Prosecution Insights
Last updated: August 16, 2026
Application No. 18/882,777

TARGET TRACKING APPARATUS AND TARGET TRACKING METHOD

Non-Final OA §102§112
Filed
Sep 12, 2024
Priority
Sep 15, 2023 — JP 2023-149852
Examiner
FRAZIER, BRADY W
Art Unit
Tech Center
Assignee
Furuno Electric Co., Ltd.
OA Round
1 (Non-Final)
78%
Grant Probability
Favorable
1-2
OA Rounds
7m
Est. Remaining
99%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 78% — above average
78%
Career Allowance Rate
424 granted / 541 resolved
+18.4% vs TC avg
Strong +27% interview lift
Without
With
+27.3%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
2y 6m
Avg Prosecution
23 currently pending
Career history
558
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
1.4%
-38.6% vs TC avg
§103
38.5%
-1.5% vs TC avg
§102
23.7%
-16.3% vs TC avg
§112
34.1%
-5.9% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 541 resolved cases

Office Action

§102 §112
DETAILED ACTION Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . Claim Objections Claim 20 is objected to because of the following informalities: The recitation “causing a computer to execute image process” lacks proper grammar and/or punctuation. Appropriate correction is required. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 112 The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 112(b): (b) CONCLUSION.—The specification shall conclude with one or more claims particularly pointing out and distinctly claiming the subject matter which the inventor or a joint inventor regards as the invention. Claims 1-20 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 112(b) as being indefinite for failing to particularly point out and distinctly claim the subject matter which the inventor or a joint inventor regards as the invention. Claim 1 recites “processing circuitry configured to: periodically acquire echo data…and track the target” which is indefinite, because it is unclear how the processing circuitry alone can acquire echo data and track a target. Both activities would necessarily require equipment independent of and discrete from such processing circuitry, such as an antenna for receiving radar pulses. However, currently the claim encompasses circuitry that can “acquire echo data” and “track the target” without the use of any external equipment, which is outside the scope of the claimed invention. Claims 19-20 are likewise rejected, and dependent claims 2-18 fail to cure the deficiency. Claim 1 recites “the detection area” which is indefinite for lack of proper antecedent basis. Claims 19-20 are likewise rejected, and dependent claims 2-18 fail to cure the deficiency. Claim 1 recites “the level of the reflected wave at which the electromagnetic wave transmitted through an antenna is reflected at the position” which is indefinite for three reasons. First, the meaning of “the level of the reflected wave” is unclear. What level is being referred to? Second, there is a lack of antecedent basis for “the reflected wave.” Third, there is a lack of antecedent basis for “the electromagnetic wave.” Claims 19-20 are likewise rejected, and dependent claims 2-18 fail to cure the deficiency. Claim 1 recites “calculate each fluctuation value of the potential target based on the acquired echo data of the potential target at each timing acquired the echo data” which is indefinite for three reasons. First, it is unclear what a fluctuation value is or how it is related to the acquired echo data, such that the fluctuation value is based on the echo data. Second, there is a mismatch between the claimed “the potential target” and the previously recited “one or a plurality of potential targets.” Second, “at each timing acquired the echo data” is unclear. Claims 19-20 are likewise rejected, and dependent claims 2-18 fail to cure the deficiency. Claim 3 recites “the processing circuitry is configured to calculate the fluctuation value based on the area of the region formed by the end points when the velocity vectors share a common base point” which is indefinite, because it is unclear whether or not the “end points” are an element of the target tracking apparatus, or whether they are instead part of some calculation of which the target tracking apparatus is capable. Claim 6 recites “determine a fluctuation threshold based on the size of the potential target” which is indefinite, because it is unclear if the processing circuitry has prior knowledge of the size of the potential target, or whether the processing circuitry is also determining the size of the target. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 102 In the event the determination of the status of the application as subject to AIA 35 U.S.C. 102 and 103 (or as subject to pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 102 and 103) is incorrect, any correction of the statutory basis for the rejection will not be considered a new ground of rejection if the prior art relied upon, and the rationale supporting the rejection, would be the same under either status. The following is a quotation of the appropriate paragraphs of 35 U.S.C. 102 that form the basis for the rejections under this section made in this Office action: A person shall be entitled to a patent unless – (a)(1) the claimed invention was patented, described in a printed publication, or in public use, on sale or otherwise available to the public before the effective filing date of the claimed invention. (a)(2) the claimed invention was described in a patent issued under section 151, or in an application for patent published or deemed published under section 122(b), in which the patent or application, as the case may be, names another inventor and was effectively filed before the effective filing date of the claimed invention. Claims 1-2, 4-5, and 18-20 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 102(a)(1) as being anticipated by Lin et al. (CN 114063055 A), hereinafter Lin. Regarding claim 1, Lin discloses a target tracking apparatus for tracking a target on the water (abstract, regarding a moving target detection method and implementation system in a strong clutter environment on the sea surface), comprising: processing circuitry configured to: periodically acquire echo data indicating a correspondence relationship between a position in the detection area and the level of the reflected wave at which the electromagnetic wave transmitted through an antenna is reflected at the position (p. 3 of translation, referred to hereinafter, regarding compare the radar echo data to be measured with a sample library, and perform clutter and clutter detection; through the multi-frame scanning of the radar, the radar data to be tested is compared with the sample library to initially separate the target or update the sample library); extract one or a plurality of potential targets to be tracked based on the level of the echo data (p. 4, regarding detect the target based on the preliminary separation of the clutter and the target); calculate each fluctuation value of the potential target based