Prosecution Insights
Last updated: October 02, 2026
Application No. 18/882,583

COILED RING CONTACTS FOR ELECTRICAL STIMULATION SYSTEMS AND METHODS OF MAKING AND USING SAME

Non-Final OA §102§103
Filed
Sep 11, 2024
Priority
Sep 13, 2023 — provisional 63/538,241
Examiner
HUH, VYNN V
Art Unit
3792
Tech Center
3700 — Mechanical Engineering & Manufacturing
Assignee
Boston Scientific Corporation
OA Round
1 (Non-Final)
62%
Grant Probability
Moderate
1-2
OA Rounds
1y 4m
Est. Remaining
99%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 62% of resolved cases
62%
Career Allowance Rate
181 granted / 291 resolved
-7.8% vs TC avg
Strong +44% interview lift
Without
With
+44.3%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
3y 5m
Avg Prosecution
31 currently pending
Career history
323
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
6.5%
-33.5% vs TC avg
§103
42.4%
+2.4% vs TC avg
§102
18.2%
-21.8% vs TC avg
§112
25.9%
-14.1% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 291 resolved cases

Office Action

§102 §103
DETAILED ACTION Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . Claim Status: Claims 1-20 are pending. Claims 5, 7-9, 11, 12, 18, and 19 have been withdrawn from consideration as being directed to non-elected species. Election/Restrictions Applicant’s election without traverse of Species C and Species Y in the reply filed on May 20, 2026 is acknowledged. Claims 5, 7, 8, 9, 11, 12, 18, and 19 have been withdrawn from further consideration pursuant to 37 CFR 1.142(b) as being drawn to a nonelected species, there being no allowable generic or linking claim. Claim 5 is directed to non-elected species A. Claim 7 is directed to non-elected species D, E, F. Claim 8 is directed to non-elected species D and F. Claim 9 is directed to non-elected species B. Claim 11 is directed to non-elected species X. Claim 12 is directed to non-elected species Z. Claim 18 is directed to non-elected species A. Claim 19 is directed to non-elected species B. Election was made without traverse in the reply filed on May 20, 2026. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 102 In the event the determination of the status of the application as subject to AIA 35 U.S.C. 102 and 103 (or as subject to pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 102 and 103) is incorrect, any correction of the statutory basis (i.e., changing from AIA to pre-AIA ) for the rejection will not be considered a new ground of rejection if the prior art relied upon, and the rationale supporting the rejection, would be the same under either status. The following is a quotation of the appropriate paragraphs of 35 U.S.C. 102 that form the basis for the rejections under this section made in this Office action: A person shall be entitled to a patent unless – (a)(1) the claimed invention was patented, described in a printed publication, or in public use, on sale, or otherwise available to the public before the effective filing date of the claimed invention. Claims 1-4, 10, and 13-17 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 102(a)(1) as being anticipated by Sage (US 2012/0232603A1). Re Claim 1, Sage discloses a connector assembly (para. [0046], fig. 4A, connector assembly 22), comprising: a connector body having an elongated shape with a first end, an opposing second end, and a longitudinal axis, the connector body defining a port at the first end configured to receive a proximal part of a lead or lead extension (para. [0050], fig. 4A, The connector assembly 22 carries a plurality of contacts that electrically couple with respective terminals at proximal ends of the therapy delivery element 14 or extension lead 16.); and a plurality of coiled ring contacts axially spaced-apart within the connector body and collectively forming a lumen that extends from the port along the longitudinal axis of the connector body (para. [0058], The connector assembly 22 includes a plurality of discrete contacts 23 located in the housing 28 that electrically couple contact rings 15 on the proximal end of the therapy delivery element 14.), each coiled ring contact (fig. 5A, para. [0060], individual contact, fig. 4A, para. [0058], a plurality of discrete contacts 23 located in the housing 28) comprising a contact housing comprising a first part and a second part attached to the first part (fig. 5A, 5B, 5C, para. [0061], a pair of annular sidewalls 468A, 468B), wherein at least the first part comprises a first radial sidewall and a first lateral sidewall extending laterally from the first radial sidewall, the first radial sidewall and the first lateral sidewall defining a pocket (fig. 5B, para. [0061], sidewall 468A has a radial sidewall