Prosecution Insights
Last updated: October 02, 2026
Application No. 18/874,102

METHOD FOR CONNECTING A METAL HOUSING AND A PLASTIC COVER, AND METAL HOUSING COMPRISING A PLASTIC COVER

Non-Final OA §103
Filed
Dec 12, 2024
Priority
Jul 01, 2022 — DE 10 2022 116 452.7 +1 more
Examiner
FERGUSON, MICHAEL P
Art Unit
3619
Tech Center
3600 — Transportation & Electronic Commerce
Assignee
Schaeffler Technologies AG & Co. KG
OA Round
1 (Non-Final)
63%
Grant Probability
Moderate
1-2
OA Rounds
1y 2m
Est. Remaining
99%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 63% of resolved cases
63%
Career Allowance Rate
817 granted / 1288 resolved
+11.4% vs TC avg
Strong +73% interview lift
Without
With
+73.3%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
2y 12m
Avg Prosecution
49 currently pending
Career history
1326
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
0.3%
-39.7% vs TC avg
§103
43.2%
+3.2% vs TC avg
§102
24.3%
-15.7% vs TC avg
§112
29.5%
-10.5% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 1288 resolved cases

Office Action

§103
DETAILED ACTION Claim Objections Claim 12 is objected to because of the following informalities: In claim 12 (line 1) “the inner” should recite –an outer--. In claim 12 (line 2) “the outer” should recite –an inner--. For the purpose of examining the application, it is assumed that appropriate correction has been made. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 103 The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 103 which forms the basis for all obviousness rejections set forth in this Office action: A patent for a claimed invention may not be obtained, notwithstanding that the claimed invention is not identically disclosed as set forth in section 102, if the differences between the claimed invention and the prior art are such that the claimed invention as a whole would have been obvious before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to a person having ordinary skill in the art to which the claimed invention pertains. Patentability shall not be negated by the manner in which the invention was made. Claims 1-20 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over Basnett (US 4,783,897). As to claim 1, Basnett discloses a method for connecting a metal housing and a cover, comprising: providing the metal housing 8 is provided, providing a metal ring 1 having a shoulder 7 extending at least in part in a peripheral direction, the metal ring is at least partly overmolded with a material to form the cover 5, axially pushing the cover and the metal ring into the metal housing so that the metal ring is located on at least part of a periphery of the metal housing, plastically deforming the metal housing so that the metal housing penetrates a recess formed by the shoulder on the metal ring (Figures 1-5). Basnett fails to disclose that the cover comprises a plastic material. Basnett does not disclose any structural or functional significance as to the specific material of the cover. Applicant is reminded that the selection of a known material based upon its suitability for the intended use, wherein there is no structural or functional significance disclosed as to the specific material of an element, is a design consideration within the skill of the art. In re Leshin, 227 F.2d 197, 125 USPQ 416 (CCPA 1960). Accordingly, it would have been obvious to one having ordinary skill in the art at the time the invention was made to modify the method disclosed by Basnett wherein the cover comprises a plastic material, as Basnett does not disclose any structural or functional significance as to the specific material of the cover, and as such selection of material is a design consideration within the skill of the art which would yield expected and predictable results. As to claim 2, Basnett discloses a method wherein the metal housing 8 and the cover 5 are connected by caulking the metal housing and the metal ring 1 (Figures 1-5). As to claim 3, Basnett discloses a method wherein the at least partially peripheral shoulder 7 on the metal ring 1 is formed by deforming the metal ring (Figures 1-5). As to claim 4, Basnett as modified discloses a method wherein the shoulder 7 is formed as an elevation on an inner peripheral surface of the metal ring 1 and is completely overmolded with plastic material (Figures 1-5). As to claim 5, Basnett discloses a method wherein the metal housing 8 is pressed in at least in sections in a radial direction on an outer peripheral surface in order to penetrate at least partially radially into the recess formed by the shoulder 7 on the metal ring 1 (Figures 1-5). As to claim 6, Basnett discloses a method wherein the cover 5 is pushed axially into the metal housing 8 up to a shoulder formed in the metal housing (Figures 1-5). As to claim 7, Basnett discloses a metal housing assembly, comprising: a metal housing 8, a cover 5 fixed to the metal housing, a metal ring 1 arranged at least partially between the metal housing and the cover, the metal ring having a shoulder 7 extending at least in part peripherally, the shoulder forming a recess for receiving an at least partially plastically deformed region of the metal housing (Figures 1-5). Basnett fails to disclose that the cover comprises a plastic material. Basnett does not disclose any structural or functional significance as to the specific material of the cover. Applicant is reminded that the selection of a known material based upon its suitability for the intended use, wherein there is no structural or functional significance disclosed as to the specific material of an element, is a design consideration within the skill of the art. In re Leshin, 227 F.2d 197, 125 USPQ 416 (CCPA 1960). Accordingly, it would have been obvious to one having ordinary skill in the art at the time the invention was made to modify the assembly disclosed by Basnett wherein