Prosecution Insights
Last updated: October 04, 2026
Application No. 18/875,273

Control Unit and Motor Drive Device for Electrically Driven Vehicle, and Electrically Driven Vehicle

Non-Final OA §103§112
Filed
Dec 16, 2024
Priority
Jul 12, 2022 — nonprovisional of PCTJP2022027375
Examiner
BOUZIANE, SAID
Art Unit
Tech Center
Assignee
Hitachi Industrial Products Ltd.
OA Round
1 (Non-Final)
77%
Grant Probability
Favorable
1-2
OA Rounds
7m
Est. Remaining
88%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 77% — above average
77%
Career Allowance Rate
452 granted / 587 resolved
+17.0% vs TC avg
Moderate +11% lift
Without
With
+10.9%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
2y 4m
Avg Prosecution
22 currently pending
Career history
602
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
2.7%
-37.3% vs TC avg
§103
53.4%
+13.4% vs TC avg
§102
15.8%
-24.2% vs TC avg
§112
26.3%
-13.7% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 587 resolved cases

Office Action

§103 §112
DETAILED ACTION Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . Information Disclosure Statement The Information Disclosure Statement filed on 12/16/2024 and 5/11/2026 has been considered. An initialed copy of form 1449 is enclosed herewith. Specification The disclosure is objected to because of the following informalities: The abstract should be limited to a single paragraph within the range of 50 to 150 words in length. Correction is required. See MPEP § 608.01(b). Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 112 The following is a quotation of the first paragraph of 35 U.S.C. 112(a): (a) IN GENERAL.—The specification shall contain a written description of the invention, and of the manner and process of making and using it, in such full, clear, concise, and exact terms as to enable any person skilled in the art to which it pertains, or with which it is most nearly connected, to make and use the same, and shall set forth the best mode contemplated by the inventor or joint inventor of carrying out the invention. The following is a quotation of the first paragraph of pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 112: The specification shall contain a written description of the invention, and of the manner and process of making and using it, in such full, clear, concise, and exact terms as to enable any person skilled in the art to which it pertains, or with which it is most nearly connected, to make and use the same, and shall set forth the best mode contemplated by the inventor of carrying out his invention. Claims 1- 15 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 112(a) or 35 U.S.C. 112 (pre-AIA ), first paragraph, because the specification, while being enabling for the first interface board on which at least an interface having a large amount of heat generation is mounted (described as temperature sensor in the spec), does not reasonably provide enablement for the interface board on which an interface having any large amount of heat generation of the interface mounted on the first interface board. The specification does not enable any person skilled in the art to which it pertains, or with which it is most nearly connected, to make and use the invention commensurate in scope with these claims. The specification only recites the first interface is equipped with a temperature sensor that generate large amount of heat (¶. [0026]). The specification does not include an interface board for terminals switching devices such as an IGBT or a MOSFET of an inverter or a DC/DC converter, which also includes an interface board for terminals and generates a large amount of heat, which is not supported by the description of the application. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 103 5. The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 103 which forms the basis for all obviousness rejections set forth in this Office action: A patent for a claimed invention may not be obtained, notwithstanding that the claimed invention is not identically disclosed as set forth in section 102, if the differences between the claimed invention and the prior art are such that the claimed invention as a whole would have been obvious before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to a person having ordinary skill in the art to which the claimed invention pertains. Patentability shall not be negated by the manner in which the invention was made. The factual inquiries set forth in Graham v. John Deere Co., 383 U.S. 1, 148 USPQ 459 (1966), that are applied for establishing a background for determining obviousness under 35 U.S.C. 103 are summarized as follows: 1. Determining the scope and contents of the prior art. 2. Ascertaining the differences between the prior art and the claims at issue. 