Prosecution Insights
Last updated: July 17, 2026
Application No. 18/876,518

BIOLOGICAL SENSOR

Non-Final OA §103
Filed
Dec 18, 2024
Priority
Jun 24, 2022 — JP 2022-102032 +1 more
Examiner
GUERRERO ROSARIO, ANA VERUSKA
Art Unit
Tech Center
Assignee
NITTO DENKO Corporation
OA Round
1 (Non-Final)
48%
Grant Probability
Moderate
1-2
OA Rounds
2y 4m
Est. Remaining
96%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 48% of resolved cases
48%
Career Allowance Rate
26 granted / 54 resolved
-11.9% vs TC avg
Strong +48% interview lift
Without
With
+48.4%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
3y 11m
Avg Prosecution
37 currently pending
Career history
107
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§103
72.3%
+32.3% vs TC avg
§102
7.2%
-32.8% vs TC avg
§112
1.3%
-38.7% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 54 resolved cases

Office Action

§103
DETAILED ACTION Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . Response to Amendment The Amendments filed December 18, 2024 have been entered. Currently, claim 6 has been amended, claims 7-10 have been newly added, and claims 1-20 are pending in the application. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 103 The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 103 which forms the basis for all obviousness rejections set forth in this Office action: A patent for a claimed invention may not be obtained, notwithstanding that the claimed invention is not identically disclosed as set forth in section 102, if the differences between the claimed invention and the prior art are such that the claimed invention as a whole would have been obvious before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to a person having ordinary skill in the art to which the claimed invention pertains. Patentability shall not be negated by the manner in which the invention was made. Claims 1-10 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over Hughes (U.S. Application No. 20160120433 A1), and further in view of Perez (E.P. Application No. 3261712B1), and as evidenced by MatWeb (“Overview of materials for Styrene-Butadiene Copolymer, SBC”) henceforth referred to as MatWeb. Regarding independent claim 1, Hughes discloses a biological sensor (100) (pa. 0080, 0094 & Fig. 1A), comprising: a sensor body (120) configured to obtain biological information (via contact electrode traces 311, 312 which are connected to electrodes 350, pa. 0100, 0122 & Figs. 1B, 3B). Examiner is interpreting a sensor body as a conductive structure able to receive and transmit electric signals; an electrode (350) connected (electrically) to the sensor body (pa. 0113); a first layer member (combination of upper housing member 140, battery holder 150, upper gasket 370, flexible body 110, and lower gasket 360) including a cover member (140) that includes a housing space (space between the upper gasket and the cover member which holds the sensor body, the battery holder, and batteries 160) in which the sensor body is housed (pa. 0096 & Fig. 1B), the electrode being disposed on a lower surface of the first layer member (see Figs. 3B, 6A); and a second layer member (combination of lower housing member 145 and lower surface of the flexible body which includes adhesive layer 340 that is applied to wings portions 130, 131 of a bottom surface of bottom substrate layer 330, pa. 0119 & Fig. 3B) that is attached to the lower surface of the first layer member so as to expose the electrode and cover the sensor body (see Fig. 6A). Lastly, Hughes discloses the cover is made of a water-resistant plastic (pa. 0126). Examiner notes that the claim language is broad and does not prohibit the first layer and the second layer from sharing structural components. However, Hughes does not disclose wherein a tensile modulus of the cover member is 1.5 MPa or less and a relative dielectric constant of the cover member is 2.2 or less. Perez, in the same field of endeavor, teaches a patch device (110) comprising a housing (111) sealed so that it is waterproof or water-resistant, wherein the housing may be molded from polymeric materials such as styrene-butadiene co-polymers (pa. 0503 & Fig. 1A). It is known to one of ordinary skill in the art that a styrene-butadiene co-polymer has inherent material properties such as a tensile modulus of 1.61 - 27.6 MPa and a dielectric constant of 2.50 (MatWeb). Therefore, it would have been prima facie obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to have substituted the water-resistant material of the cover of Hughes with the water-resistant styrene-butadiene co-polymer material taught by Perez since they are known both variants in the art and they would both yield the same predictable results of waterproofing the electrical components housed inside the