Prosecution Insights
Last updated: October 02, 2026
Application No. 18/875,816

PLAYARD ASSEMBLY INCLUDING PLAYARD AND TOPPER ASSEMBLY WITH CORNER CONNECTOR INTERFACE

Non-Final OA §102§103
Filed
Dec 17, 2024
Priority
Jun 17, 2022 — provisional 63/353,073 +3 more
Examiner
ADEBOYEJO, IFEOLU A
Art Unit
3679
Tech Center
3600 — Transportation & Electronic Commerce
Assignee
Wonderland Switzerland AG
OA Round
1 (Non-Final)
48%
Grant Probability
Moderate
1-2
OA Rounds
1y 2m
Est. Remaining
92%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 48% of resolved cases
48%
Career Allowance Rate
283 granted / 589 resolved
-4.0% vs TC avg
Strong +44% interview lift
Without
With
+43.5%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
3y 0m
Avg Prosecution
17 currently pending
Career history
615
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
0.6%
-39.4% vs TC avg
§103
55.2%
+15.2% vs TC avg
§102
17.6%
-22.4% vs TC avg
§112
25.3%
-14.7% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 589 resolved cases

Office Action

§102 §103
DETAILED ACTION Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . Election/Restrictions Applicant’s election without traverse of species A fig.1-10B claims 1-28 in the reply filed on 04/13/2026 is acknowledged. Claims 29-40 are withdrawn from further consideration pursuant to 37 CFR 1.142(b) as being drawn to a nonelected species, there being no allowable generic or linking claim. Election was made without traverse in the reply filed on 04/13/2026. Claims 4-8, 12, 13, 16, 18-24 and 27-28 are additional withdrawn for being directed towards non-elected species F fig. 18-21. Claim 15 is withdrawn for being directed towards non-elected species C fig. 12A-15. Claims 9-11 are also withdrawn for being directed to non-elected species G fig.22A-22B. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 102 In the event the determination of the status of the application as subject to AIA 35 U.S.C. 102 and 103 (or as subject to pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 102 and 103) is incorrect, any correction of the statutory basis (i.e., changing from AIA to pre-AIA ) for the rejection will not be considered a new ground of rejection if the prior art relied upon, and the rationale supporting the rejection, would be the same under either status. The following is a quotation of the appropriate paragraphs of 35 U.S.C. 102 that form the basis for the rejections under this section made in this Office action: A person shall be entitled to a patent unless – (a)(1) the claimed invention was patented, described in a printed publication, or in public use, on sale, or otherwise available to the public before the effective filing date of the claimed invention. Claim(s) 1 & 14 is/are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 102(a)(1) as being anticipated by US Patent 5,615,427 hereinafter referred to as Huang. Huang discloses: As per claim 1 a playard assembly 10 fig.1 comprising: a playard 10 having at least one playard connector 23 fig.8 at least partially defined at a playard corner region; a topper assembly 50 fig.1 having at least one topper connector 53 fig.8 at least partially defined at a topper corner region; and at least one actuator 534 fig.8 configured to selectively control engagement between the at least one topper connector and the at least one playard connector. As per claim 14 wherein the playard comprises at least one corner post 11 fig.2, and the at least one playard connector 23 is positioned at an end of the at least one corner post (see fig.2 & 8). Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 103 In the event the determination of the status of the application as subject to AIA 35 U.S.C. 102 and 103 (or as subject to pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 102 and 103) is incorrect, any correction of the statutory basis (i.e., changing from AIA to pre-AIA ) for the rejection will not be considered a new ground of rejection if the prior art relied upon, and the rationale supporting the rejection, would be the same under either status. The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 103 which forms the basis for all obviousness rejections set forth in this Office action: A patent for a claimed invention may not be obtained, notwithstanding that the claimed invention is not identically disclosed as set forth in section 102, if the differences between the claimed invention and the prior art are such that the claimed invention as a whole would have been obvious before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to a person having ordinary skill in the art to which the claimed invention pertains. Patentability shall not be negated by the manner in which the invention was made. Claim(s) 2-3, 17, 25 and 26 is/are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over Huang in view of US Patent 9,066,607 hereinafter referred to as Ransil. Re-Claim 2 Huang discloses the claimed apparatus wherein the topper assembly comprises a first rim 50 fig.1 and at least one frame connector 23. However does