Prosecution Insights
Last updated: October 04, 2026
Application No. 18/874,543

HYDRAULIC SYSTEM FOR HYBRID GEARBOX AND VEHICLE

Non-Final OA §103
Filed
Dec 12, 2024
Priority
Sep 09, 2022 — CN 202211105287.5 +1 more
Examiner
WIBLIN, MATTHEW
Art Unit
Tech Center
Assignee
Chery Automobile Co., Ltd.
OA Round
1 (Non-Final)
75%
Grant Probability
Favorable
1-2
OA Rounds
8m
Est. Remaining
98%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 75% — above average
75%
Career Allowance Rate
489 granted / 655 resolved
+14.7% vs TC avg
Strong +23% interview lift
Without
With
+23.4%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
2y 6m
Avg Prosecution
38 currently pending
Career history
695
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
1.0%
-39.0% vs TC avg
§103
41.7%
+1.7% vs TC avg
§102
22.5%
-17.5% vs TC avg
§112
32.8%
-7.2% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 655 resolved cases

Office Action

§103
DETAILED ACTION Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . Drawings The drawings are objected to under 37 CFR 1.83(a). The drawings must show every feature of the invention specified in the claims. Therefore, the following must be shown or the feature(s) canceled from the claim(s). No new matter should be entered. Claim 14 Ln 2-3 states “a three-position four-way proportional reversing valve”. This term may be referring to the first flow control valve (511) depicted in Fig. 2. However, the valve (511) depicted in Fig. 2 is not a reversing valve which would require the reversing of flow direction through the valve, which the valve (511) is not depicted/disclosed as doing. Corrected drawing sheets in compliance with 37 CFR 1.121(d) are required in reply to the Office action to avoid abandonment of the application. Any amended replacement drawing sheet should include all of the figures appearing on the immediate prior version of the sheet, even if only one figure is being amended. The figure or figure number of an amended drawing should not be labeled as “amended.” If a drawing figure is to be canceled, the appropriate figure must be removed from the replacement sheet, and where necessary, the remaining figures must be renumbered and appropriate changes made to the brief description of the several views of the drawings for consistency. Additional replacement sheets may be necessary to show the renumbering of the remaining figures. Each drawing sheet submitted after the filing date of an application must be labeled in the top margin as either “Replacement Sheet” or “New Sheet” pursuant to 37 CFR 1.121(d). If the changes are not accepted by the examiner, the applicant will be notified and informed of any required corrective action in the next Office action. The objection to the drawings will not be held in abeyance. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 103 The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 103 which forms the basis for all obviousness rejections set forth in this Office action: A patent for a claimed invention may not be obtained, notwithstanding that the claimed invention is not identically disclosed as set forth in section 102 of this title, if the differences between the claimed invention and the prior art are such that the claimed invention as a whole would have been obvious before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to a person having ordinary skill in the art to which the claimed invention pertains. Patentability shall not be negated by the manner in which the invention was made. Claims 1, 13 and 15-16 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over WEINHARDT; Mathias US 20190170169 A1, hereinafter Weinhardt, in view of YANG; YANG et al. US 20230193992 A1, hereinafter Yang. The references is/are considered analogous art to the claimed invention because the references is/are from the same field of endeavor as the claimed invention (vehicle gearing/control); or the references is/are reasonably pertinent to the problem faced by the inventor (power sources for pumps). MPEP2141.01(a) I. Regarding claim 1, Weinhardt discloses (Fig. 2a) a hydraulic system for a hybrid gearbox, comprising a first drive pump (53), a second drive pump (59), a high-pressure oil way (27/H) [0061], a low-pressure oil way (61/N) [0063], and a control valve group (36, 38), wherein the first drive pump is connected to a drive motor (57) of a vehicle [0062]; the second drive pump is connected to the drive motor (57) of the vehicle [0062]; the high-pressure oil way is connected to the first drive pump and is configured to supply hydraulic oil from the first drive pump to a high-pressure drive component (22) in the hybrid gearbox [0061]; the low-pressure oil way is configured to supply oil to components (K1, K2) to be lubricated in the hybrid gearbox [0062]; and the control valve group is separately connected to the first drive pump, the second drive pump, the high-pressure oil way, and the low-pressure oil way [0061-0063], and the control valve group is configured to control an oil pressure of the high-pressure oil way and control an oil quantity supplied by the low-pressure oil way to the components to be lubricated based on an operating working condition of the vehicle [0106]. Weinhardt fails to explicitly state that the second drive pump is driven by an engine of the vehicle. Yang discloses (Fig. 2) a hydraulic