Prosecution Insights
Last updated: October 04, 2026
Application No. 18/883,021

INSTRUMENT STAND FOR MUSICAL INSTRUMENTS

Non-Final OA §102§103§112
Filed
Sep 12, 2024
Priority
Sep 12, 2023 — DE 202023105265.7
Examiner
DONELS, JEFFREY
Art Unit
Tech Center
Assignee
Adam Hall GmbH
OA Round
1 (Non-Final)
86%
Grant Probability
Favorable
1-2
OA Rounds
4m
Est. Remaining
97%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 86% — above average
86%
Career Allowance Rate
1124 granted / 1311 resolved
+25.7% vs TC avg
Moderate +11% lift
Without
With
+11.2%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
2y 5m
Avg Prosecution
21 currently pending
Career history
1323
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
6.4%
-33.6% vs TC avg
§103
23.8%
-16.2% vs TC avg
§102
35.4%
-4.6% vs TC avg
§112
30.1%
-9.9% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 1311 resolved cases

Office Action

§102 §103 §112
Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 112 Claims 1-11 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 112(b) or 35 U.S.C. 112 (pre-AIA ), second paragraph, as being indefinite for failing to particularly point out and distinctly claim the subject matter which the inventor or a joint inventor (or for applications subject to pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 112, the applicant), regards as the invention. Claims 1,4,7-9,11 fail to point out and distinctly claim Applicant’s invention, as the metes and bounds of the phrase “in particular” is unclear. Correction is required. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 102 The following is a quotation of the appropriate paragraphs of 35 U.S.C. 102 that form the basis for the rejections under this section made in this Office action: A person shall be entitled to a patent unless – (a)(1) the claimed invention was patented, described in a printed publication, or in public use, on sale, or otherwise available to the public before the effective filing date of the claimed invention. (a)(2) the claimed invention was described in a patent issued under section 151, or in an application for patent published or deemed published under section 122(b), in which the patent or application, as the case may be, names another inventor and was effectively filed before the effective filing date of the claimed invention. Claim(s) 1,7-9 is/are rejected (to the extent understood) under 35 U.S.C. 102(a)(1) as being fully met by Adamski (DE 102014013656 A1). Regarding Claim 1, Adamski discloses an instrument stand comprising: a ring-shaped base element 4 (Fig. 6), which is formed to be placed on a ground, and an arm element 1, which extends away from the base element 6 and is formed to support and/or hold a guitar, above the base element 6, wherein the base element 6 comprises an illumination unit, which is formed to emit light in a direction of a musical instrument accommodated by the instrument stand to illuminate a musical instrument (para. 0003). Regarding Claim 7, Adamski discloses the base element comprises at least one receptacle (Fig. 10, three guitar holders not numbered), at which a corpus of a musical instrument can be placed or supported. Regarding Claim 8, Adamski discloses the arm element 1 comprises a support element (Fig. 10, three guitar holders not numbered), at which, to support a guitar. Regarding Claim 9, Adamski discloses the arm element 1 comprises a holder (Fig. 10, three guitar holders not numbered), at which a head of a guitar can be accommodated. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 103 The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 103 which forms the basis for all obviousness rejections set forth in this Office action: A patent for a claimed invention may not be obtained, notwithstanding that the claimed invention is not identically disclosed as set forth in section 102, if the differences between the claimed invention and the prior art are such that the claimed invention as a whole would have been obvious before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to a person having ordinary skill in the art to which the claimed invention pertains. Patentability shall not be negated by the manner in which the invention was made. Claim(s) 5,6,11 is/are rejected (to the extent understood) under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over Adamski in view of Rogers (USPGP 20240085014). Regarding Claim 5, Adamski (applied here in a similar manner as claim 1 above) discloses all features claimed, but does not explicitly teach an additional illumination element is arranged at the arm element and extends along the arm element. Rogers discloses an illuminated guitar stand comprising an additional illumination element 130 is arranged at an arm element 110 and extends 144 along the arm element 110. It would have been obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art, prior to the effective filing date, to adapt the teachings of Adamski with those of Rogers, as both are directed towards illuminated guitar stands, and so as to provide additional illumination elements for the guitar as known in the art to be desirable. Regarding Claims 6,11 Roger discloses a brightness and/or a color of the additional illumination element 130 is adjustable, wherein the brightness and/or the color is changeable by touching respectively a button (para. 0053). Allowable Subject Matter Claims 2-4, 10 would be allowable if rewritten to overcome the rejection(s) under 35 U.S.C. 112(b) or 35 U.S.C. 112 (pre-AIA ), 2nd paragraph, set forth in this Office action and to include all of the limitations of the base claim and any intervening claims. Conclusion The prior art made of record and not relied upon is considered pertinent to applicant's disclosure. The references cited show related teachings in the art. Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to JEFFREY DONELS whose telephone number is (571)272-2061. The examiner can normally be reached M-F. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Dedei Hammond can be reached at (571) 270-7938. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. JEFFREY . DONELS Examiner Art Unit 2837 /JEFFREY DONELS/Primary Examiner, Art Unit 2837
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Sep 12, 2024
Application Filed
Sep 18, 2026
Non-Final Rejection mailed — §102, §103, §112 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12741846
SMART ACCESS CONTROL SYSTEM AND DEVICE FOR ELEVATORS
4y 9m to grant Granted Sep 22, 2026
Patent 12731567
WATER HARP WITH OPTICAL SENSING OF THE BREAK OF FLOWING WATER STREAMS
3y 5m to grant Granted Sep 08, 2026
Patent 12725593
EFFECT ADDING APPARATUS, METHOD, AND ELECTRONIC MUSICAL INSTRUMENT
4y 11m to grant Granted Sep 01, 2026
Patent 12725594
ELECTRONIC MUSIC KEYBOARD
3y 3m to grant Granted Sep 01, 2026
Patent 12725590
METHOD FOR LAYERING AND MIXING MONAURAL BEATS TO HELP SLEEP
3y 3m to grant Granted Sep 01, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

Strategy Recommendation AI-generated — please review before filing

Get a prosecution strategy drawn from examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Typically takes 5-10 seconds — AI-generated, attorney review required before filing

Prosecution Projections

1-2
Expected OA Rounds
86%
Grant Probability
97%
With Interview (+11.2%)
2y 5m (~4m remaining)
Median Time to Grant
Low
PTA Risk
Based on 1311 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allowance rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month