3. Resolving the level of ordinary skill in the pertinent art. 4. Considering objective evidence present in the application indicating obviousness or nonobviousness. Claims 1- 15 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over Arai et al. (JP 6592470 B2) in view of Ries et al. (US 20050225949 A1). Re, claim 1, Arai discloses a control unit (60) for an electrically driven vehicle (dump truck 1 in Fig. 1) configured to receive input of an operation signal and signals from various sensors (various sensors such as a temperature sensor 42 and rotational speed sensors 16L and 16R) and to output control signals (output of unit 60) for left and right inverters (36R and 36L) configured to drive left and right motors (14R and 14L) connected to left and right wheels (13R and 13L), respectively, the control unit comprising: Arai discloses a control unit (60) having inputs for receiving various sensors (various sensors such as a temperature sensor 42 detecting a large amount of heat generated by mounted thermistor 39; and rotational speed sensors 16L and 16R) wherein the control device 60 is configured to cool the electrical resistor 39 by forced air cooling by rotating the cooling fan 40 according to the temperature measured by the temperature sensor 42. Arai does not teach a first interface board on which at least an interface having a large amount of heat generation is mounted, a second interface board on which an interface having a smaller amount of heat generation than the amount of heat generation of the interface mounted on the first interface board is mounted, and a control board configured to generate a control signal, in a box, wherein the first interface board is disposed higher than the second interface board and the control board in the box. Ries figure 2 discloses a first interface board (circuit board 22) on which at least an interface (26 and 28) having a large amount of heat generation is mounted (circuit board 22 comprises “a decoupling diode and a temperature-dependent resistor, for example a PTC thermistor” ¶. [0031]), a second interface board (14) on which an interface having a smaller amount of heat generation than the amount of heat generation of the interface mounted on the first interface board is mounted (board 14 includes any communication/control/sensor interface board, that generates less heat), and a control board (16) configured to generate a control signal (¶. [0029]), in a box (12), wherein the first interface board (22) is disposed higher than the second interface board (14) and the control board (16) in the box (12) (see Fig. 2). Hence, it would have been obvious to one with ordinary skill in the art before the effective filing date of the claimed invention, to modify the invention of Arai with the teaching of Ries to implement circuit architecture of Ries in order to direct the heat generated from the temperature sensor interface board toward the upper part of the box and dissipated from screen 32, to reduce thermal effects on other boards such as the control board (Ries, ¶. [0010]). Re. Claims 2 and 8, the combination of Arai and Ries discloses wherein the interface mounted on the first interface board supplies current to a connected sensor (see interface (Ries, ¶. [0031] and [0038]). Re. Claims 3, 4 and 9, the combination of Arai and Ries discloses wherein the interface mounted on the first interface board is an interface connected to a temperature sensor (Arai teaches various sensors such as a temperature sensor 42 and rotational speed sensors 16L and 16R and Ries teaches circuit board 22 comprises a temperature-dependent resistor¶. [0031]). Re. Claims 5 and 10, Arai discloses a left motor and right motor Hence, it would have been obvious to one with ordinary skill in the art to design the control box with the right motor control board are laterally evenly disposed on left and right sides of the box, respectively. Since it has been held that forming in one piece an article, which has formerly been formed in two pieces and put together, involves only routine skill in the art. Howard v. Detroit Stove Works, 150 U.S. 164 (1893). Re. Claims 6 and 11, the combination of Arai and Ries discloses vents are provided in upper parts of left and right sides walls of the box or on an upper surface of the box (the circuit architecture of Ries provide an opening (32) to direct the heat generated from the temperature sensor interface board toward the upper part of the box and dissipated from screen 32, to reduce thermal effects on other boards such as the control board. Ries, ¶. [0010]). Re. claim 7, Arai figures 1- 7 discloses a motor drive device for an electrically driven vehicle (dump truck 1 in Fig. 1) (various sensors such as a temperature sensor 42 and rotational speed sensors 16L and 16R) and