Prosecution Insights
Last updated: April 19, 2026
Application No. 18/873,075

PORTABLE BIOMETRIC MONITOR DEVICE FOR FIRST RESPONDERS AND METHODS

Non-Final OA §103§112
Filed
Dec 09, 2024
Examiner
LA, ANH V
Art Unit
2685
Tech Center
2600 — Communications
Assignee
Pulse Patch Inc.
OA Round
1 (Non-Final)
84%
Grant Probability
Favorable
1-2
OA Rounds
2y 4m
To Grant
99%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 84% — above average
84%
Career Allow Rate
962 granted / 1141 resolved
+22.3% vs TC avg
Moderate +14% lift
Without
With
+14.4%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
2y 4m
Avg Prosecution
22 currently pending
Career history
1163
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
3.2%
-36.8% vs TC avg
§103
46.7%
+6.7% vs TC avg
§102
19.9%
-20.1% vs TC avg
§112
4.8%
-35.2% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 1141 resolved cases

Office Action

§103 §112
DETAILED ACTION Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 112 Claims 9-36 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 112(b) or 35 U.S.C. 112 (pre-AIA ), second paragraph, as being indefinite for failing to particularly point out and distinctly claim the subject matter which the inventor or a joint inventor (or for applications subject to pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 112, the applicant), regards as the invention. Claim 9 recites the limitation "the gel layer" in lines 3-4. There is insufficient antecedent basis for this limitation in the claim. Claims 10-18 are rejected for the same reasons because of the dependency. Claim 19 recites the limitation "the biosensors" in line 5. There is insufficient antecedent basis for this limitation in the claim. Claims 20-26 are rejected for the same reasons because of the dependency. Claim 27 recites the limitation "the biosensor" in line 3. There is insufficient antecedent basis for this limitation in the claim. Claims 28-36 are rejected for the same reasons because of the dependency. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 103 The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 103 which forms the basis for all obviousness rejections set forth in this Office action: A patent for a claimed invention may not be obtained, notwithstanding that the claimed invention is not identically disclosed as set forth in section 102, if the differences between the claimed invention and the prior art are such that the claimed invention as a whole would have been obvious before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to a person having ordinary skill in the art to which the claimed invention pertains. Patentability shall not be negated by the manner in which the invention was made. Claim(s) 1-7, 9-17, 19-25, and 27-35 is/are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over Olivero (US 2021/0052171) in view of Busin (US 2022/0155157). Regarding claim 1, Olivero discloses a biometric monitor device comprising: an adhesive mechanism (adhesive layer, paragraph 25); an interim layer 22; a processor (p. 19, p. 21); two or more biosensors 20 positioned within the interim layer adjacent the adhesive mechanism (figure 1, p. 25) in communication with the processor (p. 19, p. 21, figure 1); at least one indicator light in communication with the processor (p. 20); and a speaker in communication with the processor (p. 20), wherein processor is operable to obtain biometric data from the two or more biosensors and control an operation of the at least one indicator light in response to the biometric data received from the two or more biosensors (p. 17, p. 21). Olivero does not disclose an upper layer. Busin teaches the use of an adhesive mechanism 102; an interim layer 115; an upper layer 104. It would have been obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to include an upper layer to the monitor device of Olivero as taught by Busin for the purpose of effectively protecting the monitor device. Regarding claim 9, Olivero discloses a biometric monitoring system comprising: a biometric monitor device having an adhesive mechanism (adhesive layer, paragraph 25), an interim layer 22, a processor (p. 19, p. 21), two or more biosensors 20 positioned within the interim layer adjacent the adhesive mechanism (p. 25) in communication with the processor (p. 19, p. 20, figure 1) wherein the processor is operable to obtain biometric data from the two or more biosensors (p. 19, p. 21), at least one indicator light in communication with the processor (p. 20); and a speaker in communication with the processor (p. 20), wherein the processor is operable to obtain biometric data from the two or more biosensors and control an operation of the at least one indicator light in response to the biometric data received from the two or more biosensors (p. 17, p. 21); and an electronic device 50 in communication with the biometric monitor device (figure 1). Olivero does not disclose an upper layer. Busin teaches the use of an adhesive mechanism 102; an interim layer 115; an upper layer 104. It would have been obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to include an upper layer to the monitor system of Olivero as taught by Busin for the purpose of effectively protecting the monitor device. Regarding claim 19, Olivero discloses a biometric monitor device comprising: an adhesive mechanism (adhesive layer, p. 25); an interim layer 22; a processor operable to obtain biometric data from biosensors (p. 19, p. 21); a biosensor configured to detect two or more bio parameters (p. 26) positioned within the interim layer adjacent the adhesive mechanism (p. 25) in communication with the processor (figure 1, p. 19, p. 21); at least one indicator light in communication with the processor (p. 20); and a speaker in communication with the processor (p. 20), wherein processor is configured to control an operation of the at least one indicator light in response to the biometric data received from the biosensor (p. 17, p. 21). Olivero does not disclose an upper layer. Busin teaches the use of an adhesive mechanism 102; an interim layer 115; an upper