Prosecution Insights
Last updated: July 17, 2026
Application No. 18/881,705

ABLATION CATHETERS WITH EXPANDABLE ELEMENTS AND BIPOLAR ELECTRODES TO TREAT VARICOSE VEINS

Non-Final OA §102§103
Filed
Jan 06, 2025
Priority
Jul 14, 2022 — CN 202210833124.2 +1 more
Examiner
VAHDAT, KHADIJEH A
Art Unit
Tech Center
Assignee
Boston Scientific Corporation
OA Round
1 (Non-Final)
79%
Grant Probability
Favorable
1-2
OA Rounds
1y 11m
Est. Remaining
99%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 79% — above average
79%
Career Allowance Rate
497 granted / 628 resolved
+19.1% vs TC avg
Strong +20% interview lift
Without
With
+20.5%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
3y 5m
Avg Prosecution
37 currently pending
Career history
654
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
0.6%
-39.4% vs TC avg
§103
69.6%
+29.6% vs TC avg
§102
11.8%
-28.2% vs TC avg
§112
8.4%
-31.6% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 628 resolved cases

Office Action

§102 §103
DETAILED ACTION This action is in response to preliminary amendments received on 01/06/2025. It is acknowledged that claims 11 and 13-14 have been amended and new claims 16-20 added. A complete action on the merits of claims 1-20 follows below. Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . In the event the determination of the status of the application as subject to AIA 35 U.S.C. 102 and 103 (or as subject to pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 102 and 103) is incorrect, any correction of the statutory basis for the rejection will not be considered a new ground of rejection if the prior art relied upon, and the rationale supporting the rejection, would be the same under either status. Claim Objections Claim 15 is objected to because of the following informalities: “configured to received” in line 1 should be amended to recite --configured to receive--. Appropriate correction is required. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 102 The following is a quotation of the appropriate paragraphs of 35 U.S.C. 102 that form the basis for the rejections under this section made in this Office action: A person shall be entitled to a patent unless – (a)(1) the claimed invention was patented, described in a printed publication, or in public use, on sale or otherwise available to the public before the effective filing date of the claimed invention. Claims 1-4 and 6-20 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 102(a)(1) as being anticipated by Lee (US Pub. No. 2014/0128859). Regarding Claim 1, Lee teaches a device for treating varicose vein ([0047] teaches “Embodiments of the present invention relate to a power generating and control apparatus, often for the treatment of targeted tissue in order to achieve a therapeutic effect. In some embodiments, the target tissue is tissue containing or proximate to nerves, including renal arteries and associated renal nerves. In other embodiments the target tissue is luminal tissue, which may further comprise diseased tissue such as that found in arterial disease” therefore, although Lee does not specifically teach the use of the device in treating varicose vein, it is shaped and configured to be used in such treatment), comprising: a catheter (Fig. 33) comprising: an elongated shaft (the shaft shown in Fig. 33) having a proximal end and a distal end, the shaft being sized and configured such that the distal end can be inserted into a target blood vessel (Fig. 33); and a heating element disposed near the distal end of the elongated shaft, the heating element comprising: an inflatable balloon (“expandable balloon 20” [0063]) having a proximal end and an opposite distal end and defining a longitudinal dimension therebetween (Fig. 33); and a plurality of electrode sets (“the expandable balloon 20 includes several longitudinally extending series of bipolar electrode pairs 34 positioned about the circumference of the balloon” [0063]) disposed circumferentially about the balloon (Fig. 33), wherein each electrode set comprises first and second elongated electrodes extending along a majority of the longitudinal dimension of the balloon (Fig. 33), wherein the electrodes of each electrode set are configured to form an anode-cathode pair for bipolar delivery of radiofrequency ablative energy to target tissue of the target blood vessels (“series of bipolar electrode pairs 34” [0063]). Regarding Claim 2, Lee teaches wherein the inflatable balloon has a length greater than three (3) centimeters (“the expandable device may have a working length of about 10 mm to about 100 mm” [0056]). Regarding Claim 3, Lee teaches wherein the inflatable balloon has a length smaller than ten (10) centimeters (“the expandable device may have a working length of about 10 mm to about 100 mm” [0056]). Regarding Claim 4, Lee teaches wherein the inflatable balloon has a diameter greater than five (5) millimeters when inflated (“a balloon with a 6, 7, or 8 mm diameter” [0056]). Regarding Claim 6, Lee teaches wherein the inflatable balloon has a diameter greater than a diameter of the target blood vessel when inflated ([0097] teaches “an expanded diameter of up to 10 mm” thereby it is configured to have a diameter greater than a diameter of the target blood vessel when inflated depending on the diameter of the blood vessel being treated such as “the systems and devices described herein