Prosecution Insights
Last updated: April 19, 2026
Application No. 18/884,627

Method and Apparatus for Checking a Digital Key for a Vehicle

Non-Final OA §101§102§103
Filed
Sep 13, 2024
Examiner
BROWN, VERNAL U
Art Unit
2686
Tech Center
2600 — Communications
Assignee
BAYERISCHE MOTOREN WERKE AKTIENGESELLSCHAFT
OA Round
1 (Non-Final)
70%
Grant Probability
Favorable
1-2
OA Rounds
3y 2m
To Grant
80%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 70% — above average
70%
Career Allow Rate
817 granted / 1173 resolved
+7.7% vs TC avg
Moderate +10% lift
Without
With
+10.4%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
3y 2m
Avg Prosecution
49 currently pending
Career history
1222
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
3.4%
-36.6% vs TC avg
§103
52.7%
+12.7% vs TC avg
§102
27.5%
-12.5% vs TC avg
§112
8.0%
-32.0% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 1173 resolved cases

Office Action

§101 §102 §103
Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . DETAILED ACTION The application of Matthias Fink for Method and Apparatus for Checking a Digital Key for a Vehicle filed 9/13/24 has been examined. Claims 1-20 are pending. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 101 35 U.S.C. 101 reads as follows: Whoever invents or discovers any new and useful process, machine, manufacture, or composition of matter, or any new and useful improvement thereof, may obtain a patent therefor, subject to the conditions and requirements of this title. Regarding claims 1-2 and 13-14 the claimed invention is directed to an abstract idea without significantly more. The claim(s) recite(s) the limitation of determine a sequence of key identifiers and identify a first key identifier in the sequence of key identifiers, which represents a mental process that can be performed in the human mind with the aid of pen and paper. The claim(s) does/do not include additional elements that are sufficient to amount to significantly more than the judicial exception because the claimed limitations can be implemented using a general purpose computer. Regarding claim 20, the claimed invention is directed to an abstract idea without significantly more. The claim(s) recite(s) a process that can be performed in the human mind or perform by a human using pen and paper. This judicial exception is not integrated into a practical application because the steps of providing a sequence of keys identifiers and receiving a request to provide an attestation further represents a mental process. The claim(s) does/do not include additional elements that are sufficient to amount to significantly more than the judicial exception because the limitation of providing the requested attestation by wireless communication represents conventional and routine functions. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 102 The following is a quotation of the appropriate paragraphs of 35 U.S.C. 102 that form the basis for the rejections under this section made in this Office action: A person shall be entitled to a patent unless – (a)(1) the claimed invention was patented, described in a printed publication, or in public use, on sale, or otherwise available to the public before the effective filing date of the claimed invention. Claim(s) 1-10,13-18, and 20 is/are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 102(a)91) as being anticipated by Davoust et al. US Patent Application Publication 2016/0285636 Regarding claim 1, Davoust et al. teaches an apparatus for checking a digital target key of a device for a vehicle (112, paragraph 028,044), wherein the apparatus is configured to: determine a sequence of key identifiers for a corresponding sequence of digital keys that have been used to derive the target key (new key is generated by cascading the root and various key identifiers [paragraph 031-032],the generated key is used to access to a product or service by decrypting the generated key and the various identifiers used in generating the key is used to determine the functions to be performed [paragraph 053]); identify a first key identifier in the sequence of key identifiers for a corresponding first key in the sequence of keys that has not yet been verified for the vehicle [paragraph 034,053,68]) ; obtain an attestation for the identified key from the device (the newly generated key is compared to a stored key and verified, paragraph 053,078); verify the identified key on a basis of the obtained attestation and check the target key of the device on a basis of the verified identified key (paragraph 053,078). Regarding claim 2, Davoust et al. teaches the apparatus is configured to: verify the identified key on the basis of the obtained attestation and on a basis of a preceding key in the sequence of keys, the preceding key having a preceding key identifier in the sequence of key identifiers that is disposed directly in front of the identified key identifier in the sequence of key identifiers (paragraph 053,078). Regarding claim 3, Davoust et al. teaches the apparatus is configured to: identify the first key identifier in the sequence of key identifiers using a key memory, wherein the key memory indicates zero, one, or more verified keys, and