and a lateral sidewall), and a coiled ring disposed within the contact housing, wherein the coiled ring contact is configured for disposal of the coiled ring within the pocket defined by the first part of the contact housing and prior to attachment of the second part to the first part (fig. 5A, 5B, para. [0060], outer coil 442 is retained in housing 444A, 444B (collectively “444”)), wherein the coiled ring is positioned within the contact housing so that insertion of the proximal part of the lead or lead extension through the coiled ring contact results in contact between the coiled ring and the lead or lead extension (fig. 5C, fig. 4A, para. [0058], The connector assembly 22 includes a plurality of discrete contacts 23 located in the housing 28 that electrically couple contact rings 15 on the proximal end of the therapy delivery element 14; para. [0015], individual coils of the outer coil are radially compressed against the housing in response to engagement with the contact rings on the implantable medical device.). Re Claim 2, Sage discloses that the coiled ring is disposed within the pocket defined by the first part of the contact housing without deformation of the coiled ring (fig. 5B shows that the coiled ring is disposed within the pocket without deformation; para. [0069], Gap 482 permits displacement (with or without elastic deformation) in directions 490, 492, and radial expansion 484 of the outer coil 442, within the limits of the recess 456.). Re Claim 3, Sage discloses that the coiled ring is disposed within the pocket defined by the first part of the contact housing without asymmetric deformation of the coiled ring (fig. 5B, 5C, para. [0069], Gap 482 permits displacement (with or without elastic deformation) in directions 490, 492, and radial expansion 484 of the outer coil 442, within the limits of the recess 456.). Re Claim 4, Sage discloses that the second part comprises a second radial sidewall and a second lateral sidewall extending laterally from the second radial sidewall (fig. 5B, para. [0061], sidewall 468B has a radial sidewall and a lateral sidewall). Re Claim 10, Sage discloses that the first and second parts define a groove within which at least a portion of the coiled ring is disposed (fig. 5B shows coiled ring 485 is disposed), wherein the groove has at least a portion with a circular, semicircular, elliptical, or oval shape (fig. 5C shows that the groove is circular shape). Re Claim 13, Sage discloses the connector assembly as set forth in claim 1. Sage further discloses a lead assembly, comprising: a lead or a lead extension having a proximal portion and a distal portion, wherein the proximal portion of the lead or the lead extension comprises a plurality of terminals electrically insulated from one another (para. [0050], fig. 4A, The connector assembly 22 carries a plurality of contacts that electrically couple with respective terminals at proximal ends of the therapy delivery element 14 or extension lead 16; para. [0057], [0005], The proximal ends of the leads generally includes a series of conductive rings separated by insulating spacers so that when it is fully inserted into the connector assembly, each contact ring is placed in contact with a discrete contact.). Re Claim 14, Sage discloses the lead assembly as set forth in claim 13. Sage further discloses an electrical stimulating system comprising: a control module coupled to the lead assembly, the control module comprising a housing, and an electronic subassembly disposed in the housing, wherein connector assembly is part of the control module (fig. 4A, 4B, para. [0047], the implantable pulse generator 12 includes electronic subassembly 24 (shown schematically), which includes control and pulse generation circuitry (not shown) for delivering electrical stimulation energy to the electrodes 18 of the therapy delivery element 14 in a controlled manner, and a power supply, such as battery 26; para. [0046], Proximal end 42 of the extension lead 16 is electrically coupled to the implantable pulse generator 12 via connector assembly 22 associated with housing 28). Re Claim 15, Sage discloses the lead assembly as set forth in claim 13. Sage further discloses an electrical stimulating system comprising: a lead extension (fig. 4B, extension lead 16) coupleable to the control module (fig. 4A, implantable pulse generator 12) and the lead (fig. 4B, therapy delivery element 14), wherein the connector assembly (fig. 4A, connector assembly 22) is part of the lead extension (fig. 4A, 4B, para. [0047], the implantable pulse generator 12 includes electronic subassembly 24 (shown schematically), which includes control and pulse generation