Prosecution Insights
Last updated: July 17, 2026
Application No. 18/877,962

IMAGE PROCESSING METHOD AND APPARATUS, DEVICE, AND STORAGE MEDIUM

Non-Final OA §102§112
Filed
Dec 20, 2024
Priority
Sep 09, 2022 — CN 202211105419.4 +1 more
Examiner
BROWN, SHEREE N
Art Unit
Tech Center
Assignee
Beijing Zitiao Network Technology Co., Ltd.
OA Round
1 (Non-Final)
65%
Grant Probability
Favorable
1-2
OA Rounds
1y 8m
Est. Remaining
92%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 65% — above average
65%
Career Allowance Rate
486 granted / 746 resolved
+5.1% vs TC avg
Strong +26% interview lift
Without
With
+26.5%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
3y 3m
Avg Prosecution
33 currently pending
Career history
786
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
1.5%
-38.5% vs TC avg
§103
44.6%
+4.6% vs TC avg
§102
50.5%
+10.5% vs TC avg
§112
0.9%
-39.1% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 746 resolved cases

Office Action

§102 §112
DETAILED ACTION Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . Application Status This office action is responsive to the Application No.:18/877,962 filed on 12/20/2024. Claims 1-12, 14, 15 and 17-22 are pending and presented for examination. This action has been made NON-FINAL. Priority Receipt is acknowledged of certified copies of papers required by 37 CFR 1.55 (Priority Date: 09/09/2022). Information Disclosure Statement The information disclosure statement (IDS) submitted on 12/20/2024 is being considered by the examiner. A signed IDS is hereby attached. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 112 The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 112(b): (b) CONCLUSION.—The specification shall conclude with one or more claims particularly pointing out and distinctly claiming the subject matter which the inventor or a joint inventor regards as the invention. The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 112 (pre-AIA ), second paragraph: The specification shall conclude with one or more claims particularly pointing out and distinctly claiming the subject matter which the applicant regards as his invention. Claims 2, 4, 5, 6, 8, 10, 12, 17, 19, 20 and 21 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 112(b) or 35 U.S.C. 112 (pre-AIA ), second paragraph, as being indefinite for failing to particularly point out and distinctly claim the subject matter which the inventor or a joint inventor (or for applications subject to pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 112, the applicant), regards as the invention. Claims 2, 4, 5, 6, 8, 12, 17, 19, 20 and 21 recites “determining.” The Applicant has failed to particularly point out and distinctly claim HOW the determination is made and therefore, it is unclear to the examiner HOW the determination is made. Consequently, the limitations are rendered as indefinite. Claim 10 recites “others”. However, it is unclear to the examiner with exactly “others” comprises. Therefore, the limitations are rendered as indefinite. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 102 The following is a quotation of the appropriate paragraphs of 35 U.S.C. 102 that form the basis for the rejections under this section made in this Office action: A person shall be entitled to a patent unless – (a)(2) the claimed invention was described in a patent issued under section 151, or in an application for patent published or deemed published under section 122(b), in which the patent or application, as the case may be, names another inventor and was effectively filed before the effective filing date of the claimed invention. Claim(s) 1-12, 14, 15 and 17-22 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 102(a)(2) as being anticipated by Parmar, US 20230136551. Claim 1: Parmar discloses an image processing method (See Parmar Abstract; Figure 10C/D; Paragraphs 0039-0042; 0082; 0086) comprising: obtaining an image (See Parmar Figure 10C/D; Paragraphs 0039-0042; 0082; 0086); receiving a template triggering operation for the image (See Parmar Figure 10C/D; Paragraphs 0039-0042; 0082; 0086) and displaying at least one template each comprising at least one template element (See Parmar Paragraphs 0039-0042; 0082); and receiving a template selection operation for the template (See Parmar Figure 10C/D; Paragraphs 0039-0042; 0082; 0086), and displaying a target effect image by applying a selected template to the image (See Parmar Figure 10C/D; Paragraphs 0039-0042; 0082; 