Prosecution Insights
Last updated: October 04, 2026
Application No. 18/880,646

BABY CARRIER

Non-Final OA §102§103
Filed
Jan 02, 2025
Priority
Jul 06, 2022 — CN 202221766203.8 +3 more
Examiner
VANTERPOOL, LESTER L
Art Unit
Tech Center
Assignee
Wonderland Switzerland AG
OA Round
1 (Non-Final)
55%
Grant Probability
Moderate
1-2
OA Rounds
1y 0m
Est. Remaining
44%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 55% of resolved cases
55%
Career Allowance Rate
550 granted / 1004 resolved
-5.2% vs TC avg
Minimal -11% lift
Without
With
+-10.6%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
2y 9m
Avg Prosecution
25 currently pending
Career history
1019
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
0.1%
-39.9% vs TC avg
§103
54.0%
+14.0% vs TC avg
§102
21.6%
-18.4% vs TC avg
§112
18.3%
-21.7% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 1004 resolved cases

Office Action

§102 §103
DETAILED ACTION This Non-Final Office Action is in response to the above identified patent application filed on January 02, 2025. Claims 1, 5, 6, 7, 9, 13, 14, 17, 18, 19, 22, 25, 26, 28, 29, 30, 31, 35, 36 & 37. Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 102 In the event the determination of the status of the application as subject to AIA 35 U.S.C. 102 and 103 (or as subject to pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 102 and 103) is incorrect, any correction of the statutory basis (i.e., changing from AIA to pre-AIA ) for the rejection will not be considered a new ground of rejection if the prior art relied upon, and the rationale supporting the rejection, would be the same under either status. The following is a quotation of the appropriate paragraphs of 35 U.S.C. 102 that form the basis for the rejections under this section made in this Office action: A person shall be entitled to a patent unless – (a)(1) the claimed invention was patented, described in a printed publication, or in public use, on sale, or otherwise available to the public before the effective filing date of the claimed invention. Claim(s) 1 is rejected under 35 U.S.C. 102(a)(1) as being anticipated by (U.S. Patent Publication Number 2015 / 0272342 A1) to Schaarschmidt. Regarding claim 1, Schaarschmidt discloses a baby carrier (See Figure 1) comprising a pouch component (20) and a waist belt (10 & 12), wherein a bottom (26 & 26’) of the pouch component (20) is selectively connected {i.e. via (27A, 27B, 27A’ & 27B’) & (17A, 17B, 17A’ & 17B’) in Figures 1 & 2} to the waist belt (10 & 12) so that the baby carrier (See Figure 1) has at least two operating states {(i.e. via (B1) Narrow Width Operating State in Figure 2) & (i.e. via (B2) Wide Width Operating State in Figure 4) (See Abstract) (See Figures 1, 2, 3 & 4)}. Claim(s) 1 is rejected under 35 U.S.C. 102(a)(1) as being anticipated by (U.S. Patent Publication Number 2015 / 0223614 A1) to Pos. Regarding claim 1, Pos discloses a baby carrier (11) comprising a pouch component (12) and a waist belt (10), wherein a bottom of the pouch component (12) is selectively connected (i.e. via (17 & 18) in Figure 1) to the waist belt (10) so that the baby carrier (11) has at least two operating states {(i.e. via Narrow Width (B) Operating State) & (i.e. via Wide Width (B) Operating State) (See Paragraphs 0033, 0034 & 0035) (See Figures 1 & 3)}. Claim(s) 1 is rejected under 35 U.S.C. 102(a)(1) as being anticipated by (U.S. Patent Number 10,271,663 B2) to Salazar. Regarding claim 1, Salazar discloses a baby carrier (10) comprising a pouch component (12) and a waist belt (66 & 68), wherein a bottom (24A & 24B) of the pouch component (12) is selectively connected (i.e. via Left & Right (80 & 82) in Figure 2) to the waist belt (66 & 68) so that the baby carrier (10) has at least two operating states {(i.e. via Fastened Stretched Wide Width (24A & 24B) Operating State in Figure 2) & (i.e. via Un-Fastened Gathered Narrow Width (24A & 24B) Operating State in Figure 3) (See Abstract) (See Figures 2 & 3)}. Claim(s) 1 is rejected under 35 U.S.C. 102(a)(1) as being anticipated by (U.S. Patent Publication Number 2022 / 0047095 A1) to Gilboa. Regarding claim 1, Gilboa discloses a baby carrier (100) comprising a pouch component (102) and a waist belt (132A & 132B), wherein a bottom (108) of the pouch component (102) is selectively connected (i.e. via Left & Right Zippers (134 & 136) in Figure 1) to the waist belt (132A & 132B) so that the baby carrier (100) has at least two operating states {(i.e. via (136) Operating State Connection in Figures 3A & 