biological sensor. Furthermore, it would have been obvious to one having ordinary skill in the art at the time the invention was made to have a cover with a dielectric constant of 2.2 or less, since it has been held that where the general conditions of a claim are disclosed in the prior art, discovering the optimum or workable ranges involves only routine skill in the art. In re Aller, 105 USPQ 233. Regarding claims 2-3, Hughes discloses the cover is made of a water-resistant plastic (pa. 0126). However, Hughes does not disclose wherein the cover member includes a thermoplastic elastomer, wherein the thermoplastic elastomer is a styrene-based thermoplastic elastomer. Perez, in the same field of endeavor, teaches a patch device (110) comprising a housing (111) sealed so that it is waterproof or water-resistant, wherein the housing may be molded from polymeric materials such as styrene-butadiene co-polymers (pa. 0503 & Fig. 1A). Therefore, it would have been prima facie obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to have substituted the water-resistant material of the cover of Hughes with the water-resistant styrene-butadiene co-polymer material taught by Perez since they are known both variants in the art and they would both yield the same predictable results of waterproofing the electrical components housed inside the biological sensor. Regarding claim 4, Hughes/Perez combination discloses wherein the first layer member includes a first base (combination of the battery holder 150, upper gasket 370, and flexible body 110) including a through-hole (see two holes for retaining batteries 160 in Fig. 1B) at a position corresponding to the housing space (Hughes, see Fig. 1B), and a first adhesive layer (adhesive surface 340 of the flexible body) that is provided at a surface of the first base, the surface of the first base facing a living body, and to which the electrode is attached (Hughes, pa. 0131 & Figs. 3B, 6A), and an upper adhesive layer (adhesive surface provided on the top gasket 370 and bottom gasket 360) that attaches the cover member and the first base to each other (Hughes, pa. 0125). Regarding claim 5, Hughes/Perez combination discloses wherein the second layer member includes a second adhesive layer (adhesive surface 340 of the flexible body) at a surface opposite to the first layer member (Hughes, pa. 0131 & Figs. 3B, 6A). Regarding claims 6-10, Hughes/Perez combination discloses wherein an attachment surface to a living body is formed by the first layer member, the electrode, and the second layer member (Hughes, see Figs. 1B, 6a, 7). Conclusion The prior art made of record and not relied upon is considered pertinent to applicant's disclosure. Libbus (US 20150250405 A1) teaches a plurality of electrodes connected to the patch capable of electrically coupling to the patient. Netzsch “SBR: Styrene-butadiene rubber” teaches the Young’s Modulus of Styrene butadiene rubber (SBR) is between 2-10 MPa. Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to ANA VERUSKA GUERRERO ROSARIO whose telephone number is (571)272-6976. The examiner can normally be reached Monday - Thursday 7:00 - 4:30 PM EST. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Joseph Stoklosa can be reached at (571) 272-1213. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /A.V.G./Examiner, Art Unit 3794 /Ronald Hupczey, Jr./Primary Examiner, Art Unit 3794
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Dec 18, 2024
Application Filed
Jun 23, 2026
Non-Final Rejection mailed — §103 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12667415
BASKET CATHETER WITH CLOVERLEAF STRUCTURE TO PROVIDE PREDETERMINED LATERAL STIFFNESS AND AXIAL STRAIN
3y 3m to grant Granted Jun 30, 2026
Patent 12642574
MEDICAL INSTRUMENT CUTTING SYSTEMS AND METHODS
5y 1m to grant Granted Jun 02, 2026
Patent 12622738
MEDICAL DEVICES AND RELATED METHODS
4y 11m to grant Granted May 12, 2026
Patent 12616517
EXPANDABLE BASKET ASSEMBLIES WITH LINEAR SPINE PATTERNS FOR IMPROVED TISSUE CONTACT AND METHODS FOR MAKING THEREOF
3y 2m to grant Granted May 05, 2026
Patent 12605201
SYSTEM, DEVICE, AND METHOD FOR DETERMINING LOCATION OF ARRHYTHMOGENIC FOCI
4y 2m to grant Granted Apr 21, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

Strategy Recommendation AI-generated — please review before filing

Get a prosecution strategy drawn from examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Typically takes 5-10 seconds — AI-generated, attorney review required before filing

Prosecution Projections

1-2
Expected OA Rounds
48%
Grant Probability
96%
With Interview (+48.4%)
3y 11m (~2y 4m remaining)
Median Time to Grant
Low
PTA Risk
Based on 54 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allowance rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month