0086), wherein a target display mode of at least part of template elements is different from a default display mode of the at least part of the template elements (See Parmar Paragraphs 0039-0042; 0082). Claim 2: Parmar discloses wherein displaying the target effect image by applying the selected template to the image (See Parmar Figure 10C/D; Paragraphs 0039-0042; 0082; 0086) comprises: for the selected template (See Parmar Paragraphs 0039-0042; 0082), determining an element of the at least one template element corresponding to the template (See Parmar Figure 10C/D; Paragraphs 0039-0042; 0082; 0086), and adjusting a default display mode of the element (“full view mode” See Parmar Paragraph 0061); and in a case that a display position of the element of the template has been adjusted (See Parmar Figure 10C/D; Paragraphs 0039-0042; 0082; 0086), displaying the target effect image by applying the adjusted template to the image (See Parmar Paragraphs 0039-0042; 0082). Claim 3: Parmar discloses wherein adjusting the default display mode of the element (“full view mode” See Parmar Paragraph 0061) comprises: for each element, in a case that the image comprises a target interaction subject corresponding to the element (See Parmar Figure 10C/D; Paragraphs 0039-0042; 0082; 0086), adjusting the default display mode (“full view mode” See Parmar Paragraph 0061) of the element according to a preset interaction mode corresponding to the element to apply the element to the target interaction subject (See Parmar Figure 10C/D; Paragraphs 0039-0042; 0082; 0086). Claim 4: Parmar discloses where adjusting the default display mode of the element (“full view mode” See Parmar Paragraph 0061) comprises: for each element, in a case that the element is a title element (See Parmar Figure 10C/D; Paragraphs 0039-0042; 0082; 0086), determining at least one set of candidate display modes corresponding to the element (“full view mode” See Parmar Paragraph 0061); and determining, using a first model and the candidate display modes (See Parmar Figure 10C/D; Paragraphs 0039-0042; 0082; 0086), a target display mode of the element, and adjusting the element based on the target display mode and the default display mode of the element (“full view mode” See Parmar Paragraph 0061). Claim 5: Parmar discloses wherein adjusting the default display mode of the element (“full view mode” See Parmar Paragraph 0061) comprises: for each element, determining an associated display object of the element (See Parmar Figure 10C/D; Paragraphs 0039-0042; 0082; 0086); and determining overlapping information between the element and the associated display object (See Parmar Figure 10C/D; Paragraphs 0039-0042; 0082; 0086), and adjusting, based on the overlapping information, the default display mode of the element (“full view mode” See Parmar Paragraph 0061). Claim 6: Parmar discloses wherein determining the overlapping information between the element and the associated display object (“overlay” See Parmar Paragraphs 0054; 0079) comprises: obtaining contour information (“video effects” See Parmar Paragraph 0068) or a mask image of the element, and determining, based on the contour information (“video effects” See Parmar Paragraph 0068) or the mask image, whether there is an overlapping area between the element and the associated display object (“overlay” See Parmar Paragraph 0054; 0079). Claim 7: Parmar discloses wherein adjusting, based on the overlapping information, the default display mode (“full view mode” See Parmar Paragraph 0061) of the element comprises: in a case that there is the overlapping area (“overlay” See Parmar Paragraph 0054; 0079) between the element and the associated display object, adjusting the default display mode (“full view mode” See Parmar Paragraph 0061) of the element to cause the overlapping area (“overlay” See Parmar Paragraph 0054; 0079) between the element and the associated display object disappear (“video effects” See Parmar Paragraph 0068). Claim 8: Parmar discloses wherein adjusting the default display mode (“full view mode” See Parmar Paragraph 0061) of the element to cause the overlapping area between the element and the associated display object disappear (“video effects” See Parmar Paragraph 0068) comprises: determining, based on display positions of the element and the associated display object, a first direction vector, and adjusting, based on the first direction vector, the default display mode of the element (“full view