Prosecution Insights
Last updated: July 17, 2026
Application No. 18/884,378

SUBSTRATE PROCESSING MODULE AND SUBSTRATE PROCESSING METHOD

Non-Final OA §112
Filed
Sep 13, 2024
Priority
Sep 19, 2023 — JP 2023-150967
Examiner
KO, JASON Y
Art Unit
1711
Tech Center
1700 — Chemical & Materials Engineering
Assignee
Ebara Corporation
OA Round
1 (Non-Final)
76%
Grant Probability
Favorable
1-2
OA Rounds
1y 1m
Est. Remaining
92%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 76% — above average
76%
Career Allowance Rate
822 granted / 1089 resolved
+10.5% vs TC avg
Strong +17% interview lift
Without
With
+16.8%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
2y 11m
Avg Prosecution
17 currently pending
Career history
1107
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
0.4%
-39.6% vs TC avg
§103
79.5%
+39.5% vs TC avg
§102
7.2%
-32.8% vs TC avg
§112
7.7%
-32.3% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 1089 resolved cases

Office Action

§112
Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . Election/Restrictions Claims 9-16 are withdrawn from further consideration pursuant to 37 CFR 1.142(b) as being drawn to a nonelected invention, there being no allowable generic or linking claim. Election was made without traverse in the reply filed on 12/18/25. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 112 The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 112(b): (b) CONCLUSION.—The specification shall conclude with one or more claims particularly pointing out and distinctly claiming the subject matter which the inventor or a joint inventor regards as the invention. The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 112 (pre-AIA ), second paragraph: The specification shall conclude with one or more claims particularly pointing out and distinctly claiming the subject matter which the applicant regards as his invention. Claims 1-8 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 112(b) or 35 U.S.C. 112 (pre-AIA ), second paragraph, as being indefinite for failing to particularly point out and distinctly claim the subject matter which the inventor or a joint inventor (or for applications subject to pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 112, the applicant), regards as the invention. Re Claim 1, it is unclear what the metes and bounds of “having an open-cell foam structure” is. It is unclear whether this is foam or only has structure like that of foam. Re Claim 1, it is also unclear whether “a fine bubble” is literally a single bubble. It is further unclear whether the gas supply device also supplies the liquid, from the claim language “wherein the gas supply device… while supplying the liquid from the liquid supply device.” It is noted that this claim is not a method claim nor is a controller claimed to control what appears to be a process. It is also unclear how the gas supply generates a (single) fine bubble through the open cell foam structure, if it is configured to supply gas to the gap, and not directly to the foam structure. Claims 2-8 are rejected as they depend from Claim 1 without curing the deficiency. Claim 3 makes it more unclear with the phrasing “while continuously supplying the fine bubble”. It is unclear if one bubble is somehow maintained or more than one bubble is being supplied. Re Claim 6, it is unclear what the metes and bounds of “a grounded conductive resin” is, as conductive can be relative and subjective. Re Claim 7 it is unclear what the metes and bounds of “fine pores” is as fine doesn’t appear to have any sizing bounds. Further examination on the merits is precluded in light of the unascertainable claim scope. Conclusion Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to JASON Y KO whose telephone number is (571)270-7451. The examiner can normally be reached M-F: 9:00-6:00. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Michael Barr can be reached at 571-270-1414. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. JASON Y. KO Primary Examiner Art Unit 1711 /JASON Y KO/Primary Examiner, Art Unit 1711
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Sep 13, 2024
Application Filed
Apr 22, 2026
Non-Final Rejection mailed — §112 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12680214
DRUM-TYPE WASHING MACHINE
2y 5m to grant Granted Jul 14, 2026
Patent 12680210
CLOTHES HANDLING DEVICE
1y 11m to grant Granted Jul 14, 2026
Patent 12668912
LAUNDRY TREATING APPARATUS
2y 1m to grant Granted Jun 30, 2026
Patent 12648401
SUBSTRATE PROCESSING SYSTEM
1y 10m to grant Granted Jun 02, 2026
Patent 12642036
APPARATUS AND METHOD OF TREATING SUBSTRATE
3y 7m to grant Granted May 26, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

Strategy Recommendation AI-generated — please review before filing

Get a prosecution strategy drawn from examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Typically takes 5-10 seconds — AI-generated, attorney review required before filing

Prosecution Projections

1-2
Expected OA Rounds
76%
Grant Probability
92%
With Interview (+16.8%)
2y 11m (~1y 1m remaining)
Median Time to Grant
Low
PTA Risk
Based on 1089 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allowance rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month