to output control signals (output of unit 60) for left and right inverters (36R and 36L) configured to drive left and right motors (14R and 14L) connected to left and right wheels (13R and 13L), respectively, motor drive device comprising: a rectifier unit (rectifier 34 that converts AC power generated by the main generator 32 into DC power,) configured to convert AC power from the generator into direct current (DC); a left motor inverter unit and a right motor inverter unit configured to create drive signals for the left and right motors (36R and 36L) respectively; and a control unit (control device 60) configured to supply control signals to the left motor inverter unit (36L) and the right motor inverter unit (36R), wherein: Arai does not teach a first interface board on which at least an interface having a large amount of heat generation is mounted, a second interface board on which an interface having a smaller amount of heat generation than the amount of heat generation of the interface mounted on the first interface board is mounted, and a control board configured to generate a control signal, in a box, wherein the first interface board is disposed higher than the second interface board and the control board in the box. Ries figure 2 discloses a first interface board (circuit board 22) on which at least an interface (26 and 28) having a large amount of heat generation is mounted (circuit board 22 comprises “a decoupling diode and a temperature-dependent resistor, for example a PTC thermistor” ¶. [0031]), a second interface board (14) on which an interface having a smaller amount of heat generation than the amount of heat generation of the interface mounted on the first interface board is mounted (board 14 includes any communication/control/sensor interface board, that generates less heat), and a control board (16) configured to generate a control signal (¶. [0029]), in a box (12), wherein the first interface board (22) is disposed higher than the second interface board (14) and the control board (16) in the box (12) (see Fig. 2). Hence, it would have been obvious to one with ordinary skill in the art before the effective filing date of the claimed invention, to modify the invention of Arai with the teaching of Ries to implement circuit architecture of Ries in order to direct the heat generated from the temperature sensor interface board toward the upper part of the box and dissipated from screen 32, to reduce thermal effects on other boards such as the control board (Ries, ¶. [0010]). Re. claim 12, Arai discloses wherein the rectifier unit, the left motor inverter unit, the right motor inverter unit, and the control unit are accommodated in a control cabinet of the electrically driven vehicle (see control cabinet 20). Re. claims 13- 15, Arai disclose a left and right motors connected to left and right wheels (12L and 12R), a generator (32) configured to generate AC power; and an engine (31) configured to drive the generator, and the vehicle is a dump truck (1). Conclusion 6. Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to SAID BOUZIANE whose telephone number is (571)272-7592. The examiner can normally be reached Mon-Fri 6:00-15:00. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Eduardo Colon-Santana can be reached at Colon-Santana. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /SAID BOUZIANE/Primary Examiner, Art Unit 2837
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Dec 16, 2024
Application Filed
Sep 03, 2026
Non-Final Rejection mailed — §103, §112 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12746816
POWERTRAIN FOR AN ELECTRIC VEHICLE
3y 1m to grant Granted Sep 29, 2026
Patent 12733572
TORQUE BALANCING SCHEME FOR A VELOCITY CONTROLLED DRIVE SYSTEM OF A MOWER
2y 5m to grant Granted Sep 15, 2026
Patent 12719338
METHOD FOR MEASURING THE ROTOR ANGLE-BASED EXPANSION OF A ROTATING ROTOR UNDER CENTRIFUGAL STRESS
2y 7m to grant Granted Aug 25, 2026
Patent 12712477
SYSTEMS AND METHODS FOR ANALYZING FREQUENCY COMPONENTS OF STATOR CURRENT OF A MOTOR OPERATING AT VARYING CONDITIONS
2y 5m to grant Granted Aug 18, 2026
Patent 12700820
POWER TOOL AND CONTROL METHOD THEREOF
2y 9m to grant Granted Aug 04, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

Strategy Recommendation AI-generated — please review before filing

Get a prosecution strategy drawn from examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Typically takes 5-10 seconds — AI-generated, attorney review required before filing

Prosecution Projections

1-2
Expected OA Rounds
77%
Grant Probability
88%
With Interview (+10.9%)
2y 4m (~7m remaining)
Median Time to Grant
Low
PTA Risk
Based on 587 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allowance rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month