Prosecution Insights
Last updated: October 02, 2026
Application No. 18/878,252

METHOD OF USER EQUIPMENT (UE), METHOD OF COMMUNICATION APPARATUS AND UE

Non-Final OA §101§102
Filed
Dec 23, 2024
Priority
Jul 28, 2022 — IN 202211043222 +1 more
Examiner
IQBAL, KHAWAR
Art Unit
Tech Center
Assignee
NEC Corporation
OA Round
1 (Non-Final)
73%
Grant Probability
Favorable
1-2
OA Rounds
1y 8m
Est. Remaining
99%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 73% — above average
73%
Career Allowance Rate
483 granted / 661 resolved
+13.1% vs TC avg
Strong +29% interview lift
Without
With
+29.2%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
3y 5m
Avg Prosecution
29 currently pending
Career history
689
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
3.2%
-36.8% vs TC avg
§103
55.5%
+15.5% vs TC avg
§102
29.2%
-10.8% vs TC avg
§112
5.0%
-35.0% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 661 resolved cases

Office Action

§101 §102
DETAILED ACTION Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 101 35 U.S.C. 101 reads as follows: Whoever invents or discovers any new and useful process, machine, manufacture, or composition of matter, or any new and useful improvement thereof, may obtain a patent therefor, subject to the conditions and requirements of this title. Claim 1-6, 8-18 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 101 because the claimed invention is directed to a judicial exception (i.e., a law of nature, a natural phenomenon, or an abstract idea) without “significantly more”. Claim(s) 1-6, 8-18 is/are directed to Abstract Idea such as an idea standing alone such as an instantiated concept, pan or scheme, as well as a mental process (thinking) that “can be performed in the human mind, or by a human using a pen and paper for example sending, to the communication apparatus, first Single Network Slice Selection Assistance Information (S-NSSAI) included in Pending Network Slice Selection Assistance Information (NSSAI). The apparatus and the method claims 1, 8 and 13 recites limitation , “sending, to the communication apparatus”. Since the claim is directed to a process and a machine, which is one of the statutory categories of the invention (Step 1: YES). The claim is then analyzed to determine whether it is directed to any judicial exception. The claim recites sending, to the communication apparatus, first Single Network Slice Selection Assistance Information (S-NSSAI) included in Pending Network Slice Selection Assistance Information, recited in the claim is no more than an abstract idea i.e., mental process of sending, etc. (Step 2A: Prong One Abstract Idea=Yes). The claim is then analyzed if it requires an additional elements or a combination of additional elements in the claim to apply, rely on, or use the judicial exception in a manner that imposes a meaningful limit on the judicial exception, such that the claim is more than a drafting effort designed to monopolize the exception – i.e., limitation that are indicative of integration into a practical application: improving to the functioning of a computer or to any other technology or technical field. In the current claims, there is no additional elements that would integrate the abstract idea into a practical application (Step 2A: Prong Two Abstract Idea=Yes). Next the claim as a whole is analyzed to determine if there are additional limitation recited in the claim such that the claim amount to significantly more than an abstract idea. The claim requires the additional limitation of a computer with the central processing unit, memory, a printer, an input and output terminal and a program. These generic computer components are claimed to perform the basic functions of storing, retrieving and processing data through the program that enables. In the current scenario, there are no additional elements that would amount to significantly more than the abstract idea. Therefore, the claim does not amount to significantly more than the abstract idea itself (Step 2B: No). Accordingly, the claim is not patent eligible. Further, dependent claims does not add any positive limitation or step that recite within the scope of the claim and does not carry patentable weight they are also rejected for the same reasons as independent claims. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 102 The following is a quotation of the appropriate paragraphs of 35 U.S.C. 102 that form the basis for the rejections under this section made in this Office action: A person shall be entitled to a patent unless – (a)(2) the claimed invention was described in a patent issued under section 151, or in an application for patent published or deemed published under section 122(b), in which the patent or application, as the case may be, names another inventor and was effectively filed before the effective filing date of the claimed invention. Claim(s) 1-6, 8-18 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 102(a)(2) as being anticipated by KUGE (20250097834). Regarding claim 1, Kuge discloses, a method of a User Equipment (UE, fig. 3, 6-7), the method comprising: communicating with a communication apparatus; and sending, to the communication apparatus, first Single Network Slice Selection Assistance Information (S-NSSAI) included in Pending Network Slice Selection Assistance Information (NSSAI) (¶ 0242-0243, 0364, 0368, one or more pieces of S-NSSAI included in the pending NSSAI transmitted together are S-NSSAI of the current PLMN or SNPN or S-NSSAI or VPLMN of an HPLMN or an HSNPN.). Regarding claim 2, Kuge discloses, wherein the sending the first S-NSSAI includes sending the first S-NSSAI after performing a network slice based cell reselection (¶ 0126, 0308, 0368-0369, UE_A 10 stores the mapped S-NSSAI with respect to the pending NSSAI and the pending NSSAI when the UE_A 10 is roaming, and further in a case that the UE_A 10 stores one or more pieces of mapped S-NSSAI that is not included in the mapped S-NSSAI with respect to the pending NSSAI stored in the UE_A 10 but is included in the list of the mapped S-NSSAI of the Configured NSSAI, the UE may include the pending NSSAI associated with the mapped S-NSSAI and the S-NSSAI included in the configured NSSAI in the registration request message together with the mapped S-NSSAI and transmit the message. Furthermore, in a case that the UE stores “pending NSSAI valid for all PLMNs” (hereinafter, “pending NSSAI”), the UE may transmit the S-NSSAI included in the pending NSSAI, or the S-NSSAI to which the S-NSSAI is mapped, or the S-NSSAI associated with the S-NSSAI, or the mapped S-NSSAI of the S-NSSAI without including the S-NSSAI in the requested NSSAI IE). Regarding claim 3, Kuge discloses, wherein the network slice based cell reselection is performed for second S- NSSAI, and wherein the second S-NSSAI is different from the first S-NSSAI (¶ 0126, 0308, 0368-0369, UE_A 10 stores the mapped S-NSSAI with respect to the pending NSSAI and the pending NSSAI when the UE_A 10 is roaming, and further in a case that the UE_A 10 stores one or more pieces of mapped S-NSSAI that is not included in the mapped S-NSSAI with respect to the pending NSSAI stored in the UE_A 10 but is included in the list of the mapped S-NSSAI of the Configured NSSAI, the UE may include the pending NSSAI associated with the mapped S-NSSAI and the S-NSSAI included in the configured NSSAI in the registration request message together with the mapped S-NSSAI and transmit the message. Furthermore, in a case that the UE stores “pending NSSAI valid for all PLMNs” (hereinafter, “pending NSSAI”), the UE may transmit the S-NSSAI included in the pending NSSAI, or the S-NSSAI to which the S-NSSAI is mapped, or the S-NSSAI associated with the S-NSSAI, or the mapped S-NSSAI of the S-NSSAI without including the S-NSSAI in the requested NSSAI IE). Regarding claim 4, Kuge discloses, wherein the sending the first S-NSSAI includes sending the first S-NSSAI and Requested NSSAI including the