system for a hybrid gearbox, comprising a first drive pump (2), a second drive pump (1), a high-pressure oil way (depicted line connected to (1)), and a low-pressure oil way (depicted line connected to (2)), wherein the first drive pump is connected to a drive motor (M) of a vehicle [0035]; the second drive pump is connected to an engine (E) of the vehicle [0035]. One of ordinary skill in the art could have substituted one known element (engine driven pump) for another (motor driven pump), and the results of the substitution (rotationally driving the pump) would have been predictable. Because both Weinhardt and Yang teach hydraulic systems for gearboxes comprising multiple pumps, it would have been obvious to one skilled in the art to substitute the engine driven pump for the motor driven pump to achieve the predictable result of rotationally driving the pump. Regarding claim 13, Weinhardt fails to explicitly state that the system further comprising a filter, wherein the filter is connected between an oil tank and an oil inlet of the first drive pump as well as an oil inlet of the second drive pump. Yang discloses (Fig. 2) the system further comprising a filter, wherein the filter is connected between an oil tank and an oil inlet of the first drive pump as well as an oil inlet of the second drive pump (depicted component at pumps’ inlets between pumps and depicted oil tanks). It would have been obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art, at the time the invention was filed, to modify Weinhardt, by providing the filter, as taught by Yang, for the purpose of removing contaminants from the fluid before entering the system. Regarding claim 15, Weinhardt discloses (Fig. 2a) the high-pressure drive component comprises a clutch [0071]. Regarding claim 16, Weinhardt discloses (Fig. 1-2a) a vehicle, comprising a drive motor (57), an engine (“motor” [0060]), a hybrid gearbox (Fig. 1), and a hydraulic system (Fig. 2a) comprising a first drive pump (53), a second drive pump (59), a high-pressure oil way (27/H) [0061], a low-pressure oil way (61/N) [0063], and a control valve group (36, 38), wherein the first drive pump is connected to a drive motor (57) of a vehicle [0062]; the second drive pump is connected to the drive motor (57) of the vehicle [0062]; the high-pressure oil way is connected to the first drive pump and is configured to supply hydraulic oil from the first drive pump to a high-pressure drive component (22) in the hybrid gearbox [0061]; the low-pressure oil way is configured to supply oil to components (K1, K2) to be lubricated in the hybrid gearbox [0062]; the control valve group is separately connected to the first drive pump, the second drive pump, the high-pressure oil way, and the low-pressure oil way [0061-0063]; the control valve group is configured to control an oil pressure of the high-pressure oil way and control an oil quantity supplied by the low-pressure oil way to the components to be lubricated based on an operating working condition of the vehicle [0106]; and wherein the drive motor and the engine are both connected to the hybrid gearbox, and the hydraulic system is connected to a box body of the hybrid gearbox (at least [0060] indicates the presence of the motor driving the gearbox depicted in Fig. 1 and Fig. 1-2 depict at least a fluid connection to the gearbox depicted in Fig. 1). Weinhardt fails to explicitly state that the second drive pump is driven by an engine of the vehicle. Yang discloses (Fig. 2) a hydraulic system for a hybrid gearbox, comprising a first drive pump (2), a second drive pump (1), a high-pressure oil way (depicted line connected to (1)), and a low-pressure oil way (depicted line connected to (2)), wherein the first drive pump is connected to a drive motor (M) of a vehicle [0035]; the second drive pump is connected to an engine (E) of the vehicle [0035]. One of ordinary skill in the art could have substituted one known element (engine driven pump) for another (motor driven pump), and the results of the substitution (rotationally driving the pump) would have been predictable. Because both Weinhardt and Yang teach hydraulic systems for gearboxes comprising multiple pumps, it would have been obvious to one skilled in the art to substitute the engine driven pump for the motor driven pump to achieve the predictable result of rotationally driving the pump. Claims 9 and 10 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over Weinhardt in view of Yang, in further view of KIM; Hyunsuk et al. US 20210207708 A1, hereinafter Kim. The references is/are considered analogous art to the claimed invention because the references is/are from the same field of endeavor as the claimed invention (vehicle gearing/control); or the references is/are reasonably pertinent to the problem faced by the inventor (flow control through system). MPEP2141.01(a) I. Regarding claim 9, Weinhardt discloses the claimed invention substantially as claimed, as set forth above for Claim 1except fails to explicitly state that the system further comprising a first check valve, wherein an oil inlet of the first check valve communicates with an oil inlet of the second drive pump, and an oil outlet of the first check valve communicates with the oil outlet of the second drive pump. Kim discloses (Fig. 3) a hydraulic system for a hybrid gearbox, comprising