Prosecution Insights
Last updated: July 17, 2026
Application No. 18/883,602

LIGHTBAR AND BEACON WARNING LIGHT

Final Rejection §102
Filed
Sep 12, 2024
Priority
Apr 19, 2023 — provisional 63/497,153 +1 more
Examiner
HAN, JASON
Art Unit
2875
Tech Center
2800 — Semiconductors & Electrical Systems
Assignee
HiViz, LLC
OA Round
5 (Final)
68%
Grant Probability
Favorable
6-7
OA Rounds
6m
Est. Remaining
99%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 68% — above average
68%
Career Allowance Rate
681 granted / 999 resolved
At TC average
Strong +32% interview lift
Without
With
+31.9%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
2y 5m
Avg Prosecution
16 currently pending
Career history
1013
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
0.2%
-39.8% vs TC avg
§103
77.9%
+37.9% vs TC avg
§102
19.5%
-20.5% vs TC avg
§112
0.3%
-39.7% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 999 resolved cases

Office Action

§102
DETAILED ACTION Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . Response to Arguments Applicant's arguments filed March 11, 2026 have been fully considered but they are not persuasive. At present, the prior art to Pederson et al. (U.S. Patent 7,486,677 B2) remains commensurate to the scope of the claims as stated by the Applicant and as broadly interpreted by the Examiner [MPEP 2111], which is elucidated and expounded upon below. In response to Applicant’s amendment, “a lightbar comprising a plurality of light modules comprising a plurality of sections… wherein each section is configured to emit a single color of light,” Pederson remains commensurate in teaching a lightbar [note Figure 5] including a plurality of light modules having a plurality of sections [e.g., note Figure 11: (1138, 1280) – light modules/sections are considered broad/arbitrary]. Pederson specifically discloses, “Controller 50 may be designed to provide independent control of or between the N groups of LEDs… Although the LEDs 1234 may take on many colors, preferred colors include, but are not limited to red, amber, green, blue, and white. The LEDs may all take on a single color, such as blue, or the LEDs may take on combination of colors” [Column 6, Lines 28-29… Column 8, Lines 44-47 – underlined added for emphasis]. In response to Applicant’s amendment, “at least one controller area network (CAN) component configured to control the (at least one light module) plurality of light modules, wherein each light module of the plurality of light modules is configured to be controlled independently,” Pederson remains commensurate in disclosing, “Controller 50 may be designed to provide independent control of or between the N groups of LEDs” [Column 6, Lines 28-29]. Applicant should again be aware that the broadest reasonable interpretation has been applied to the claim limitations as argued, which have been addressed above. Claim Objections Claim 1 is objected to because of the following informalities: “at least one controller area network (CAN) component configured to control the at least one light module” is suggested to read as “at least one controller area network (CAN) component configured to control the plurality of light modules”. Appropriate correction is required. Claim 18 is objected to because of the following informalities: “wherein each light module of the plurality of light modules” is suggested to read as “wherein each of the one or more additional lights”. Appropriate correction is required. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 102 In the event the determination of the status of the application as subject to AIA 35 U.S.C. 102 and 103 (or as subject to pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 102 and 103) is incorrect, any correction of the statutory basis (i.e., changing from AIA to pre-AIA ) for the rejection will not be considered a new ground of rejection if the prior art relied upon, and the rationale supporting the rejection, would be the same under either status. The following is a quotation of the appropriate paragraphs of 35 U.S.C. 102 that form the basis for the rejections under this section made in this Office action: A person shall be entitled to a patent unless – (a)(1) the claimed invention was patented, described in a printed publication, or in public use, on sale, or otherwise available to the public before the effective filing date of the claimed invention. Claims 1-17 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 102(a)(1) as being anticipated by Pederson et al. (U.S. Patent 7,468,677 B2). With regards to Claim 1, Pederson discloses an emergency lighting system [Figures 1-18] including: A lightbar [note Figure 5] including a plurality of