Prosecution Insights
Last updated: April 19, 2026
Application No. 18/884,743

DATA CARRIER IN CARD FORM AND METHOD FOR PRODUCING A DATA CARRIER IN CARD FORM

Non-Final OA §103
Filed
Sep 13, 2024
Examiner
MAI, THIEN T
Art Unit
2876
Tech Center
2800 — Semiconductors & Electrical Systems
Assignee
Giesecke+Devrient Epayments GmbH
OA Round
3 (Non-Final)
59%
Grant Probability
Moderate
3-4
OA Rounds
3y 3m
To Grant
80%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 59% of resolved cases
59%
Career Allow Rate
397 granted / 678 resolved
-9.4% vs TC avg
Strong +21% interview lift
Without
With
+21.4%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
3y 3m
Avg Prosecution
41 currently pending
Career history
719
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
8.0%
-32.0% vs TC avg
§103
52.5%
+12.5% vs TC avg
§102
20.1%
-19.9% vs TC avg
§112
15.2%
-24.8% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 678 resolved cases

Office Action

§103
Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . Continued Examination Under 37 CFR 1.114 A request for continued examination under 37 CFR 1.114, including the fee set forth in 37 CFR 1.17(e), was filed in this application after final rejection. Since this application is eligible for continued examination under 37 CFR 1.114, and the fee set forth in 37 CFR 1.17(e) has been timely paid, the finality of the previous Office action has been withdrawn pursuant to 37 CFR 1.114. Applicant's submission filed on 1/08/2026 has been entered. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 103 The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 103 which forms the basis for all obviousness rejections set forth in this Office action: A patent for a claimed invention may not be obtained, notwithstanding that the claimed invention is not identically disclosed as set forth in section 102, if the differences between the claimed invention and the prior art are such that the claimed invention as a whole would have been obvious before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to a person having ordinary skill in the art to which the claimed invention pertains. Patentability shall not be negated by the manner in which the invention was made. Claim(s) 1-4, 7-17 is/are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over Waumans (US 20120223516) Waumans discloses 1. A data carrier in card form, comprising: a card body (1), which has a first card surface, a second card surface and a peripheral border (Fig. 1-5); with the peripheral border connecting the first card surface to the second card surface (Fig. 1-7); with the peripheral border having a first border portion with at least one cutout (52, 52’); with the at least one cutout being at least partially filled with a color material, in order in this way to provide a color effect for the first border portion (Fig. 5) wherein the at least one cutout is defined by a lowered part and two raised parts; wherein the two raised parts are adjacent to the lowered part; wherein the color material is recessed within the lowered part and set back between the two raised parts,. PNG media_image1.png 224 453 media_image1.png Greyscale Waumans is silent to the color material being protected from mechanical influences by the at least one cutout However, Waumans also mentions that the holes have desired size and shape (par. 33) and polymeric material (i.e. plastic) are used in the card and [0047] The inks may be aqueous based or solvent based inks, but are preferably inks curable by UV radiation or e-beam, since they speed up the production of security document precursors. Radiation curable inks are generally cured by polymerization or crosslinking in a much shorter time than the drying time of aqueous based or solvent based inks. Therefore, it would have been obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art before the effective date the invention was made that the ink color materials are protected from light mechanical influence due to a hole shape, card and lamination material, and the cured ink. It would have also been obvious that since the Waumans does not mention of any mechanical influence leading to failure of the ink and card, the card and the ink would also be protected from mechanical influences 2.1, wherein the at least one cutout is provided in the form of a depression in the first border portion, extending perpendicularly to the first card surface and/or the second card surface (Waumans, Figs. 1-5). 3.1, wherein the at least one cutout is provided in the form of a depression in the first border portion, extending from the first card surface to the second card surface (Waumans, Figs. 1-6). 4.1, wherein the at least one cutout is provided in the form of an elongate depression in the first border portion, extending parallel to the first card surface and/or to the second card surface (Waumans, Fig. 1-5). 5.1, wherein the at least one cutout has in a cross section parallel to the first card surface and/or to the second card surface a curved form, a rectangular form or a triangular form; and/or wherein the at least one cutout has a cross section perpendicular to the first card surface and/or to the second card surface a curved form, a rectangular form or a triangular form (Waumans, Fig. 1-5). 7.1, wherein the first border portion has a multiplicity of cutouts, which are arranged at predetermined distances from one another along the first border portion; wherein each cutout of the multiplicity of cutouts is at least partially filled with a color material, in order in this way to provide a color effect for the first border portion (Waumans describes that the holes of different shapes and sizes can be partially filled, i.e. with only one color, and the fill the rest of the hole with another color (also partially) as seen in Fig. 2. Also as seen in Fig. 2, the holes do not need to be completely filled). 