key identifiers thereof, that have already been verified for the vehicle (key sequence identifier is stated as chain 1-key 1, chain 2-key 1, paragraph 033). Regarding claim 4, Davoust et al. teaches the apparatus is configured to: include the verified identified key with the identified key identifier in the key memory (the verified key include the root key, product key, and class key, paragraph 031, 53,78). ` Regarding claim 5, Davoust teaches the sequence of key identifiers has N key identifiers n=1, N, with N≥2, wherein an N-th key identifier is the key identifier for the target key of the device, and wherein the identified key identifier corresponds to an n₁-th key identifier in the sequence of key identifiers, where 1≤n₁<N (a chain of keys can be created using the key creation function and the root key, paragraph 033). Regarding claim 6, Davoust teaches the apparatus is configured to verify the key with the subsequent (n₁+1)-th key identifier in the sequence of key identifiers by using the attestation for the key with the subsequent (n₁+1)-th key identifier, and by using the previously verified key with the n₁-th key identifier (paragraph 033-035). Regarding claim 7, Davoust teaches, in order to finally verify the target key of the device as the key with the N-th key identifier, the apparatus is configured to, iteratively for n= n₁+1 to N: obtain the attestation for the key with the n-th key identifier; and verify the key with the n-th key identifier on a basis of the respective obtained attestation and by using a key with an (n-1)-th key identifier (paragraph 033-035). Regarding claim 8, Davoust et al. teaches binding the different identifiers via a cryptographic function (paragraph 032,034,053,078) and this is considered as cryptographically signing the key information and the decrypting of the key information (paragraph 028,053) represents the attestation for the identified key Regarding claim 9, Davoust et al. teaches the sequence of key identifiers and/or the attestation are stored on the device and are obtained by the vehicle via a wireless communication connection (device 112 stores the key and represent a vehicular device, paragraph 044,053). Regarding claim 10, the sequence of key identifiers indicates a version of each of the individual keys used in the corresponding sequence of keys (chain of keys, paragraph 033), wherein one or more keys in the corresponding sequence of keys have a version from multiple different possible versions (paragraph 035), and wherein the apparatus is configured to: identify the first key identifier in the sequence of key identifiers for a corresponding first key in the sequence of keys that has not yet been verified for the vehicle with the respective indicated version (paragraph 053,078). Regarding claim 13, Davoust teaches a method for checking a digital target key of a device for a vehicle, the method comprising: determining a sequence of key identifiers for a corresponding sequence of digital keys that have been used to derive the target key (new key is generated by cascading the root and various key identifiers [paragraph 031-032],the generated key is used to access to a product or service by decrypting the generated key and the various identifiers used in generating the key is used to determine the functions to be performed [paragraph 053]); identifying a first key identifier in the sequence of key identifiers for a corresponding first key in the sequence of keys that has not yet been verified for the vehicle (paragraph 053,68); obtaining an attestation for the identified key from the device (the newly generated key is compared to a stored key and verified, paragraph 053,078); verifying the identified key on a basis of the obtained attestation and checking the target key of the device on a basis of the verified identified key (paragraph 053,078). Regarding claim 14, Davoust teaches verifying the identified key on the basis of the obtained attestation and on a basis of a preceding key in the sequence of keys, the preceding key having a preceding key identifier in the sequence of key identifiers that is disposed directly in front of the identified key identifier in the sequence of key identifiers (paragraph 053,078). Regarding claim 15, Davoust et al. teaches the apparatus is configured to: identify the first key identifier in the sequence of key identifiers using a key memory, wherein the key memory indicates zero, one, or more verified keys, and key identifiers thereof, that have already been verified for the vehicle (key sequence identifier is stated as chain 1-key 1, chain 2-key 1, paragraph 033). Regarding claim 16, Davoust et al. teaches the apparatus is configured to: include the verified identified key with the identified key identifier in the key memory (the verified key include the root key, product key, and class key, paragraph 031, 53,78). Regarding claim 17, Davoust et al. teaches binding the different identifiers via a cryptographic function (paragraph 032,034,053,078) and this is considered as cryptographically signing the key information and the decrypting of the key information (paragraph 028,053) represents the attestation for the identified key Regarding