Prosecution Insights
Last updated: August 17, 2026
Application No. 18/873,340

MOTOR

Non-Final OA §102§103§112
Filed
Dec 10, 2024
Priority
Jun 28, 2022 — nonprovisional of PCTJP2022025727
Examiner
STEFANON, JUSTIN
Art Unit
Tech Center
Assignee
Mitsubishi Electric Corporation
OA Round
1 (Non-Final)
51%
Grant Probability
Moderate
1-2
OA Rounds
1y 6m
Est. Remaining
99%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 51% of resolved cases
51%
Career Allowance Rate
95 granted / 187 resolved
-9.2% vs TC avg
Strong +48% interview lift
Without
With
+48.3%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
3y 2m
Avg Prosecution
45 currently pending
Career history
242
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
1.3%
-38.7% vs TC avg
§103
39.0%
-1.0% vs TC avg
§102
32.8%
-7.2% vs TC avg
§112
26.1%
-13.9% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 187 resolved cases

Office Action

§102 §103 §112
DETAILED ACTION Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . Information Disclosure Statement The information disclosure statement (IDS) submitted on 12/10/2024 is being considered by the examiner. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 112 The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 112(b): (b) CONCLUSION.—The specification shall conclude with one or more claims particularly pointing out and distinctly claiming the subject matter which the inventor or a joint inventor regards as the invention. The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 112 (pre-AIA ), second paragraph: The specification shall conclude with one or more claims particularly pointing out and distinctly claiming the subject matter which the applicant regards as his invention. Claim 8 is rejected under 35 U.S.C. 112(b) or 35 U.S.C. 112 (pre-AIA ), second paragraph, as being indefinite for failing to particularly point out and distinctly claim the subject matter which the inventor or a joint inventor (or for applications subject to pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 112, the applicant), regards as the invention. Claim 8 recites the limitation "a field pole of the first rotor unit is constituted by a salient pole only" in line 13. This limitation renders the claim indefinite as it is unclear whether each pole of the first rotor unit is a salient pole only or if it is merely claimed that a single one of a plurality of field poles is a salient pole only. Claim 8 recites the limitation "a field pole of the second rotor unit is constituted by a permanent magnet only" in line 13. This limitation renders the claim indefinite as it is unclear whether each pole of the second rotor unit is a permanent magnet only or if it is merely claimed that a single one of a plurality of field poles is a permanent magnet only. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 102 The following is a quotation of the appropriate paragraphs of 35 U.S.C. 102 that form the basis for the rejections under this section made in this Office action: A person shall be entitled to a patent unless – (a)(1) the claimed invention was patented, described in a printed publication, or in public use, on sale, or otherwise available to the public before the effective filing date of the claimed invention. (a)(2) the claimed invention was described in a patent issued under section 151, or in an application for patent published or deemed published under section 122(b), in which the patent or application, as the case 46 may be, names another inventor and was effectively filed before the effective filing date of the claimed invention. This application currently names joint inventors. In considering patentability of the claims the examiner presumes that the subject matter of the various claims was commonly owned as of the effective filing date of the claimed invention(s) absent any evidence to the contrary. Applicant is advised of the obligation under 37 CFR 1.56 to point out the inventor and effective filing dates of each claim that was not commonly owned as of the effective filing date of the later invention in order for the examiner to consider the applicability of 35 U.S.C. 102(b)(2)(C) for any potential 35 U.S.C. 102(a)(2) prior art against the later invention. Claims 1-2, 4-9, 11-12, 14-15, and 17 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 102(a)(1) as being anticipated by MARUYAMA: JP 2017192190. Regarding claim 1, MARUYAMA discloses a motor comprising: a stator 2; and a rotor 3, wherein the stator 2 has a plurality of first teeth 21 disposed with a spacing therebetween in a circumferential direction (Fig. 5), and an armature winding 22 wound around each of the plurality of first teeth 21 (para [0011]), PNG media_image1.png 462 456 media_image1.png Greyscale the armature winding 22 is a ring connection (i.e., delta- ; see para [0018]), a DC power source is connected to one end and another end of the ring connection (para [0030]), in each of the plurality of first teeth 21, a magnetic pole with an identical polarity is formed by a direct current flowing through the armature winding 22 (Fig. 6(a)), PNG media_image2.png 223 327 media_image2.png Greyscale the rotor 3 has a rotor core and a plurality of permanent magnets 6, the rotor core has an outer diameter surface facing outward in a radial direction, and an inner diameter surface which is a surface opposite to the outer diameter surface in the radial direction (Fig. 5), the rotor core has a plurality of salient poles 32 forming first magnetic poles in the outer diameter surface, the plurality of salient poles 32 are arranged with a spacing therebetween along the circumferential direction (Fig. 5), each of the plurality of permanent magnets 6 is attached to the outer diameter surface so as to be located between two adjacent salient poles 32 of the plurality of salient poles 32 in the circumferential direction, and forms a second magnetic pole (Fig. 5), and the plurality of salient poles 32 and the plurality of permanent magnets 6 face the stator 2, with a cavity 10 being interposed