Prosecution Insights
Last updated: October 02, 2026
Application No. 18/882,157

CARD DISCARDING DEVICE FOR TABLETOP GAME

Non-Final OA §101
Filed
Sep 11, 2024
Priority
Oct 14, 2014 — JP 2014-223628 +2 more
Examiner
BALDORI, JOSEPH B
Art Unit
Tech Center
Assignee
Angel Group Co., Ltd.
OA Round
1 (Non-Final)
45%
Grant Probability
Moderate
1-2
OA Rounds
8m
Est. Remaining
75%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 45% of resolved cases
45%
Career Allowance Rate
488 granted / 1087 resolved
-15.1% vs TC avg
Strong +30% interview lift
Without
With
+30.1%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
2y 9m
Avg Prosecution
44 currently pending
Career history
1127
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
3.7%
-36.3% vs TC avg
§103
50.4%
+10.4% vs TC avg
§102
19.5%
-20.5% vs TC avg
§112
22.4%
-17.6% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 1087 resolved cases

Office Action

§101
DETAILED ACTION Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . Claim Objections Claim 5 is objected to because of the following informalities: Claim 5 line 1 recites “he count,” which appears should be “the count.” Appropriate correction is required. Double Patenting A rejection based on double patenting of the “same invention” type finds its support in the language of 35 U.S.C. 101 which states that “whoever invents or discovers any new and useful process... may obtain a patent therefor...” (Emphasis added). Thus, the term “same invention,” in this context, means an invention drawn to identical subject matter. See Miller v. Eagle Mfg. Co., 151 U.S. 186 (1894); In re Vogel, 422 F.2d 438, 164 USPQ 619 (CCPA 1970); In re Ockert, 245 F.2d 467, 114 USPQ 330 (CCPA 1957). A statutory type (35 U.S.C. 101) double patenting rejection can be overcome by canceling or amending the claims that are directed to the same invention so they are no longer coextensive in scope. The filing of a terminal disclaimer cannot overcome a double patenting rejection based upon 35 U.S.C. 101. Claims 1-20 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 101 as claiming the same invention as that of claims 1-5, 14-22, and 6-11 of prior U.S. Patent No. 12,115,438 B2. This is a statutory double patenting rejection. Claims 1-20 are identical to claims 1-5, 14-22, and 6-11 of the ‘438 patent. Conclusion Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to JOSEPH B BALDORI whose telephone number is (571)270-7424. The examiner can normally be reached Monday - Friday 9am to 5pm EST. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Eugene Kim can be reached at 571-272-4463. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /JOSEPH B BALDORI/Primary Examiner, Art Unit 3711
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Sep 11, 2024
Application Filed
Sep 01, 2026
Non-Final Rejection mailed — §101 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12734419
GOLF CLUB HEAD WITH HOSEL HOLE COVER
3y 11m to grant Granted Sep 15, 2026
Patent 12734460
KIT FOR CREATING MINIATURE REPLICA OF A FOOD OR BEVERAGE ITEM
1y 0m to grant Granted Sep 15, 2026
Patent 12722053
GOLF CLUB SHAFT
4y 0m to grant Granted Sep 01, 2026
Patent 12691385
TOY VEHICLE TRACK
1y 2m to grant Granted Jul 28, 2026
Patent 12667761
HYBRID BASEBALL BAT AND CONSTRUCTION METHODS
4y 0m to grant Granted Jun 30, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

Strategy Recommendation AI-generated — please review before filing

Get a prosecution strategy drawn from examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Typically takes 5-10 seconds — AI-generated, attorney review required before filing

Prosecution Projections

1-2
Expected OA Rounds
45%
Grant Probability
75%
With Interview (+30.1%)
2y 9m (~8m remaining)
Median Time to Grant
Low
PTA Risk
Based on 1087 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allowance rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month