Prosecution Insights
Last updated: October 24, 2026
Application No. 18/880,839

WIRELESS COMMUNICATION SYSTEM, CONTROL APPARATUS, RELAY STATION APPARATUS, AND DATA TRANSMISSION METHOD DETERMINATION METHOD

Non-Final OA §103
Filed
Jan 02, 2025
Priority
Jul 07, 2022 — nonprovisional of PCTJP2022027031
Examiner
SEN, ANINDITA
Art Unit
2478
Tech Center
2400 — Computer Networks
Assignee
Nippon Telegraph and Telephone Corporation
OA Round
1 (Non-Final)
82%
Grant Probability
Favorable
1-2
OA Rounds
1y 3m
Est. Remaining
86%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 82% — above average
82%
Career Allowance Rate
70 granted / 85 resolved
+24.4% vs TC avg
Minimal +3% lift
Without
With
+3.4%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
3y 0m
Avg Prosecution
17 currently pending
Career history
145
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
0.2%
-39.8% vs TC avg
§103
78.9%
+38.9% vs TC avg
§102
14.7%
-25.3% vs TC avg
§112
1.4%
-38.6% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 85 resolved cases

Office Action

§103
Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 103 The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 103 which forms the basis for all obviousness rejections set forth in this Office action: A patent for a claimed invention may not be obtained, notwithstanding that the claimed invention is not identically disclosed as set forth in section 102, if the differences between the claimed invention and the prior art are such that the claimed invention as a whole would have been obvious before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to a person having ordinary skill in the art to which the claimed invention pertains. Patentability shall not be negated by the manner in which the invention was made. Claim 1-6,8-10 is rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over Kimura et al. (US20160037358A1) in view of Zhu et al.( US20210400537A1) Regarding Claim 1, Kimura teaches, A wireless communication system comprising a processor configured to execute operations comprising: relaying, by a relay station apparatus, wireless communication between one or more base station apparatuses and a terminal apparatus by using a plurality of systems [115]- The communication control unit 190, on the other hand, controls overall functions of the relay station 100 by using a processing apparatus such as a CPU (Central Processing Unit) and DSP (Digital Signal Processor). [52]- The relay stations 100 a and 100 b are radio communication apparatuses having a role to relay a radio signal (that is, a role to perform relay communication) between the base station 10 and one of the mobile stations. acquiring, by the relay station apparatus, quality information of relay between the relay station apparatus and at least one of the terminal apparatus and each base station apparatus for which the relay station apparatus performs relaying; [136]- Then, the relay station 100 selects the modulation and/or multiplexing method to be used for relay communication based on, for example, the type of each communication link between the mobile station 200 and the base station 10, quality of each link, or the type of data to be transmitted (step S304) and notifying, by the relay station apparatus, the control apparatus of the acquired quality information [119]- It is also assumed, for example, that link quality between the relay station 100 and the destination node R×A is better than that between the source node T×A or T×B and the relay station 100. transmits the common symbols to the destination node R×A by using the first modulation and/or multiplexing method or the second modulation and/or multiplexing method. determining, by the control apparatus, a type of data transmission operation for each of a communication path between each base station apparatus and the relay station apparatus [135]- Accordingly, for example, it becomes possible to decide the modulation and/or multiplexing method to be used and assign communication resources in a unified manner by the base station or the like. [53]- In this case, the relay station 100 a positioned between the mobile station 200 a and the base station 10 relays a radio signal between these two nodes. and notifying the relay station apparatus of the determined type of data transmission operation [135]- n such a case, the relay station receives, for example, information specifying the modulation and/or multiplexing method to be used for relay communication from the base station. Kimura does not teach, determining a communication path between the relay station apparatus and the terminal apparatus on the basis of the quality information and priority of the terminal apparatus. Zhu teaches, determining a communication path between the relay station apparatus and the terminal apparatus on the basis of the quality information and priority of the terminal apparatus [49]- MAMS is a programmable framework that provides mechanisms for the flexible selection of network paths in an MX communication environment 100, based on the application needs and/or requirements, as well as adapt to dynamic network conditions when multiple network connections serve a client device 101. The MAMS framework leverages network intelligence and policies to dynamically adapt traffic distribution across selected paths and UP treatments. It would have been obvious to a person having an ordinary skill in the