Prosecution Insights
Last updated: May 29, 2026
Application No. 18/883,443

SOLAR TRACKING SYSTEM SUPPORT DEVICES

Non-Final OA §102
Filed
Sep 12, 2024
Priority
Jan 17, 2023 — provisional 63/480,249 +1 more
Examiner
SOHN, SEUNG C
Art Unit
2878
Tech Center
2800 — Semiconductors & Electrical Systems
Assignee
Array Tech, Inc.
OA Round
1 (Non-Final)
87%
Grant Probability
Favorable
1-2
OA Rounds
8m
Est. Remaining
97%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 87% — above average
87%
Career Allowance Rate
714 granted / 820 resolved
+19.1% vs TC avg
Moderate +10% lift
Without
With
+10.2%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
2y 4m
Avg Prosecution
21 currently pending
Career history
836
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
3.4%
-36.6% vs TC avg
§103
33.0%
-7.0% vs TC avg
§102
54.3%
+14.3% vs TC avg
§112
3.8%
-36.2% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 820 resolved cases

Office Action

§102
DETAILED ACTION Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 102 The following is a quotation of the appropriate paragraphs of 35 U.S.C. 102 that form the basis for the rejections under this section made in this Office action: A person shall be entitled to a patent unless – (a)(2) the claimed invention was described in a patent issued under section 151, or in an application for patent published or deemed published under section 122(b), in which the patent or application, as the case may be, names another inventor and was effectively filed before the effective filing date of the claimed invention. Claim(s) 1-15 is/are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 102(a)(2) as being anticipated by Creasy et al. (Patent Pub. No. US 2022/0294386 A1). Regarding claim 1, Creasy et al. shows in Figs. 10-12 a mounting mechanism for securing components in a solar tracking system to a torque tube, the mounting mechanism comprising: an attachment structure (1000) comprising a support bracket (1100 or 1220) and a tube clamp (1005), wherein the tube clamp is selectively attachable to the support bracket and, when the support bracket and the tube clamp are in an attached configuration, the attachment structure is configured to be secured around a torque tube (1210); and a support device (Fig. 10A, 1010, i.e., spacers) positioned at least partially between the attachment structure and the torque tube, the support device being configured to reduce application of disproportionate force on the torque tube ([0075] – [0077]). Regarding claim 2, Creasy et al. shows in Figs. 10-12 the mounting mechanism of claim 1, wherein the tube clamp (1005) is a U-bolt that secures at each end to the support bracket. Regarding claim 3, Creasy et al. shows in Figs. 10-12 the mounting mechanism of claim 1, wherein the attachment structure (1000) is configured to be secured to a torque tube having a circular cross-sectional shape. Regarding claim 4, Creasy et al. shows in Figs. 10-12 the mounting mechanism of claim 1, wherein the attachment structure (1000) is configured to be secured to a torque tube having a polygonal cross-sectional shape. Regarding claim 5, Creasy et al. shows in Figs. 10-12 the mounting mechanism of claim 1, wherein the support bracket (1220) is configured to engage with a first exterior surface of the torque tube (1210) and the tube clamp (1005) is configured to engage with a second exterior surface of the torque tube. Regarding claim 6, Creasy et al. shows in Figs. 10-12 the mounting mechanism of claim 5, wherein the attachment structure does not engage with all exterior surfaces of the torque tube such that there are non-engaged surfaces of the torque tube. Regarding claim 7, Creasy et al. shows in Figs. 10-12 the mounting mechanism of claim 6, wherein the support device is configured to engage with at least one of the non-engaged surfaces of the torque tube. Regarding claim 8, Creasy et al. shows in Figs. 10-12 the mounting mechanism of claim 7, wherein the support device is a wedge comprising: a first surface that interfaces with the attachment structure; and a second surface configured to interface with the at least one non-engaged surface of the torque tube. Regarding claim 9, Creasy et al. shows in Figs. 10-12 the mounting mechanism of claim 7, wherein the support device (1010) is a spacer tube that is configured to deform to interface with the attachment structure and the at least one non-engaged surface of the torque tube. Regarding claim 10, Creasy et al. shows in Figs. 10-12 the mounting mechanism of claim 1, wherein the attachment structure comprises a sleeve (1010) that is configured to be positioned between the torque tube and at least one of the support bracket and tube clamp in the attached configuration. Regarding claim 11, Creasy et al. shows in Figs. 10-12 the mounting mechanism of claim 10, wherein the sleeve is configured to expand an area of pressure applied by the attachment structure on the torque tube. Regarding claim 12, Creasy et al. shows in Figs. 10-12 the mounting mechanism of claim 11, wherein the sleeve is configured to be positioned between the tube clamp (1005) and the torque tube (1210) such that the tube clamp lacks any direct contact with the torque tube. Regarding claim 13, Creasy et al. shows in Figs. 10-12 the mounting mechanism of claim 1, wherein the support device (1010) comprises a unibody device comprising a metal material, a steel material, an aluminum material, a plastic material, or a high-density polyethylene material. Regarding claim 14, Creasy et al. shows in Figs. 10-12 a mounting mechanism for securing components in a solar tracking system to a torque tube, the mounting mechanism comprising: an attachment structure (1000) comprising a support bracket (1100, 1220) and a tube clamp (1005), wherein the tube clamp is selectively attachable to the support bracket and, when the support bracket and the tube clamp are in an attached configuration, the attachment structure is configured to be secured around an exterior surface of a torque tube (1210); and a sleeve (1010) positioned at least partially between the attachment structure and the torque tube, the sleeve being configured to reduce application of disproportionate force on the torque tube by expanding an area of pressure applied by the attachment structure on the torque tube ([0075] – [0077]). Regarding claim 15, Creasy et al. shows in Figs. 10-12 the mounting mechanism of claim 14, wherein the sleeve (1010) is configured to be positioned between the tube clamp (10050 and the torque tube (1210) such that the tube clamp lacks any direct contact with the torque tube. Conclusion The prior art made of record and not relied upon is considered pertinent to applicant's disclosure: Schuknecht et al. (Patent Pub. No. US 2021/0359640 A1) discloses an extension flat top surface sized to be approximately a same width as the flexible member at a first end of the extension flat top surface proximate the mating surface and flared out as the extension flat top surface extends away from the flexible member. Kimble (Patent Pub. No. US 2020/0248930 A1) discloses a clamp for mounting a panel to a pipe carried by a support structure. Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to SEUNG C SOHN whose telephone number is (571)272-4123. The examiner can normally be reached M - F 8 - 5. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, GEORGIA EPPS can be reached at 571-272-2328. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /SEUNG C SOHN/Primary Examiner, Art Unit 2878
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Sep 12, 2024
Application Filed
Mar 26, 2026
Non-Final Rejection mailed — §102
May 19, 2026
Response Filed