second S-NSSAI (¶ 0126, 0308, 0368-0369, UE_A 10 stores the mapped S-NSSAI with respect to the pending NSSAI and the pending NSSAI when the UE_A 10 is roaming, and further in a case that the UE_A 10 stores one or more pieces of mapped S-NSSAI that is not included in the mapped S-NSSAI with respect to the pending NSSAI stored in the UE_A 10 but is included in the list of the mapped S-NSSAI of the Configured NSSAI, the UE may include the pending NSSAI associated with the mapped S-NSSAI and the S-NSSAI included in the configured NSSAI in the registration request message together with the mapped S-NSSAI and transmit the message. Furthermore, in a case that the UE stores “pending NSSAI valid for all PLMNs” (hereinafter, “pending NSSAI”), the UE may transmit the S-NSSAI included in the pending NSSAI, or the S-NSSAI to which the S-NSSAI is mapped, or the S-NSSAI associated with the S-NSSAI, or the mapped S-NSSAI of the S-NSSAI without including the S-NSSAI in the requested NSSAI IE). Regarding claim 5, Kuge discloses, wherein the first S-NSSAI and the Requested NSSAI are included in a registration request message (¶ 0126, 0308, 0368-0369, UE_A 10 stores the mapped S-NSSAI with respect to the pending NSSAI and the pending NSSAI when the UE_A 10 is roaming, and further in a case that the UE_A 10 stores one or more pieces of mapped S-NSSAI that is not included in the mapped S-NSSAI with respect to the pending NSSAI stored in the UE_A 10 but is included in the list of the mapped S-NSSAI of the Configured NSSAI, the UE may include the pending NSSAI associated with the mapped S-NSSAI and the S-NSSAI included in the configured NSSAI in the registration request message together with the mapped S-NSSAI and transmit the message. Furthermore, in a case that the UE stores “pending NSSAI valid for all PLMNs” (hereinafter, “pending NSSAI”), the UE may transmit the S-NSSAI included in the pending NSSAI, or the S-NSSAI to which the S-NSSAI is mapped, or the S-NSSAI associated with the S-NSSAI, or the mapped S-NSSAI of the S-NSSAI without including the S-NSSAI in the requested NSSAI IE). Regarding claim 6, Kuge discloses, wherein the sending the first S-NSSAI includes sending the first S-NSSAI in a case where the UE has the Pending NSSAI. Regarding claim 8, Kuge discloses, a method of a communication apparatus, the method comprising: receiving first Single Network Slice Selection Assistance Information (S-NSSAI) included in Pending Network Slice Selection Assistance Information (NSSAI) (¶ 0126, 0308, 0368-0369, UE_A 10 stores the mapped S-NSSAI with respect to the pending NSSAI and the pending NSSAI when the UE_A 10 is roaming, and further in a case that the UE_A 10 stores one or more pieces of mapped S-NSSAI that is not included in the mapped S-NSSAI with respect to the pending NSSAI stored in the UE_A 10 but is included in the list of the mapped S-NSSAI of the Configured NSSAI, the UE may include the pending NSSAI associated with the mapped S-NSSAI and the S-NSSAI included in the configured NSSAI in the registration request message together with the mapped S-NSSAI and transmit the message. Furthermore, in a case that the UE stores “pending NSSAI valid for all PLMNs” (hereinafter, “pending NSSAI”), the UE may transmit the S-NSSAI included in the pending NSSAI, or the S-NSSAI to which the S-NSSAI is mapped, or the S-NSSAI associated with the S-NSSAI, or the mapped S-NSSAI of the S-NSSAI without including the S-NSSAI in the requested NSSAI IE); and aborting Network Slice-Specific Authentication and Authorization (NSSAA) procedure for the first S-NSSAI (¶ 0125, 0145, 0158, 0467-0468, The rejected NSSAI transmitted and/or received by using the rejected NSSAI IE may be information including one or multiple combinations of S-NSSAI (SST and/or SD) and a rejection cause value (rejected S-NSSAI). The rejected NSSAI transmitted and/or received using an Extended rejected NSSAI IE may be, during roaming, information including one or more combinations (Rejected