Prosecution Insights
Last updated: July 17, 2026
Application No. 18/873,980

CHILD SAFETY SEAT

Non-Final OA §102
Filed
Dec 11, 2024
Priority
Jun 14, 2022 — CN 202210674743.1 +1 more
Examiner
BARFIELD, ANTHONY DERRELL
Art Unit
Tech Center
Assignee
Wonderland Switzerland AG
OA Round
1 (Non-Final)
80%
Grant Probability
Favorable
1-2
OA Rounds
8m
Est. Remaining
94%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 80% — above average
80%
Career Allowance Rate
989 granted / 1233 resolved
+20.2% vs TC avg
Moderate +14% lift
Without
With
+13.8%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
2y 3m
Avg Prosecution
25 currently pending
Career history
1249
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
0.3%
-39.7% vs TC avg
§103
62.4%
+22.4% vs TC avg
§102
29.0%
-11.0% vs TC avg
§112
6.6%
-33.4% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 1233 resolved cases

Office Action

§102
DETAILED ACTION Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 102 The following is a quotation of the appropriate paragraphs of 35 U.S.C. 102 that form the basis for the rejections under this section made in this Office action: A person shall be entitled to a patent unless – (a)(1) the claimed invention was patented, described in a printed publication, or in public use, on sale, or otherwise available to the public before the effective filing date of the claimed invention. Claim(s) 1-3, 6-13 and 16-17 is/are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 102(a)(1) as being anticipated by Pines et al. (2008/0150335). Pines et al. A child safety seat (Fig. 1), comprising: a seat housing comprising a seat portion for supporting a hip of a child; an adjustment belt having a rear end connected to a shoulder belt of the child safety seat, and a front end passing through a front end of the seat portion; a locking member arranged in the seat portion and locking the adjustment belt to prevent movement of the adjustment belt (Fig. 1); a seat cover (10) comprising seat cloth covering the seat portion, the seat cloth being provided with an operation port (110,120) for allowing a hand to pass through to unlock the locking member; and a barrier structure (20,30,40,50) configured to prevent, through the operation port, sundries from falling into the locking member. Regarding claim 2, Pines et al. shows the barrier structure comprising a blocking bag (Fig. 8) with a predetermined depth and mouth of the blocking bag is arranged around the operation port and connected to the seat cloth (Figs. 1-5). Pines et al. has disclosed that the blocking bag is connected to the seat cloth by sewing (para[0076]), in regards to claim 3. Regarding claims 6-7, the barrier structure comprises a first blocking sheet (60) made of elastic fabric with a periphery thereof being connected to the seat clothe “close” to the operation port and at an inner surface of the seat cloth whereby the blocking sheet larger the operation port (Fig2. 2-4). Regarding claim 9, the barrier structure comprises a second blocking sheet (20,580) covering the operation port on an outer side surface of the seat cloth, a part of a periphery of the second blocking sheet being connected to the outer side surface of the seat cloth, another part of the periphery of the second blocking sheet being connected to the outer side surface of the seat cloth to form a gap communicated with the operation port. Regarding claims 10-12, and 17 the barrier structure comprises a first flip cover (580) a rear edge of the first flip cover being connected to the outer surface of the seat cloth (via hook and loop fasteners) wherein a holding device (520) is configured to hold the first flip cover at the closed position. Regarding claim 13, the barrier structure comprises an adhesive layer (130,140) (via the hook and loop fasteners) being provide with and inlet and outlet (Fig. 1). Regarding claim 16, the seat portion comprises a recess (90) for accommodating the locking member; and the barrier structure comprises a third blocking sheet (50) made of elastic fabric, the third blocking sheet being connected to the seat portion and covering the recess above the locking member to separate the locking member from the operation port. Allowable Subject Matter Claims 4-5, 14-15 and 18-19 are objected to as being dependent upon a rejected base claim, but would be allowable if rewritten in independent form including all of the limitations of the base claim and any intervening claims. Conclusion The prior art made of record and not relied upon is considered pertinent to applicant's disclosure. Reference Nos. 2012/0104813 show features of the claimed invention. Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to ANTHONY D BARFIELD whose telephone number is (571)272-6852. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /ANTHONY D BARFIELD/Primary Examiner, Art Unit 3636 adb June 13, 2026
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Dec 11, 2024
Application Filed
Jun 17, 2026
Non-Final Rejection mailed — §102 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12679260
SEAT SUPPORT ELEMENT COMPRISING A VENTILATION DEVICE FOR A BEARING SURFACE
2y 11m to grant Granted Jul 14, 2026
Patent 12674501
DAMPER FOR VEHICLE SEAT
2y 7m to grant Granted Jul 07, 2026
Patent 12662025
ADJUSTABLE PROTECTOR AND SAFETY SEAT
4y 5m to grant Granted Jun 23, 2026
Patent 12662026
CHILD SAFETY SEAT
4y 0m to grant Granted Jun 23, 2026
Patent 12662036
SEAT FOR VEHICLE
3y 11m to grant Granted Jun 23, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

Strategy Recommendation AI-generated — please review before filing

Get a prosecution strategy drawn from examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Typically takes 5-10 seconds — AI-generated, attorney review required before filing

Prosecution Projections

1-2
Expected OA Rounds
80%
Grant Probability
94%
With Interview (+13.8%)
2y 3m (~8m remaining)
Median Time to Grant
Low
PTA Risk
Based on 1233 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allowance rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month