3B) & (i.e. via (134) Oerating State Connection in Figures 2A & 2B)}. Claim(s) 1, 6, 9 & 14 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 102(a)(1) as being anticipated by (KR 20170003426 U) to Cha Bok-Hee. Regarding claim 1, Cha Bok-Hee discloses a baby carrier (100) comprising a pouch component (i.e. Body Portion (100) in Figures 3 & 4) and a waist belt (200), wherein a bottom (105) of the pouch component (i.e. Body Portion (100) in Figures 3 & 4) is selectively connected (i.e. via Zipper (106, 107 & 108) in Figure 4) to the waist belt (200) so that the baby carrier (100) has at least two operating states {(i.e. via Zipper (108) connection configuration in Figures 6 & 7) & (i.e. via Zipper (107) connection configuration in Figures 9 & 10)}. Regarding claim 6, Cha Bok-Hee discloses wherein the bottom (105) of the pouch component (i.e. Body Portion (100) in Figures 3 & 4) is provided with at least two third connecting members (i.e. via Zippers (106, 107 & 108) in Figure 4) along a height direction (See Figure 4), and the waist belt (200) is provided with a fourth connecting member (202), the fourth connecting member (202) being selectively removably connected to one of the at least two third connecting members (i.e. via Zipper (106, 107 & 108) in Figure 4). Regarding claim 9, Cha Bok-Hee discloses wherein: a bottom edge (i.e. Bottom Edge Portion of (105) in Figure 4) of the pouch component (i.e. Body Portion (100) in Figures 3 & 4) is connected to a top edge (i.e. Top Edge Portion of (200) in Figure 5) of the waist belt (200); the baby carrier (100) has a third operating state and a fourth operating state; when the baby carrier (100) is in the third operating state, the pouch component (100) and the waist belt (200) are in an unfolded state (See Figures 3 & 4); and when the baby carrier (100) is in the fourth operating state, a bottom edge (i.e. Bottom Edge Portion of (105) in Figure 4) of the waist belt (200) is folded upwards (See Figures 6 & 9) and removably connected (i.e. via Zipper (108 or 107) in Figures 6 & 9) to the pouch component (100). Regarding claim 14, Cha Bok-Hee discloses wherein the pouch component (i.e. Body Portion (100) in Figures 3 & 4) of the baby carrier (100) provides, in the at least two operating states {(i.e. via Zipper (108) connection configuration in Figures 6 & 7) & (i.e. via Zipper (107) connection configuration in Figures 9 & 10)}, different seating heights for an infant or a child sitting in the baby carrier (100), or wherein the pouch component (i.e. Body Portion of (100) in Figures 3 & 4) of the baby carrier (100) has different effective use lengths in the at least two operating states {(i.e. via Zipper (108) connection configuration in Figures 6 & 7) & (i.e. via Zipper (107) connection configuration in Figures 9 & 10)}. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 103 In the event the determination of the status of the application as subject to AIA 35 U.S.C. 102 and 103 (or as subject to pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 102 and 103) is incorrect, any correction of the statutory basis (i.e., changing from AIA to pre-AIA ) for the rejection will not be considered a new ground of rejection if the prior art relied upon, and the rationale supporting the rejection, would be the same under either status. The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 103 which forms the basis for all obviousness rejections set forth in this Office action: A patent for a claimed invention may not be obtained, notwithstanding that the claimed invention is not identically disclosed as set forth in section 102, if the differences between the claimed invention and the prior art are such that the claimed invention as a whole would have been obvious before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to a person having ordinary skill in the art to which the claimed invention pertains. Patentability shall not be negated by the manner in which the invention was made. The factual inquiries for establishing a background for determining obviousness under 35 U.S.C. 103 are summarized as follows: 1. Determining the scope and contents of the prior art. 2. Ascertaining the differences between the prior art and the claims at issue. 