Prosecution Insights
Last updated: April 19, 2026
Application No. 18/875,368

POST VISIBILITY PERMISSION SETTING METHOD, ELECTRONIC DEVICE, AND STORAGE MEDIUM

Non-Final OA §102
Filed
Dec 16, 2024
Examiner
CHAI, LONGBIT
Art Unit
2431
Tech Center
2400 — Computer Networks
Assignee
BEIJING ZITIAO NETWORK TECHNOLOGY CO., LTD.
OA Round
1 (Non-Final)
88%
Grant Probability
Favorable
1-2
OA Rounds
2y 9m
To Grant
99%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 88% — above average
88%
Career Allow Rate
647 granted / 737 resolved
+29.8% vs TC avg
Strong +32% interview lift
Without
With
+32.3%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
2y 9m
Avg Prosecution
23 currently pending
Career history
760
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
14.4%
-25.6% vs TC avg
§103
36.7%
-3.3% vs TC avg
§102
30.4%
-9.6% vs TC avg
§112
8.0%
-32.0% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 737 resolved cases

Office Action

§102
Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . DETAILED ACTION Currently pending claims are 1 – 8 & 10 – 21 (CLAIM 9 Cancelled). In the event the determination of the status of the application as subject to AIA 35 U.S.C. 102 and 103 (or as subject to pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 102 and 103) is incorrect, any correction of the statutory basis for the rejection will not be considered a new ground of rejection if the prior art relied upon, and the rationale supporting the rejection, would be the same under either status. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 102 The following is a quotation of the appropriate paragraphs of 35 U.S.C. 102 that form the basis for the rejections under this section made in this Office action: A person shall be entitled to a patent unless – (a)(1) the claimed invention was patented, described in a printed publication, or in public use, on sale or otherwise available to the public before the effective filing date of the claimed invention. Claims 1 – 8 & 10 – 21 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 102(a)(1) as being anticipated by Zha et al. (CN 10-630-2666). As per claim 1, 10 & 11, Zha teaches a post visibility permission setting method, comprising: receiving a target triggering operation (Zha: Abstract & Page 2 / 2nd Para, Page 4 / S202 – S206, Page 6 / 1st Para & Page 7 / 2nd – 4th Para: receiving a request to trigger an operation of pushing target data associated with a 1st target account w.r.t. a login (client) application based upon checking of whether the requested target push operation meets the requirement of matching the target visibility permission (i.e. the target data visible to another 2nd account / client) with an established preset relation association with one of the target account information of the 1st (target) account); and setting, in response to the target triggering operation, a target post to have a target visibility permission in a current application (Zha: see above, Page 2 / 2nd Para, Summary Invention & Page 7 / 2nd – 4th Para and Page 8 / 3rd – 6th Para: for the purpose of improving the push efficiency to avoid configuring the relation association with the target account using (same) default access authority (i.e. avoid using a default account type), the system utilizing a target visibility permission to distinct access authorities from different account / client such that the target data only visible to a particular 2nd account / client via the use of different account information of the 1st (target) account that correspond to the 2nd account / client with established (preset) relation association); wherein the target post is a post corresponding to the target triggering operation in a target account, and the target post, when having the target visibility permission, is visible to second users in a posted state (Zha: see above); the target account is an account logged in by a first user in the current application, a first account type of the target account is different from a default second account type of the current application (Zha: see above, Abstract, Page 2 / 2nd Para, Summary Invention & Page 7 / 2nd – 4th Para: the first account type of the target account is different from a default second account type so as to improve the push efficiency to avoid using (same) default access authority by configuring a relation association with the 1st (login) target account), the first account type is set by the first user (Zha: see above & Page 7 / 2nd – 4th Para: the 1st account type is specified by a 1st user by classifying different account information (e.g. A, B & C) associated with the 1st (target) account as a private account), the second users comprise at least some of users in the current application, and the at least some of users have not yet performed a triggering operation of establishing a preset association relationship with the first user (Zha: see above & Page 7 / 2nd – 4th Para: different 2nd (friend) accounts with different access authorities based on the established association relation between the 1st account so as to realize different social relationships corresponding to different account information of the 1st (target) account including the access permissions visible to those 2nd accounts w/o the need of using different friend accounts – e.g. account information A which has not yet performed a triggering