art before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to modify the system of Kimura , and a communication path between the relay station apparatus and the terminal apparatus on the basis of the quality information and priority of the terminal apparatus as taught by Zhu to use priority to steer modes to gain reliability and throughput on each hop. Regarding Claim 2, Kimura does not teach, The wireless communication system according to The wireless communication system according to wherein the type of the data transmission operation comprises at least one of redundant transmission, division transmission, or selective transmission. Zhu teaches, The wireless communication system according to The wireless communication system according to wherein the type of the data transmission operation comprises at least one of redundant transmission, division transmission, or selective transmission. [108]- The GMA Tx entity 510 splits or duplicates traffic over multiple radio links 105 and retransmits packets over a different radio link 105 based on e2e measurements. [117]- In procedure 700, if the message is “On”, the convergence layer sends all traffic to the default link 105 (denoted as a “RAT1 link”); otherwise, the convergence layer will send all traffic to a fallback link (denoted as “RAT2 link”). It would have been obvious to a person having an ordinary skill in the art before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to modify the system of Kimura The wireless communication system according to The wireless communication system according to wherein the type of the data transmission operation comprises at least one of redundant transmission, division transmission, or selective transmission as taught by Zhu to use priority to steer modes to gain reliability and throughput on each hop. Regarding Claim 3, Kimura teaches, The wireless communication system according to The wireless communication system according to wherein the control apparatus determines the type of the data transmission operation for each communication path by referring to a table describing a relationship between priority and the type of the data transmission operation. [121]- FIG. 11 is a table illustrating an example of a selection standard in the communication control unit 190 for selecting the modulation and/or multiplexing method used for relay communication. [123]- Whether or not data contained in a radio signal is data for a real-time application can be identified, in the case of LTE, for example, by referring to QCI (QoS Class Identifier) information acquired via the control channel. Regarding Claim 4,Kimura does not teach, The wireless communication system according to The wireless communication system according to wherein, when the priority of the terminal apparatus represents a first priority, the control apparatus determines a type of a data transmission operation using less resources than an amount of resources used in another type of data transmission operation determined for a second priority higher than the first priority. Zhu teaches, The wireless communication system according to The wireless communication system according to wherein, when the priority of the terminal apparatus represents a first priority, the control apparatus determines a type of a data transmission operation using less resources than an amount of resources used in another type of data transmission operation determined for a second priority higher than the first priority.[105]- The present disclosure provides dynamic traffic splitting for different optimization targets such as reducing e2e delay (e.g., “low delay”) or minimizing cellular (e.g., 5G/NR, LTE, etc.) usage (e.g., “low cost”). [779]- Example A19 includes the method of example A18 and/or some other example(s) herein, further comprising: disabling, by the convergence layer, the packet duplication process when the selected link transitions.[536]- QoS-aware traffic shaping and queueing (e.g., priority queuing (PQ), Strict Priority (SP), Weighted Round Robin (WRR), etc.). It would have been obvious to a person having an ordinary skill in the art before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to modify the system of Kimura The wireless communication system according to The wireless communication system according to wherein, when the priority of the terminal apparatus represents a first priority, the control apparatus determines a type of a data transmission operation using less resources than an amount of resources used in another type of data transmission operation determined for a second priority higher than the first priority as taught by Zhu to use priority to steer modes to gain reliability and throughput on each hop. Regarding Claim 5, Kimura teaches, A control apparatus in a wireless communication system the control apparatus comprising a processor configured to execute operations comprising: 115]- The communication control unit 190, on the other hand, controls overall functions of the relay station 100 by using a processing apparatus such as a CPU (Central Processing Unit) and DSP (Digital Signal Processor). acquiring, from a relay station apparatus in the wireless communication system, quality information of relay between the relay station apparatus and at least one of a terminal apparatus and each base station apparatus for which the relay station apparatus performs relaying, [136]- Then, the