With Interview (+48.3%)
3y 2m (~1y 6m remaining)
Median Time to Grant
Low
PTA Risk
Based on 187 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allowance rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month