not disclose a second rim; and at least one frame connector configured to connect the first rim and the second rim. Ransil teaches a playard assembly 10 fig.1 comprising: a playard 10; a topper assembly 30 fig.8; wherein the topper assembly comprises: a first rim 32, 33 fig.8; a second rim 37, 38 fig.8; and at least one frame connector 351, 352, 361, 362 fig.8 configured to connect the first rim and the second rim. Accordingly, it would have been obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art before the invention was effectively filed to have combined the topper assembly of Huang and the collapsible topper assembly of Ransil with a reasonable expectation of success arrived at a playard having an attachable topper assembly that can be collapsed. One of ordinary skill in the art would have been motivated to make such a combination for the purpose of having a collapsible topper that is stable in the deployed position and collapsible for easy storage as taught in Ransil [see claim 1]. Re-Claim 3 Huang as modified by Ransil above discloses, wherein the first rim consists of two first frame halves, and the second rim consists of two second frame halves (see fig.8 Ransil). Re-Claim 17 Huang as modified by Ransil above discloses, Huang discloses wherein the at least one actuator 534 is supported at least partially by the frame connector 23 (see fig.8) Re-Claim 25 Huang discloses a topper assembly 50 fig.1 configured to be selectively attached to a playard 10 fig.1, the topper assembly comprising: a second frame 52; a plurality of topper connectors 23 fig.8 each configured to be selectively engaged with the playard; and a first actuator 534 fig.8 and a second actuator 534 each arranged on the second frame, wherein the first and second actuators are each configured to control engagement of the plurality of topper connectors with the playard. However does not disclose a first frame and a second frame; a first frame connector and a second frame connector each connecting the first frame and the second frame. Ransil teaches a playard assembly 10 fig.1 comprising: a playard 10; a topper assembly 30 fig.8; wherein the topper assembly comprises: a first frame 37, 38 fig.8; a second frame 32, 33 fig.8; and a first frame connector and a second frame connector 351, 352, 361, 362 fig.8 each connecting the first frame and the second frame. Accordingly, it would have been obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art before the invention was effectively filed to have combined the topper assembly of Huang and the collapsible topper assembly of Ransil with a reasonable expectation of success arrived at a playard having an attachable topper assembly that can be collapsed. One of ordinary skill in the art would have been motivated to make such a combination for the purpose of having a collapsible topper that is stable in the deployed position and collapsible for easy storage as taught in Ransil [see claim 1]. Re-Claim 26 Huang as modified by Ransil above discloses, Huang discloses wherein the first actuator and the second actuator are each at a respective one of the first frame connector and the second frame connector (see fig.8). Conclusion The prior art made of record and not relied upon is considered pertinent to applicant's disclosure (see notice of references cited). Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to IFEOLU A ADEBOYEJO whose telephone number is (571)270-3072. The examiner can normally be reached M-Th 10AM-5PM EST. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Matthew Troutman can be reached at (571) 270-3654. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /IFEOLU A ADEBOYEJO/Examiner, Art Unit 3679 /Matthew Troutman/Supervisory Patent Examiner, Art Unit 3679
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Dec 17, 2024
Application Filed
Aug 27, 2026
Non-Final Rejection mailed — §102, §103 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12727683
SYSTEMS AND METHODS FOR CHILD SUPPORT SYSTEMS WITH A DIVISABLE SUPPORT STRUCTURE
1y 11m to grant Granted Sep 08, 2026
Patent 12702610
RADIOTHERAPY APPARATUS FOR POSITIONING A SUBJECT
3y 11m to grant Granted Aug 11, 2026
Patent 12690691
ELASTIC MODULE, ELASTIC MATTRESS AND FURNITURE
2y 5m to grant Granted Jul 28, 2026
Patent 12628960
SPRING MODULE AND SPRING CUSHION FOR FURNITURE
1y 4m to grant Granted May 19, 2026
Patent 12611045
ELASTIC MODULE AND ELASTIC MATTRESS FOR FURNITURE
1y 8m to grant Granted Apr 28, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

Strategy Recommendation AI-generated — please review before filing

Get a prosecution strategy drawn from examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Typically takes 5-10 seconds — AI-generated, attorney review required before filing

Prosecution Projections

1-2
Expected OA Rounds
48%
Grant Probability
92%
With Interview (+43.5%)
3y 0m (~1y 2m remaining)
Median Time to Grant
Low
PTA Risk
Based on 589 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allowance rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month