a first drive pump (6), a second drive pump (2), a high-pressure oil way (20/8) [0031], a low-pressure oil way (12/4) [0031], a control valve group (14), a first check valve (OWV3) located on a bypass line (24), wherein an oil inlet of the first check valve (depicted bottom port) communicates with an oil inlet of the second drive pump (depicted bottom port), and an oil outlet (depicted top port) of the first check valve communicates with the oil outlet (depicted top port) of the second drive pump for the purpose of enabling fluid to flow from the tank to downstream components in the event the pump is not operating [0054] while preventing the backflow of pressurized oil [0038]. It would have been obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art, at the time the invention was filed, to modify Weinhardt, by providing the bypass line/first check valve, as taught by Kim, for the purpose of enabling fluid to flow from the tank to downstream components in the event the pump is not operating while preventing the backflow of pressurized oil. Regarding claim 10, Weinhardt discloses the claimed invention substantially as claimed, as set forth above for Claim 1except fails to explicitly state that the system further comprising a second check valve, wherein an oil inlet of the second check valve communicates with an oil inlet of the first drive pump, and an oil outlet of the second check valve communicates with an oil outlet of the first drive pump. Kim discloses (Fig. 3) a hydraulic system for a hybrid gearbox, comprising a first drive pump (6), a second drive pump (2), a high-pressure oil way (20/8) [0031], a low-pressure oil way (12/4) [0031], a control valve group (14), a second check valve (CV) located on a bypass line (22), wherein an oil inlet of the second check valve (depicted bottom port) communicates with an oil inlet of the first drive pump (depicted bottom port), and an oil outlet (depicted top port) of the second check valve communicates with the oil outlet (depicted top port) of the first drive pump for the purpose of enabling fluid to flow from the tank to downstream components in the event the pump is not operating [0049] while preventing the backflow of pressurized oil [0039]. It would have been obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art, at the time the invention was filed, to modify Weinhardt, by providing the bypass line/second check valve, as taught by Kim, for the purpose of enabling fluid to flow from the tank to downstream components in the event the pump is not operating while preventing the backflow of pressurized oil. Allowable Subject Matter Claims 2-8, 11-12, 14 and 17-20 are objected to as being dependent upon a rejected base claim, but would be allowable if rewritten in independent form including all of the limitations of the base claim and any intervening claims. The following is a statement of reasons for the indication of allowable subject matter: Regarding claim 2, Weinhardt discloses the claimed invention substantially as claimed, as set forth above for Claim 1. Weinhardt further discloses (Fig. 2a) the low-pressure oil way comprises a first sub-oil way (K1), and a second sub-oil way (K2) that are configured to supply oil to the components to be lubricated [0062], respectively; wherein the control valve group comprises a first flow control valve (63); a first oil port (depicted bottom port connected to (67) of the first flow control valve communicates with an oil outlet of the first drive pump (53) [0063], a second oil port (depicted bottom port connected to (61)) of the first flow control valve separately communicates with the second drive pump (59) and the first sub-oil way [0062], and a first control oil port (depicted top port connected to (K1)) of the first flow control valve communicates with the first oil port of the first flow control valve [0061-0063]. Weinhardt fails to explicitly state that the low pressure oil way comprises a third sub-oil way that is configured to supply oil to the components to be lubricated; wherein the control valve group comprises a second flow control valve, and a third flow control valve; a first oil port of the second flow control valve communicates with the second oil port of the first flow control valve, and a second oil port of the second flow control valve communicates with the second sub-oil way; and a first oil port of the third flow control valve communicates with the second oil port of the first flow control valve, and a second oil port of the third flow control valve communicates with the third sub-oil way The prior art does not anticipate nor render obvious the combination set forth in the claim, and specifically does not show the claimed third sub-oil way, second flow control valve and third flow control valve. Although Weinhardt discloses a hydraulic system comprising a first/second sub-oil way and a first flow control valve, there is no teaching in the prior art of record that would, reasonably and absent impermissible hindsight, motivate one having ordinary skill in the art to modify the teachings of Weinhardt to incorporate the details of the third sub-oil way, second flow control valve and third flow control valve, along with the other claimed components of the hydraulic system. Therefore, when viewed as a whole and for at least the foregoing reasons, the prior art