Prosecution Insights
Last updated: October 01, 2026
Application No. 18/873,002

REFRIGERATOR AND CONTROL METHOD THEREFOR

Non-Final OA §103
Filed
Dec 09, 2024
Priority
Jun 23, 2022 — nonprovisional of PCTKR2022008918
Examiner
SUTEERAWONGSA, JARURAT
Art Unit
2623
Tech Center
2600 — Communications
Assignee
LG Electronics Inc.
OA Round
1 (Non-Final)
66%
Grant Probability
Favorable
1-2
OA Rounds
1y 3m
Est. Remaining
99%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 66% — above average
66%
Career Allowance Rate
296 granted / 445 resolved
+4.5% vs TC avg
Strong +33% interview lift
Without
With
+32.9%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
3y 1m
Avg Prosecution
11 currently pending
Career history
462
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
2.7%
-37.3% vs TC avg
§103
74.2%
+34.2% vs TC avg
§102
9.8%
-30.2% vs TC avg
§112
7.9%
-32.1% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 445 resolved cases

Office Action

§103
DETAILED ACTION Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 103 In the event the determination of the status of the application as subject to AIA 35 U.S.C. 102 and 103 (or as subject to pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 102 and 103) is incorrect, any correction of the statutory basis (i.e., changing from AIA to pre-AIA ) for the rejection will not be considered a new ground of rejection if the prior art relied upon, and the rationale supporting the rejection, would be the same under either status. The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 103 which forms the basis for all obviousness rejections set forth in this Office action: A patent for a claimed invention may not be obtained, notwithstanding that the claimed invention is not identically disclosed as set forth in section 102, if the differences between the claimed invention and the prior art are such that the claimed invention as a whole would have been obvious before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to a person having ordinary skill in the art to which the claimed invention pertains. Patentability shall not be negated by the manner in which the invention was made. Claims 1, 4-8, and 16 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over US 2019/0249485 A1 to Jeong et al. (Jeong) and US 2015/0228253 A1 to Lee et al. (Lee). As to claim 1, Jeong discloses a refrigerator (1) comprising: a cabinet (10) defining at least one space (12, 13) therein (Fig. 3, Pars. 108-109); a display door (40, 50) configured to open and close the space (12) (Fig. 1, Par. 111) and composed of a display panel (62) configured to output information (Figs. 8, 13, 15, Par. 171); a first door (upper left door 20), a second door (lower left door 30), and a third door (lower right door 30) configured to open and close the space (12, 13) (Figs. 1-3, Par. 113) and sense a knock gesture ([0152]); and a controller (15) configured to control the display panel (62) (Figs. 14-15, Pars. 285-286), wherein the controller (15) is configured to: receive the sensed knock gesture from the display door (40, 50) (Figs. 1-3, 14-15, Par. 152) and perform an operation based on the received knock gesture (Figs. 1-3, 14-15, Par. 152). Jeong does not expressly disclose the first door, the second door, and the third door configured to sense a knock gesture and perform an operation based on the received knock gesture. Lee discloses the first door (upper left door 12), the second door (lower left door 12), and the third door (lower right door 12)) configured to sense a knock gesture and perform an operation (e.g. switching between display states) based on the received knock gesture (Fig. 1, Par. 56). Before the effective filing date of the claimed invention, it would have been obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art to have modified Jeong with the teaching of Lee to enable the user to view only the food of interest stored in the refrigerator as suggested by Lee (Par. 40). As to claim 16, Jeong view of Lee teaches a method of controlling the refrigerator of claim 1 above. The limitation of claim 16 is substantially similar to claim 1. Accordingly, claim 16 is rejected based on same analysis as claim 1. As to claim 4, Jeong as modified discloses the knock gesture is sensed via a touch sensor (Jeong , Pars 34-35, 152 and Lee’s Fig. 1, Par. 56). See claim 1 motivation above. As to claim 5, Jeong as modified discloses the touch sensor is mounted on at least one of the first door, the second door, the third door, and the display door (Jeong’s Pars. 144, 152, Lee’s Par. 55, see also Par. 56). See claim 1 motivation above. As to claim 6, Jeong as modified discloses the display door (40, 50) is configured to sense the knock gesture (Figs. 1-3, 14-15, Par. 152), wherein the controller (15) is configured to: control the display panel (62) to operate in one of a transparent mode, a translucent mode, and an opaque mode (Figs. 1-3, 14-15, Par. 173); and switch a mode of the display panel (62) to the transparent mode when receiving a first knock gesture sensed via the display door (40,50) (Figs. 1-3, 14-15, Par. 173). As to claim 7, Jeong as modified discloses at least one of the first door, the second door, and the third door further includes an internal camera (115) configured to capture interior of the refrigerator (Jeong’s Par. 297), wherein the controller (15) is configured to, when a sensed second knock