3. Resolving the level of ordinary skill in the pertinent art. 4. Considering objective evidence present in the application indicating obviousness or nonobviousness. Claim(s) 13 is rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over (KR 20170003426 U) to Cha Bok-Hee in view of (U.S. Patent Publication Number 2011 / 0290831 A1) to Wang and (U.S. Patent Publication Number 2020 / 0163466 A1) to Telford. Regarding claim 13, Cha Bok-Hee discloses an upper part (118) of the pouch component (100) is provided with two shoulder straps (i.e. Left & Right (117) in Figure 3). However, Cha Bok-Hee lacks and does not explicitly disclose two connecting lugs extending obliquely upwards, and the two shoulder straps and the two connecting lugs being connected through a buckle. Wang teaches two sides of the pouch component (4) are provided with two connecting lugs (i.e. Left & Right (11) in Figure 1A) extending obliquely upwards (See Figure 1), the two shoulder straps (i.e. Left & Right (6) in Figure 1A) and the two connecting lugs (i.e. Left & Right (11) in Figure 1A) being connected through a buckle (12) (See Figures 1A, 1B, 2A, 2B & 2C). It would have been obvious to one having ordinary skill in the art at the time the invention was effectively filed to make two connecting lugs extending obliquely upwards, and the two shoulder straps and the two connecting lugs being connected through a buckle as taught by Wang with the baby carrier of Cha Bok-Hee in order to provide quick, easy and fast connections. However, Cha Bok-Hee lacks and does not explicitly disclose an opening, foldable lining being accommodated in the opening. Telford teaches an inner side surface (i.e. via Inner Side of (160) in Figure 1) or an outer side surface of each of the two shoulder straps (160) is provided with an opening (i.e. via Slit (162) in Figure 1), foldable lining (i.e. Folded Material) being accommodated in the opening (i.e. via Slit (162) in Figure 1) (See Paragraph 0066). It would have been obvious to one having ordinary skill in the art at the time the invention was effectively filed to make an inner side surface of the shoulder strap is provided with an opening, foldable lining being accommodated in the opening as taught by Telford with the baby carrier of Cha Bok-Hee in order to allow the shoulder straps to widen (See Paragraph 0066). Allowable Subject Matter Claims 5, 7, 17, 18, 19, 22, 25, 26, 28, 29, 30 & 31 are objected to as being dependent upon a rejected base claim, but would be allowable if rewritten in independent form including all of the limitations of the base claim and any intervening claims. Claims 35, 36 & 37 are allowed. Conclusion The prior art made of record and not relied upon is considered pertinent to applicant's disclosure. (U.S. Patent Number 5,203,482) to Puff teaches an inner side surface (i.e. via Inner Side of (1) in Figures 3, 5 & 6) or an outer side surface of each of the two shoulder strap (1) is provided with an opening (i.e. via Gap Opening of (1) in Figures 3 & 5), foldable lining (5) being accommodated in the opening (i.e. via Gap Opening of (1) in Figures 3 & 5) (See Figures 1, 3 & 5). Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to LESTER L VANTERPOOL whose telephone number is (571)272-8028. The examiner can normally be reached 8:30-5:00. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Nathan J. Newhouse can be reached at 571-272-4544. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /L.L.V/Examiner, Art Unit 3734 /NATHAN J NEWHOUSE/Supervisory Patent Examiner, Art Unit 3734
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Jan 02, 2025
Application Filed
Sep 11, 2026
Non-Final Rejection mailed — §102, §103 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12740635
Pack-Based Holder For Bottle or Other Elongate Object
2y 12m to grant Granted Sep 22, 2026
Patent 12734974
Carrier for Transportation
2y 9m to grant Granted Sep 15, 2026
Patent 12722729
Backpack And Backpack Connecting Components
2y 5m to grant Granted Sep 01, 2026
Patent 12714218
BACKCOUNTRY BACKPACK WITH TOOL STORAGE APPARATUS
2y 6m to grant Granted Aug 25, 2026
Patent 12714210
APPARATUS AND METHOD FOR CARRYING AND STORING FOOTWEAR
2y 4m to grant Granted Aug 25, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

Strategy Recommendation AI-generated — please review before filing

Get a prosecution strategy drawn from examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Typically takes 5-10 seconds — AI-generated, attorney review required before filing

Prosecution Projections

1-2
Expected OA Rounds
55%
Grant Probability
44%
With Interview (-10.6%)
2y 9m (~1y 0m remaining)
Median Time to Grant
Low
PTA Risk
Based on 1004 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allowance rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month