Prosecution Insights
Last updated: April 19, 2026
Application No. 18/883,201

ROW DECODER CIRCUIT AND CORRESPONDING METHOD OF OPERATION

Non-Final OA §103
Filed
Sep 12, 2024
Examiner
TECHANE, MUNA A
Art Unit
2827
Tech Center
2800 — Semiconductors & Electrical Systems
Assignee
STMicroelectronics
OA Round
1 (Non-Final)
93%
Grant Probability
Favorable
1-2
OA Rounds
1y 10m
To Grant
99%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 93% — above average
93%
Career Allow Rate
508 granted / 545 resolved
+25.2% vs TC avg
Moderate +7% lift
Without
With
+6.9%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Fast prosecutor
1y 10m
Avg Prosecution
16 currently pending
Career history
561
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
2.5%
-37.5% vs TC avg
§103
28.2%
-11.8% vs TC avg
§102
35.7%
-4.3% vs TC avg
§112
25.1%
-14.9% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 545 resolved cases

Office Action

§103
DETAILED ACTION Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . Drawings The drawings received on 09/12/2024 have been accepted by the examiner. Priority Receipt is acknowledged of papers submitted under 35 U.S.C. 119(a)-(d), which papers have been placed of record in the file. Information Disclosure Statement Acknowledgment is made of applicant's Information Disclosure Statement (IDS) Form PTO-1449, filed 09/12/2024. The information disclosed therein was considered. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 103 The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 103 which forms the basis for all obviousness rejections set forth in this Office action: A patent for a claimed invention may not be obtained, notwithstanding that the claimed invention is not identically disclosed as set forth in section 102, if the differences between the claimed invention and the prior art are such that the claimed invention as a whole would have been obvious before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to a person having ordinary skill in the art to which the claimed invention pertains. Patentability shall not be negated by the manner in which the invention was made. Claim(s) 1-2, 11-15, & 18-20 is/are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over Disegni et al (US20210183442). Regarding claim 1, Disegni discloses a row decoder circuit(FIG 8; [0093]), comprising: at least one input node configured to receive at least one row selection signal(PX, sLX, sLY) and an output node configured for coupling to a word line of a memory device(WL-dx<0>); a first pull-down circuit coupled between the word line and a ground node at ground voltage(110 coupled between WL and ground), the first pull-down circuit configured to selectively couple the word line to the ground node in response to the at least one row selection signal being asserted110 coupling WL to ground in response to at least (PX, sLX, sLY)); a pull-up circuit coupled between the word line and a supply node that provides a selectable supply voltage (126R coupled between WL and Vdd), the pull-up circuit configured to selectively couple the word line to the supply node in response to a deselection signal being de-asserted(Vcomm<0>); an inverter circuit coupled between the supply node and a shifted ground node that provides a selectable reference voltage (212 between Vdd and 219 and provides shifted ground), the inverter circuit configured to receive as input a control signal from a control node and produce the deselection signal (INT to produce Vcomm<0>); a current generator circuit configured to source a biasing current to the control node(FIG 8; [0084-0085] discloses 200, 302, 304 configured to source biasing current I1 to INT); and a second pull-down circuit coupled between the control node and the ground node(202, 204, 206, 208 & 210 coupled between INT and ground), the second pull-down circuit configured to selectively couple the control node to the ground node in response to the at least one row selection signal being asserted(INT to ground in response to PX,Slx,sLY), wherein the second pull-down circuit comprises a first cascode n-channel transistor(202) , a second cascode n-channel transistor(206), and at least one selection transistor all having conductive channels arranged in series between the control node and the ground node( 208 & 210 having their conductive channels arrange in series between INT and ground), and wherein the at least one selection transistor is controlled by the at least one row selection signal(PX,sLX, sLY). However, Disegni does not disclose a cascode p-channel transistor. However, the particular placement of a cascode p-channel transistor device was held to be an obvious matter of design choice. Therefore, Disegni can easily replace the transistor (204) with the cascode p-channel transistor. Please see MPEP 2144.04. Regarding claim 2, Disegni discloses wherein: the first cascode n-channel transistor has a conductive channel arranged between the control node and a first cascode node(202 between INT and node end of 202); the cascode p-channel transistor has a conductive channel arranged between the first cascode node and a second cascode node(204 between end of 202 and end of 204); the second cascode n-channel transistor has a conductive channel arranged between the second cascode node and a third cascode node(206 between end of 204 and end of 206); and the at least one selection transistor has a conductive channel arranged between the third cascode node and the ground node (208 210 between end of 206 and ground). Regarding claim 11, Disegni discloses further comprising a memory control circuit configured to: during a read operation of the memory device(FIG 8; [0020 & 0083]), set the selectable supply voltage to a first supply value and set the selectable reference voltage to the ground voltage(shifted ground); and during a write operation of the memory device, set the selectable supply voltage to a second supply value that is higher than the first supply value, and set the selectable reference voltage to half of the second supply value(shifting