gesture is received from one of the first door, the second door, and the third door, output an internal image of the refrigerator corresponding to the door where the second knock gesture is sensed via the display panel (Jeong’s Figs. 1-3, 14-15, Par. 152, 398, Lee’s Fig. 1, Par. 56). See claim 1 motivation above. As to claim 8, Jeong as modified discloses the controller is configured to: output a user interface representing the refrigerator on the display panel (Figs. 42A, Pars. 488-489, Lee’ Fig. 1, Par. 56); receive an input signal for selecting one of the first door, the second door, and the third door in the user interface (Figs. 42A, Pars. 488-489, Lee’ Fig. 1, Par. 56); and output an internal image of the refrigerator corresponding to the selected door on the display panel based on the input signal (Figs. 42A, Pars. 488-489, Lee’ Fig. 1, Par. 56). See claim 1 motivation above. Claims 2-3 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over US 2019/0249485 A1 to Jeong et al. (Jeong) and US 2015/0228253 A1 to Lee et al. (Lee); in view of US 2018/0292127 A1 to Park et al. (Park). As to claim 2, Jeong does not expressly disclose the knock gesture is sensed via a microphone sensor. However, Jeong discloses a microphone sensor may be mounted near the front panel (61)(Fig. 15, Par. 144). Park discloses the knock gesture is sensed via a microphone sensor (Par. 393). Before the effective filing date of the claimed invention, it would have been obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art to have modified Jeong with the teaching of Park to ensure accurate recognition rate of knocking operation detection as suggested by Park (Par. 397). As to claim 3, Jeong as modified discloses the microphone sensor is mounted in the display door (Park’s Fig. 33, Par. 393. See claim 2 motivation above. Claims 9-15 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over US 2019/0249485 A1 to Jeong et al. (Jeong) and US 2015/0228253 A1 to Lee et al. (Lee); in view of US 2022/0260875 A1 to Wang et al. (Wang). As to claim 9, Jeong teaches the display door of the refrigerator including a front plate (61) and a light guide plate (64) guiding light to the front plate (61) (Fig. 13, Pars. 184-185), wherein the controller (15) is configured to irradiate light to the light guide plate (64) using the light source (68) (Figs. 13-15, Pars. 160-161), wherein light irradiated to the light guide plate (64) passes through the front plate (61) (Figs. 13-15, Pars. 184-185), wherein when the light source (68) is turned on, the front plate (61) emits light with a color (Figs. 13-15, Par. 360). Jeong does not expressly disclose each of the first door, the second door, and the third door is equipped with a display. Lee teaches a multiple display area (A) located on the first door (upper left) , the second door (lower left) , and the third door (lower right) configured to display the food information including text, an image or video (Fig. 1, Pars. 56-57, 70). It would have been obvious that each of the displays (A) located on the doors of Lee would have a light source in the same way as the display of Jeong so that it can be displayed the information Before the effective filing date of the claimed invention, it would have been obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art to have modified Jeong with the teaching of Lee to enable the user to view only the food of interest stored in the refrigerator as suggested by Lee (Par. 40). Jeong teaches light sources using in the display and Lee teaches four displays located on the four doors of refrigerator, but does not teach a light source capable of rendering RGB colors. In same field of endeavor (refrigerator, par 25), Wang teaches a light source capable of rendering RGB colors (Par. 25) used in a display. Before the effective filing date of the claimed invention, it would have been obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art to have modified Jeong and Lee with the teaching of Wang to provide a high color gamut display as suggested by Wang (Par. 25). As to claim 10, Jeong as modified discloses the controller is configured to, when receiving a sensed third knock gesture (i.e. multiple knocks) from a display door change different states from transparent, translucent and opaque of the door where the third knock gesture is sensed (see pars 173 and 290). Lee teaches multiple display areas (A) located on the first door , the second door (lower left ), and the third door (lower right) configured to sense a knock gesture to display the food information including text, an image or video (Fig. 1, Pars. 56-57, 70). Before the effective filing date of the claimed invention, it would have been obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art to have modified Jeong with the teaching of Lee to enable the user to view the food of interest stored in all doors of the refrigerator as suggested by Lee (Par. 40). Wang teaches a light source using on the display capable of rendering RGB colors (Par. 25). Thus, using color light sources of Wang to the light sources of Jeong would result of color change according the number of times of knocks. Before the effective filing date of the claimed invention, it would have been obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art to have modified Jeong and Lee with the teaching of Wang to provide a high color gamut display as suggested by