may be used in renal arteries or other vessels having diameters of less than 4 mm and/or lengths of less than 20 mm” [0210]). Regarding Claim 7, Lee teaches wherein the inflatable balloon has a length and a diameter, wherein the length is at least two times of the diameter when inflated (Fig. 33). Regarding Claim 8, Lee teaches wherein at least one electrode in the plurality of electrode sets comprises a flexible circuit ([0097] and [0115]). Regarding Claim 9, Lee teaches wherein a distance between an anode-cathode pair is smaller than a distance between two adjacent electrode sets (“the expandable balloon 20 includes several longitudinally extending series of bipolar electrode pairs 34 positioned about the circumference of the balloon” [0063], as seen in Fig. 33 the spacing between each longitudinally extending electrode pairs 34 is more than the electrode pairs on each strep 34 itself). Regarding Claim 10, Lee teaches the distance between two adjacent electrode sets is at least two (2) times of the distance between the anode-cathode pair (“the expandable balloon 20 includes several longitudinally extending series of bipolar electrode pairs 34 positioned about the circumference of the balloon” [0063] and Fig. 33 shows the spacing between each longitudinally extending electrode pairs 34 being more than (at least two times) the spacing between the electrode pairs of each strep 34 itself). Regarding Claim 11, Lee teaches a system for treating varicose vein ([0047] teaches “Embodiments of the present invention relate to a power generating and control apparatus, often for the treatment of targeted tissue in order to achieve a therapeutic effect. In some embodiments, the target tissue is tissue containing or proximate to nerves, including renal arteries and associated renal nerves. In other embodiments the target tissue is luminal tissue, which may further comprise diseased tissue such as that found in arterial disease” therefore, although Lee does not specifically teach the use of the device in treating varicose vein, it is shaped and configured to be used in such treatment), comprising: a catheter (Fig. 33) comprising: an elongated shaft (the shaft shown in Fig. 33) having a proximal end and a distal end, the shaft being sized and configured such that the distal end can be inserted into a target blood vessel (Fig. 33); and a heating element disposed near the distal end of the elongated shaft, the heating element comprising: an inflatable balloon (“expandable balloon 20” [0063]) having a proximal end and an opposite distal end and defining a longitudinal dimension therebetween (Fig. 33); and a plurality of electrode sets (“the expandable balloon 20 includes several longitudinally extending series of bipolar electrode pairs 34 positioned about the circumference of the balloon” [0063]) disposed circumferentially about the balloon (Fig. 33), wherein each electrode set comprises first and second elongated electrodes extending along a majority of the longitudinal dimension of the balloon (each of the electrode streps 34 comprises a pair of electrodes, Fig. 33), wherein the electrodes of each electrode set are configured to form an anode-cathode pair for bipolar delivery of radiofrequency ablative energy to target tissue of the target blood vessels ([0063]); an energy generator 110 connected to the catheter and configured to generate an electric signal (“control unit 110 can include an RF generator” [0051], [0054], Figs. 1A, 6); and a controller operatively connected to the energy generator to control the generation of the electric signal (“the control unit 110 may include a processor or otherwise be coupled to a processor to control or record treatment” [0052], also see [0125] and [0194]). Regarding Claim 12, Lee teaches wherein the plurality of electrode sets are operatively coupled to the energy generator (Figs. 1A and 6 and [0051]-[0054] and [0194]). Regarding Claim 13, Lee teaches wherein the inflatable balloon 20 is configured to be inflated to a first diameter at a first operating mode and the inflatable balloon is configured to be inflated to a second diameter at a second operating mode, wherein the first diameter is different from the second diameter ([0123]-[0125] where the first mode is interpreted to be the initial insertion and inflation of the balloon where based on the feedback control the amount of inflation of the balloon changes to achieve the appropriate contact with the vessel wall and the second mode is interpreted to be the final positioning and inflation of the balloon where the sensors provide feedback that the balloon is in adequate contact with the vessel wall and/or [0127] teaches moving the balloon to a second location by deflating the balloon and re-inflating it, depending on the diameter of the new location, the balloon is configured to be inflated to a less or greater diameter than the first location). Regarding Claim 14, Lee teaches wherein the inflatable balloon 20 is configured to be inflated to a size diameter such that an expandable membrane of the inflatable balloon is pressed against a wall of the target blood vessel (Fig. 33 and [0086]). Regarding Claim 15, Lee teaches wherein the controller is configured to received a measured impedance between the plurality of electrode sets to determine if the inflatable balloon is contacting the wall of the target blood vessel ([0125] and [0146]). Regarding Claim 16, Lee teaches a catheter for treating varicose veins ([0047] teaches “Embodiments of the present invention relate to a power generating and control apparatus, often for the treatment of targeted tissue in order to achieve a therapeutic effect. In some embodiments, the target tissue is tissue containing or proximate to nerves, including renal arteries and associated renal nerves. In other embodiments the target tissue is luminal tissue, which may further comprise diseased tissue such as that found in arterial disease” therefore, although Lee does not specifically teach the use of the device in treating varicose vein, it is shaped and configured to be used in such treatment), the catheter comprising: an elongated shaft (the shaft shown in Fig. 33) having a proximal end and a distal end, the shaft being sized and configured such that the distal end can be inserted into a target blood vessel (Fig. 33); and an inflatable balloon (“expandable balloon 20” [0063]) disposed at the distal end of the shaft, the inflatable balloon having a proximal end and an opposite distal end and defining a longitudinal dimension therebetween (Fig. 33), wherein the longitudinal dimension is at least two times a diameter of the balloon when inflated (Fig. 33); and a plurality of electrode sets (“the expandable balloon 20 includes several longitudinally extending series of bipolar electrode pairs 34 positioned about the circumference of the balloon” [0063]) disposed circumferentially about the balloon (Fig. 33), wherein each electrode set comprises first and second elongated electrodes extending along a majority of the longitudinal dimension of the balloon (each of the electrode streps 34 comprises a pair of electrodes, Fig. 33), wherein the electrodes of each electrode set 34 are configured to form an anode-cathode pair for bipolar delivery of radiofrequency ablative energy to target tissue of the target blood vessels ([0063]). Regarding Claim 17, Lee teaches wherein at least one electrode in the plurality of electrode sets comprises a flexible circuit ([0097] and [0115]). Regarding Claim 18, Lee teaches wherein a distance between an anode-cathode pair is smaller than a distance between two adjacent electrode sets (“the expandable balloon 20 includes several longitudinally extending series of bipolar electrode pairs 34 positioned about the circumference of the balloon” [0063] and Fig. 33 shows the spacing between each longitudinally extending electrode pairs 34 being more than the spacing between the electrode pairs of each strep 34 itself). Regarding Claim 19, Lee teaches the distance between two adjacent electrode sets is at least two times of the distance between the anode-cathode pair (“the expandable balloon 20 includes several longitudinally extending series of bipolar electrode pairs 34 positioned about the circumference of the balloon” [0063] and Fig. 33 shows the spacing between each longitudinally extending electrode pairs 34 being more than (at least two times) the spacing between the electrode pairs of each strep 34 itself). Regarding Claim 20, Lee teaches wherein the inflatable balloon is configured to be inflated to a first diameter at a first operating mode and the inflatable balloon is configured to be inflated to a second diameter at a second operating mode, wherein the first diameter is different from the second diameter ([0123]-[0125] where the first mode is interpreted to be the initial insertion and inflation of the balloon where based on the feedback control the amount of inflation of the balloon changes to achieve the appropriate contact with the vessel wall and the second mode is interpreted to be the final positioning and inflation of the balloon where the sensors provide feedback that the balloon is in adequate contact with the vessel wall and/or [0127] teaches moving the balloon to a second location by deflating the balloon and re-inflating it, depending on the diameter of the new location, the balloon is configured to be inflated to a less or greater diameter than the first location). Claims 1, 6-10 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 102(a)(1) as being anticipated by Weber (US Pub. No. 2015/0105773). Regarding Claim 1, Weber teaches a device for treating varicose vein ([0020]), comprising: a catheter (Fig. 1) comprising: an elongated shaft 202/302/402 having a proximal end and a distal end, the shaft being sized and configured such that the distal end can be inserted into a target blood vessel (Fig. 1); and a heating element disposed near the distal end of the elongated shaft, the heating element comprising: an inflatable balloon 210/304/404 having a proximal end and an opposite distal end and defining a longitudinal dimension therebetween (Figs. 2-4); and a plurality of electrode sets (“one or more pairs of bipolar electrodes” [0005], 212a-212b Fig. 2, 312a-312f Fig. 3, 412a-412f/ 416a-416f [0042] and Fig. 4) disposed circumferentially about the balloon (Figs. 2-4), wherein each electrode set comprises first and second elongated electrodes extending along a majority of the longitudinal dimension of the balloon (Figs. 2-4), wherein the electrodes of each electrode set are configured to form an anode-cathode pair for bipolar delivery of radiofrequency ablative energy to target tissue of the target blood vessels (“one or more pairs of bipolar