relay station 100 selects the modulation and/or multiplexing method to be used for relay communication based on, for example, the type of each communication link between the mobile station 200 and the base station 10, quality of each link, or the type of data to be transmitted (step S304) wherein the wireless communication system further comprises the terminal apparatus and said each base station apparatus of a plurality of base station apparatuses; [52]- The relay stations 100 a and 100 b are radio communication apparatuses having a role to relay a radio signal (that is, a role to perform relay communication) between the base station 10 and one of the mobile stations. determining a type of a data transmission operation for each of a communication path between each base station apparatus and the relay station apparatus; and [135]- Accordingly, for example, it becomes possible to decide the modulation and/or multiplexing method to be used and assign communication resources in a unified manner by the base station or the like. [53]- In this case, the relay station 100 a positioned between the mobile station 200 a and the base station 10 relays a radio signal between these two nodes. notifying the relay station apparatus of the type of a determined data transmission operation. [119]- It is also assumed, for example, that link quality between the relay station 100 and the destination node R×A is better than that between the source node T×A or T×B and the relay station 100. transmits the common symbols to the destination node R×A by using the first modulation and/or multiplexing method or the second modulation and/or multiplexing method. Kimura does not teach and a communication path between the relay station apparatus and the terminal apparatus on the basis of the quality information and a priority of the terminal apparatus. Zhu teaches, and a communication path between the relay station apparatus and the terminal apparatus on the basis of the quality information and a priority of the terminal apparatus. [49]- MAMS is a programmable framework that provides mechanisms for the flexible selection of network paths in an MX communication environment 100, based on the application needs and/or requirements, as well as adapt to dynamic network conditions when multiple network connections serve a client device 101. The MAMS framework leverages network intelligence and policies to dynamically adapt traffic distribution across selected paths and UP treatments,. It would have been obvious to a person having an ordinary skill in the art before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to modify the system of Kimura , and a communication path between the relay station apparatus and the terminal apparatus on the basis of the quality information and a priority of the terminal apparatus as taught by Zhu to use priority to steer modes to gain reliability and throughput on each hop. Regarding Claim 6,Kimura teaches, A relay station apparatus comprising a processor configured to execute operations comprising: acquiring quality information of relay between the relay station apparatus and at least one of a terminal apparatus and each base station apparatus for which the relay station apparatus performs relaying, and the relay station apparatus for each system; [115]- The communication control unit 190, on the other hand, controls overall functions of the relay station 100 by using a processing apparatus such as a CPU (Central Processing Unit) and DSP (Digital Signal Processor). [52]- The relay stations 100 a and 100 b are radio communication apparatuses having a role to relay a radio signal (that is, a role to perform relay communication) between the base station 10 and one of the mobile stations. determining a type of a data transmission operation for each of a communication path between each base station apparatus and the relay station apparatus and a communication path between the relay station apparatus and the terminal apparatus on the basis of the [135]- Accordingly, for example, it becomes possible to decide the modulation and/or multiplexing method to be used and assign communication resources in a unified manner by the base station or the like. [53]- In this case, the relay station 100 a positioned between the mobile station 200 a and the base station 10 relays a radio signal between these two nodes. Kimura does not teach, communication path between the relay station apparatus and the terminal apparatus on the basis of the quality information and a priority of the terminal apparatus. Zhu teaches, communication path between the relay station apparatus and the terminal apparatus on the basis of the quality information and a priority of the terminal apparatus.