layer 104. It would have been obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to include an upper layer to the monitor system of Olivero as taught by Busin for the purpose of effectively protecting the monitor device. Regarding claim 27, Olivero discloses a biometric monitoring system comprising: a biometric monitor device having an adhesive mechanism (adhesive layer, p. 25), an interim layer 22, a processor operable to obtain biometric data from a biosensor 20 (p. 19, p.21), the biosensor configured to detect two or more bio parameters (p. 26) positioned within the interim layer adjacent the adhesive mechanism (p. 25) in communication with the processor (p. 19, p.21, figure 1), at least one indicator light in communication with the processor (p. 20); and a speaker in communication with the processor (p. 20), wherein processor is configured to control an operation of the at least one indicator light in response to the biometric data received from the biosensor (p. 17, p. 21); and an electronic device 50 in communication with the biometric monitor device (figure 1). Olivero does not disclose an upper layer. Busin teaches the use of an adhesive mechanism 102; an interim layer 115; an upper layer 104. It would have been obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to include an upper layer to the monitor system of Olivero as taught by Busin for the purpose of effectively protecting the monitor device. Regarding claims 2-3, 7, 12-13, 17, 20-21, 25, 30-31, and 35, Olivero (modified by Busin) discloses all the claimed subject matter as set forth above in the rejection of claim 1, but does not disclose a power supply (claims 2, 12, 20, and 30); the interim layer comprising an electronic flex circuit and an integrated connector circuit (claims 3, 13, 21, 31); the processor being configured to control an operation of the speaker (claims 7, 17, 25, and 35). Busin further discloses a power supply 112; the interim layer comprising an electronic flex circuit (paragraph 55) and an integrated connector circuit 111; a processor being configured to control an operation of a speaker (p. 58). It would have been obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to include a power supply; the interim layer comprising an electronic flex circuit and an integrated connector circuit; the processor being configured to control an operation of the speaker to the monitor device of Olivero as taught by Busin for the purpose of effectively providing power supply and signaling indicators. Regarding claims 4, 14, 22, and 32, Olivero discloses wherein the processor is configured to control an operation of the at least one indicator light (p. 19, p. 20). Regarding claims 5, 15, 23, and 33, Olivero discloses wherein the at least one indicator light is operable to display two or more colors (p. 32). Regarding claims 6, 16, 24, and 34, Olivero discloses wherein the two or more colors are selected from red, green and yellow (p. 32). Regarding claims 10 and 28, Olivero discloses wherein the electronic device is at least one of a mobile device 50 and a central station 24 (figure 1). Regarding claims 11 and 29 , Olivero discloses wherein the electronic device communicates with the biometric monitor device via at least one of near-field communication, Bluetooth and wi-fi (p. 32). Claim(s) 8, 18, 26, and 36 is/are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over Olivero and Busin as applied to claim 1 above, and further in view of Rogers (US 2021/0393155). Regarding claims 8, 18, 26, and 36, Olivero (modified by Busin) discloses all the claimed subject matter as set forth above in the rejection of claim 1, but does not disclose at least one of the two or more biosensors being pre-gelled. Rogers teaches the use of at least one of two or more biosensors being pre-gelled (p. 147). It would have been obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to include at least one of the two or more biosensors being pre-gelled to the monitor device of Olivero (modified by Busin) as taught by Rogers for the purpose of effectively attaching to skin surface. Conclusion The prior art made of record and not relied upon is considered pertinent to applicant's disclosure. Sieja, Solomon, and Gottesman disclose systems for physiological monitoring. Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to ANH V LA whose telephone number is (571)272-2970. The examiner can normally be reached 8:30 AM-5:00 PM. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Quan-Zhen Wang can be reached at 571-272-3114. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /ANH V LA/ Primary Examiner, Art Unit 2685 ANH V. LA Primary Examiner Art Unit 2685 Al April 3, 2026
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Dec 09, 2024
Application Filed
Apr 03, 2026
Non-Final Rejection — §103, §112 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12600375
PARKING ASSISTANCE DEVICE AND PARKING ASSISTANCE PROGRAM
2y 5m to grant Granted Apr 14, 2026
Patent 12586455
DEVICES, SYSTEMS, AND METHODS FOR MONITORING CONTROLLED SPACES FOR TRANSITORY USES
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 24, 2026
Patent 12573293
METHODS AND SYSTEMS FOR ADVANCED TRAFFIC ANALYSIS
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 10, 2026
Patent 12565196
PARKING ASSISTANCE DEVICE, PARKING ASSISTANCE METHOD, AND COMPUTER-READABLE MEDIUM
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 03, 2026
Patent 12557790
SYSTEMS, METHODS AND COMPUTER PROGRAM PRODUCTS FOR MONITORING THE BEHAVIOR, HEALTH, AND/OR CHARACTERISTICS OF AN ANIMAL
2y 5m to grant Granted Feb 24, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

AI Strategy Recommendation

Get an AI-powered prosecution strategy using examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Powered by AI — typically takes 5-10 seconds

Prosecution Projections

1-2
Expected OA Rounds
84%
Grant Probability
99%
With Interview (+14.4%)
2y 4m
Median Time to Grant
Low
PTA Risk
Based on 1141 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allow rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month