S-NSSAI) of S-NSSAI (SST and/or SD) and mapped S-NSSAI (SST of the mapped HPLMN or SNPN and/or SD of the mapped HPLMN or SNPN) (if any. For example, when the UE performs roaming, or in a case that the associated PLMN or SNPN is the VPLMN or VSNPN) and the rejection cause value). Regarding claim 9, Kuge discloses, wherein the first S-NSSAI is included in a registration request message, wherein the registration request message includes Requested NSSAI, wherein the Requested NSSAI includes second S-NSSAI, and wherein the second S-NSSAI is different from the first S-NSSAI (¶ 0126, 0308, 0368-0369, UE_A 10 stores the mapped S-NSSAI with respect to the pending NSSAI and the pending NSSAI when the UE_A 10 is roaming, and further in a case that the UE_A 10 stores one or more pieces of mapped S-NSSAI that is not included in the mapped S-NSSAI with respect to the pending NSSAI stored in the UE_A 10 but is included in the list of the mapped S-NSSAI of the Configured NSSAI, the UE may include the pending NSSAI associated with the mapped S-NSSAI and the S-NSSAI included in the configured NSSAI in the registration request message together with the mapped S-NSSAI and transmit the message. Furthermore, in a case that the UE stores “pending NSSAI valid for all PLMNs” (hereinafter, “pending NSSAI”), the UE may transmit the S-NSSAI included in the pending NSSAI, or the S-NSSAI to which the S-NSSAI is mapped, or the S-NSSAI associated with the S-NSSAI, or the mapped S-NSSAI of the S-NSSAI without including the S-NSSAI in the requested NSSAI IE). Regarding claim 10, Kuge discloses, wherein the aborting the NSSAA procedure includes aborting the NSSAA procedure in a case where the NSSAA procedure is ongoing (¶ 0125, 0145, 0158, 0467-0468, The rejected NSSAI transmitted and/or received by using the rejected NSSAI IE may be information including one or multiple combinations of S-NSSAI (SST and/or SD) and a rejection cause value (rejected S-NSSAI). The rejected NSSAI transmitted and/or received using an Extended rejected NSSAI IE may be, during roaming, information including one or more combinations (Rejected S-NSSAI) of S-NSSAI (SST and/or SD) and mapped S-NSSAI (SST of the mapped HPLMN or SNPN and/or SD of the mapped HPLMN or SNPN) (if any. For example, when the UE performs roaming, or in a case that the associated PLMN or SNPN is the VPLMN or VSNPN) and the rejection cause value). Regarding claim 11, Kuge discloses, removing the first S-NSSAI from Allowed NSSAI in a case where the NSSAA procedure completes successfully (¶ 0174, 0184, 0191, 0215, 0222, the UE registered with the network slice or the S-NSSAI may refer to the S-NSSAI indicating the network slice included in allowed NSSAI for storage. An apparatus within a network, the apparatus supporting the function to manage the maximum number of UEs connected to a slice or the function to manage and/or control the maximum number of UEs that can be registered with a network slice or S-NSSAI simultaneously can store, for each piece of S-NSSAI, whether to require management of the maximum number of UEs connected to the slice and can further check, during the registration procedure, whether the number of registered UEs has reached a certain constant corresponding to the maximum number. Furthermore, each apparatus supporting the function to manage the maximum number of UEs connected to a slice or the function to manage and/or control the maximum number of UEs that can be registered with the network slice or S-NSSAI simultaneously is good to be able to store the fourth rejected NSSAI. In this specification, the maximum number of UE connected to a slice may be referred to as the maximum number of UE connected per slice, or the maximum number of UE that can be registered with a network slice or S-NSSAI, or the maximum number of UE, or a constant). Regarding claim 12, Kuge discloses, including the first S-NSSAI in Rejected NSSAI in a case where the NSSAA procedure fails (¶ 0183-0184, 0482-0485, the