of record neither anticipates nor rendered obvious the present invention as set forth in the claim. Claims 3-8, 11-12 and 14 depend upon claim 2. Regarding claim 17, Weinhardt discloses the claimed invention substantially as claimed, as set forth above for Claim 16. Weinhardt further discloses (Fig. 2a) the low-pressure oil way comprises a first sub-oil way (K1), and a second sub-oil way (K2) that are configured to supply oil to the components to be lubricated [0062], respectively; wherein the control valve group comprises a first flow control valve (63); a first oil port (depicted bottom port connected to (67) of the first flow control valve communicates with an oil outlet of the first drive pump (53) [0063], a second oil port (depicted bottom port connected to (61)) of the first flow control valve separately communicates with the second drive pump (59) and the first sub-oil way [0062], and a first control oil port (depicted top port connected to (K1)) of the first flow control valve communicates with the first oil port of the first flow control valve [0061-0063]. Weinhardt fails to explicitly state that the low pressure oil way comprises a third sub-oil way that is configured to supply oil to the components to be lubricated; wherein the control valve group comprises a second flow control valve, and a third flow control valve; a first oil port of the second flow control valve communicates with the second oil port of the first flow control valve, and a second oil port of the second flow control valve communicates with the second sub-oil way; and a first oil port of the third flow control valve communicates with the second oil port of the first flow control valve, and a second oil port of the third flow control valve communicates with the third sub-oil way The prior art does not anticipate nor render obvious the combination set forth in the claim, and specifically does not show the claimed third sub-oil way, second flow control valve and third flow control valve. Although Weinhardt discloses a hydraulic system comprising a first/second sub-oil way and a first flow control valve, there is no teaching in the prior art of record that would, reasonably and absent impermissible hindsight, motivate one having ordinary skill in the art to modify the teachings of Weinhardt to incorporate the details of the third sub-oil way, second flow control valve and third flow control valve, along with the other claimed components of the hydraulic system. Therefore, when viewed as a whole and for at least the foregoing reasons, the prior art of record neither anticipates nor rendered obvious the present invention as set forth in the claim. Claims 18-20 depend upon claim 17. Any comments considered necessary by applicant must be submitted no later than the payment of the issue fee and, to avoid processing delays, should preferably accompany the issue fee. Such submissions should be clearly labeled “Comments on Statement of Reasons for Allowance.” Relevant Art The following is a listing of relevant art: US 20200292054 A1, US 20230029138 A1, US 20140169994 A1, US 20200032894 A1 disclose hydraulic systems for gearboxes similar to the claimed invention. Contact Information Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to MATTHEW WIBLIN whose telephone number is (571)272-9836. The examiner can normally be reached on Monday-Friday 8:00 am - 4:00 pm. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, NATHANIEL WIEHE can be reached on 571-272-8648. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of an application may be obtained from the Patent Application Information Retrieval (PAIR) system. Status information for published applications may be obtained from either Private PAIR or Public PAIR. Status information for unpublished applications is available through Private PAIR only. For more information about the PAIR system, see http://pair-direct.uspto.gov. Should you have questions on access to the Private PAIR system, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative or access to the automated information system, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /MATTHEW WIBLIN/ Primary Examiner, Art Unit 3745
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Dec 12, 2024
Application Filed
Sep 22, 2026
Non-Final Rejection mailed — §103 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12747559
Electric Working Machine
1y 2m to grant Granted Sep 29, 2026
Patent 12735863
CONSTRUCTION MACHINE
1y 3m to grant Granted Sep 15, 2026
Patent 12728831
FLUID PRESSURE SUPPLY APPARATUS
1y 10m to grant Granted Sep 08, 2026
Patent 12729701
HYDRAULIC SYSTEM WITH COOLING CIRCUIT AND MACHINE TOOL
1y 3m to grant Granted Sep 08, 2026
Patent 12722687
A REDUNDANT HYDRAULIC SYSTEM
2y 5m to grant Granted Sep 01, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

Strategy Recommendation AI-generated — please review before filing

Get a prosecution strategy drawn from examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Typically takes 5-10 seconds — AI-generated, attorney review required before filing

Prosecution Projections

1-2
Expected OA Rounds
75%
Grant Probability
98%
With Interview (+23.4%)
2y 6m (~8m remaining)
Median Time to Grant
Low
PTA Risk
Based on 655 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allowance rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month