Prosecution Insights
Last updated: September 17, 2026
Application No. 18/874,651

3D PRINTING MOUTH PIECE INCLUDING SIMULATION OF DEFORMATION

Non-Final OA §101
Filed
Dec 13, 2024
Priority
Jun 17, 2022 — NL 2032211 +1 more
Examiner
SYED, NABIL H
Art Unit
3772
Tech Center
3700 — Mechanical Engineering & Manufacturing
Assignee
Lake3D Holding B V
OA Round
1 (Non-Final)
60%
Grant Probability
Moderate
1-2
OA Rounds
1y 1m
Est. Remaining
91%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 60% of resolved cases
60%
Career Allowance Rate
583 granted / 965 resolved
-9.6% vs TC avg
Strong +30% interview lift
Without
With
+30.2%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
2y 10m
Avg Prosecution
31 currently pending
Career history
994
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
4.2%
-35.8% vs TC avg
§103
55.1%
+15.1% vs TC avg
§102
16.3%
-23.7% vs TC avg
§112
14.2%
-25.8% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 965 resolved cases

Office Action

§101
DETAILED ACTION Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 101 35 U.S.C. 101 reads as follows: Whoever invents or discovers any new and useful process, machine, manufacture, or composition of matter, or any new and useful improvement thereof, may obtain a patent therefor, subject to the conditions and requirements of this title. Claim 20 is rejected under 35 U.S.C. 101 because the claimed invention is directed to a non-statuary subject matter. The claim does not fall within at least one of the four categories of patent eligible subject matter because the claim is directed to “a computer program product”, so the claim is drawn to a software per se and is not directed to any of the statutory categories (a process, machines, manufactures or composition of matter). It is suggested that the claim language be amended to cover only statutory embodiments by adding the limitation “non-transitory” to the claims. Claim Objections Claims 4, 7 and 8 are objected to because of the following informalities: Claim 4, line 3, term “1,0Mpa” should be –1.0 Mpa--. Line 3, term “2,0Mpa” should be --2.0Mpa--. Claim 7, line 3 term “£mm” should be “εmin”. Line 4, term “a minimal deformation εmin” should be --“the minimal deformation εmin”. Line 5, term “a maximal deformation εmax” should be “the maximal deformation εmax”. Claim 8, Line 2, term “deformation E” is not clear. “E” should be defined. Is the term “deformation E” referring to “deformation” in claim 1? Appropriate correction is required. Allowable Subject Matter Claims 1-19 are allowable over the prior art. Application will be in condition of allowance if claim 20 is properly amended to overcome the 35 USC 101 rejection and claims 4, 7 and 8 are amended to correct the objections raised above. Reasons for Allowance The following is an examiner’s statement of reasons for allowance: None of the prior art on record discloses or suggest, a method for manufacturing a mouth piece comprising the steps of carrying out a simulation in which the input mouth piece model is positioned on at least one of the virtual upper jaw and virtual lower jaw and wherein a deformation of the input mouth piece model is determined in response to an exerted force; adapting the input mouth piece model to a work mouth piece model by substituting material of at least a portion of the input mouthpiece model by a replacement material; manufacturing, in particular by 3D printing, the mouth piece based on the work mouth piece model. The featured limitations discussed above in combination with the other limitations of the claim are not anticipated by the prior art of record, nor would it have been obvious to one having ordinary skill in the art to modify the prior art of record in order to make the aforementioned limitations unpatentable. Any comments considered necessary by applicant must be submitted no later than the payment of the issue fee and, to avoid processing delays, should preferably accompany the issue fee. Such submissions should be clearly labeled “Comments on Statement of Reasons for Allowance.” Citation of Pertinent Prior Art The prior art made of record and not relied upon is considered pertinent to applicant's disclosure. WIPO Publication (WO 2012140021) to Barthe discloses a method comprising obtaining virtual three-dimensional (3D) teeth model of upper jaw and lower jaw for resembling the upper jaw and lower jaw of the patient's mouth. The virtual upper jaw and lower jaw are arranged in a virtual articulator in an initial relative configuration. The articulation movement between the virtual upper jaw and lower jaw is simulated by virtual articulator based on motion relative to the terminal hinge axis of the patient. The virtual orthodontic element is designed based on the virtual 3D teeth model and arrangement of 3D teeth model in the virtual articulator. US Pub (2022/0031427) to Hostettler et al. discloses a three-dimensional orthodontic retainer (2) and to a method for producing such a retainer (2) in which the three-dimensional orthodontic retainer (2) is matched to the exact shape of the adjacent teeth (3) and is produced from a blank (1) in such a manner that the physical properties of the material of the remaining part of the blank (1) are unchanged in the retainer (2). The method for producing the three-dimensional orthodontic retainer (2) comprises the following method steps: creating three-dimensional model of the structure of the patient's teeth (3); designing a customized, precisely fitting model of the retainer (2); producing the retainer (2) on the basis of the designed 3D model by computer-controlled deposition or application of material. Conclusion Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to NABIL H SYED whose telephone number is (571)270-3028. The examiner can normally be reached 8:00-5:00 M-F. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Davetta W Goins can be reached at (571) 272-2957. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /NABIL H SYED/ Primary Examiner, Art Unit 2689
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Dec 13, 2024
Application Filed
Sep 01, 2026
Non-Final Rejection mailed — §101 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12738114
DOOR SYSTEM WITH AUTHENTICATION AND ACTIVATION
2y 9m to grant Granted Sep 15, 2026
Patent 12736942
METHOD FOR PREPARING FOR THE START-UP OF A CONTROL UNIT FOR ACCESS DEVICES, ACCESS SYSTEM, CONTROL UNIT, ACCESS DEVICE, COMPUTER PROGRAM PRODUCT
3y 0m to grant Granted Sep 15, 2026
Patent 12729579
GARAGE MANAGEMENT SYSTEM AND METHOD
2y 9m to grant Granted Sep 08, 2026
Patent 12725473
DETERMINING WHEN TO ESTABLISH A COMMUNICATION CHANNEL FOR ACCESS CONTROL
2y 6m to grant Granted Sep 01, 2026
Patent 12719166
WIRELESS SYSTEM
2y 3m to grant Granted Aug 25, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

Strategy Recommendation AI-generated — please review before filing

Get a prosecution strategy drawn from examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Typically takes 5-10 seconds — AI-generated, attorney review required before filing

Prosecution Projections

1-2
Expected OA Rounds
60%
Grant Probability
91%
With Interview (+30.2%)
2y 10m (~1y 1m remaining)
Median Time to Grant
Low
PTA Risk
Based on 965 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allowance rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month