Prosecution Insights
Last updated: October 04, 2026
Application No. 18/872,762

APPARATUS FOR INSERTING AN ELONGATE OBJECT INTO A TRENCH

Final Rejection §112
Filed
Dec 06, 2024
Priority
Jun 09, 2022 — EU 22178033.1 +1 more
Examiner
SICONOLFI, ROBERT
Art Unit
3678
Tech Center
3600 — Transportation & Electronic Commerce
Assignee
Soil Machine Dynamics Limited
OA Round
2 (Final)
40%
Grant Probability
At Risk
3-4
OA Rounds
2y 2m
Est. Remaining
59%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants only 40% of cases
40%
Career Allowance Rate
25 granted / 63 resolved
-12.3% vs TC avg
Strong +20% interview lift
Without
With
+19.6%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
4y 0m
Avg Prosecution
4 currently pending
Career history
65
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§103
52.2%
+12.2% vs TC avg
§102
24.1%
-15.9% vs TC avg
§112
22.0%
-18.0% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 63 resolved cases

Office Action

§112
Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 112 The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 112(b): (b) CONCLUSION.—The specification shall conclude with one or more claims particularly pointing out and distinctly claiming the subject matter which the inventor or a joint inventor regards as the invention. The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 112 (pre-AIA ), second paragraph: The specification shall conclude with one or more claims particularly pointing out and distinctly claiming the subject matter which the applicant regards as his invention. Claims 1-4, 6,7 and 9-18 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 112(b) or 35 U.S.C. 112 (pre-AIA ), second paragraph, as being indefinite for failing to particularly point out and distinctly claim the subject matter which the inventor or a joint inventor (or for applications subject to pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 112, the applicant), regards as the invention. Claim 1 states “at least one pin configured to be releasably attachable to the object engaging means and is configured to be receivable within a corresponding slot of a corresponding support” Claim 3 states “at least one protrusion configured to be releasably attachable to one side of the object engaging means” Clam 16 also refers to “at least one pin”. It is unclear what the difference is between the pin and the protrusion. The embodiment of figures 3 and 4 appear to show a releasable pin while the embodiment of figures 5 and 6 show a protrusion that appears to be non-releasable. It is unclear if the limitations are duplicate or they refer to different structures. Further, it is unclear if the claims have inadvertently combined limitations of different embodiments. Conclusion Applicant's amendment necessitated the new ground(s) of rejection presented in this Office action. Accordingly, THIS ACTION IS MADE FINAL. See MPEP § 706.07(a). Applicant is reminded of the extension of time policy as set forth in 37 CFR 1.136(a). A shortened statutory period for reply to this final action is set to expire THREE MONTHS from the mailing date of this action. In the event a first reply is filed within TWO MONTHS of the mailing date of this final action and the advisory action is not mailed until after the end of the THREE-MONTH shortened statutory period, then the shortened statutory period will expire on the date the advisory action is mailed, and any nonprovisional extension fee (37 CFR 1.17(a)) pursuant to 37 CFR 1.136(a) will be calculated from the mailing date of the advisory action. In no event, however, will the statutory period for reply expire later than SIX MONTHS from the mailing date of this final action. Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to Robert A. Siconolfi whose telephone number is (571)272-7124. The examiner can normally be reached Monday-Friday 9am-5pm. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Joseph Thomas can be reached at 571-272-8004. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. ROBERT A. SICONOLFI Supervisory Patent Examiner Art Unit 3616 /Robert A. Siconolfi/Supervisory Patent Examiner, Art Unit 3616
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Dec 06, 2024
Application Filed
Apr 07, 2026
Non-Final Rejection mailed — §112
Jul 06, 2026
Response Filed
Sep 03, 2026
Final Rejection mailed — §112 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12741617
REDUNDANT BRAKING SYSTEM AND METHOD FOR OPERATING SUCH A BRAKING SYSTEM
5y 4m to grant Granted Sep 22, 2026
Patent 12674497
CONSTANT PRESSURE GENERATING SYSTEM
3y 2m to grant Granted Jul 07, 2026
Patent 12623748
CONTROLLABLE CYCLE SUSPENSION
7y 7m to grant Granted May 12, 2026
Patent 12590616
COMPOSITE COIL SPRING WITH CARBON AND GLASS FIBER LAYERS
4y 5m to grant Granted Mar 31, 2026
Patent 12565730
DAMPER, IN PARTICULAR FRICTION DAMPER
3y 0m to grant Granted Mar 03, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

Strategy Recommendation AI-generated — please review before filing

Get a prosecution strategy drawn from examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Typically takes 5-10 seconds — AI-generated, attorney review required before filing

Prosecution Projections

3-4
Expected OA Rounds
40%
Grant Probability
59%
With Interview (+19.6%)
4y 0m (~2y 2m remaining)
Median Time to Grant
Moderate
PTA Risk
Based on 63 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allowance rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month