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12641921
METHOD FOR FORMING STRUCTURE COMPRISING QUANTUM DOTS IN SURFACE CONTROL REGION, SURFACE CONTROL SUBSTRATE HAVING STRUCTURE FORMED TO COMPRISE QUANTUM DOTS, AND PHOTOELECTRIC ELEMENT USING SAME
3y 6m to grant Granted May 26, 2026
Patent 12638286
METHOD AND SYSTEM TO DETERMINE SURFACE SHAPES OF HELIOSTATS USING FULLY-SAMPLED STARLIGHT IMAGES
2y 2m to grant Granted May 26, 2026
Patent 12616969
SYSTEMS AND METHODS FOR INLINE, DUAL-STAGE SAMPLE DILUTION
2y 3m to grant Granted May 05, 2026
Patent 12618712
DIFFERENTIAL TRANSIMPEDANCE AMPLIFIER FROM A SINGLE PHOTODIODE
2y 6m to grant Granted May 05, 2026
Patent 12622084
IMAGE SENSOR AND IMAGE SENSOR MANUFACTURING METHOD
1y 8m to grant Granted May 05, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

Strategy Recommendation AI-generated — please review before filing

Get a prosecution strategy drawn from examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Typically takes 5-10 seconds — AI-generated, attorney review required before filing

Prosecution Projections

1-2
Expected OA Rounds
87%
Grant Probability
97%
With Interview (+10.2%)
2y 4m (~8m remaining)
Median Time to Grant
Low
PTA Risk
Based on 820 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allowance rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month