Prosecution Insights
Last updated: July 17, 2026
Application No. 18/884,462

SEISMIC-RESISTANT JOINT STRUCTURE OF PC COLUMN AND PC BEAM USING STEEL BRACKET

Non-Final OA §112
Filed
Sep 13, 2024
Priority
Sep 15, 2023 — RE 10-2023-0123049
Examiner
BETIT, JACOB F
Art Unit
3633
Tech Center
3600 — Transportation & Electronic Commerce
Assignee
Samsung Electronics
OA Round
1 (Non-Final)
36%
Grant Probability
At Risk
1-2
OA Rounds
2y 3m
Est. Remaining
53%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants only 36% of cases
36%
Career Allowance Rate
60 granted / 166 resolved
-15.9% vs TC avg
Strong +17% interview lift
Without
With
+16.6%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
4y 1m
Avg Prosecution
71 currently pending
Career history
220
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
5.9%
-34.1% vs TC avg
§103
69.6%
+29.6% vs TC avg
§102
12.8%
-27.2% vs TC avg
§112
10.5%
-29.5% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 166 resolved cases

Office Action

§112
DETAILED ACTION Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 112 The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 112(b): (b) CONCLUSION.—The specification shall conclude with one or more claims particularly pointing out and distinctly claiming the subject matter which the inventor or a joint inventor regards as the invention. The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 112 (pre-AIA ), second paragraph: The specification shall conclude with one or more claims particularly pointing out and distinctly claiming the subject matter which the applicant regards as his invention. Claims 1-7 - are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 112(b) or 35 U.S.C. 112 (pre-AIA ), second paragraph, as being indefinite for failing to particularly point out and distinctly claim the subject matter which the inventor or a joint inventor (or for applications subject to pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 112, the applicant), regards as the invention. The claims are generally narrative and indefinite, failing to conform with current U.S. practice. They appear to be a literal translation into English from a foreign document and are replete with grammatical and idiomatic errors. The meets and bounds of the claim cannot be ascertained because of such errors and the multiple instances of confusing claim language. Additionally, claim 7 is confusing because “after” an upper reinforcement bar is arranged in the PC beam and concrete “is poured” in the PC beam are method-related limitations in claims drawn to a system. The claims are best understood as follows: 1. A seismic-resistant joint structure comprising: a PC column, a steel bracket composed of a pair of vertical side plates spaced apart from each other by a predetermined distance, a vertical coupling plate connecting end parts of the pair of vertical side plates to each other, the vertical coupling plate having a seating slot extending from an upper part thereof downward to a predetermined height, a horizontal seating plate having a longitudinal edge connected to a coupling plate upper edge , opposite seating plate end edges connecting upper edges of the pair of vertical side plates to each other, and a guide slot joining the seating slot, the vertical coupling plate protruding outward from the PC column, and a PC beam including a step positioned at a lower surface of an end of the PC beam adjacent the PC column, a lower reinforcement bar arranged in an inner lower part of the PC beam, wherein an end part of the lower reinforcement bar is exposed a predetermined length from the step and the exposed part is threaded, the step mounted on the steel bracket horizontal seating plate, and the PC beam lower reinforcement bar seated on a base of the seating slot, a nut threaded on the lower reinforcement bar threaded exposed part, the nut contacting a vertical coupling plate face. 2. The seismic-resistant joint structure of claim 1, wherein the step comprises a recess at a bottom of the end part of the PC beam. 3. The seismic-resistant joint structure of claim 1, wherein a shim plate is provided on an upper surface of the horizontal seating plate to absorb a vertical installation error. 4. The seismic-resistant joint structure of claim 1, wherein a shim plate is provided on a joint surface between the PC column and the PC beam at the upper part of the steel bracket to absorb a horizontal installation error. 5. The seismic-resistant joint structure of claim 1, wherein the seating slot comprises a two spaced apart seating slots, the guide slot comprises two spaced apart guide slots, and a vertical reinforcement plate is located between the guide slots to connect the horizontal seating plate with the vertical coupling plate. 6. The seismic-resistant joint structure of claim 1, wherein an interior of the steel bracket and a space between the steel bracket and the step are filled with non-shrinkage mortar so that the PC beam and steel bracket are integrated with each other. 7. The seismic-resistant joint structure of claim 1, wherein a coupler is embedded in the PC column above a position at which the steel bracket is installed in the column so that an end of the coupler is exposed, an upper reinforcement bar is arranged in an upper part of the PC beam so that an upper reinforcement bar end is coupled to the coupler, and concrete occupies the PC beam upper part. Allowable Subject Matter Claims 1-7 would be allowable if rewritten or amended to overcome the rejection(s) under 35 U.S.C. 112(b) or 35 U.S.C. 112 (pre-AIA ), 2nd paragraph, set forth in this Office action. Claim 1 is so allowed because while the best reference of record, GU (CN 117605171), teaches elements of the claimed as best understood joint, the GU, fig. 3, steel bracket does not comprise at least a horizontal seating plate having a longitudinal edge connected to a coupling plate upper edge (GU does not teach any horizontal seating plate), and the GU joint connects two RC beams, not the RC beam to the RC column. Conclusion Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to DANIEL J KENNY whose telephone number is (571)272-9951. The examiner can normally be reached Monday-Friday 8am-5pm. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Brian Glessner can be reached at (571)272-6754. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /DANIEL J KENNY/ Examiner, Art Unit 3633
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Sep 13, 2024
Application Filed
Mar 12, 2026
Non-Final Rejection mailed — §112
May 15, 2026
Response Filed

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 9339688
CORE EXERCISE APPARATUS
2y 12m to grant Granted May 17, 2016
Patent 9043275
DATA SYNCHRONIZATION USING STRING MATCHING
3y 0m to grant Granted May 26, 2015
Patent 9026539
RANKING SUPERVISED HASHING
2y 7m to grant Granted May 05, 2015
Patent 9020954
RANKING SUPERVISED HASHING
2y 7m to grant Granted Apr 28, 2015
Patent 8819054
INFORMATION PROCESSING APPARATUS, METHOD FOR PROCESSING INFORMATION, AND STORAGE MEDIUM
4y 4m to grant Granted Aug 26, 2014
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

Strategy Recommendation AI-generated — please review before filing

Get a prosecution strategy drawn from examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Typically takes 5-10 seconds — AI-generated, attorney review required before filing

Prosecution Projections

1-2
Expected OA Rounds
36%
Grant Probability
53%
With Interview (+16.6%)
4y 1m (~2y 3m remaining)
Median Time to Grant
Low
PTA Risk
Based on 166 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allowance rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month