claim 18, Davoust teaches the sequence of key identifiers indicates a version of each of the individual keys used in the corresponding sequence of keys (chain of keys, paragraph 033), wherein one or more keys in the corresponding sequence of keys have a version from multiple different possible versions (paragraph 035), and wherein the apparatus is configured to: identify the first key identifier in the sequence of key identifiers for a corresponding first key in the sequence of keys that has not yet been verified for the vehicle with the respective indicated version (paragraph 053,078). Regarding claim 20, Davoust teaches a method for checking a digital target key of a device for a vehicle, the method comprising: providing a sequence of key identifiers for a corresponding sequence of keys that have been used to derive the target key (new key is generated by cascading the root and various key identifiers [paragraph 031-032],the generated key is used to access to a product or service by decrypting the generated key and the various identifiers used in generating the key is used to determine the functions to be performed [paragraph 053]); receiving a request to provide an attestation for a key in the sequence of keys that has been identified by a key identifier in the sequence of key identifiers and providing the requested attestation via a wireless communication connection (the newly generated key is compared to a stored key and verified, paragraph 053,078). Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 103 The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 103 which forms the basis for all obviousness rejections set forth in this Office action: A patent for a claimed invention may not be obtained, notwithstanding that the claimed invention is not identically disclosed as set forth in section 102, if the differences between the claimed invention and the prior art are such that the claimed invention as a whole would have been obvious before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to a person having ordinary skill in the art to which the claimed invention pertains. Patentability shall not be negated by the manner in which the invention was made. Claim(s) 12 is/are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over Davoust et al. US Patent Application Publication 20160285636 in view of Kwon et al. US Patent Application Publication 20230147516. Regarding claim 12, Davoust et al is silent on teaching each of the individual keys of the sequence of keys is designed according to the Car Connectivity Consortium (CCC) key standard. Kwon in an analogous art teaches designing keys according to the Car Connectivity Consortium (CCC) key standard (paragraph 068), It would have been obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art at the time of the invention to modify the system of Davoust as disclosed by Kwon because such modification represents an improvement over the system Davoust by standardizing the key identifiers and further allowing devices to be easily paired. Allowable Subject Matter Claim 11 is objected to as being dependent upon a rejected base claim, but would be allowable if rewritten in independent form including all of the limitations of the base claim and any intervening claims. Regarding claim 11, the prior art of record is silent on teaching use the identified key identifier to determine a subarea of a memory area of the device in which the attestation for the identified key is stored; and read the attestation for the identified key from the determined subarea. Conclusion Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to VERNAL U BROWN whose telephone number is (571)272-3060. The examiner can normally be reached Monday-Friday, 8AM-5PM, EST. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Steven Lim can be reached at 571 270 1210. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /VERNAL U BROWN/ Primary Examiner, Art Unit 2686
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Sep 13, 2024
Application Filed
Mar 21, 2026
Non-Final Rejection — §101, §102, §103 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12604195
SYSTEM AND METHOD FOR DUAL LAYER AUDIO DEVICE PAIRING AUTHENTICATION WITH VOICE PATTERN RECOGNITION
2y 5m to grant Granted Apr 14, 2026
Patent 12585899
AUTOMATED SECURE ALLOCATION OF SCANNING DEVICES
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 24, 2026
Patent 12566833
CRITICAL AREA SAFETY DEVICE AND METHODS OF USE
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 03, 2026
Patent 12555424
DATACENTER DETECTION AND AUTHENTICATION TECHNIQUES
2y 5m to grant Granted Feb 17, 2026
Patent 12540491
ELECTRONIC LOCK SYSTEM
2y 5m to grant Granted Feb 03, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

AI Strategy Recommendation

Get an AI-powered prosecution strategy using examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Powered by AI — typically takes 5-10 seconds

Prosecution Projections

1-2
Expected OA Rounds
70%
Grant Probability
80%
With Interview (+10.4%)
3y 2m
Median Time to Grant
Low
PTA Risk
Based on 1173 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allow rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month