[49]- MAMS is a programmable framework that provides mechanisms for the flexible selection of network paths in an MX communication environment 100, based on the application needs and/or requirements, as well as adapt to dynamic network conditions when multiple network connections serve a client device 101. The MAMS framework leverages network intelligence and policies to dynamically adapt traffic distribution across selected paths and UP treatments,. It would have been obvious to a person having an ordinary skill in the art before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to modify the system of Lee , communication path between the relay station apparatus and the terminal apparatus on the basis of the quality information and a priority of the terminal apparatus as taught by Zhou to use priority to steer modes to gain reliability and throughput on each hop. Regarding Claim 8, The control apparatus according to claim 5, wherein the type of the data transmission operation comprises at least one of redundant transmission, division transmission, or selective transmission. [108]- The GMA Tx entity 510 splits or duplicates traffic over multiple radio links 105 and retransmits packets over a different radio link 105 based on e2e measurements. [117]- In procedure 700, if the message is “On”, the convergence layer sends all traffic to the default link 105 (denoted as a “RAT1 link”); otherwise, the convergence layer will send all traffic to a fallback link (denoted as “RAT2 link”). Regarding Claim 9, Kimura teaches, Regarding Claim 3, Kimura teaches, The wireless communication system according to The wireless communication system according to wherein the control apparatus determines the type of the data transmission operation for each communication path by referring to a table describing a relationship between priority and the type of the data transmission operation. [121]- FIG. 11 is a table illustrating an example of a selection standard in the communication control unit 190 for selecting the modulation and/or multiplexing method used for relay communication. [123]- Whether or not data contained in a radio signal is data for a real-time application can be identified, in the case of LTE, for example, by referring to QCI (QoS Class Identifier) information acquired via the control channel. Regarding Claim 10,Kimura does not teach, The control apparatus according to claim 5, wherein, when the priority of the terminal apparatus represents a first priority, the control apparatus determines a type of a data transmission operation using less resources than an amount of resources used in another type of data transmission operation determined for a second priority higher than the first priority. Zhu teaches, The control apparatus according to claim 5, wherein, when the priority of the terminal apparatus represents a first priority, the control apparatus determines a type of a data transmission operation using less resources than an amount of resources used in another type of data transmission operation determined for a second priority higher than the first priority..[105]- The present disclosure provides dynamic traffic splitting for different optimization targets such as reducing e2e delay (e.g., “low delay”) or minimizing cellular (e.g., 5G/NR, LTE, etc.) usage (e.g., “low cost”). [779]- Example A19 includes the method of example A18 and/or some other example(s) herein, further comprising: disabling, by the convergence layer, the packet duplication process when the selected link transitions.[536]- QoS-aware traffic shaping and queueing (e.g., priority queuing (PQ), Strict Priority (SP), Weighted Round Robin (WRR), etc.). It would have been obvious to a person having an ordinary skill in the art before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to modify the system of Kimura The control apparatus according to claim 5, wherein, when the priority of the terminal apparatus represents a first priority, the control apparatus determines a type of a data transmission operation using less resources than an amount of resources used in another type of data transmission operation determined for a second priority higher than the first priority as taught by Zhu to use priority to steer modes to gain reliability and throughput on each hop. Conclusion Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to Anindita Sen whose telephone number is (571)-272-2390. The examiner can normally be reached 7:30am-5:30pm. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Joseph Avellino can be reached on (571)-272-3905. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /ANINDITA SEN/Examiner, Art Unit 2478 /JOSEPH E AVELLINO/Supervisory Patent Examiner, Art Unit 2478
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Jan 02, 2025
Application Filed
Oct 01, 2026
Non-Final Rejection mailed — §103 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12750880
SYSTEMS AND METHODS FOR PROVIDING SUB-BAND FULL-DUPLEX COVERAGE FOR LEGACY USER EQUIPMENT
3y 7m to grant Granted Sep 29, 2026
Patent 12713351
EARLY INDICATION OF NETWORK POWER SAVING MODE
4y 5m to grant Granted Aug 18, 2026
Patent 12706854
SYSTEM AND METHOD FOR A USER EQUIPMENT TO PROCESS OVERLAPPING PHYSICAL DOWNLINK SHARED CHANNELS
5y 11m to grant Granted Aug 11, 2026
Patent 12610325
ARRAY SELECTION METHOD, TERMINAL, NETWORK DEVICE, AND STORAGE MEDIUM
2y 12m to grant Granted Apr 21, 2026
Patent 12547166
METHOD AND SYSTEM FOR TELEOPERATIONS AND SUPPORT SERVICES
5y 5m to grant Granted Feb 10, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

Strategy Recommendation AI-generated — please review before filing

Get a prosecution strategy drawn from examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Typically takes 5-10 seconds — AI-generated, attorney review required before filing

Prosecution Projections

1-2
Expected OA Rounds
82%
Grant Probability
86%
With Interview (+3.4%)
3y 0m (~1y 3m remaining)
Median Time to Grant
Low
PTA Risk
Based on 85 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allowance rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month