operation of establishing a (particular) preset association relation with the first user). As per claim 2 – 3, 12 – 13 & 19 – 20, Zha teaches displaying, in response to a panel displaying operation, a permission setting panel for the target post, wherein a target permission control is displayed in the permission setting panel, and the target permission control is configured to trigger execution of the target triggering operation (Zha: see above & Page 8 / 3rd – 6th Para, Page 10 / 8th – 9th Para, Page 6 / Last Para – Page 7 / 1st Para: (a) using a pop-up display panel / window to configure a target permission control via a plurality of different account information (e.g. A | B | C) associated with a target account / client and (b) prior to the checking of matching w.r.t. the account information, the target post is merely equivalent to a to-be-posted post while after a compliance with the matching, the target post would become a posted post, and also (c) see claim 7). As per claim 4, 14 & 21, Zha teaches posting the target post in the current application in response to a posting operation for the target post (Zha: see above, Page 2 / 2nd Para, Summary Invention & Page 7 / 2nd – 4th Para and Page 8 / 3rd – 6th Para). As per claim 5 – 6 & 15 – 16, Zha teaches creating the target post by capturing in a first interface and setting the target post to have the target visibility permission in the current application; or using selected post materials in a second interface as post materials for the target post, and setting the target post to have the target visibility permission in the current application (Zha: see above & Page 10 / 8th – 9th Para, Page 8 / 3rd – 6th Para, Page 6 / Last Para – Page 7 / 1st Para: creating a priority w.r.t. different account information for capturing a first user interface so as to display a post list of the first user account information, which is used to display post information of the first user associated with different account information). As per claim 7 & 17, Zha teaches displaying a post list of the first user in response to a post list displaying operation, the post list being used to display post information of the first user, the post information comprising target post information corresponding to a post with the target visibility permission, and the target post information having a preset identifier (Zha: see above & Page 8 / 3rd – 6th Para, Page 10 / 8th – 9th Para, Page 6 / Last Para – Page 7 / 1st Para: displaying a post list of the first user account information, which is used to display post information of the first user associated with different account information based on a different pre-configured priority for capturing the user interface (i.e. display) by different 1st - target account information (A|B|C)). As per claim 8 & 18, Zha teaches wherein the first account type is a private account type, and the second account type is a public account type (Zha: see above & (Zha: see above & Page 7 / 2nd – 4th Para, Page 2 / 2nd Para, Summary Invention & Page 7 / 2nd – 4th Para and Page 8 / 3rd – 6th Para: (a) the 1st account type is specified by a 1st user by classifying different account information (e.g. A, B & C) associated with the 1st (target) account – i.e. a private account type and (b) the relation association configured with the target account using (same) default access authority (i.e. avoid using a default account type – i.e. a public account type (see: Page 2 / 2nd Para, Summary Invention & Page 7 / 2nd – 4th Para and Page 8 / 3rd – 6th Para)). Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to LONGBIT CHAI whose telephone number is (571)272-3788. The examiner can normally be reached Monday - Friday 9:00am-5:00pm. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Lynn D. Feild can be reached at 571-272-2092. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. --------------------------------------------------- /Longbit Chai/ Longbit Chai E.E. Ph.D. Primary Examiner, Art Unit 2431 No. #2605 – 2026 ---------------------------------------------------
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Dec 16, 2024
Application Filed
Feb 22, 2026
Non-Final Rejection — §102 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12574418
CONFIDENTIAL RESOURCE TRUSTED DOMAIN MIGRATION STRATEGY
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 10, 2026
Patent 12568099
FINDING ANOMALOUS PATTERNS
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 03, 2026
Patent 12568086
AUTOMATIC SECURITY COVERAGE EXPANSION OF CLOUD SECURITY POSTURE MANAGEMENT (CSPM) ASSETS
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 03, 2026
Patent 12563097
Systems and methods for tag-based policy enforcement for dynamic cloud workloads
2y 5m to grant Granted Feb 24, 2026
Patent 12563102
DYNAMIC ATTRIBUTE BASED EDGE-DEPLOYED SECURITY
2y 5m to grant Granted Feb 24, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

AI Strategy Recommendation

Get an AI-powered prosecution strategy using examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Powered by AI — typically takes 5-10 seconds

Prosecution Projections

1-2
Expected OA Rounds
88%
Grant Probability
99%
With Interview (+32.3%)
2y 9m
Median Time to Grant
Low
PTA Risk
Based on 737 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allow rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month