Prosecution Insights
Last updated: July 17, 2026
Application No. 18/878,881

STORAGE DEVICE AND PROCESSING DEVICE

Non-Final OA §102§103
Filed
Dec 25, 2024
Priority
Jul 11, 2022 — JP 2022-110948 +1 more
Examiner
YANG, HAN
Art Unit
Tech Center
Assignee
Sony Group Corporation
OA Round
1 (Non-Final)
92%
Grant Probability
Favorable
1-2
OA Rounds
7m
Est. Remaining
99%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 92% — above average
92%
Career Allowance Rate
833 granted / 904 resolved
+32.1% vs TC avg
Moderate +12% lift
Without
With
+11.6%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Fast prosecutor
2y 2m
Avg Prosecution
23 currently pending
Career history
925
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
2.5%
-37.5% vs TC avg
§103
58.2%
+18.2% vs TC avg
§102
29.4%
-10.6% vs TC avg
§112
4.6%
-35.4% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 904 resolved cases

Office Action

§102 §103
Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . DETAILED ACTION Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 102 1. The following is a quotation of the appropriate paragraphs of 35 U.S.C. 102 that form the basis for the rejections under this section made in this Office action: A person shall be entitled to a patent unless – (a)(1) the claimed invention was patented, described in a printed publication, or in public use, on sale, or otherwise available to the public before the effective filing date of the claimed invention. 2. Claim(s) 1-2, 19-21, is/are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 102(a)(1) as being anticipated by BRAGANCA et al (Pub. No.: US 2017/011702). 3. Regarding independent claim 1, BRAGANCA et al teaches a storage device (Fig. 1) comprising: a memory cell (Fig. 1, #102) provided with a magnetoresistive effect element (Fig. 1, #102, claim 16, line 1, Fig. 3); a word line (Fig. 1, WORD LINES) connected to one end of the magnetoresistive effect element (Fig. 1, #102, claim 16, line 1, Fig. 3); and a bit line (Fig. 1, BIT LINES) connected to another end of the magnetoresistive effect element (Fig. 1, #102, claim 16, line 1, Fig. 3). 4. Regading claim 2, BRAGANCA et al teaches the magnetoresistive effect element (Fig. 1, #102, claim 16, line 1, Fig. 3) has a voltage controlled magnetic anisotropy (VCMA) effect (Fig. 3, paragraph [0028], lines 11-19). 5. Regarding claim 19, BRAGANCA et al teaches comprising:a stacked structure (see Fig. 3) of a memory cell (Fig. 1, #102) array in which the memory cell (Fig. 1, #102)s are arranged in a matrix in a row direction and a column direction (see Fig. 1, and Fig. 2). 6. Regarding claim 20, BRAGANCA et al teaches the word line (Fig. 1, WORD LINES) and the bit line (Fig. 1, BIT LINES) are provided for every layer of the memory cell (Fig. 1, #102) array (see Fig. 2). 7. Regarding claim 21, BRAGANCA et al teaches the word line (Fig. 1, WORD LINES) and the bit line (Fig. 1, BIT LINES) are alternately provided for every layer of the memory cell (Fig. 1, #102) array (see Fig. 2). Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 103 8. The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 103 which forms the basis for all obviousness rejections set forth in this Office action: A patent for a claimed invention may not be obtained, notwithstanding that the claimed invention is not identically disclosed as set forth in section 102, if the differences between the claimed invention and the prior art are such that the claimed invention as a whole would have been obvious before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to a person having ordinary skill in the art to which the claimed invention pertains. Patentability shall not be negated by the manner in which the invention was made. 9. Claim(s) 2-4 is/are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over BRAGANCA et al (Pub. No.: US 2017/011702) in view of Wang et al (Pub. No.: US 2022/0271218). 10. Regarding claim 3, BRAGANCA et al teaches the VCMA effect (Fig. 3, paragraph [0028], lines 11-19) BRAGANCA et al is silent with respect to VCMA effect is nonlinear. Wang et al teaches the VCMA effect is nonlinear (Fig. 3, paragraph [0022], lines 1-6). It would have been obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art at the time of the invention to apply the teachings of Wang et al to the teaching of BRAGANCA et al such that improved VCMA can allow for lower energy used to switch the magnetic orientation of the ferromagnetic layer (Wang et al, paragraph [0020]). 11. Regarding claim 4, BRAGANCA et al teaches VCMA effect (Fig. 3, paragraph [0028], lines 11-19) applied to the magnetoresistive effect element (Fig. 1, #102, claim 16, line 1, Fig. 3). BRAGANCA et al is silent with respect to the VCMA effect has a region having a smaller inclination at a point where a cell voltage is low than an inclination at a point where the cell voltage is high. Wang et al teaches the VCMA effect has a region having a smaller inclination at a point where a cell voltage is low than an inclination at a point where the cell voltage is high (see Fig. 3A, where at 1.0V/nm the inclination is higher than at -1.0V/nm region). It would have been obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art at the time of the invention to apply the teachings of Wang et al to the teaching of BRAGANCA et al such that improved VCMA can allow for lower energy used to switch the magnetic orientation of the ferromagnetic layer (Wang et al, paragraph [0020]). 