Wang (Par. 25). As to claim 11, Jeong as modified by Lee and Wang discloses the controller is configured to output information on food located inside the refrigerator corresponding to the door where the third knock gesture is sensed on the display panel, based on the third knock gesture as analyzed in claims 1 and 9-10 above (Jeong’s Pars 173 and 290, Lee’s Fig. 1, Pars. 56-57, 70 and Wang’s Par. 25). See claims 1 and 9-10 for motivation. As to claim 12, Jeong as modified by Lee and Wang discloses the controller is configured to, when receiving the third knock gesture, change the color of the door where the third knock gesture is sensed based on the information on the food located inside the refrigerator corresponding to the door where the third knock gesture is sensed as analyzed in claims 1 and 9-10 above (Jeong’s Pars 173 and 290, Lee’s Fig. 1, Pars. 56-57, 70 and Wang’s Par. 25). See claims 1 and 9-10 for motivation. As to claim 13, Jeong as modified by Lee and Wang discloses the controller is configured to, when receiving a sensed fourth knock gesture from one of the first door, the second door, and the third door, change a color of the door mapped to the fourth knock gesture (i.e. multiple times knocks changing the display states as taught by Jeong whereas Lee teaches a multiple displays located on four doors and different color light source as taught by Wang), wherein the fourth knock gesture is different from the third knock gesture (i.e. various inputs of the manipulation as taught by Jeong) as analyzed in claims 1 and 10 above (Jeong’s Pars 173 and 290, Lee’s Fig. 1, Pars. 56-57, 70 and Wang’s Par. 25). See claims 1 and 9-10 for motivation. As to claim 14, Jeong as modified as modified by Lee and Wang discloses the controller is configured to, when receiving the fourth knock gesture, change a color of at least one partial area of the first door, the second door, and the third door, wherein the at least one partial area is an area mapped to the fourth knock gesture as analyzed similar to claims 1, 9 and 13 (Jeong’s Pars 173 and 290, Lee’s Fig. 1, Pars. 36, 56, Wang’s Par. 25). It is noted that Jeong teaches a see-through part on door (Par.19) See claims 1 and 9-10 for motivation. As to claim 15, Jeong discloses the light source (68) included in at a display door has one of a lower edge structure, a side edge structure, a lower-and-side edge structure, and a downward-directed structure (Jeong’s Figs. 8, 13, Pars. 160-161). Jeong does not teach at least one of the first door, the second door, and the third door. Lee discloses the first door (upper left door 12), the second door (lower left door 12), and the third door (lower right door 12)) configured to sense a knock gesture and perform an operation (e.g. switching between display states) based on the received knock gesture (Fig. 1, Par. 56). It would have been obvious that each of the displays located on the doors of Lee would have a light source in the same way as the display of Jeong so that it can be displayed the information Before the effective filing date of the claimed invention, it would have been obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art to have modified Jeong with the teaching of Lee to enable the user to view the food of interest stored in the refrigerator as suggested by Lee (Par. 40). Conclusion The prior art made of record and not relied upon is considered pertinent to applicant's disclosure: US 2010/0170289 A1 to Graziano teaches a refrigerator door equipped with a camera matrix which is adapted to provide a complete and seamless view of the contents of the refrigerator when the refrigerator door is in the closed position. Inquiries Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to JARURAT SUTEERAWONGSA whose telephone number is (571)270-7361. The examiner can normally be reached Monday thru Thursday, 8:30AM to 4:00PM, EST. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Chanh Nguyen can be reached at 571-272-7772. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /JARURAT SUTEERAWONGSA/Examiner, Art Unit 2623 /CHANH D NGUYEN/Supervisory Patent Examiner, Art Unit 2623
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Dec 09, 2024
Application Filed
Aug 05, 2026
Non-Final Rejection mailed — §103 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12745510
DISPLAY DEVICE
4y 9m to grant Granted Sep 22, 2026
Patent 12737057
INPUT DEVICE
2y 6m to grant Granted Sep 15, 2026
Patent 12730522
SEMANTIC USER INPUT
4y 6m to grant Granted Sep 08, 2026
Patent 12710657
EXTENDED REALITY SYSTEM INCLUDING AI-ASSISTED IMAGE CAPTURE OPTICAL CHARACTER RECOGNITION FOR USE WITH VISUAL AID CORRECTION FOR LOW VISION
1y 7m to grant Granted Aug 18, 2026
Patent 12706036
DEVICES AND METHODS FOR PROVIDING ACCESS TO INTERNAL COMPONENT
5y 0m to grant Granted Aug 11, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

Strategy Recommendation AI-generated — please review before filing

Get a prosecution strategy drawn from examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Typically takes 5-10 seconds — AI-generated, attorney review required before filing

Prosecution Projections

1-2
Expected OA Rounds
66%
Grant Probability
99%
With Interview (+32.9%)
3y 1m (~1y 3m remaining)
Median Time to Grant
Low
PTA Risk
Based on 445 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allowance rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month