on the acquired echo data of the potential target at each timing acquired the echo data (p. 7, regarding statistical analysis is performed based on the clutter background and the characteristics of various targets, and relevant thresholds and parameters are adaptively adjusted to detect and track various targets, thereby improving the detection and tracking capabilities of various targets); determine a target to be tracked based on the fluctuation value (p. 8, regarding a parallel detection method for moving targets and stationary targets is formed, which are respectively input to the multi-hypothesis tracking module for further tracking processing; the tracking processing module can further reduce the false alarm rate and the false alarm rate of the track); and track the target (p. 9, regarding as seen by tracking water surface floats, the system can track targets with little reflection and slow motion). Regarding claim 2, Li discloses the invention in claim 1, and further discloses wherein: the processing circuitry is configured to calculate the fluctuation value based on the change in the velocity vector of the potential target calculated based on the position of the potential target acquired at each successive timing (p. 8, regarding the distribution of the sliding window meeting the threshold in the large candidate area can be further counted; if there is only one sliding window in the large candidate area, the velocity vector of this point can be counted for the next frame to appropriately change the large candidate; the shape of the area to greatly reduce the amount of sliding window calculation). Regarding claim 4, Li discloses the invention in claim 1, and further discloses wherein: the processing circuitry is configured to select the potential target as a target to be tracked, whose fluctuation value is less than a fluctuation threshold (see again p. 8). Regarding claim 5, Li discloses the invention in claim 1, and further discloses wherein: the processing circuitry is configured to select the potential target having the smallest fluctuation value as a target to be tracked (see again p. 8). Regarding claim 18, Li discloses the invention in claim 1, and further discloses the invention further comprising: a memory including a computer code configured to, when executed by the processing circuitry, cause the apparatus to: periodically acquire echo data indicating a correspondence relationship between a position in the detection area and the level of the reflected wave at which the electromagnetic wave transmitted through an antenna is reflected at the position; extract one or a plurality of potential targets to be tracked based on the level of the echo data; calculate each fluctuation value of the potential target based on the acquired echo data of the potential target at each timing acquired the echo data; determined a target to be tracked based on the fluctuation value; and track the target (see rejection of claim 1 detailed hereinabove). Regarding claim 19, Lin discloses a target tracking method for tracking target on the water, comprising: periodically acquiring echo data indicating a correspondence relationship between a position in the detection area and the level of the reflected wave at which the electromagnetic wave transmitted through an antenna is reflected at the position (see again p. 3); extracting one or a plurality of potential targets to be tracked based on the level of the echo data (see again p. 4); calculating each fluctuation value of the potential target, based on the change in the velocity vector of the potential target calculated based on the position of the potential target acquired at each successive timing (see again p. 7); determining a target to be tracked based on the fluctuation value (see again p. 8); and tracking the target (see again p. 9). Regarding claim 20, Lin discloses a non-transitory computer readable medium storing a program causing a computer to execute image process, the image process comprising: periodically acquiring echo data indicating a correspondence relationship between a position in the detection area and the level of the reflected wave at which the electromagnetic wave transmitted through an antenna is reflected at the position (see again p. 3); extracting one or a plurality of potential targets to be tracked based on the level of the echo data (see again p. 4); calculating each fluctuation value of the potential target based on the acquired echo data of the potential target acquired at each timing (see again p. 7); determining a target to be tracked based on the fluctuation value (see again p. 8); and tracking the target (see again p. 9). Allowable Subject Matter Claims 3 and 6-17 would be allowable if rewritten to overcome the rejection(s) under 35 U.S.C. 112(b) set forth in this Office action and to include all of the limitations of the base claim and any intervening claims. Specifically, the prior art does not appear to teach the combined limitations of said dependent claims. Conclusion The cited references made of record in the contemporaneously filed PTO-892 form and not relied upon in the instant office action are considered pertinent to applicant's disclosure, and may have one or more of the elements in Applicant’s disclosure and at least claim 1. Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to BRADY W FRAZIER whose telephone number is (469)295-9263. The examiner can normally be reached Monday-Friday 9:00am-5:00pm CT. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Vladimir Magloire can be reached at 571-270-5144. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /BRADY W FRAZIER/Primary Examiner, Art Unit 3648
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Sep 12, 2024
Application Filed
Jul 22, 2026
Non-Final Rejection mailed — §102, §112 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12699161
ELECTRONIC DEVICE
2y 7m to grant Granted Aug 04, 2026
Patent 12699188
SYSTEM AND METHOD FOR BOUNDING A SATELLITE POSITIONING SOLUTION INTEGRITY
2y 7m to grant Granted Aug 04, 2026
Patent 12693370
POSITION ESTIMATION SYSTEM AND POSITION ESTIMATION METHOD
2y 6m to grant Granted Jul 28, 2026
Patent 12689122
ANTENNA DEVICE WITH ELECTRONICALLY CONTROLLED THREE-STAGE PHASE SHIFTER AND THREE-STAGE PHASE SHIFTER
2y 2m to grant Granted Jul 21, 2026
Patent 12672238
PACKAGING ARCHITECTURE FOR A HIGH FREQUENCY ACTIVE ELECTRONICALLY SCANNED ARRAY
2y 5m to grant Granted Jun 30, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

Strategy Recommendation AI-generated — please review before filing

Get a prosecution strategy drawn from examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Typically takes 5-10 seconds — AI-generated, attorney review required before filing

Prosecution Projections

1-2
Expected OA Rounds
78%
Grant Probability
99%
With Interview (+27.3%)
2y 6m (~7m remaining)
Median Time to Grant
Low
PTA Risk
Based on 541 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allowance rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month