Prosecution Insights
Last updated: October 26, 2026
Application No. 18/882,346

SEMICONDUCTOR DEVICE

Non-Final OA §102
Filed
Sep 11, 2024
Priority
Mar 15, 2022 — JP 2022-040283 +1 more
Examiner
YEUNG LOPEZ, FEIFEI
Art Unit
2899
Tech Center
2800 — Semiconductors & Electrical Systems
Assignee
Denso Corporation
OA Round
1 (Non-Final)
81%
Grant Probability
Favorable
1-2
OA Rounds
3m
Est. Remaining
79%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 81% — above average
81%
Career Allowance Rate
887 granted / 1092 resolved
+13.2% vs TC avg
Minimal -2% lift
Without
With
+-2.5%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
2y 5m
Avg Prosecution
37 currently pending
Career history
1137
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
0.4%
-39.6% vs TC avg
§103
54.8%
+14.8% vs TC avg
§102
24.3%
-15.7% vs TC avg
§112
17.4%
-22.6% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 1092 resolved cases

Office Action

§102
Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . Claim Objections Claims 1-5 is objected to because of the following informalities: Regarding claim 1, “a first wire” and “a second wire” should be plural wires since they are connected to plural terminals. Regarding claim 2, “the second extension portion is located at at a position” delete one at. Regarding claim 5, “a plurlaity” should be “a plurality”. Appropriate correction is required. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 102 The following is a quotation of the appropriate paragraphs of 35 U.S.C. 102 that form the basis for the rejections under this section made in this Office action: A person shall be entitled to a patent unless – (a)(1) the claimed invention was patented, described in a printed publication, or in public use, on sale, or otherwise available to the public before the effective filing date of the claimed invention. Claim(s) 1-5 is/are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 102(a)(1) as being anticipated by Shiraishi et al (PG Pub 2006/0113664 A1). Regarding claim 1, Shiraishi teaches (figs. 5 and 6) a semiconductor device comprising: a package having a first side, a second side, a third side and a fourth side in a plan view; a plurality of terminals (GND or near 7a3, respectively on bottom and top of fig. 5) arranged along each of the first side and the second side of the package opposing to each other; a first island (7a2) having four sides in a plan view, one of the four sides of the first island opposing the first side of the package; a second island (7a3), separated from the first island, having four sides in a plan view, one of the four sides of the second island opposing the second side of the package; at least one first semiconductor chip (5b, paragraph [0100]) mounted on the first island; at least one second semiconductor chip (5c) mounted on the second island; an insulating element (6) provided on one or both of the first semiconductor chip and the second semiconductor chip; a first wire (W) electrically connecting the first semiconductor chip to the plurality of terminals arranged on the first side of the package; a second wire (W) electrically connecting the second semiconductor chip to the plurality of terminals arranged on the second side of the package; and a third wire (W) electrically connecting the first semiconductor chip and the second semiconductor chip, wherein the first island has: a first extension portion (Lx on the left of fig. 5) extending to be exposed from one of the third side and the fourth side of the package; and a first terminal connector )Lx on the bottom of fig. 5) connected to a terminal, positioned farthest from the first extension portion, of the plurality of terminals arranged on the first side, the first island is supported (figs. 5 and 6) by the package through the first extension portion and the first terminal connector, the second island has: a second extension portion (on the right of fig. 5 near 7a3) extending to be exposed from the other of the third side and the fourth side; and a second terminal connector connected to a terminal (top of fig. 5, connected to 7a3), positioned farthest from the second extension portion, of the plurality of terminals arranged on the second side, and the second island is supported (figs. 5 and 6) by the package through the second extension portion and the second terminal connector. Regarding claim 2, Shiraishi teaches (see fig. 5 attached) the semiconductor device according to claim 1, wherein the first extension portion is located at a position farther from the plurality of terminals arranged on the first side than a center position of the one of the third side and the fourth side is, and the second extension portion is located at a position farther from the plurality of terminals arranged on the second side than a center position of the other of the third side and the fourth side is. Note that the claims do not require that “a package” to be the entirety of the “semiconductor device” claimed in the preamble. Thus, the package’s side is only what’s indicated below in fig. 5. PNG media_image1.png 793 819 media_image1.png Greyscale Regarding claim 3, Shiraishi teaches (see fig. 5 attached below) the semiconductor device according to claim 1, wherein the first extension portion is located at a position between the plurality of terminals arranged on the first side and a center position of the one of the third side and the fourth side, and the second extension portion is located at a position between the plurality of terminals arranged on the second side and a center position of the other of the third side and the fourth side. PNG media_image2.png 793 824 media_image2.png Greyscale Regarding claim 4, Shiraishi teaches the semiconductor device according to claim 1, wherein a creepage distance between a first exposed portion exposed to outside of the package and electrically connected to the first island and a second exposed portion exposed to outside of the package and electrically connected to the second island is equal to or greater than a predetermined specified distance (the distance between lead near Lx on the left and the lead on the right and connected to 7a2) for insulation. Regarding claim 5, Shiraishi teaches the semiconductor device according to claim 1, wherein the first extension portion is one of a plurality of first extension portions, and the second extension portion is one of a plurality of second extension portions (fig. 5). Conclusion Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to FEIFEI YEUNG LOPEZ whose telephone number is (571)270-1882. The examiner can normally be reached M-F: 8am to 4pm EST. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Dale Page can be reached at 571 270 7877. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /FEIFEI YEUNG LOPEZ/Primary Examiner, Art Unit 2899
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Sep 11, 2024
Application Filed
Sep 14, 2026
Non-Final Rejection mailed — §102
Oct 14, 2026
Applicant Interview (Telephonic)
Oct 14, 2026
Examiner Interview Summary

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12772632
REPAIRING COMPONENT INCLUDING MICRO-LED CHIP AND PRODUCTION METHOD THEREOF, REPAIRING METHOD, METHOD FOR PRODUCING LIGHT EMITTING DEVICE, AND LIGHT EMITTING DEVICE
4y 1m to grant Granted Oct 20, 2026
Patent 12772628
LED ARRAY FOR IN-PLANE OPTICAL INTERCONNECTS
3y 8m to grant Granted Oct 20, 2026
Patent 12772862
SELF-ALIGNED MULTIPLE PATTERNING MARK
3y 8m to grant Granted Oct 20, 2026
Patent 12772607
LIGHT EMITTING DEVICE AND DISPLAY APPARATUS INCLUDING THE SAME
3y 2m to grant Granted Oct 20, 2026
Patent 12765150
DISPLAY PANEL AND MANUFACTURING METHOD THEREOF, DISPLAY DEVICE AND SPLICING DISPLAY DEVICE
3y 8m to grant Granted Oct 13, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

Strategy Recommendation AI-generated — please review before filing

Get a prosecution strategy drawn from examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Typically takes 5-10 seconds — AI-generated, attorney review required before filing

Prosecution Projections

1-2
Expected OA Rounds
81%
Grant Probability
79%
With Interview (-2.5%)
2y 5m (~3m remaining)
Median Time to Grant
Low
PTA Risk
Based on 1092 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allowance rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month