electrodes” [0005]-[0006], [0030] and [0042]). Regarding Claim 6, Weber teaches wherein the inflatable balloon has a diameter greater than a diameter of the target blood vessel when inflated (Fig. 2 and [0025], also based on the teachings of [0034] the compliant balloon of Fig. 3 is configured to have a diameter greater than a diameter of the target blood vessel when inflated). Regarding Claim 7, Weber teaches wherein the inflatable balloon has a length and a diameter, wherein the length is at least two times of the diameter when inflated (Figs. 2-4). Regarding Claim 8, Weber teaches wherein at least one electrode in the plurality of electrode sets comprises a flexible circuit (Figs. 2-4, [0029]-0033], [0040] and [0042]-0045]). Regarding Claim 9, Weber teaches wherein a distance between an anode-cathode pair is smaller than a distance between two adjacent electrode sets (bipolar electrode pairs 412c/412f vs. bipolar electrode pairs 416a/416d [0042] and Fig. 4). Regarding Claim 10, Weber teaches the distance between two adjacent electrode sets is at least two (2) times of the distance between the anode-cathode pair (bipolar electrode pairs 412c/412f vs. bipolar electrode pairs 416a/416d [0042] and Fig. 4). Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 103 The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 103 which forms the basis for all obviousness rejections set forth in this Office action: A patent for a claimed invention may not be obtained, notwithstanding that the claimed invention is not identically disclosed as set forth in section 102, if the differences between the claimed invention and the prior art are such that the claimed invention as a whole would have been obvious before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to a person having ordinary skill in the art to which the claimed invention pertains. Patentability shall not be negated by the manner in which the invention was made. The factual inquiries set forth in Graham v. John Deere Co., 383 U.S. 1, 148 USPQ 459 (1966), that are applied for establishing a background for determining obviousness under 35 U.S.C. 103 are summarized as follows: 1. Determining the scope and contents of the prior art. 2. Ascertaining the differences between the prior art and the claims at issue. 3. Resolving the level of ordinary skill in the pertinent art. 4. Considering objective evidence present in the application indicating obviousness or nonobviousness. Claim 5 is rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over Lee as applied above in view of Martin (US Pub. No. 2017/0172580). Regarding Claim 5, Lee teaches wherein the inflatable balloon has a diameter of “expanded diameter of up to 10 mm” [0097], but not greater than twelve (12) millimeters when inflated. In the field of treating varicose veins, Martin teaches “in certain embodiments, each of the inflated distal balloon diameter and the inflated proximal balloon diameter may be from at least about any of the following: 5, 6, 7, and 8 mm and/or at most about 20, 19, 18, 17, 16, 15, 14, 13, and 12 mm (e.g., about 6-18 mm, about 5-14 mm, etc.)” in [0034]. It would have been obvious to one having ordinary skill in the art prior to the effective filing date of the current invention to have the balloon diameter be flexible to reach and contact different sized vessels such as greater than twelve (12) millimeters when inflated in order to allow the use of the device in different treatment procedures such as treating varicose veins. In addition, a change in size is general recognized as being within the level of ordinary skill in the art. In re Rose, 105 USPQ 237 (CCPA 1955). Conclusion Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to KHADIJEH A VAHDAT whose telephone number is (571)270-7631. The examiner can normally be reached M-F 9-6 EST. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Joanne Rodden can be reached at (303) 297-4276. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /KHADIJEH A VAHDAT/Primary Examiner, Art Unit 3794
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Jan 06, 2025
Application Filed
Jul 01, 2026
Non-Final Rejection mailed — §102, §103 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12678307
TRANSLUMINAL DELIVERY DEVICES AND RELATED KITS AND METHODS
3y 2m to grant Granted Jul 14, 2026
Patent 12667413
PLASMA SURGERY DEVICE
3y 8m to grant Granted Jun 30, 2026
Patent 12667416
APPARATUS, SYSTEMS, AND METHODS FOR ACHIEVING INTRAVASCULAR, THERMALLY-INDUCED RENAL NEUROMODULATION RELATED APPLICATION
2y 10m to grant Granted Jun 30, 2026
Patent 12667412
ELECTRODE APPARATUS FOR NERVE DENERVATION OR MODULATION IN VIVO
2y 4m to grant Granted Jun 30, 2026
Patent 12661032
METHODS AND SYSTEMS FOR DETERMINING BODY LUMEN SIZE
3y 11m to grant Granted Jun 23, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

Strategy Recommendation AI-generated — please review before filing

Get a prosecution strategy drawn from examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Typically takes 5-10 seconds — AI-generated, attorney review required before filing

Prosecution Projections

1-2
Expected OA Rounds
79%
Grant Probability
99%
With Interview (+20.5%)
3y 5m (~1y 11m remaining)
Median Time to Grant
Low
PTA Risk
Based on 628 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allowance rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month