mode” See Parmar Paragraph 0061) to cause the overlapping area between the element and the associated display object disappear (“video effects” See Parmar Paragraph 0068). Claim 9: Parmar discloses wherein adjusting the default display mode of the element (See Parmar Paragraph 0061) comprises: adjusting, based on an element category corresponding to each element in the template (See Parmar Paragraphs 0039-0042; 0082) and an adjustment priority corresponding to the element category, the default display mode of the element (“full view mode” See Parmar Paragraph 0061). Claim 10: Parmar discloses wherein element categories comprise an interaction element, a title element or others, and wherein adjustment priorities corresponding to the element categories (See Parmar Paragraph 0055), from high to low, are as follows: the interactive element, the title element, and others (“priority” See Parmar Paragraph 0077). Claim 11: Parmar discloses wherein displaying the target effect image by applying the selected template to the image (See Parmar Paragraphs 0039-0042; 0082) comprises: determining a target display area in the image, determining, based on the target display area, a target image, and displaying the target effect image by applying the selected template to the target image (See Parmar Paragraphs 0039-0042; 0082). Claim 12: Parmar discloses wherein determining the target display area in the image comprises at least one of the following: determining salient information in the image, and using an image area corresponding to the salient information as the target display area; or determining an environmental target subject in the image, and using an image area corresponding to the environmental target subject as the target display area (“Halloween” See Parmar Paragraph 0055). Claim 14: Claim 14 is rejected on the same basis as claim 1. Claim 15: Claim 15 is rejected on the same basis as claim 1. Claims 17-22: Claims 17-22 are rejected on the same basis as claims 2-7. Pertinent Art The prior art made of record and not relied upon is considered pertinent to applicant's disclosure. US Patent No.: 10048829 discloses a method for displaying icons and an electronic apparatus are provided. The method includes: determining N icons which have a one-to-one correspondence with N applications of an electronic apparatus, where N≥1, each of the N icons has a first display parameter; acquiring a sensing parameter by a sensor of the electronic apparatus; determining whether the sensing parameter matches with a preset operation; and adjusting the first display parameter of at least one of the N icons if the sensing parameter matches with the preset operation. Contact Information Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to SHEREE N BROWN whose telephone number is (571)272-4229. The examiner can normally be reached M-F 5:30-2:00 PM EST. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, SAID BROOME can be reached at (571) 272-2931. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /SHEREE N BROWN/Primary Examiner, Art Unit 2612 July 3, 2026
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Dec 20, 2024
Application Filed
Jul 07, 2026
Non-Final Rejection mailed — §102, §112 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12664727
METHOD OF MODELING INTERACTIVE INTELLIGENT THREE-DIMENSIONAL IMPLICIT STRUCTURE BASED ON DEEP LEARNING
2y 10m to grant Granted Jun 23, 2026
Patent 12651412
Optimizing Image Capture for Training Machine-Learned Models for Implicit Representation
2y 5m to grant Granted Jun 09, 2026
Patent 12633071
IMAGE PROCESSING METHOD, RECORDING MEDIUM, AND IMAGE PROCESSING SYSTEM
3y 2m to grant Granted May 19, 2026
Patent 12633038
SYSTEMS AND METHODS FOR GENERATING AN IMAGE USING INTERPOLATION OF FEATURES
3y 1m to grant Granted May 19, 2026
Patent 12620371
INFORMATION PROCESSING APPARATUS
3y 1m to grant Granted May 05, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

Strategy Recommendation AI-generated — please review before filing

Get a prosecution strategy drawn from examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Typically takes 5-10 seconds — AI-generated, attorney review required before filing

Prosecution Projections

1-2
Expected OA Rounds
65%
Grant Probability
92%
With Interview (+26.5%)
3y 3m (~1y 8m remaining)
Median Time to Grant
Low
PTA Risk
Based on 746 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allowance rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month