Prosecution Insights
Last updated: October 01, 2026
Application No. 18/872,310

METHODS, APPARATUS, AND SYSTEMS FOR HIERARCHICAL BEAM PREDICTION BASED ON ASSOCIATION OF BEAM RESOURCES

Non-Final OA §102§112
Filed
Dec 06, 2024
Priority
Jul 11, 2022 — provisional 63/388,063 +1 more
Examiner
NGUYEN, BRIAN D
Art Unit
Tech Center
Assignee
InterDigital Inc.
OA Round
1 (Non-Final)
92%
Grant Probability
Favorable
1-2
OA Rounds
5m
Est. Remaining
98%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 92% — above average
92%
Career Allowance Rate
1223 granted / 1322 resolved
+32.5% vs TC avg
Moderate +6% lift
Without
With
+5.5%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
2y 3m
Avg Prosecution
15 currently pending
Career history
1331
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
7.8%
-32.2% vs TC avg
§103
30.5%
-9.5% vs TC avg
§102
23.9%
-16.1% vs TC avg
§112
23.4%
-16.6% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 1322 resolved cases

Office Action

§102 §112
DETAILED ACTION Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 112 The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 112(b): (b) CONCLUSION.—The specification shall conclude with one or more claims particularly pointing out and distinctly claiming the subject matter which the inventor or a joint inventor regards as the invention. Claims 1 and 31 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 112(b) as being indefinite for failing to particularly point out and distinctly claim the subject matter which the inventor or a joint inventor regards as the invention. Claim 1 recites the limitation "the second set of RSs" in line 12. There is insufficient antecedent basis for this limitation in the claim. Claim 31 recites the limitation "the second set of RSs" in line 12. There is insufficient antecedent basis for this limitation in the claim. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 102 The following is a quotation of the appropriate paragraphs of 35 U.S.C. 102 that form the basis for the rejections under this section made in this Office action: A person shall be entitled to a patent unless – (a)(2) the claimed invention was described in a patent issued under section 151, or in an application for patent published or deemed published under section 122(b), in which the patent or application, as the case may be, names another inventor and was effectively filed before the effective filing date of the claimed invention. Claims 21-40 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 102(a)(2) as being anticipated by Li et al (2025/0253906). Regarding claims 21 and 31, Li discloses a method and a wireless transmit/receive unit (WTRU) (see UE in figure 3) comprising: a processor configured to: perform one or more channel state information (CSI) measurements on a first set of reference signals (RSs) associated with a first set of transmission configuration indicator (TCI) states (see a first channel state information reference signal (CSI-RS) associated with a first transmission configuration indicator (TCI) state in paragraph 0005; the UE may measure signals transmitted from the other device and provide the other device with measurements of those signals (e.g., something indicative of those measurements). These measurements or observations may be used for training a ML model used to predict future TCI states for transmitted signals (e.g., reference signals) in paragraph 0047); predict one or more CSI parameters for a second set of TCI states based on the CSI measurements performed on the first set of RSs associated with the first set of TCI states (see predict future TCI states for transmitted signals (e.g., reference signals) in paragraphs 0047; the second TCI state in paragraph 0065; parameters (e.g., duration, number of beams, etc.) for a receive-beam refinement operation in paragraph 0142); receive a first indication to activate or deactivate a first TCI state in the first set of TCI states (see activation/deactivation and TCI state in paragraphs 0063-0065); predict to activate or deactivate a second TCI state in the second set of TCI states based on the first indication to activate or deactivate the first TCI state of the first set of TCI states and the predicted one or more CSI parameters for the second set of RSs (see indicating predicted future TCI states in paragraphs 0048, 0050, 0065, 0067, 0133, 0137, 0178, 0195, 0209); and send a second indication that the second TCI state in the second set of TCI states has been activated or deactivated (see the MAC-CE used to activate the second TCI state in paragraph 0065). Regarding claims 22 and 32, Li discloses wherein the one or more CSI parameters for the second set of TCI states is predicted based on a precoding matrix indicator (PMI) determined from the CSI measurements performed on the first set of RSs associated with the first set of TCI states (see a precoding matrix indicator (PMI) in paragraph 0098). Regarding claims 23 and 33, Li discloses wherein the first set of TCI states is associated with a first frequency range and the second set of TCI states is associated with a second frequency range (see different frequency ranges in paragraphs 0079, 0093). Regarding claims 24 and 34, Li discloses determining a spatial association between the first set of RSs and the second set of RSs, wherein the one or more CSI parameters for the second set of RSs is predicted based on the spatial association (see spatial and prediction in paragraphs 0060, 0100). Regarding claims 25 and 35, Li discloses wherein the first set of RSs is associated with a first set of beam resources and the second set of RSs is associated with a second set of beam resources (see beams and resources in paragraphs 0154, 0160, 0194). Regarding claims 26 and 36, Li discloses wherein the first set of beam resources is in a first frequency range and the second set of beam resources is in a second frequency range (see different frequency ranges in paragraphs 0079, 0093). Regarding claims 27 and 37, Li discloses wherein the first set of beam resources comprises a larger beamwidth than the second set of beam resources (see figure 8 and resources in paragraphs 0137-0140). Regarding claims 28 and 38, Li discloses wherein the first indication is received via a medium access control control element (MAC-CE) (see MAC-CE in paragraphs 0139-0140). Regarding claims 29 and 39, Li discloses determining one or more parameters for the second set of RSs based on one or more artificial intelligence or machine learning models (see artificial intelligence (AI) and/or machine learning in paragraph 0047). Regarding claims 30 and 40, Li discloses receiving configuration information associated the first set of RSs and the second set of RSs (see configuration in paragraph 0014). Conclusion Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to BRIAN D NGUYEN whose telephone number is (571)272-3084. The examiner can normally be reached Monday-Friday 8:00 - 4:30. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Khaled Kassim can be reached at 571-270-3770. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /BRIAN D NGUYEN/Primary Examiner, Art Unit 2475
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Dec 06, 2024
Application Filed
Sep 16, 2026
Non-Final Rejection mailed — §102, §112 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12750839
TRANSMISSION OF DEFERRED FEEDBACK VIA UPLINK SHARED CHANNEL
3y 0m to grant Granted Sep 29, 2026
Patent 12744629
COMMUNICATION METHOD AND APPARATUS
2y 6m to grant Granted Sep 22, 2026
Patent 12739802
Enhanced PSFCH Resource Mapping For Standalone Sidelink CSI-RS
3y 1m to grant Granted Sep 15, 2026
Patent 12739837
METHOD AND APPARATUS FOR TRANSMITTING UPLINK FEEDBACK INFORMATION
2y 8m to grant Granted Sep 15, 2026
Patent 12733031
COMMUNICATION APPARATUSES AND COMMUNICATION METHODS FOR SELECTION AND SENSING WINDOWS FOR NR SIDELINK UES WITH PARTIAL SENSING
3y 2m to grant Granted Sep 08, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

Strategy Recommendation AI-generated — please review before filing

Get a prosecution strategy drawn from examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Typically takes 5-10 seconds — AI-generated, attorney review required before filing

Prosecution Projections

1-2
Expected OA Rounds
92%
Grant Probability
98%
With Interview (+5.5%)
2y 3m (~5m remaining)
Median Time to Grant
Low
PTA Risk
Based on 1322 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allowance rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month