8.1, wherein the peripheral border has the first border portion, a second border portion, a third border portion and a fourth border portion; wherein the first border portion lies opposite the third border portion with respect to the card body; wherein the second border portion lies opposite the fourth border portion with respect to the card body (Waumans, Figs. 1-5). 9.8, wherein the at least one cutout extends along the first border portion, the second border portion, the third border portion and the fourth border portion (Waumans, Fig. 1, 5). 10.1, wherein the color material is an ultraviolet-radiation-curing printing ink (Waumans, par. 56, 90). 11. The use of a data carrier in card form as claimed in claim 1, wherein said use includes an identification document, an identity document, a chip card or a payment card (Waumans, Fig. 1). Re claim 12, see discussion regarding claims above. 13.12, with the provision of the at least one cutout in the first border portion of the peripheral border taking place during a punching out of the card body (Waumans, par. 78: by drilling; punching would have been an obvious extension). 14.12, wherein the provision of the at least one cutout in the first border portion of the peripheral border takes place by means of a laser process or a milling process (Waumans, par. 75-78). 15.12, wherein the introduction of the color material into the at least one cutout takes place by means of a printing process or a spraying process (Waumans, abstract, par. 13-15, 49, 90). 16.1, wherein the two raised parts and the lowered part are formed by delimitations of the at least one cutout, the delimitations being laterally raised with respect to the color material (as seen in Fig. 5 of Waumans above, the two raised parts and the lowered part are seen to be formed by delimitations of the at least one cutout, and the delimitations being laterally raised/formed to hold color materials therein. 17.16, wherein the delimitations are configured to provide a haptic effect felt by a user of the data carrier (Waumans, par. 17, 33, 42, the holes may have desired shape and size and desired colors, which would cause a haptic effect felt by a user). Response to Arguments Applicant's arguments have been fully considered but they are not persuasive. Applicant argues that the cited references including Waumans do not disclose the claimed invention as amended. However, upon review, it is determined that Waumans still meet the current claim limitations. It is noticed that the current claims do to define what are considered influences. Thus, as discussed above, Waumans also mentions that the holes have desired size and shape (par. 33) and polymeric material (i.e. plastic) are used in the card and [0047] The inks may be aqueous based or solvent based inks, but are preferably inks curable by UV radiation or e-beam, since they speed up the production of security document precursors. Radiation curable inks are generally cured by polymerization or crosslinking in a much shorter time than the drying time of aqueous based or solvent based inks. Applicant further argues that Waumans it is unclear how the holes 52' in Fig. 5 of Waumans as being partially (i.e., only in part, or to a limited extent) filled with colored matter 22 because the new perimeter edge 54' is colinear with the colored matter 22. It is respectfully submitted that Waumans describes that the holes of different shapes and sizes can be partially filled, i.e. with only one color, and the fill the rest of the hole with another color (also partially) as seen in Fig. 2. Also as seen in Fig. 2, the holes do not need to be completely filled, i.e. by leaving a small percentage unfilled. For these reasons, the previous rejection(s) is/are respectfully maintained. Conclusion Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to THIEN T. MAI whose telephone number is (571)272-8283. The examiner can normally be reached on M-F, 8-5pm. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner' s supervisor, Steve S. Paik can be reached at (571)272-2404. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of an application may be obtained from the Patent Application Information Retrieval (PAIR) system. Status information for published applications may be obtained from either Private PAIR or Public PAIR. Status information for unpublished applications is available through Private PAIR only. For more information about the PAIR system, see http://pair-direct.uspto.gov. Should you have questions on access to the Private PAIR system, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative or access to the automated information system, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /Thien T Mai/ Primary Examiner, Art Unit 2887
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Sep 13, 2024
Application Filed
Jun 07, 2025
Non-Final Rejection — §103
Jul 22, 2025
Interview Requested
Aug 05, 2025
Applicant Interview (Telephonic)
Aug 05, 2025
Examiner Interview Summary
Sep 05, 2025
Response Filed
Oct 17, 2025
Final Rejection — §103
Dec 19, 2025
Response after Non-Final Action
Jan 08, 2026
Request for Continued Examination
Jan 24, 2026
Response after Non-Final Action
Mar 08, 2026
Non-Final Rejection — §103 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12602963
CASH HANDLING APPARATUS
2y 5m to grant Granted Apr 14, 2026
Patent 12596897
4D Indicium Mapping for Moving Objects
2y 5m to grant Granted Apr 07, 2026
Patent 12518123
ASSEMBLY FOR SHIELDING AT LEAST ONE RADIO-FREQUENCY CHIP AND METHOD FOR MAKING THE SAME
2y 5m to grant Granted Jan 06, 2026
Patent 12511511
DETECTION DEVICE
2y 5m to grant Granted Dec 30, 2025
Patent 12505325
TRANSACTION CARD WITH MULTIPLE ORIENTATIONS
2y 5m to grant Granted Dec 23, 2025
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

AI Strategy Recommendation

Get an AI-powered prosecution strategy using examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Powered by AI — typically takes 5-10 seconds

Prosecution Projections

3-4
Expected OA Rounds
59%
Grant Probability
80%
With Interview (+21.4%)
3y 3m
Median Time to Grant
High
PTA Risk
Based on 678 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allow rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month