Prosecution Insights
Last updated: October 04, 2026
Application No. 18/875,227

WORKPIECE SUPPLY SYSTEM, WORKPIECE SUPPLY METHOD, AND WORKPIECE SUPPLY PROGRAM

Non-Final OA §101§102
Filed
Dec 16, 2024
Priority
Jul 22, 2022 — JP 2022-116828 +1 more
Examiner
MCCLAIN, GERALD
Art Unit
Tech Center
Assignee
Amada Co., Ltd.
OA Round
1 (Non-Final)
74%
Grant Probability
Favorable
1-2
OA Rounds
8m
Est. Remaining
89%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 74% — above average
74%
Career Allowance Rate
595 granted / 801 resolved
+14.3% vs TC avg
Moderate +14% lift
Without
With
+14.5%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
2y 5m
Avg Prosecution
32 currently pending
Career history
831
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
1.0%
-39.0% vs TC avg
§103
38.4%
-1.6% vs TC avg
§102
33.6%
-6.4% vs TC avg
§112
23.5%
-16.5% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 801 resolved cases

Office Action

§101 §102
DETAILED ACTION Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . Priority Receipt is acknowledged of certified copies of papers required by 37 CFR 1.55. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 101 35 U.S.C. 101 reads as follows: Whoever invents or discovers any new and useful process, machine, manufacture, or composition of matter, or any new and useful improvement thereof, may obtain a patent therefor, subject to the conditions and requirements of this title. Claims 8-10 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 101 because the claimed invention is directed to non-statutory subject matter. The claim(s) does/do not fall within at least one of the four categories of patent eligible subject matter because under Step 1, software per se (“workpiece supply program”) is not one of the four statutory classes. Under BRI, Claims 8-10 read on a computer program without structure recited. See MPEP 2106.03(I). Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 102 In the event the determination of the status of the application as subject to AIA 35 U.S.C. 102 and 103 (or as subject to pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 102 and 103) is incorrect, any correction of the statutory basis (i.e., changing from AIA to pre-AIA ) for the rejection will not be considered a new ground of rejection if the prior art relied upon, and the rationale supporting the rejection, would be the same under either status. The following is a quotation of the appropriate paragraphs of 35 U.S.C. 102 that form the basis for the rejections under this section made in this Office action: A person shall be entitled to a patent unless – (a)(1) the claimed invention was patented, described in a printed publication, or in public use, on sale, or otherwise available to the public before the effective filing date of the claimed invention. Claim(s) 1-10 is/are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 102(a)(1) as being anticipated by Abler (DE 198 34 492 A1). Claim 1: a magnet floater (7) configured to separate an uppermost workpiece from a group of workpieces stacked on a loading area (4) by magnetizing the group of workpieces; and a workpiece supply robot (1) configured to be able to transport the uppermost workpiece from among the group of workpieces, wherein the magnet floater (7) is configured to be able to switch between an on state (Fig. 4-5) where a magnetic force is applied to the group of workpieces and an off state (Fig. 1-3/6) where a magnetic force to be applied to the group of workpieces is reduced compared to the magnetic force in the on state, and the workpiece supply robot is configured to contact the uppermost workpiece when the magnet floater is in the off state (Fig. 2) and to separate the uppermost workpiece from the group of workpieces when the magnet floater is in the on state (Fig. 4); Claim 2: wherein the workpiece supply robot is configured to be able to perform a first elevating operation of lifting the uppermost workpiece from among the group of workpieces and a second elevating operation of further lifting the uppermost workpiece after the first elevating operation, the magnet floater is configured to switch from the on state to the off state between the first elevating operation and the second elevating operation of the workpiece supply robot, and an amount of elevation in the first elevating operation is less than an amount of elevation in the second elevating operation (the first elevation in Fig. 5 and the second elevation (including workpiece) in Fig. 1); Claim 3: wherein the workpiece supply robot is configured to be able to perform a stopping operation of stopping elevation between the first elevating operation and the second elevating operation, and the magnet floater is configured to switch from the on state to the off state during the stopping operation of the workpiece supply robot (the stopping operation in Fig. 6); Claim 4: wherein the workpiece supply robot is configured to be able to transport the uppermost workpiece in a state of