therebetween, in the radial direction (Fig. 6). Regarding claim 2, MARUYAMA discloses the motor according to claim 1, wherein a winding direction of the armature winding 22 is identical in each of the plurality of first teeth 21 (Fig. 6). Regarding claim 4, MARUYAMA discloses the motor according to claim 1, wherein the stator 2 further has a plurality of second teeth disposed with a spacing therebetween in the circumferential direction, and each of the plurality of second teeth is disposed between two adjacent first teeth 21 of the plurality of first teeth 21 (i.e. there are at least five teeth disclosed, two of which are second teeth as broadly claimed; see annotated Fig. 5, below). PNG media_image3.png 294 177 media_image3.png Greyscale Regarding claim 5, MARUYAMA discloses the motor according to claim 1, wherein a minimum value of a distance between each of the plurality of permanent magnets 6 and the stator 2 is different from a minimum value of a distance between each of the plurality of salient poles 32 and the stator 2 (Fig. 5). Regarding claim 6, MARUYAMA discloses the motor according claim 1, wherein each of the plurality of permanent magnets 6 has a first end and a second end in the circumferential direction, each of the plurality of salient poles 32 has a third end and a fourth end in the circumferential direction (Fig. 9), and a first angle formed between a first virtual straight line passing through the first end and a center of the rotor core and a second virtual straight line passing through the second end and the center is different from a second angle formed between a third virtual straight line passing through the third end and the center and a fourth virtual straight line passing through the fourth end and the center (para [0051]). PNG media_image4.png 345 328 media_image4.png Greyscale Regarding claim 7, MARUYAMA discloses the motor according to claim 1, further comprising a power converter electrically connected to the armature winding 22, wherein the power converter is driven by a DC bus, and a voltage of the DC bus is larger than a voltage of the DC power source (para [0035]). Regarding claim 8, MARUYAMA discloses a motor comprising: a stator 2; and a rotor disposed with a cavity 10 being interposed between the rotor and the stator 2 in a radial direction (Fig. 6), wherein the stator 2 has a plurality of teeth disposed with a spacing therebetween in a circumferential direction (Fig. 5), and an armature winding 22 wound around each of the plurality of teeth (para [0011]), the armature winding 22 is a ring connection (i.e., delta- ; see para [0018]), a DC power source is connected to one end and another end of the ring connection (para [0030]), in each of the plurality of teeth, a magnetic pole with an identical polarity is formed by a direct current flowing through the armature winding 22 (Fig. 6(a)), the rotor has a first rotor unit and a second rotor unit (i.e. as broadly claimed this could be the respective poles with 31 and without 32 magnets), the first rotor unit and the second rotor unit are arranged along an axial direction (i.e. they are mounted to shaft 4, which is arranged along an axial direction as broadly claimed), a [each] field pole of the first rotor unit is constituted by a salient pole only, and a [each] field pole of the second rotor unit is constituted by a permanent magnet only (para [0038]). Regarding claim 9, MARUYAMA discloses the motor according to claim 2, wherein a minimum value of a distance between each of the plurality of permanent magnets 6 and the stator 2 is different from a minimum value of a distance between each of the plurality of salient poles 32 and the stator 2 (Fig. 5). Regarding claim 11, MARUYAMA discloses the motor according to claim 4, wherein a minimum value of a distance between each of the plurality of permanent magnets 6 and the stator 2 is different from a minimum value of a distance between each of the plurality of salient poles 32 and the stator 2 (Fig. 5). Regarding claim 12, MARUYAMA discloses the motor according to claim 2, wherein each of the plurality of permanent magnets 6 has a first end and a second end in the circumferential direction, each of the plurality of salient poles 32 has a third end and a fourth end in the circumferential direction (Fig. 9), and a first angle formed between a first virtual straight line passing through the first end and a center of the rotor core and a second virtual straight line passing through the second end and the center is different from a second angle formed between a third virtual straight line passing through the third end and the center and a fourth virtual straight line passing through the fourth end and the center (para [0051]). Regarding claim 14, MARUYAMA discloses the motor according to claim 4, wherein each of the plurality of permanent magnets 6 has a first end and a second end in the circumferential direction, each of the plurality of salient poles 32 has a third end and a fourth end in the circumferential direction (Fig. 9), and a first angle formed between a first virtual straight line passing through the first end and a center of the rotor core and a second virtual straight line passing through the second end and the center is different from a second angle formed between a third virtual straight line passing through the third end and the center and a fourth virtual straight line passing through the fourth end and the center (para [0051]). Regarding claim 15, MARUYAMA discloses the motor according to claim 2, further comprising a power converter electrically connected to the armature winding 22, wherein the power converter is driven by a DC bus, and a voltage of the DC bus is larger than a voltage of the DC power source (para [0030]). Regarding claim 16, MARUYAMA discloses the motor according to claim 3, further comprising a power converter electrically connected to the armature winding 22, wherein the power converter is driven by a DC bus, and a voltage of the DC bus is larger than a voltage of the DC power source (para [0030]). Regarding claim 17, MARUYAMA discloses the motor according to claim 4, further comprising a power converter electrically connected to the armature winding 22, wherein the power converter is driven by a DC bus, and a voltage of the DC bus is larger than a voltage of the DC power source (para [0030]). Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 103 The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 103 which forms the basis for all obviousness rejections set forth in this Office action: A patent for a claimed invention may not be obtained, notwithstanding that the claimed invention is not identically disclosed as set forth in section 102, if the differences between the claimed invention and the prior art are such that the claimed invention as a whole would have been obvious before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to a person having ordinary skill in the art to which the claimed invention pertains. Patentability shall not be negated by the manner in which the invention was made. Claims 3, 10, 13, and 16 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over MARUYAMA in view of KATO: US 20110309707. Regarding claim 3, MARUYAMA discloses the motor according to claim 1, further comprising: a shaft 4; and a case 46, wherein the shaft 4 is attached to the inner diameter surface, the case 46 covers the stator 2 and the rotor 3, and a magnetic flux generated in each of the plurality of first teeth 21, by the direct current flowing through the armature winding 22, passes through the cavity 10, each of the plurality of salient poles 32, the shaft 4, and the case 46, and returns to each of the plurality of first teeth 21. However, MURUYAMA does not teach the shaft and the case are each formed of a magnetic body. KATO teaches a motor with a shaft 21 and a case 305 that are each formed of a magnetic body. (See para [0123] and [0112]). It would have been obvious before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to a person having ordinary skill in the art to which the claimed invention pertains to provide the motor of MARUYAMA with the shaft and the case are each formed of a magnetic body, similar to KATO. A person having ordinary skill in the art to which the claimed invention pertains would have been motivated to make such modification in order to reduce the leakage flux of the rotor, as taught by KATO (para [0127]), and to provide a high-strength material for the case and the shaft in a magnetic metal. Regarding claim 10, MARUYAMA in view of KATO teaches the motor according to claim 3, wherein MARUYAMA teaches a minimum value of a distance between each of the plurality of permanent magnets 6 and the stator 2 is different from a minimum value of a distance between each of the plurality of salient poles 32 and the stator 2 (Fig. 5). Regarding claim 13, MARUYAMA in view of KATO teaches the motor according to claim 3, wherein MARUYAMA teaches each of the plurality of permanent magnets 6 has a first end and a second end in the circumferential direction, each of the plurality of salient poles 32 has a third end and a fourth end in the circumferential direction (Fig. 9), and a first angle formed between a first virtual straight line passing through the first end and a center of the rotor core and a second virtual straight line passing through the second end and the center is different from a second angle formed between a third virtual straight line passing through the third end and the center and a fourth virtual straight line passing through the fourth end and the center (para [0051]). Regarding claim 16, MARUYAMA in view of KATO teaches the motor according to claim 3, further comprising a power converter electrically connected to the armature winding 22, wherein MARUYAMA teaches the power converter is driven by a DC bus, and a voltage of the DC bus is larger than a voltage of the DC power source (para [0030]). Conclusion The prior art made of record and not relied upon is considered pertinent to applicant's disclosure. US-20100033046-A1 Chiba discloses an inner rotor DC motor with axially tandem rotor sections, alternating salient poles and permanent magnets, and a casing made of magnetic material; US-20170222504-A1 KUSASE discloses an inner rotor motor with a shaft made of magnetic material; JPA 1975016818-000000 is Document 2 in the ISR. Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to JUSTIN STEFANON whose telephone number is (703)756-4648. The examiner can normally be reached Monday - Thursday and alternate Fridays 8AM - 5PM EDT. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Oluseye Iwarere can be reached at (571) 270-5112. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /JUSTIN STEFANON/Examiner, Art Unit 2834 /OLUSEYE IWARERE/Supervisory Patent Examiner, Art Unit 2834
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Dec 10, 2024
Application Filed
Jul 30, 2026
Non-Final Rejection mailed — §102, §103, §112 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12494684
ROTOR OF AN ELECTRIC MACHINE
2y 3m to grant Granted Dec 09, 2025
Patent 12451742
METHOD AND APPARATUS FOR COOLING A ROTOR ASSEMBLY
3y 2m to grant Granted Oct 21, 2025
Patent 12316190
CASE STRUCTURE OF IN-WHEEL MOTOR
2y 10m to grant Granted May 27, 2025
Patent 9650015
BELT RETRACTOR FOR A VEHICLE SAFETY BELT
2y 8m to grant Granted May 16, 2017
Patent 9635986
SPINDLE AND ADAPTER FOR ROLL PAPER PRODUCT DISPENSERS
5y 6m to grant Granted May 02, 2017
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

Strategy Recommendation AI-generated — please review before filing

Get a prosecution strategy drawn from examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Typically takes 5-10 seconds — AI-generated, attorney review required before filing

Prosecution Projections

1-2
Expected OA Rounds
51%
Grant Probability
99%
With Interview (+48.3%)
3y 2m (~1y 6m remaining)
Median Time to Grant
Low
PTA Risk
Based on 187 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allowance rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month