light modules [e.g., (1138, 1280)] including a plurality of sections having one or more light-emitting diodes (LEDs) [e.g., (1234, 1302) – light modules/sections are considered broad/arbitrary], wherein the at least one light module includes a common optical element [e.g., (1244, 1286) and/or circuit of Figures 1-3] configured to emit red, green, blue, amber, and white light, and wherein each individual LED of the one or more LEDs is configured to emit chromatically accurate colored light [Column 8, Lines 41-65], wherein each section is configured to emit a single color of light [note Figures 1-18 and Column 6, Lines 28-29… Column 8, Lines 44-47]; and At least one controller area network (CAN) component (50) configured to control the (at least one light module) plurality of light modules, wherein each light module of the plurality of light modules is configured to be controlled independently [Column 6, Lines 28-29]. With regards to Claim 2, Pederson discloses the plurality of light modules further configured to emit infrared (IR) light [Column 8, Lines 62-65]. With regards to Claim 3, Pederson discloses the common optical element including a five-color light-emitting diode (LED) circuit [Figures 1-3 and Column 8, Lines 41-65]. With regards to Claim 4, Pederson discloses the common optical element including five independent light emitting diodes (LEDs) [Figures 1-18 and Column 8, Lines 41-65]. With regards to Claim 5, Pederson discloses the common optical element including four pixels and a fifth primary color [as broadly interpreted, Figures 1-18 and Column 8, Lines 41-65]. With regards to Claim 6, Pederson discloses the common optical element is further configured to emit combinations of red, green, blue, amber, and white light [Figures 1-3 and Column 8, Lines 41-65]. With regards to Claim 7, Pederson discloses one or more optical sensors (1332) configure to measure ambient light and switch the lighting system to night mode when the ambient light falls below a predetermined threshold [Column 12, Lines 54-64]. With regards to Claim 8, Pederson discloses one or more additional lights, wherein the one or more additional lights [e.g., Figures 1-18: multiple light bars (1138, 1280) that are remote to each other] are controlled by the CAN component of the lighting system [e.g., (50)], and wherein the one or more additional lights are configured to emit red, green, blue, amber, and white light [Column 8, Lines 41-65]. With regards to Claim 9, Pederson discloses each light module [e.g., (1138, 1280)] includes two or more light elements [e.g., (1234)], wherein each light element of the two or more light elements includes a first primary warning light; a secondary primary warning; and a secondary primary warning light [as broadly interpreted, Column 8, Lines 41-65 = different colors, patterns, etc.]. With regards to Claim 10, Pederson discloses the lighting system further including: an exoskeleton [e.g., (1142, 1278)], wherein the plurality of light modules coupled to the exoskeleton; a first corner light module, configured to couple to the exoskeleton [e.g., left end cap (1148)]; and a second corner light module configured to couple to the exoskeleton [e.g., right end cap (1148)], wherein when the first corner light module and the second corner light module are coupled to the exoskeleton, an opening is formed [note Figures 1-18, as broadly interpreted]. With regards to Claim 11, Pederson discloses each light module of the plurality of light modules being configured to be controlled independent of another light module of the plurality of light modules [Column 8, Lines 41-65]. With regards to Claim 12, Pederson discloses the plurality of light modules being configured to emit a flash pattern [Column 8, Lines 41-65]. With regards to Claim 13, Pederson discloses each light module of the plurality of light modules includes two or more light elements [e.g., (1234)], wherein each light element of the two or more light elements includes a first primary warning light and a secondary warning light [as broadly interpreted, Column 8, Lines 41-65 = different colors, patterns, etc.]. With regards to Claim 14, Pederson discloses the secondary warning light element being configured to emit red, green, blue, amber, white light, infrared light, or a combination thereof [Column 8, Lines 41-65]. With regards to Claim 15, Pederson discloses the two or more lighting elements further including a secondary primary warning light [as broadly interpreted, Column 8, Lines 41-65 = different colors, patterns, etc.]