being separated from the magnet floater (Fig. 6); Claim 5: bringing a workpiece supply robot (1) into contact with an uppermost workpiece among a group of workpieces stacked on a loading area (Fig. 2); applying, after the bringing, a stronger magnetic force than a magnetic force before the bringing to the group of workpieces (Fig. 1-3/6); and separating the uppermost workpiece from the group of workpieces with the workpiece supply robot in a state where the magnetic force is applied to the group of workpieces (Fig. 4); Claim 6: wherein the separating comprises: lifting the uppermost workpiece from the group of workpieces, in a first elevating step; and further lifting the uppermost workpiece after the first elevating step, in a second elevating step, wherein an amount of elevation of the workpiece supply robot in the first elevating step is less than an amount of elevation of the workpiece supply robot in the second elevating step, and between the first elevating step and the second elevating step, a magnetic force to be applied to the group of workpieces is reduced compared to the stronger magnetic force in the applying (the first elevation in Fig. 5 and the second elevation (including workpiece) in Fig. 1); Claim 7: wherein the separating further comprises stopping elevation of the workpiece supply robot between the first elevating step and the second elevating step, and in the stopping, a magnetic force to be applied to the group of workpieces is reduced compared to the stronger magnetic force in the applying (the stopping operation in Fig. 6); Claim 8: a robot (1) contact process of contacting an uppermost workpiece before a magnetic force for separating the uppermost workpiece from a group of workpieces stacked on a loading area is applied to the group of workpieces (Fig. 2); and a workpiece separation process of separating the uppermost workpiece from the group of workpieces in a state where the magnetic force for separating the uppermost workpiece from the group of workpieces is applied (Fig. 1-3/6) to the group of workpieces (Fig. 4); Claim 9: wherein the workpiece separation process comprises: a first elevating process of lifting the uppermost workpiece from the group of workpieces; and a second elevating process of further lifting the uppermost workpiece after the first elevating process, wherein an amount of elevation of the workpiece supply robot in the first elevating process is less than an amount of elevation of the workpiece supply robot in the second elevating process, and after a magnetic force to be applied to the group of workpieces is reduced compared to a magnetic force in the first elevating process, the workpiece supply program causes the workpiece supply robot to execute the second elevating process (the first elevation in Fig. 5 and the second elevation (including workpiece) in Fig. 1); Claim 10: wherein the workpiece separation process further comprises a stopping process of stopping elevation of the workpiece supply robot between the first elevating process and the second elevating process (the stopping operation in Fig. 6). Conclusion The prior art made of record and not relied upon is considered pertinent to applicant's disclosure. US 2650092 discloses magnets 60. Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to Gerald McClain whose telephone number is (571)272-7803. The examiner can normally be reached Monday through Friday from 8:30 a.m. to 5:00 p.m. and at gerald.mcclain@uspto.gov (see MPEP 502.03 (II)). Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Saul Rodriguez can be reached at (571) 272-7097. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /Gerald McClain/Primary Examiner, Art Unit 3652
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Dec 16, 2024
Application Filed
Sep 02, 2026
Non-Final Rejection mailed — §101, §102 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12728540
METHOD AND APPARATUS FOR PROCESSING A SUBSTRATE IN CLEANING MODULES
2y 12m to grant Granted Sep 08, 2026
Patent 12729073
PROBE CARD GRIPPER AND TRANSFER DEVICE COMPRISING SAME
2y 8m to grant Granted Sep 08, 2026
Patent 12728544
HANDLING SYSTEM COMPRISING TUBE LIFTER AND MANIPULATOR WITH GEARBOX
2y 1m to grant Granted Sep 08, 2026
Patent 12727437
APPARATUS AND METHODS FOR HANDLING SEMICONDUCTOR PART CARRIERS
1y 9m to grant Granted Sep 01, 2026
Patent 12715691
STOCKER AND STOCKER SYSTEM
2y 7m to grant Granted Aug 25, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

Strategy Recommendation AI-generated — please review before filing

Get a prosecution strategy drawn from examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Typically takes 5-10 seconds — AI-generated, attorney review required before filing

Prosecution Projections

1-2
Expected OA Rounds
74%
Grant Probability
89%
With Interview (+14.5%)
2y 5m (~8m remaining)
Median Time to Grant
Low
PTA Risk
Based on 801 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allowance rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month