the cover comprises a plastic material, as Basnett does not disclose any structural or functional significance as to the specific material of the cover, and as such selection of material is a design consideration within the skill of the art which would yield expected and predictable results. As to claim 8, Basnett discloses a metal housing assembly wherein at least one of the metal housing 8 or the metal ring 1 is formed from a steel alloy (Figures 1-5; C2 L14-15). As to claim 9, Basnett discloses a metal housing assembly wherein the metal housing 8 is plastically deformed at least in sections on an outer peripheral surface of the metal housing in a region of the shoulder 7 on the metal ring 1 (Figures 1-5). As to claim 10, Basnett discloses an electric machine (vehicle) having a metal housing 8 (the vehicle inherently comprises electric components; Figures 1-5). As to claim 11, Basnett discloses a method wherein the recess formed by the shoulder 7 of the metal ring 1 is free of plastic material (Figures 1-5). As to claim 12, Basnett discloses a method wherein an outer peripheral surface of the metal ring 1 and an inner peripheral surface of the metal housing 8 are cylindrical (Figures 1-5). As to claim 13, Basnett discloses a method wherein when the cover 5 is pushed axially into the metal housing 1 up to the shoulder, an outer circumferential surface of the cover and an inner circumferential surface of the metal housing form one of either a transition fit, a clearance fit, or an interference fit (Figures 1-5). As to claim 14, Basnett discloses a housing assembly wherein the recess formed by the shoulder 7 of the metal ring 1 is free of plastic material (Figures 1-5). As to claim 15, Basnett discloses a housing assembly, comprising: a metal housing 8, a cover 5 fixed to the metal housing, a metal sleeve 1 arranged radially between the metal housing and the cover, the metal sleeve: having a circumferentially extending shoulder 7 forming a recess with the metal housing, the circumferentially extending shoulder overmolded with material of the cover, and fixedly attached to the metal housing via radially inward elevations that penetrate into the recess to form a force-fitting connection, the radially inward elevations formed via plastic deformation of the metal housing after axial insertion of the cover within the metal housing (Figures 1-5). Basnett fails to disclose that the cover comprises a plastic material. Basnett does not disclose any structural or functional significance as to the specific material of the cover. Applicant is reminded that the selection of a known material based upon its suitability for the intended use, wherein there is no structural or functional significance disclosed as to the specific material of an element, is a design consideration within the skill of the art. In re Leshin, 227 F.2d 197, 125 USPQ 416 (CCPA 1960). Accordingly, it would have been obvious to one having ordinary skill in the art at the time the invention was made to modify the assembly disclosed by Basnett wherein the cover comprises a plastic material, as Basnett does not disclose any structural or functional significance as to the specific material of the cover, and as such selection of material is a design consideration within the skill of the art which would yield expected and predictable results. As to claim 16, Basnett discloses a housing assembly wherein the recess is open on one side before insertion of the cover 5 within the metal housing 8 (Figures 1-5). As to claim 17, Basnett discloses a housing assembly wherein the circumferentially extending shoulder 7 is integrally formed with the metal sleeve 1 via a metal forming process (Figures 1-5). As to claim 18, Basnett discloses a housing assembly wherein an outer circumferential surface of the metal sleeve 1 is free of the plastic material of the cover 5 (Figures 1-5). As to claim 19, Basnett discloses a housing assembly wherein the cover 5 is axially inserted within the metal housing 8 until an end of the cover engages a shoulder of the metal housing 1, the shoulder forming an axial stop for the cover (Figures 1-5). As to claim 20, Basnett discloses a housing assembly wherein the metal housing 8, cover 5 and metal sleeve 1 are cylindrical in shape (Figures 1-5). Conclusion Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to MICHAEL P FERGUSON whose telephone number is (571)272-7081. The examiner can normally be reached M-F (10:00 am-7:00 pm EST). Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Anna Momper can be reached at (571)270-5788. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. 08/18/26 /MICHAEL P FERGUSON/Primary Examiner, Art Unit 3619
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Dec 12, 2024
Application Filed
Aug 21, 2026
Non-Final Rejection mailed — §103 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12735906
Turnbuckle for Tensioning Frame Formwork Elements
2y 8m to grant Granted Sep 15, 2026
Patent 12735900
HIDDEN FASTENER UNIT AND RELATED METHOD OF USE
2y 8m to grant Granted Sep 15, 2026
Patent 12735914
FENCE KIT
2y 7m to grant Granted Sep 15, 2026
Patent 12736073
DIRECTIONAL FIXING DEVICE
2y 7m to grant Granted Sep 15, 2026
Patent 12716446
Clevis Pin Arrangement for a Tool
5y 2m to grant Granted Aug 25, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

Strategy Recommendation AI-generated — please review before filing

Get a prosecution strategy drawn from examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Typically takes 5-10 seconds — AI-generated, attorney review required before filing

Prosecution Projections

1-2
Expected OA Rounds
63%
Grant Probability
99%
With Interview (+73.3%)
2y 12m (~1y 2m remaining)
Median Time to Grant
Low
PTA Risk
Based on 1288 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allowance rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month