circuitry (not shown) for delivering electrical stimulation energy to the electrodes 18 of the therapy delivery element 14 in a controlled manner, and a power supply, such as battery 26; para. [0046], Proximal end 42 of the extension lead 16 is electrically coupled to the implantable pulse generator 12 via connector assembly 22 associated with housing 28). Re Claim 16, Sage discloses a coiled ring contact (fig. 5A, para. [0060], individual contact, fig. 4A, para. [0058], a plurality of discrete contacts 23 located in the housing 28), comprising: a contact housing comprising a first part and a second part attached to the first part (fig. 5A, 5B, 5C, para. [0061], a pair of annular sidewalls 468A, 468B), wherein at least the first part comprises a first radial sidewall and a first lateral sidewall extending laterally from the first radial sidewall, the first radial sidewall and the first lateral sidewall defining a pocket (fig. 5B, para. [0061], sidewall 468A has a radial sidewall and a lateral sidewall); and a coiled ring disposed within the contact housing, wherein the coiled ring contact is configured for disposal of the coiled ring within the pocket defined by the first part of the contact housing and prior to attachment of the second part to the first part (fig. 5A, 5B, para. [0060], outer coil 442 is retained in housing 444A, 444B (collectively “444”)), wherein the coiled ring is positioned within the contact housing so that insertion of a proximal part of a lead or lead extension through the coiled ring contact results in contact between the coiled ring and the lead or lead extension (fig. 5C, fig. 4A, para. [0058], The connector assembly 22 includes a plurality of discrete contacts 23 located in the housing 28 that electrically couple contact rings 15 on the proximal end of the therapy delivery element 14; para. [0015], individual coils of the outer coil are radially compressed against the housing in response to engagement with the contact rings on the implantable medical device.). Re Claim 17, Sage discloses the claimed invention substantially as set forth in claim 16. Sage discloses a method of making the coiled ring contact, the method comprising: disposing the coiled ring into the pocket defined by the first radial sidewall and the first lateral sidewall of the first part (fig. 5B, para. [0061], sidewall 468A has a radial sidewall and a lateral sidewall; fig. 5A, 5B, para. [0060], outer coil 442 is retained in housing 444A, 444B (collectively “444”)); and attaching the second part to the first part with the coiled ring disposed therebetween (fig. 5A, 5B, para. [0060], outer coil 442 is retained in housing 444A, 444B (collectively “444”)). Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 103 In the event the determination of the status of the application as subject to AIA 35 U.S.C. 102 and 103 (or as subject to pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 102 and 103) is incorrect, any correction of the statutory basis (i.e., changing from AIA to pre-AIA ) for the rejection will not be considered a new ground of rejection if the prior art relied upon, and the rationale supporting the rejection, would be the same under either status. The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 103 which forms the basis for all obviousness rejections set forth in this Office action: A patent for a claimed invention may not be obtained, notwithstanding that the claimed invention is not identically disclosed as set forth in section 102, if the differences between the claimed invention and the prior art are such that the claimed invention as a whole would have been obvious before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to a person having ordinary skill in the art to which the claimed invention pertains. Patentability shall not be negated by the manner in which the invention was made. Claims 6 and 20 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over Sage (US 2012/0232603A1) in view of Ramsey (US 2004/0143297A1). Re Claim 6, Sage discloses the claimed invention substantially as set forth in claims 1 and 4. Sage is silent regarding wherein the first lateral sidewall is disposed radially inward from the second lateral sidewall. However, Ramsey discloses a container (figs. 2A, 2B, para. [0142], container 112) comprising a first part (para. [0142], end cap 121) and a second part (para. [0142], end cap 114) attached to the first part (fig. 2B), wherein at least the first part comprises a first radial sidewall and a first lateral sidewall extending laterally from the first radial sidewall, the first radial sidewall and the first lateral sidewall defining a pocket (fig. 2A, 