UE_A 10 has received the rejection cause value “S-NSSAI not available due to failed or revoked NSSAA” and the rejected NSSAI including the rejected S-NSSAI associated with the rejection cause value, the UE_A 10 may add and/or store the S-NSSAI to and/or in the “third rejected NSSAI”. Note that, in a case that the UE stores the third rejected NSSAI associated with the current PLMN, the received S-NSSAI may be added to and/or stored in the third rejected NSSAI associated with the current PLMN and the UE_A 10 has received the rejected NSSAI, the UE_A 10 may delete the S-NSSAI included in the received rejected NSSAI from the “allowed NSSAI associated with the current PL). Regarding claim 13, Kuge discloses, a user Equipment (UE, fig. 3) comprising: at least one memory (340); and at least one hardware processor (300) coupled to the at least one memory (340), wherein the at least one hardware processor is configured to send, to a communication apparatus, first Single Network Slice Selection Assistance Information (S-NSSAI) included in Pending Network Slice Selection Assistance Information (NSSAI) (¶ 0242-0243, 0364, 0368, one or more pieces of S-NSSAI included in the pending NSSAI transmitted together are S-NSSAI of the current PLMN or SNPN or S-NSSAI or VPLMN of an HPLMN or an HSNPN.). Regarding claim 14, Kuge discloses, wherein the at least one hardware processor is configured to send the first S-NSSAI after performing a network slice based cell reselection (¶ 0126, 0308, 0368-0369, UE_A 10 stores the mapped S-NSSAI with respect to the pending NSSAI and the pending NSSAI when the UE_A 10 is roaming, and further in a case that the UE_A 10 stores one or more pieces of mapped S-NSSAI that is not included in the mapped S-NSSAI with respect to the pending NSSAI stored in the UE_A 10 but is included in the list of the mapped S-NSSAI of the Configured NSSAI, the UE may include the pending NSSAI associated with the mapped S-NSSAI and the S-NSSAI included in the configured NSSAI in the registration request message together with the mapped S-NSSAI and transmit the message. Furthermore, in a case that the UE stores “pending NSSAI valid for all PLMNs” (hereinafter, “pending NSSAI”), the UE may transmit the S-NSSAI included in the pending NSSAI, or the S-NSSAI to which the S-NSSAI is mapped, or the S-NSSAI associated with the S-NSSAI, or the mapped S-NSSAI of the S-NSSAI without including the S-NSSAI in the requested NSSAI IE). Regarding claim 15, Kuge discloses, wherein the network slice based cell reselection is performed for second S- NSSAI, and wherein the second S-NSSAI is different from the first S-NSSAI (¶ 0126, 0308, 0368-0369, UE_A 10 stores the mapped S-NSSAI with respect to the pending NSSAI and the pending NSSAI when the UE_A 10 is roaming, and further in a case that the UE_A 10 stores one or more pieces of mapped S-NSSAI that is not included in the mapped S-NSSAI with respect to the pending NSSAI stored in the UE_A 10 but is included in the list of the mapped S-NSSAI of the Configured NSSAI, the UE may include the pending NSSAI associated with the mapped S-NSSAI and the S-NSSAI included in the configured NSSAI in the registration request message together with the mapped S-NSSAI and transmit the message. Furthermore, in a case that the UE stores “pending NSSAI valid for all PLMNs” (hereinafter, “pending NSSAI”), the UE may transmit the S-NSSAI included in the pending NSSAI, or the S-NSSAI to which the S-NSSAI is mapped, or the S-NSSAI associated with the S-NSSAI, or the mapped S-NSSAI of the S-NSSAI without including the S-NSSAI in the requested NSSAI IE). Regarding claim 16, Kuge discloses, wherein the at least one hardware processor is configured to send the first S-NSSAI and Requested NSSAI including the second S-NSSAI (¶ 0126, 0308, 0368-0369, UE_A 10 stores the mapped S-NSSAI with respect to the pending NSSAI and the pending NSSAI when the UE_A 10 is roaming, and further in a case that the UE_A 10 stores one or more pieces