12. Claim(s) 5 is/are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over BRAGANCA et al (Pub. No.: US 2017/011702) in view of Lee et al (Pub. No.: US 2018/0374526). 13. Regarding claim 5, BRAGANCA et al teaches the magnetoresistive effect element (Fig. 1, #102, claim 16, line 1, Fig. 3) on a basis of the VCMA effect (Fig. 3, paragraph [0028], lines 11-19). BRAGANCA et al is silent with respect to a driver configured to apply a reversing voltage for reversing a magnetization direction. Lee et al teaches a driver (Fig. 12, #1208) configured to apply a reversing voltage for reversing a magnetization direction. It would have been obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art at the time of the invention to apply the teachings of Lee et al to the teaching of BRAGANCA et al such that reverse pulse scheme for reducing write error rate in magnetoelectric random access memory (see Lee et al abstract, line 1-2) Allowable Subject Matter 14. Claims 22-28 are allowed 15. With respect to independent claim 22, there is no teaching, suggestion, or motivation for combination in the prior art to a resistive state is transitioned on a basis of voltage application in which cell voltages are substantially equal in the resistance states different from each other; 16. With respect to dependent claim 23-28, since these claims are depending on claim 22, therefore claims 23-28 are allowable subject matter. 17. Claim(s) 6-18 is/are objected to as being dependent upon a rejected base claim, but would be allowable if rewritten in independent form including all of the limitations of the base claim and any intervening claims. 18. With respect to claims 6, there is no teaching, suggestion, or motivation for combination in the prior art to wherein the driver switches a voltage applied to the memory cell such that a reversing voltage is applied to a selected cell while a non-reversing voltage is applied to a non-selected cell, wherein the non-reversing voltage does not reverse a magnetization direction of the magnetoresistive effect element. 19. With respect to dependent claims 7-18, since these claims are depending on claims 6, therefore claims 7-18 are allowable subject matter. Conclusion 20. The prior art made of record and not relied upon is considered pertinent to applicant's disclosure, Lupino et al (Pub. No: US 2015/0249096). Lupino et al (Pub. No: US 2015/0249096) shows MRAM has VCMA effect. 21. Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to Han Yang whose telephone is (571) 270-3048. The examiner can normally be reached on Monday-Friday 8am-5pm with alternate Friday off. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Richard Elms can be reached on (571) 272-1869. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is (571) 273-8300. Information regarding the status of an application may be obtained from the Patent Application Information Retrieval (PAIR) system. Status information for published applications may be obtained from either Private PAIR or Public PAIR. Status information for unpublished applications is available through Private PAIR only. For more information about the PAIR system, see http://pair-direct.uspto.gov. Should you have questions on access to the Private PAIR system, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative or access to the automated information system, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. HY 06/10/2026 /HAN YANG/ Primary Examiner, Art Unit 2824
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Dec 25, 2024
Application Filed
Jun 15, 2026
Non-Final Rejection mailed — §102, §103 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12676743
METHODS AND APPARATUSES FOR PROVIDING COMMUNICATION BETWEEN A SERVER AND A CLIENT DEVICE VIA A PROXY NODE
3y 3m to grant Granted Jul 07, 2026
Patent 12676204
MEMORY SYSTEM AND OPERATION METHOD OF MEMORY SYSTEM
2y 2m to grant Granted Jul 07, 2026
Patent 12670952
CURRENT REFERENCES FOR MEMORY CELLS
2y 4m to grant Granted Jun 30, 2026
Patent 12665005
STORAGE DEVICE PERFORMING DUMMY READ OPERATION, AND METHOD OF OPERATING THE SAME
2y 1m to grant Granted Jun 23, 2026
Patent 12659149
DYNAMIC SOFTWARE SECURITY OBJECTS
1y 11m to grant Granted Jun 16, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

Strategy Recommendation AI-generated — please review before filing

Get a prosecution strategy drawn from examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Typically takes 5-10 seconds — AI-generated, attorney review required before filing

Prosecution Projections

1-2
Expected OA Rounds
92%
Grant Probability
99%
With Interview (+11.6%)
2y 2m (~7m remaining)
Median Time to Grant
Low
PTA Risk
Based on 904 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allowance rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month