. With regards to Claim 16, Pederson discloses the first primary warning light and the second primary warning light are configured to emit light independently [Column 8, Lines 41-65]. With regards to Claim 17, Pederson discloses the first primary warning light, the secondary primary warning light, the secondary warning light, or a combination thereof are configured to emit a flash pattern [Column 8, Lines 41-65]. Claims 18-20 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 102(a)(1) as being anticipated by Pederson et al. (U.S. Patent 7,468,677 B2). With regards to Claim 18, Pederson discloses an emergency lighting system [Figures 1-18] including: A lightbar [e.g., Figure 5: (1138, 1280)]; and One or more additional lights [e.g., as broadly interpreted, (1138, 1280)] having one or more light-emitting diodes (LEDs) [Column 8, Lines 41-65], wherein the one or more additional lights are controlled by the emergency lighting system [note Figures 1-18], and wherein the one or more additional lights include a common optical element [e.g., (1244, 1286) and/or circuit of Figures 1-3] configured to emit red, green, blue, amber, and white light, and wherein each individual LED of the one or more LEDs is configured to emit chromatically accurate colored light [Column 8, Lines 41-65]; and At least one controller area network (CAN) component (50) configured to control the one or more additional lights, wherein each of the one or more additional lights (instead of module of the plurality of light modules) is configured to be controlled independently [Column 6, Lines 28-29]. With regards to Claim 19, Pederson discloses the one or more additional lights are selected from headlights, undercarriage lights, scene lights, standalone lights separate from the emergency lighting system, or a combination thereof [Figures 1-18, as broadly interpreted]. With regards to Claim 20, Pederson discloses the common optical element further configured to emit combinations of red, green, blue, amber, and white light [Column 8, Lines 41-65 and Column 10, Lines 61-63]. Conclusion THIS ACTION IS MADE FINAL. Applicant is reminded of the extension of time policy as set forth in 37 CFR 1.136(a). A shortened statutory period for reply to this final action is set to expire THREE MONTHS from the mailing date of this action. In the event a first reply is filed within TWO MONTHS of the mailing date of this final action and the advisory action is not mailed until after the end of the THREE-MONTH shortened statutory period, then the shortened statutory period will expire on the date the advisory action is mailed, and any nonprovisional extension fee (37 CFR 1.17(a)) pursuant to 37 CFR 1.136(a) will be calculated from the mailing date of the advisory action. In no event, however, will the statutory period for reply expire later than SIX MONTHS from the mailing date of this final action. Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to JASON M HAN whose telephone number is (571)272-2207. The examiner can normally be reached 9AM-5PM EST M-F. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Abdulmajeed Aziz can be reached at 571-270-5046. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. Friday, April 10, 2026 /Jason M Han/Primary Examiner, Art Unit 2875
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Show 4 earlier events
Jun 06, 2025
Request for Continued Examination
Jun 09, 2025
Response after Non-Final Action
Jun 18, 2025
Final Rejection mailed — §102
Nov 18, 2025
Request for Continued Examination
Nov 22, 2025
Response after Non-Final Action
Dec 17, 2025
Non-Final Rejection mailed — §102
Mar 11, 2026
Response Filed
Apr 15, 2026
Final Rejection mailed — §102 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12668170
VEHICLE HAVING ROAD-SURFACE RENDERING FUNCTION
2y 5m to grant Granted Jun 30, 2026
Patent 12668176
LIGHT EMITTING DEVICE
1y 0m to grant Granted Jun 30, 2026
Patent 12655963
Linear Luminaire
1y 6m to grant Granted Jun 16, 2026
Patent 12638688
LASER REMOTE VIEWING AND OPERATING ROOM INTERACTIVE AUDIOVISUAL SYSTEM
1y 5m to grant Granted May 26, 2026
Patent 12624816
LIGHT SOURCE UNIT FOR VEHICULAR LIGHTING FIXTURE, AND VEHICULAR LIGHTING FIXTURE
1y 8m to grant Granted May 12, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

Strategy Recommendation AI-generated — please review before filing

Get a prosecution strategy drawn from examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Typically takes 5-10 seconds — AI-generated, attorney review required before filing

Prosecution Projections

6-7
Expected OA Rounds
68%
Grant Probability
99%
With Interview (+31.9%)
2y 5m (~6m remaining)
Median Time to Grant
High
PTA Risk
Based on 999 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allowance rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month