of mapped S-NSSAI that is not included in the mapped S-NSSAI with respect to the pending NSSAI stored in the UE_A 10 but is included in the list of the mapped S-NSSAI of the Configured NSSAI, the UE may include the pending NSSAI associated with the mapped S-NSSAI and the S-NSSAI included in the configured NSSAI in the registration request message together with the mapped S-NSSAI and transmit the message. Furthermore, in a case that the UE stores “pending NSSAI valid for all PLMNs” (hereinafter, “pending NSSAI”), the UE may transmit the S-NSSAI included in the pending NSSAI, or the S-NSSAI to which the S-NSSAI is mapped, or the S-NSSAI associated with the S-NSSAI, or the mapped S-NSSAI of the S-NSSAI without including the S-NSSAI in the requested NSSAI IE). Regarding claim 17, Kuge discloses, wherein the first S-NSSAI and the Requested NSSAI are included in a registration request message (¶ 0126, 0308, 0368-0369, UE_A 10 stores the mapped S-NSSAI with respect to the pending NSSAI and the pending NSSAI when the UE_A 10 is roaming, and further in a case that the UE_A 10 stores one or more pieces of mapped S-NSSAI that is not included in the mapped S-NSSAI with respect to the pending NSSAI stored in the UE_A 10 but is included in the list of the mapped S-NSSAI of the Configured NSSAI, the UE may include the pending NSSAI associated with the mapped S-NSSAI and the S-NSSAI included in the configured NSSAI in the registration request message together with the mapped S-NSSAI and transmit the message. Furthermore, in a case that the UE stores “pending NSSAI valid for all PLMNs” (hereinafter, “pending NSSAI”), the UE may transmit the S-NSSAI included in the pending NSSAI, or the S-NSSAI to which the S-NSSAI is mapped, or the S-NSSAI associated with the S-NSSAI, or the mapped S-NSSAI of the S-NSSAI without including the S-NSSAI in the requested NSSAI IE). Regarding claim 18, Kuge discloses, wherein the at least one hardware processor is configured to send the first S-NSSAI in a case where the UE has the Pending NSSAI (¶ 0242-0243, 0364, 0368, one or more pieces of S-NSSAI included in the pending NSSAI transmitted together are S-NSSAI of the current PLMN or SNPN or S-NSSAI or VPLMN of an HPLMN or an HSNPN.). Conclusion Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to KHAWAR IQBAL whose telephone number is (571)272-7909. The examiner can normally be reached M-F. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Jinsong Hu can be reached at 5712723965. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /KHAWAR IQBAL/Primary Examiner, Art Unit 2643
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Dec 23, 2024
Application Filed
Sep 24, 2026
Non-Final Rejection mailed — §101, §102 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12750650
LOCATION TRACKING AND DISTRESS NOTIFICATIONS USING WIRELESS NETWORK
2y 9m to grant Granted Sep 29, 2026
Patent 12750898
Sensing Service Shared Channel Establishing Method and Device
2y 4m to grant Granted Sep 29, 2026
Patent 12750667
CORE NETWORK DEVICE, COMMUNICATION TERMINAL, COMMUNICATION SYSTEM, AUTHENTICATION METHOD, AND COMMUNICATION METHOD
1y 2m to grant Granted Sep 29, 2026
Patent 12732939
WIRELESS CONNECTION MONITORING, CLASSIFICATION, AND PRIORITY
3y 4m to grant Granted Sep 08, 2026
Patent 12732778
LOCATING METHOD USING ADVERTISEMENT AND ELECTRONIC DEVICE THEREFOR
2y 10m to grant Granted Sep 08, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

Strategy Recommendation AI-generated — please review before filing

Get a prosecution strategy drawn from examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Typically takes 5-10 seconds — AI-generated, attorney review required before filing

Prosecution Projections

1-2
Expected OA Rounds
73%
Grant Probability
99%
With Interview (+29.2%)
3y 5m (~1y 8m remaining)
Median Time to Grant
Low
PTA Risk
Based on 661 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allowance rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month