Prosecution Insights
Last updated: October 02, 2026
Application No. 18/879,234

IMAGE PROCESSING METHOD

Non-Final OA §103
Filed
Dec 26, 2024
Priority
Jul 07, 2022 — JP 2022-109503 +2 more
Examiner
KY, KEVIN
Art Unit
2671
Tech Center
2600 — Communications
Assignee
Logic And Design Co. Ltd.
OA Round
1 (Non-Final)
77%
Grant Probability
Favorable
1-2
OA Rounds
9m
Est. Remaining
99%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 77% — above average
77%
Career Allowance Rate
448 granted / 579 resolved
+15.4% vs TC avg
Strong +25% interview lift
Without
With
+25.2%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
2y 6m
Avg Prosecution
28 currently pending
Career history
595
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
18.4%
-21.6% vs TC avg
§103
51.2%
+11.2% vs TC avg
§102
19.3%
-20.7% vs TC avg
§112
6.3%
-33.7% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 579 resolved cases

Office Action

§103
DETAILED ACTION Claim Objections Claim 1 is objected to because of the following informalities: in step (3), “blackand-white image” is claimed, where there is a hyphen missing between “black” and “and”. Appropriate correction is required. Claim 1 is further objected to because of the following informalities: the phrase “the aforementioned process” refers to a “process” that has not previously been expressly identified in the claim. Applicant is requested to clarify the phrase by identifying the particular preceding processing to which it refers. Appropriate correction is required. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 103 The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 103 which forms the basis for all obviousness rejections set forth in this Office action: A patent for a claimed invention may not be obtained, notwithstanding that the claimed invention is not identically disclosed as set forth in section 102, if the differences between the claimed invention and the prior art are such that the claimed invention as a whole would have been obvious before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to a person having ordinary skill in the art to which the claimed invention pertains. Patentability shall not be negated by the manner in which the invention was made. Claim(s) 1 is/are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over CN109658341 et al in view of Adobe Photoshop NPL (https://whsdigitalmedia.weebly.com/uploads/1/3/1/0/13103434/_ps_howto_correct_color.pdf), in further view of Kuniba (US 8103119). Regarding claim 1, CN109658341 discloses an image processing method (abstract: method for enhancing image contrast), comprising the following steps: (1) converting an original image to RGB color space (abstract: convert a source image from RGB space) 4) converting the original image to YUV color space, YCbCr color space, or YPbPr color space (pg. 5 s10, converting the source image from the RGB color space to the YCbCr color space;); (5) replacing the luminance of the red region of the black-and-white image that has been brightened using the red-enhancing filter with a luminance (Y) of the red region of the YUV color space, the YCbCr color space, or the YPbPr color space of the original image (pg. 5 the luminance signal (Y) and the chrominance signals (Cr and Cb) are independent of each other, and when the luminance component Y is enhanced, the chrominance signals are not affected; pg. 6 S11, acquiring a brightness component Y, a blue chrominance component Cb and a red chrominance component Cr of the source image in a YCbCr space; s12, adjusting the brightness component Y to obtain a processed image; fusing the dark-area detail image and the bright-area detail image by adopting a pulse coupling neural network model to obtain a brightness component Y1 with enhanced contrast; the contrast-enhanced luminance component Y1, the blue chrominance component Cb, and the red chrominance component Cr constitute the processed image); and CN109658341 fails to teach where Adobe Photoshop teaches 2) converting the image converted to RGB color space to grayscale by determining weights for red (R), yellow (Ye), green (G), cyan (C), blue (B), and magenta (M) hues (pg. 5 Converting images to black and white: The Black & White adjustment enables you to convert a color image to grayscale while maintaining full control over how individual colors are converted; Fig. 9 Properties panel with Black & White options, including weights for red, yellow, green, cyan, blue, and magenta); (3) using a red-enhancing filter to enhance a luminance ratio (Y1) of a red region of a blackand-white image when converting to the grayscale (Fig. 9 Properties panel with Black & White options, including independently adjusting weights for red); CN109658341 fails to teach where Kuniba teaches (6) equalizing the contrast to return the gradation that has been expanded by the aforementioned process to a natural brightness range ( col 10 lines 27-30 by increasing the luminance of the dark portion and decreasing the luminance of the bright portion in the image, the whole image can be corrected to natural brightness; col 10 lines 40-43 gradation correction of each pixel can be performed such that the input RGB image as a whole is made at natural brightness.). Therefore, it would have been obvious to one with ordinary skill in the art before the effective filing date of the invention to have implemented the teaching of 2) converting the image converted to RGB color space to grayscale by determining weights for red (R), yellow (Ye), green (G), cyan (C), blue (B), and magenta (M) hues and (3) using a red-enhancing filter to enhance a luminance ratio (Y1) of a red region of a blackand-white image when converting to the grayscale from Adobe Photoshop, and the teaching of equalizing the contrast to return the gradation that has been expanded by the aforementioned process to a natural brightness range from Kuniba, into the image processing method as disclosed by CN109658341. The motivation for doing this is to improve image processing techniques including color quality adjusting in images and gradation correction in images. Conclusion Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to KEVIN KY whose telephone number is (571)272-7648. The examiner can normally be reached Monday-Friday 9-5PM. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Vincent Rudolph can be reached at 571-272-8243. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /KEVIN KY/Primary Examiner, Art Unit 2671
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Dec 26, 2024
Application Filed
Sep 21, 2026
Non-Final Rejection mailed — §103 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12743811
SYSTEMS AND METHODS FOR EFFICIENT OBJECT TRACKING AS A SERVICE VIA EDGE
4y 3m to grant Granted Sep 22, 2026
Patent 12743906
SEMANTICALLY GENERATED VIDEO METHOD AND SYSTEM
1y 0m to grant Granted Sep 22, 2026
Patent 12738276
DISPLAY APPARATUS CAPABLE OF RELEASING A VOICE INPUT MODE BY SENSING A SPEECH FINISH AND VOICE CONTROL METHOD THEREOF
2y 11m to grant Granted Sep 15, 2026
Patent 12737934
HARDWARE-AWARE EFFICIENT ARCHITECTURES FOR TEXT-TO-IMAGE DIFFUSION MODELS
2y 10m to grant Granted Sep 15, 2026
Patent 12737414
CONVERTING VIDEO SEMANTICS INTO LANGUAGE FOR REAL-TIME QUERY AND INFORMATION RETRIEVAL
2y 9m to grant Granted Sep 15, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

Strategy Recommendation AI-generated — please review before filing

Get a prosecution strategy drawn from examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Typically takes 5-10 seconds — AI-generated, attorney review required before filing

Prosecution Projections

1-2
Expected OA Rounds
77%
Grant Probability
99%
With Interview (+25.2%)
2y 6m (~9m remaining)
Median Time to Grant
Low
PTA Risk
Based on 579 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allowance rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month