Prosecution Insights
Last updated: April 19, 2026
Application No. 18/877,791

PUSHING PROCESSING METHOD AND APPARATUS FOR VIDEO, AND DEVICE AND MEDIUM

Non-Final OA §101§103
Filed
Dec 20, 2024
Examiner
SAINT CYR, JEAN D
Art Unit
2425
Tech Center
2400 — Computer Networks
Assignee
BEIJING YOUZHUJU NETWORK TECHNOLOGY CO., LTD.
OA Round
1 (Non-Final)
60%
Grant Probability
Moderate
1-2
OA Rounds
3y 5m
To Grant
68%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 60% of resolved cases
60%
Career Allow Rate
355 granted / 590 resolved
+2.2% vs TC avg
Moderate +8% lift
Without
With
+8.3%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
3y 5m
Avg Prosecution
39 currently pending
Career history
629
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
5.2%
-34.8% vs TC avg
§103
69.9%
+29.9% vs TC avg
§102
9.6%
-30.4% vs TC avg
§112
5.7%
-34.3% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 590 resolved cases

Office Action

§101 §103
Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . Claims rejections-35 U.S.C. 101 35 U.S.C. 101 reads as follows: Whoever invents or discovers any new and useful process, machine, manufacture, or composition of matter, or any new and useful improvement thereof, may obtain a patent therefor, subject to the conditions and requirements of this title. Claims 14 , 22 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 101 because the claimed invention is directed to non-statutory subject matter. The claim(s) does/do not fall within at least one of the four categories of patent eligible subject matter because claims 14 and 22 disclose “a computer-readable storage medium” including signals such as data signal propagated in a baseband or as a part of a carrier wave, electromagnetic signal, an optical signal, program code as described in para.0077. Objections to the claims Claims 2-8; 11; 16-22 are objected to as being dependent upon a rejected base claim, but would be allowable if rewritten in independent form including all of the limitations of the base claim and any intervening claims. Claims rejections-35 U.S.C. 103 The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 103 which forms the basis for all obviousness rejections set forth in this Office action: A patent for a claimed invention may not be obtained, notwithstanding that the claimed invention is not identically disclosed as set forth in section 102, if the differences between the claimed invention and the prior art are such that the claimed invention as a whole would have been obvious before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to a person having ordinary skill in the art to which the claimed invention pertains. Patentability shall not be negated by the manner in which the invention was made. Claim(s) 1; 9-10; 13-14 is/are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over Wehrman(US.Pub.No.20240078120) in view of Lai(US.Pub.No.20180331985). Regarding claim 1, Wehrman et al disclose a video pushing method, comprising: detecting a trigger operation(the system is able to provide trigger event or instruction based on schedule information; 0091) on a video sharing card during displaying the video sharing card(see fig.1 to fig.11 for sharing template or video card in a platform sharing video ; 0024-0025;0074;0072); wherein the video sharing card is determined based on a video type of a shared video(the system is able to share video template or video card based on media data type; 0058) and an associated sharing object of the shared video(see fig.1 to fig.11 providing media overlays; 0031), and the video sharing card comprises a plurality of candidate card regions(the system is able to display a list of video templates or video card in specific order on the screen and the system can rank the video templated or the video cards; the templates are ranked and displayed in the order of most relevant to least relevant,0063). But did not explicitly disclose in response to detecting the trigger operation on the video sharing card, determining a target card region that matches a trigger position of the trigger operation among the plurality of candidate card regions, and displaying a pushing page corresponding to the target card region, wherein the pushing page comprises a video page of the shared video and/or an object information page of the associated sharing object. However, Lai et al disclose in response to detecting the trigger operation on the video sharing card(trigger operation; 0104-0106), determining a target card region that matches a trigger position of the trigger operation among the plurality of candidate card regions(the system is able to match trigger or message or switch instruction associated with resource sharing message template; 0259-0261; 0165), and displaying a pushing page corresponding to the target card region(the system is able to display template or video card in specific area or region on the screen; 0249), wherein the pushing page comprises a video page( a social network sites,0144) of the shared video and/or an object information page of the associated sharing object(see fig.5 having a list of video contents; 0020; 0086; link address,0247). It would have been obvious before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to incorporate the teaching of Lai to modify Wehrman by providing options to match trigger related to a plurality of video templates or video card of Lai to the sharing platform of Wehrman resulting in “in response to detecting the trigger operation on the video sharing card, determining a target card region that matches a trigger position of the trigger operation among the plurality of candidate card regions, and displaying a pushing page corresponding to the target card region, wherein the pushing page comprises a video page of the shared video and/or an object information page of the associated sharing object” for the purpose of sharing specific video card via a content sharing platform accordingly. Regarding claim 9, Wehrman et al disclose, wherein the video sharing page comprises: an instant messaging interface(the system is able to provide instant messages; 0042). Regarding claim 10, Wehrman et al disclose wherein the video sharing page comprises: a forum sharing page on a social forum platform(the system is able to share video content on social network; 0029;0036). Regarding claim 13, it is rejected using the same ground of rejection for claim 1. Regarding claim 14, it is rejected using the same ground of rejection for claim 1. Conclusion Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to JEAN D SAINT CYR whose telephone number is (571)270-3224. The examiner can normally be reached 9-5. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Brian Pendleton can be reached at 5712727527. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /JEAN D SAINT CYR/Examiner, Art Unit 2425 /Brian T Pendleton/Supervisory Patent Examiner, Art Unit 2425
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Dec 20, 2024
Application Filed
Mar 25, 2026
Non-Final Rejection — §101, §103 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12604245
Data Caching Method and Related Apparatus
2y 5m to grant Granted Apr 14, 2026
Patent 12604064
METHOD AND SERVER FOR PROVIDING CONTENT RECOMMENDATION LIST
2y 5m to grant Granted Apr 14, 2026
Patent 12604069
SYSTEM AND METHOD FOR MEDIA PLAN GENERATION FOR A CONTENT DELIVERY NETWORK
2y 5m to grant Granted Apr 14, 2026
Patent 12585333
SYSTEMS AND METHOD FOR PROVIDING VIDEO ON DEMAND IN AN INTELLIGENT TELEVISION
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 24, 2026
Patent 12563248
REDUCING ACTIVE USER BIAS FOR CONTENT RECOMMENDATION MODELS
2y 5m to grant Granted Feb 24, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

AI Strategy Recommendation

Get an AI-powered prosecution strategy using examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Powered by AI — typically takes 5-10 seconds

Prosecution Projections

1-2
Expected OA Rounds
60%
Grant Probability
68%
With Interview (+8.3%)
3y 5m
Median Time to Grant
Low
PTA Risk
Based on 590 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allow rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month