Prosecution Insights
Last updated: August 06, 2026
Application No. 18/875,160

FIBER, FIBER FORMED BODY AND FIBER PRODUCT

Non-Final OA §102§103
Filed
Dec 15, 2024
Priority
Sep 29, 2022 — JP 2022-156382 +1 more
Examiner
MATZEK, MATTHEW D
Art Unit
Tech Center
Assignee
Es Indorama Ventures Denmark Aps
OA Round
1 (Non-Final)
46%
Grant Probability
Moderate
1-2
OA Rounds
2y 2m
Est. Remaining
83%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 46% of resolved cases
46%
Career Allowance Rate
330 granted / 716 resolved
-13.9% vs TC avg
Strong +37% interview lift
Without
With
+37.0%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
3y 9m
Avg Prosecution
44 currently pending
Career history
755
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
0.3%
-39.7% vs TC avg
§103
58.6%
+18.6% vs TC avg
§102
17.0%
-23.0% vs TC avg
§112
15.9%
-24.1% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 716 resolved cases

Office Action

§102 §103
DETAILED ACTION Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 102 In the event the determination of the status of the application as subject to AIA 35 U.S.C. 102 and 103 (or as subject to pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 102 and 103) is incorrect, any correction of the statutory basis (i.e., changing from AIA to pre-AIA ) for the rejection will not be considered a new ground of rejection if the prior art relied upon, and the rationale supporting the rejection, would be the same under either status. The following is a quotation of the appropriate paragraphs of 35 U.S.C. 102 that form the basis for the rejections under this section made in this Office action: A person shall be entitled to a patent unless – (a)(1) the claimed invention was patented, described in a printed publication, or in public use, on sale, or otherwise available to the public before the effective filing date of the claimed invention. Claim(s) 1, 3, and 5–8 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 102(a)(1) as being anticipated by Koichiro. Koichiro discloses a sterilization method for textile products such as clothes and linens, which are made up of fibers, wherein the method includes the application of a polyakylene biguanide compound represented by Applicant’s General Formula (I), and a nonionic surfactant such as polyoxyethylene alkyl ether and fatty acid esters such as glycerin fatty acid esters and sucrose fatty acid esters. Koichiro abstract, Description. The polyakylene biguanide may be applied to the textile products at levels in a preferred range of 0.005–0.5% by mass. Id. Description. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 103 The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 103 which forms the basis for all obviousness rejections set forth in this Office action: A patent for a claimed invention may not be obtained, notwithstanding that the claimed invention is not identically disclosed as set forth in section 102, if the differences between the claimed invention and the prior art are such that the claimed invention as a whole would have been obvious before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to a person having ordinary skill in the art to which the claimed invention pertains. Patentability shall not be negated by the manner in which the invention was made. Claim(s) 2 and 4 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over Koichiro as applied to claim 1 above, and further in view of Yutaka (KR 20200047742 A). Koichiro fails to teach that the use of an anionic surfactant selected from the group consisting of carboxylate salt, sulfonate salt, sulfate ester salt, and phosphate ester salt; or the fiber is a heat adhesive conjugate fiber comprising an olefin-based resin. Yutaka teaches the treatment of a polyolefin-based conjugate fiber, wherein the treatment comprises anionic surfactants such as sulfonates and sulfate ester salts that improve hydrophilicity. Yutaka abstract, Description. It would have been obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art to have looked to Yutaka for guidance as to suitable fiber types in order to successfully practice the invention of Koichiro. Additionally, it would have been obvious to have added the anionic sulfate ester salt surfactant of Yutaka to the sterilization compound of Koichiro motivated by the desire to impart hydrophilicity to the fabric. Conclusion Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to MATTHEW D MATZEK whose telephone number is (571)272-5732. The examiner can normally be reached M-F 9:30-6. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Jennifer Boyd can be reached at 571.272.7783. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /MATTHEW D MATZEK/Primary Examiner, Art Unit 1786
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Dec 15, 2024
Application Filed
Jul 24, 2026
Non-Final Rejection mailed — §102, §103 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12698368
METHOD OF MAKING A HIGH FILLED FIBER-MESH REINFORCED CERAMIC-THERMOPLASTIC POLYMER COMPOSITES WITH OUTSTANDING MECHANICAL PERFORMANCE
3y 11m to grant Granted Aug 04, 2026
Patent 12687199
COMPOSITE LUG WITH ENHANCED PERFORMANCE
3y 4m to grant Granted Jul 21, 2026
Patent 12686812
COMPOSITE ELECTROCHROMIC MATERIAL, AND PREPARATION METHOD THEREFOR AND APPLICATION THEREOF
2y 10m to grant Granted Jul 21, 2026
Patent 12680198
SUPER-TOUGH CELLULOSE AEROGEL FIBER AS WELL AS PREPARATION METHOD AND USE THEREOF
1y 6m to grant Granted Jul 14, 2026
Patent 12668396
DEGRADABLE CONTAINMENT FEATURES
3y 5m to grant Granted Jun 30, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

Strategy Recommendation AI-generated — please review before filing

Get a prosecution strategy drawn from examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Typically takes 5-10 seconds — AI-generated, attorney review required before filing

Prosecution Projections

1-2
Expected OA Rounds
46%
Grant Probability
83%
With Interview (+37.0%)
3y 9m (~2y 2m remaining)
Median Time to Grant
Low
PTA Risk
Based on 716 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allowance rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month