2B, para. [0142], end cap 121), wherein the second part comprises a second radial sidewall and a second lateral sidewall extending laterally from the second radial sidewall (fig. 2A, 2B, para. [0142], end cap 114), wherein the first lateral sidewall is disposed radially inward from the second lateral sidewall (fig. 2B, end caps 114 and 121 attached). Therefore, it would have been obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art, at the time of filing, to modify Sage, by configuring the first lateral sidewall to be disposed radially inward from the second lateral sidewall, as taught by Ramsey, for the purpose of closing the container using end caps (para. [0142]) and because such a modification is the result of simple substitution of one known element for another producing a predictable result. Re Claim 20, Sage discloses the claimed invention substantially as set forth in claims 16 and 17. Sage discloses that the second part comprises a second radial sidewall and a second lateral sidewall extending laterally from the second radial sidewall (fig. 5B, para. [0061], sidewall 468B has a radial sidewall and a lateral sidewall). Sage is silent regarding wherein the first lateral sidewall is disposed radially inward from the second lateral sidewall. However, Ramsey discloses a container (figs. 2A, 2B, para. [0142], container 112) comprising a first part (para. [0142], end cap 121) and a second part (para. [0142], end cap 114) attached to the first part (fig. 2B), wherein at least the first part comprises a first radial sidewall and a first lateral sidewall extending laterally from the first radial sidewall, the first radial sidewall and the first lateral sidewall defining a pocket (fig. 2A, 2B, para. [0142], end cap 121), wherein the second part comprises a second radial sidewall and a second lateral sidewall extending laterally from the second radial sidewall (fig. 2A, 2B, para. [0142], end cap 114), wherein the first lateral sidewall is disposed radially inward from the second lateral sidewall (fig. 2B, end caps 114 and 121 attached). Therefore, it would have been obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art, at the time of filing, to modify Sage, by configuring the first lateral sidewall to be disposed radially inward from the second lateral sidewall, as taught by Ramsey, for the purpose of closing the container using end caps (para. [0142]) and because such a modification is the result of simple substitution of one known element for another producing a predictable result. Conclusion The prior art made of record and not relied upon is considered pertinent to applicant's disclosure. Dawson et al. (US 20190063537 A1) discloses a groove that has at least a portion with a circular, semicircular, elliptical, or oval shape (fig. 22) where coils 102 are disposed within the groove. Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to VYNN V HUH whose telephone number is (571)272-4684. The examiner can normally be reached Monday to Friday from 9 am to 5 pm. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Benjamin Klein can be reached at (571) 270-5213. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /Benjamin J Klein/Supervisory Patent Examiner, Art Unit 3792 /V.V.H./ Vynn Huh, September 12, 2026Examiner, Art Unit 3792
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Sep 11, 2024
Application Filed
Sep 24, 2026
Non-Final Rejection mailed — §102, §103 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12728263
Delivering Tumor Treating Fields (TTFields) to the Neck, Thoracic Spine, and Optic Tract
1y 10m to grant Granted Sep 08, 2026
Patent 12727775
PORTABLE DEVICE FOR QUANTITATIVE MEASUREMENT OF TISSUE AUTOREGULATION AND NEUROVASCULAR COUPLING USING EEG, METABOLISM, AND BLOOD FLOW DIAGNOSTICS
1y 8m to grant Granted Sep 08, 2026
Patent 12714846
BLOOD PUMP SYSTEM
2y 1m to grant Granted Aug 25, 2026
Patent 12691300
LASER SYSTEM AND METHODS FOR CUTANEOUS TREATMENTS AND SURGERY
3y 8m to grant Granted Jul 28, 2026
Patent 12636516
DEVICE FOR STIMULATING THE MEIBOMIAN GLANDS
6y 7m to grant Granted May 26, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

Strategy Recommendation AI-generated — please review before filing

Get a prosecution strategy drawn from examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Typically takes 5-10 seconds — AI-generated, attorney review required before filing

Prosecution Projections

1-2
Expected OA Rounds
62%
Grant Probability
99%
With Interview (+44.3%)
3y 5m (~1y 4m remaining)
Median Time to Grant
Low
PTA Risk
Based on 291 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allowance rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month