Vdd, at a supply voltage e.g., equal to 1.8V in the reading step and 4.8V in writing step). Regarding claim 12, Disegni discloses wherein the first supply value is equal to 2 V and the second supply value is equal to 4.8 V (FIG 8; [0020 & 0083] discloses shifting Vdd, at a supply voltage e.g., equal to 1.8V in the reading step and 4.8V in writing step). Regarding claim 13, Disegni discloses a method of operating a row decoder circuit comprising at least one input node(FIG 8; [0098]; PX, sLX,sLY), an output node for a word line of a memory device(WL-dx<0>), a first pull-down circuit coupled between the word line and a ground node at ground voltage(110 coupled between WL and ground), a pull-up circuit coupled between the word line and a supply node(126R coupled between WL and Vdd), an inverter circuit coupled between the supply node and a shifted ground node (212 between Vdd and 219 and provides shifted ground), and a second pull-down circuit coupled between a control node and the ground node(202, 204, 206, 208 & 210 coupled between INT and ground), the second pull-down circuit comprising a first cascode n-channel transistor(202), a second cascode n-channel transistor(206), and at least one selection transistor all having conductive channels arranged in series between the control node and the ground node( 208 & 210 having their conductive channels arrange in series between INT and ground), the method comprising: receiving, by the at least one input node, at least one row selection signal; selectively coupling, by the first pull-down circuit, the word line to the ground node in response to the at least one row selection signal being asserted(10 coupling WL to ground in response to at least (PX, sLX, sLY); selectively coupling, by the pull-up circuit, the word line to the supply node in response to a deselection signal being de-asserted(Vcomm<0>); receiving, at an input of the inverter circuit, a control signal from the control node; producing, at an output of the inverter circuit, the deselection signal(INT to produce Vcomm<0>);; sourcing, by a current generator, a biasing current to the control node FIG 8; [0084-0085] discloses 200, 302, 304 configured to source biasing current I1 to INT); and selectively coupling, by the second pull-down circuit, the control node to the ground node in response to the at least one row selection signal being asserted(INT to ground in response to PX,Slx,sLY), the selectively coupling the control node to the ground node comprising controlling, by the at least one row selection signal, the at least one selection transistor(PX,sLX, sLY). However, Disegni does not disclose a cascode p-channel transistor. However, the particular placement of a cascode p-channel transistor device was held to be an obvious matter of design choice. Therefore, Disegni can easily replace the transistor (204) with the cascode p-channel transistor. Please see MPEP 2144.04. Regarding claim 14, Disegni discloses further comprising: providing, by the supply node, a selectable supply voltage; and providing, by the shifted ground node, a selectable reference voltage (FIG 8;212 between Vdd and 219 and provides shifted ground). Regarding claim 15, Disegni discloses further comprising a memory control circuit configured to: during a read operation of the memory device, set the selectable supply voltage to a first supply value and set the selectable reference voltage to the ground voltage; and during a write operation of the memory device, set the selectable supply voltage to a second supply value that is higher than the first supply value, and set the selectable reference voltage to half of the second supply value FIG 8; [0020 & 0083] discloses shifting Vdd, at a supply voltage e.g., equal to 1.8V in the reading step and 4.8V in writing step). Allowable Subject Matter Claims 18-20 are allowed. Claims 3-10 & 16-17 is objected to as being dependent upon a rejected base claim, but would be allowable if rewritten in independent form including all of the limitations of the base claim and any intervening claims. Conclusion The prior art made of record and not relied upon is considered pertinent to applicant's disclosure: Keeth et al (US7969810 FIG 2-3; discloses pulldown, pullup and inverters circuits). Behera et al (US20110063893 FIG 5; discloses WL, pull up and pull-down circuits). Lee et al (US7391670 FIG 3-5; discloses first and second signal generator and inverters). Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to MUNA A TECHANE whose telephone number is (571)272-7856. The examiner can normally be reached 571-272-7856. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Amir Zarabian can be reached at 571-272-1852. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /MUNA A TECHANE/Primary Examiner, Art Unit 2827
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Sep 12, 2024
Application Filed
Mar 04, 2026
Non-Final Rejection — §103 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12597459
APPARATUSES AND METHODS FOR ROW HAMMER COUNTER MAT
2y 5m to grant Granted Apr 07, 2026
Patent 12597452
MINIMUM MEMORY CLOCK ESTIMATION PROCEDURES
2y 5m to grant Granted Apr 07, 2026
Patent 12597461
MEMORY DEVICE
2y 5m to grant Granted Apr 07, 2026
Patent 12592271
APPARATUSES AND METHODS FOR INCREASED RELIABILITY ROW HAMMER COUNTS
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 31, 2026
Patent 12586613
MEMORY DEVICE INCLUDING A FILTERING CIRCUIT AND MEMORY SYSTEM INCLUDING THE MEMORY DEVICE AND FILTERING CIRCUIT
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 24, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

AI Strategy Recommendation

Get an AI-powered prosecution strategy using examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Powered by AI — typically takes 5-10 seconds

Prosecution Projections

1-2
Expected OA Rounds
93%
Grant Probability
99%
With Interview (+6.9%)
1y 10m
Median Time to Grant
Low
PTA Risk
Based on 545 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allow rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month