Prosecution Insights
Last updated: August 14, 2026
Application No. 18/874,354

SYSTEM AND METHOD FOR CHANGING WORKING SHARD OF ACCOUNT IN BLOCKCHAIN NETWORK

Non-Final OA §101
Filed
Dec 12, 2024
Priority
Jun 14, 2022 — RE 10-2022-0072023 +2 more
Examiner
PATEL, CHIRAG R
Art Unit
2454
Tech Center
2400 — Computer Networks
Assignee
BLOOM TECHNOLOGY, INC.
OA Round
1 (Non-Final)
87%
Grant Probability
Favorable
1-2
OA Rounds
1y 2m
Est. Remaining
99%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 87% — above average
87%
Career Allowance Rate
623 granted / 715 resolved
+29.1% vs TC avg
Strong +16% interview lift
Without
With
+15.6%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
2y 10m
Avg Prosecution
16 currently pending
Career history
731
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
11.3%
-28.7% vs TC avg
§103
54.6%
+14.6% vs TC avg
§102
18.9%
-21.1% vs TC avg
§112
5.2%
-34.8% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 715 resolved cases

Office Action

§101
Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 101 35 U.S.C. 101 reads as follows: Whoever invents or discovers any new and useful process, machine, manufacture, or composition of matter, or any new and useful improvement thereof, may obtain a patent therefor, subject to the conditions and requirements of this title. Claims 1-12 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 101 because the claimed invention is directed to non-statutory subject matter. Claim 1 does not fall within at least one of the four categories of patent eligible subject matter. The claim is directed to “software per se” as the claims recite “A system for changing a working shard of an account in a blockchain network on a network affiliated node”. There are no hardware elements, such as a processor or memory associated with the system. The “network affiliate node” is not associated with and part of the system as changing a working shard happens on the “network affiliated node” Claims 2-12 are rejected under software per se due to its dependence on claim 1. Allowable Subject Matter Claims 13-16, 18 and 20-22 are allowed. The following is a statement of reasons for the indication of allowable subject matter: The closest prior art, A. Bugday, A. Ozsoy and H. Sever, "Securing Blockchain Shards By Using Learning Based Reputation and Verifiable Random Functions," teaches assigning nodes in the network to the shards and calculates the reputation score of the nodes to determine it is not a malicious actor by using a trust value and calculating a loss value for each node. The random function uses the seed value and private key as input and outputs hash value and verifies it to make sure that the hash is computed properly. Krol et al. (Shard Scheduler: object placement and migration in sharded account-based blockchains) teaches that the shard scheduler that reduces the number of costly cross-shard transactions , ensures balanced load distribution and maximizes the number of processed transaction for the blockchain while reducing the number of costly cross-shard transactions by half while ensuring equal load and increasing the throughput. It distinguishes whether the transactions write only to one shard or multiple shards. Shard scheduler observers system load and interactions between accounts to place and migrate accounts across shards to maximize the throughput and teaches the concepts of the shards in which miners are divided into group called shards. Kramer et al. (WO 2019/207503) discloses balancing of transaction across shards, allocates transactions to different shards based on an transaction ID. , perform a transaction validation process in which it maintains of node, and shard they are members of and the transaction allocated to each shard to the nodes are a member of. F. ENRIQUE et al., "Smart Contracts on the Move" references moving the contracts when operating the move protocol as opposed to moving the nodes of the shard on the blockchain network. Although the prior art teaches portions of the claim limitations, it fails to disclose or render obvious, “the node is a node affiliated with an origin working shard of a first moving account, and communicates with a first home shard-affiliated node of the first moving account and a first destination working shard-affiliated node of the first moving account to perform a working shard change procedure for the first moving account, and the node comprises: a working shard change detection unit that detects whether a working shard of the first moving account is changed; and a working shard change request unit that requests a working shard change for the first moving account to the first destination working shard-affiliated node.” Conclusion Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from theexaminer should be directed to Chirag R Patel whose telephone number is (571)272-7966. The examiner can normally be reached on Monday to Friday from 9:00AM to 6:00PM. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, theexaminer's supervisor, Glenton Burgess, can be reached on 571-272-3949. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceedingis assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of an application may be obtained from the Patent Application Information Retrieval (PAIR) system. Status informationfor published applications may be obtained from either Private PAIR or PublicPAIR. Status information for unpublished applications is available throughPrivate PAIR only. For more information about the PAIR system, seehttp://pairdirect.uspto.gov. Should you have questions on access to the PrivatePAIR system, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197(toll free). /Chirag R Patel/ Primary Examiner, Art Unit 2454
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Dec 12, 2024
Application Filed
Jul 22, 2026
Non-Final Rejection mailed — §101 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12689600
AUTOMATED TEXT-TO-OPTIMIZATION ROUTING
2y 5m to grant Granted Jul 21, 2026
Patent 12689687
DEVICE MANAGEMENT SERVER, CONTROL METHOD FOR DEVICE MANAGEMENT SERVER, AND STORAGE MEDIUM
2y 0m to grant Granted Jul 21, 2026
Patent 12683823
CONFERENCING SESSION FACILITATION SYSTEMS AND METHODS USING VIRTUAL ASSISTANT SYSTEMS AND ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE ALGORITHMS
2y 1m to grant Granted Jul 14, 2026
Patent 12676815
SYSTEM FOR DISAMBIGUATING COMPOSITE EGRESS TRAFFIC FOR ROUTING AND OTHER CONTROL
2y 4m to grant Granted Jul 07, 2026
Patent 12676813
System and Method for Reducing Permitted Session Downtime
1y 10m to grant Granted Jul 07, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

Strategy Recommendation AI-generated — please review before filing

Get a prosecution strategy drawn from examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Typically takes 5-10 seconds — AI-generated, attorney review required before filing

Prosecution Projections

1-2
Expected OA Rounds
87%
Grant Probability
99%
With Interview (+15.6%)
2y 10m (~1y 2m remaining)
Median Time to Grant
Low
PTA Risk
Based on 715 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allowance rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month